Hydrothermal Preparation of TiO2/Graphite Nanosheets Composites and Its Effect on Electrothermal Behavior

Abstract

Nowadays, carbon materials are supposed to replace the resistance wire made of metal alloy to be the next generation of heat-generating materials due to their excellent electrical conductivity and corrosion resistance. In this study, TiO₂/graphite nanosheets (GNs) composite was prepared by chemical exfoliation and hydrothermal methods. XRD, FTIR, and Raman spectra confirm TiO₂ particles are on the surface of GNs. SEM photographs show TiO₂ nanoparticles covering the surface of the GNs uniformly. We used TiO₂/GNs and sodium silicate to produce the electrothermal film coated on the glass. As compared to raw GNs, the heating rate and maximum temperature have greatly improved. In order to find the reasons for the improvement, the BET and zeta potential of TiO₂/GNs were tested, and we found that the enhancement of the surface area and the dispersion to the composite by TiO₂ particles and sodium silicate make the distribution of GNs more uniform.

1. Introduction

Electrothermal material is an important area of research for alternative energy as it deals with conductive materials, which convert electricity into heat. Traditional electrothermal materials, such as Ni–Cr (nichrome) or Fe–Cr–Al (Kanthal), because of their heavy weight, rigidity, brittleness, and intolerance to acids or bases, have many restrictions on the application. Therefore, it is necessary to find a material that has the potential to replace them in the future.

Graphene is a two-dimensional carbon material, which has been characterized by excellent electrical properties [1], faster and more efficient heating [2,3], and uniform temperature distribution [4]. More importantly, compared with metal material, graphene is lighter, so it can show the same performance with lighter quality. Moreover, graphene powder disperses easily in an organic solvent, so it can be compounded with other materials to form thin films. Because of the above advantages, graphene is often used as an electrothermal film material.

Despite the above-mentioned merits, graphene as a single component cannot satisfy all demands for many different applications [5]. Until now, different modification and doping strategies have been applied to graphene. Inducing oxygen functional groups at the graphene surface, such as nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), carboxylic, carbonyl, and hydroxyl groups, can improve the solution dispersibility of graphene [6]. Heteroatom doping can greatly influence the charge-storage capacity of graphene because of the modification of the electronic structure and surface energy [7]. It is generally used in supercapacitors. As in the case of the electrothermal material, simply adding graphene to the polymer coating cannot get the ideal heat material, it is necessary to modify the graphene to improve the performance.

Graphite nanosheets (GNs), which are composed of two-dimension graphite layers, have similar properties to graphite, such as lower density, increased charge carrier mobility, excellent electrical conductivity, etc. [8]. Besides, compared with the preparation methods of graphene, the preparation of GNs is easier, safer, and friendlier to the environment [9]. Therefore, in this study, GNs is used to prepare electrothermal composite material. Chen developed a novel wearable heater based on flexible, stretchable graphite nanoplates and polyurethane (GNP/PU) nanocomposite films, which can generate heat uniformly under the safe voltage of 5–24 V to achieve rapid heating and cooling rate of 25 °C/min and 13 °C/min, respectively [10].

Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) is commonly an inorganic filler used in coating. It has been proved that TiO₂ could enhance the thermal stability of the polymer [11], improve the mechanical properties, and endow the materials with high fire resistance [12]. Taking these into account, TiO₂-modified graphite nanosheets might be an efficient electrothermal material that has good thermal stability and fire performance. In addition, the stack of the graphite nanosheets is prevented by the tightly anchored nanoparticles, which is beneficial for the uniform dispersion of graphite in a matrix [13,14,15].

Hence, we modified graphite nanosheets by TiO₂ to study the synergistic electrothermal effects on the properties’ enhancement of sodium silicate composite film. We prepared GNs by chemical exfoliation of graphite powder, and modified GNs with TiO₂ by the hydrothermal method. The preparation method is easy to operate, and the experiment has good results. It is anticipated that loading TiO₂ nanoparticles on the graphite nanosheets could prevent the graphite nanosheets from stacking and reduce the resistivity compared with directly adding TiO₂. This work attempts to provide a promising electrothermal material so as to enhance the graphite nanosheets’ electrothermal behavior.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Graphite powder (200 mesh) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Titanium oxysulfate (TiOSO₄) was obtained from Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Research Institute (Tianjin, China). Potassium permanganate (KMnO₄, AP), ethanol, sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄, 98%), sodium silicate (Na₂SiO₃, 30% aq.), silicone oil, magnesium oxide (MgO), sodium hydrate (NaOH), and antimonous oxide (Sb₂O₃) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Beijing, China).

2.2. Preparation of TiO₂/Graphite Nanosheets Composite

Graphite nanosheets (GNs) were prepared by chemical exfoliation of graphite powder. As a typical preparation of GNs, 10 g natural graphite was soaked in 60 mL H₂SO₄ and stirred for 10 min, then added 3.5 g KMnO₄ and 10 mL acetic acid to the mixture. We kept stirring for 1 h and washed graphite several times with deionized water until the solution was neutral. Next, the product was dried in an oven at 70 °C, then, heated in air atmosphere at 900 °C for 30 s to obtain expanded graphite (EG). The EG was suspended in 70% ethanol. After 40 min mixing by ultrasonic processing under the power of 900 W, GNs were obtained.

The TiO₂/graphite nanosheets composite was obtained via the hydrothermal method with modifications. First, we dissolved 0.5 g TiOSO₄·2H₂O in 80 mL deionized water, stirring until the solution became completely transparent. Then, we added 0.5 g GNs and 15 mL 1 M HCL to the solution, and it was mixed by ultrasonic processing for 30 min. The resultant solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave and treated at different temperatures for 12 h. The temperature was set separately at 100, 120 and 140 °C. It was expected that there would be a suitable temperature for the preparation of TiO₂ so that that sample could be used in the later steps. The obtained precipitates were washed with deionized water and ethanol and dried at 65 °C.

Heating films were prepared with sodium silicate. Briefly, 2.8 g TiO₂/GNs (containing TiO₂ 0.8 g) and other additives (Table 1 [16]), except for sodium silicate, were added into deionized water and stirred for 10 min. Then, sodium silicate was added into the mixed suspension and stirred until a homogeneous mixture was obtained. At last, the blend was cast into a 150 × 75 × 0.08 mm³ film with a 5 mm thick glass plate and dried at room temperature to form flat membranes. Following the above-mentioned methods, films were prepared and subjected to a measurement of electrothermal properties. In the case of the GNs film, the same amount of GNs and TiO₂ was added, and the above methods were identical.

2.3. Characterization

The phase composition of the product was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Model DX-2700, Haoyuan, China) with Cu Kα (λ = 0.15418 nm). The scanning range of this device was from 10° to 90°, and the scanning speed was 4°/min. The Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, Gloucestershire, UK) used He-Ne laser (λ = 532 nm) with the power of 20 KW/cm². The Raman spectrometer was used to distinguish ordered and disordered crystal structures of GNs. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET, Beishide 3H-2000PS1, Beijing, China) measurement could identify the surface area of the sample. The scanning electron microscope (SEM, MERLIN Compact, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) is equipped with EDS, which was used to identify the micromorphology and element composition. The Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer measurement (Nicolet 380, MA, USA) was used to identify the functional groups of the sample. The zeta potential (Malvern Nano ZS90, Malvern, UK) has the ability to measure the dispersivity of the sample.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the TiO₂/GNs Composite

In acidic, high-temperature conditions, TiOSO₄ is first hydrolyzed to form H₂TiO₃. The chemical equation is expressed as:

${\mathrm{TiOSO}}_4+2{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O} \to { \mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{TiO}}_3+{ \mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{SO}}_4$

H₂TiO₃ is insoluble in water. In order to reduce the nuclear energy, H₂TiO₃ crystals will be preferred crystallization on the GNs surface. In the presence of strong acid, the dehydration reaction takes place among the hydroxyl groups of H₂TiO₃ and GNs to form Ti–O–C bonds.

Raman spectroscopy is generally used to characterize the crystal quality of carbonaceous materials. Figure 1 shows the Raman spectra of GNs and the samples in different hydrothermal temperatures. Raman spectra of TiO₂/GNs composite have strong Raman characteristic peaks at 148 cm⁻¹ (E_g(1)), 397 cm⁻¹ (B_1g), 516 cm⁻¹ (A_1g), and 638 cm⁻¹ (E_g(2)), respectively, which are attributed to a pure anatase phase of TiO₂ [17]. As for bare GNs, the Raman spectra are characterized by the D and G bands, arising from one breathing mode of k-point photons of A_1g symmetry and the zone center E_g(2) mode, respectively [18]. After the TiO₂ nanoparticles were loaded on graphite nanosheets, the peaks of TiO₂ appeared on the Raman spectra of all the temperature samples, which revealed the successful fabrication of TiO₂. We can see that the 140 °C sample had the highest peak of TiO₂, it seems that the temperature was more suitable for the preparation of TiO₂. Thus, the 140 °C sample was used in the subsequent experiments and tests. For convenience, the temperature was left out in the following text and the composite was named TiO₂/GNs. Furthermore, the G band of TiO₂/graphite nanosheets composite shows a shift to higher wave numbers while the 2D band shifted to lower wave numbers, compared to that of raw GNs, which is attributed to the effect of doping and the reduced number of sheets, indicating that the re-stack of GNs sheets was controlled. That may be because the TiO₂ particles obtained by the hydrothermal method are able to reduce the stack of GNs.

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) profiles (see Figure 2) describe a continuous dispersion of TiO₂ nanoparticles over graphite nanosheets. For pure GNs, it has a uniform surface morphology revealing a rather smooth surface (Figure 2a). Compared to pure graphite nanosheet, there are some TiO₂ nanoparticles existing on the surface (Figure 2b). In enlarged Figure 2b, a thin flocculent film can be observed, and EDS report (Figure 2d) shows the red point area with the elements of titanium and oxygen, which implies that the film may be made up of TiO₂. Table 2 shows the relative content of different elements in the EDS report in detail. The film consists of a number of small particles, and we speculate that those large particles may be made up of small particles due to the concentration of the reaction at the defect.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the as-prepared GNs and TiO₂/GNs composite are given in Figure 3. The diffraction peaks of GNs are similar to graphite, which has a strong peak near 26° corresponding to the (002) plane of graphite. The TiO₂/GNs composite sample shows TiO₂ exists as an anatase phase indicated with peaks at 25.3°, 37.8°, 48.0°, and 55.1°. This result supports the assumption that the white particles in the SEM photograph are TiO₂.

To determine the specific surface area of the composite nanomaterial, N₂ adsorption/desorption measurements and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis method were used. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms for GNs and TiO₂/GNs composite are shown in Figure 4. The overall shape of the TiO₂/GNs indicates a material with mesoporous and macroporous characteristics. It can be calculated by BET analysis method based on Figure 4 that the surface area of the TiO₂/GNs composite increased to 58.9 m²·g⁻¹, which is higher than blank TiO₂ and pure GNs. The BET surface area of GNs is calculated to be 20 m²·g⁻¹. The surface area of TiO₂/GNs composite is almost three times as much as GNs. Furthermore, the BET surface area of GNs is higher than raw graphite particles, which is 8.9 m²·g⁻¹. However, it is still lower than the theoretical specific surface area (2630 m²·g⁻¹), possibly due to the incomplete exfoliation of graphite oxide and the agglomerations of graphene layers during the reduction process [19].

FTIR spectra of raw GNs and TiO₂/GNs composite are shown in Figure 5. For convenience, the two curves were put together in one figure to be compared. It can be seen that after the thermal reduction of the graphite nanosheets, the oxidation groups on the surface have been completely removed, only a few carbon-hydrogen bonds can be detected. The broader absorption band below 1000 cm⁻¹ in TiO₂/GNs composite corresponds to the Ti–O–Ti vibration. A small absorption peak was observed at 1630 cm⁻¹, probably due to the small amount of absorbed water on the surface of TiO₂.

Through the zeta potential test, we found that TiO₂/GNs composite and raw GNs have different dispersing capacities in sodium silicate solutions. Figure 6 shows the zeta potential of raw GNs and TiO₂/GNs composite in 1% sodium silicate solution, which is because the high concentration of sodium silicate causes the conductivity of the solution to increase greatly, resulting in an unmeasurable zeta point. The zeta potential of TiO₂/GNs composite has an absolute value of about 30, higher than that of raw GNs about 15. The absolute value of zeta potential is an important indicator of dispersion stability, the larger the number, the better the dispersion [20]. This improvement in dispersing ability is due to the dispersion of TiO₂ in sodium silicate. The reason for the wider distribution of GNs is that the amount of TiO₂ attached to the graphite nanosheets is different.

3.2. Electrothermal Application of TiO₂/GNs Composite

Electrical conductivity, heating rate, and maximum temperature rise are the three main parameters of electrothermal properties. Figure 7 displays time-dependent temperature changes of the TiO₂/GNs films and raw GNs films at 15 V DC voltage, and the current is about 5 A. The film is heated at room temperature. The curve clearly shows the heating rate and maximum temperature rise of TiO₂/GNs film are obviously higher than GNs film. In the maximum temperature rise region (500–600 s), the heat gain by electric power is equal to the heat loss by radiation and convection based on the conservation law of energy, which is in thermal equilibrium. The maximum temperature rise of TiO₂/GNs film is about 20 °C higher than GNs film. Table 3 is a summary of other electrothermal films about the driving voltage, saturated temperature, and heating speed.

The improvement of electrothermal property is due to the decrease of sheet resistance. Using the four-probe method to measure the resistivity of the films at the same amount of GNs added, the resistivity of TiO₂/GNs film is about 0.071 Ω·cm, far below the GNs film, which is about 0.135 Ω·cm. The synergistic effects of GNs and TiO₂ are proposed to be the possible reason for reducing the resistivity of sodium silicate materials. We speculate that the synergistic effects mainly show in three respects: The TiO₂ nanoparticles loaded on GNs prevent the GNs from re-stacking and result in good dispersion. The presence of TiO₂ increases the specific surface area, which makes GNs from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. Sodium silicate plays a role in the dispersion of TiO₂/GNs. Figure 8 shows that when the dispersion capacity of the GNs is increased, the arrangement between the sheet and sheet tends to be more uniform, and more overlap points cause the resistance to decrease. Figure 9 shows the SEM images of GNs film and TiO₂/GNs film. Figure 9a shows that the GNs have a very obvious tendency to agglomerate, and each layer is not well lapped. This structure cannot show the excellent conductivity of GNs. Figure 9b shows that the TiO₂/GNs film has a very uniform distribution, which supports that the arrangement of GNs becomes uniform and further makes an impact on the resistance.

4. Conclusions

In this work, TiO₂/GNs composite material was successfully synthesized by chemical exfoliation and hydrothermal reduction methods, and its structure was confirmed by XRD, FTIR, and Raman spectra. SEM results show that TiO₂ nanoparticles uniformly cover the surface of the GNs. The TiO₂/GNs composite was added to sodium silicate to make electrothermal film, and compared with the raw GNs, the heating rate and the maximum temperature were obviously improved. The BET and zeta potential tests prove that the improvement of the performance is due to the enhancement of the specific surface area of TiO₂ and the dispersion to the composite by TiO₂ particles and sodium silicate. When the dispersion capacity of the GNs is increased, the arrangement between the sheets tends to be more uniform, and more overlap points cause the resistance to decrease. Therefore, TiO₂/GNs composite is able to enhance the electrothermal behavior of raw GNs. The new composite material in the field of electric heating has great potential applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.W.; methodology, W.T.; formal analysis, B.Z.; investigation, W.T. and H.W.; data curation, S.K. and H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, C.W. and B.Z.; writing—review and editing, C.W.; visualization, S.K. and C.Q.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures and Tables

Generate image description

Figure 1. Raman spectra of GNs and the TiO2/GNs samples in different hydrothermal temperatures.

Generate image description

Figure 2. SEM images of (a) GNs, (b) TiO2/GNs composite, (c) partial enlarged drawing of (b), and (d) EDS report at red point in (c).

Generate image description

Figure 3. XRD patterns of GNs and TiO2/GNs composite.

Generate image description

Figure 4. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms for GNs, TiO2/GNs.

Generate image description

Figure 5. FTIR spectra of raw GNs and TiO2/GNs.

Generate image description

Figure 6. Zeta potential of GNs and TiO2/GNs.

Generate image description

Figure 7. Heating curves of TiO2/GNs and GNs films.

Generate image description

Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the effect of dispersion on resistance.

Generate image description

Figure 9. SEM images of (a) GNs film, (b) TiO2/GNs film.

Table 1

Other additives of electrothermal GNs film.

Composition	Sodium Silicate	Water	Silicone Oil	MgO	NaOH	Sb2O3
Contains	65 g	60 g	0.3 g	0.3 g	0.1 g	0.2 g

Table 2

The relative content of different elements in the EDS report.

Element	Weight %	Atomic %	Net Int.	Error %	K-Ratio
C	63.30	74.44	3109.42	4.74	0.4307
O	25.06	22.13	526.64	10.90	0.0316
Ti	11.63	3.43	1275.51	2.46	0.0955

Table 3

Summary of other electrothermal films.

Sample	Voltage/Power	Max Temperature (°C)	Speed	Reference
Graphene (GE)/UC film	30 V	199	-	[21]
GNSs/MWCNTs/CB	3 V	175	17.5 °C/s	[2]
laser-induced graphene/PI flim	-	270	27 °C/s	[3]
water-dispersible graphene films	10 V	147	11.8 °C/s	[8]
GNP/PU film	5–24 V	-	25 °C/min	[10]
GNP films	3–5 V	-	25–65 °C/min	[22]
graphene sheets/NFC membrane	2000 W·m−2	60	20 °C/min	[5]
RGO/MnFe2O4 paper	0.35 A	100.2	6.68 °C/s	[23]
F-N Co-doped laser reduced GO	9 V	365	385.33 °C/s	[24]
polyurethane/graphene	22 V	75	-	[25]

References

1. Abbas, Q.; Shinde, P.A.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Alami, A.H.; Mirzaeian, M.; Yadav, A.; Olabi, A.G. Graphene Synthesis Techniques and Environmental Applications. Materials; 2022; 15, 7804. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15217804] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36363396]

2. Liao, Y.; Tian, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhao, M.; Qian, J.; Wang, X. Screen-printed high-performance flexible electrothermal films based on three-dimensional intercalation graphene nanosheets/MWCNT/carbon black composite. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2020; 12, pp. 48077-48083. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c10924] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32975925]

3. Yang, F.; Yu, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, B.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y. High-Performance Electrothermal Film Based on Laser-Induced Graphene. Adv. Eng. Mater.; 2022; 24, 2200368. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adem.202200368]

4. Shao, C.; Li, X.; Lin, S.; Zhuo, B.; Yang, S.; Yuan, Q. Characterization of nanocellulose–graphene electric heating membranes prepared via ultrasonic dispersion. J. Mater. Sci.; 2020; 55, pp. 421-437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04006-5]

5. Li, X.; Shao, C.; Zhuo, B.; Yang, S.; Zhu, Z.; Su, C.; Yuan, Q. The use of nanofibrillated cellulose to fabricate a homogeneous and flexible graphene-based electric heating membrane. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.; 2019; 139, pp. 1103-1116. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.081]

6. Shao, C.; Zhu, Z.; Su, C.; Yang, S.; Yuan, Q. Thin Electric Heating Membrane Constructed with a Three-Dimensional Nanofibrillated Cellulose–Graphene–Graphene Oxide System. Materials; 2018; 11, 1727. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11091727]

7. Ren, K.; Liu, Z.; Wei, T.; Fan, Z. Recent developments of transition metal compounds-carbon hybrid electrodes for high energy/power supercapacitors. Nano-Micro Lett.; 2021; 13, pp. 237-268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00642-2]

8. Wu, J.; Wang, H.; Qiu, J.; Shao, J.; Zhang, K.; Yan, L. Electrochemical exfoliation for few-layer graphene in molybdate aqueous solution and its application for fast electrothermal film. Prog. Nat. Sci.; 2020; 30, pp. 312-320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2020.05.007]

9. Ma, J.; Jiang, H.; Hu, S.; Song, J.; Zhang, X.; Hu, T.; Ye, H.; Xu, L. Ultraviolet light crosslinked graphene/multi-walled carbon nanotube hybrid films for highly robust, efficient and flexible electrothermal heaters. Compos. Sci. Technol.; 2021; 221, 109183. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109183]

10. Chen, W.; Yang, S.; Wang, H.; Yang, K.; Wu, X.; Gao, F.; Zheng, B.; Qian, K.; Yao, W.; Zhang, T. et al. Flexible, stretchable, waterproof (IPX7) electro-thermal films based on graphite nanoplatelets & polyurethane nanocomposites for wearable heaters. Chem. Eng. J.; 2022; 431, 133990.

11. Jayanthi, S.; Shenbagavalli, S.; Muthuvinayagam, M.; Sundaresan, B. Effect of nano TiO2 on the thransport, structural and thermal properties of PEMA-NaI solid polymer electrolytes for energy storage devices. Mater. Sci. Eng. B; 2022; 285, 115942. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115942]

12. Yang, X.; Zhang, M.J.; Min, Y.; Xu, M.; Mei, Z.; Liang, J.; Hu, J.; Yuan, S.; Xiao, S.; Duan, Y. et al. Controllable formation of (004)-orientated Nb: TiO2 for high-performance transparent conductive oxide thin films with tunable near-infrared transmittance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2017; 9, pp. 29021-29029. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b06792] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28791868]

13. Kang, S.; Hwang, J. rGO-wrapped Ag-doped TiO2 nanofibers for photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible light. J. Clean. Prod.; 2022; 374, 134022. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134022]

14. Niu, R.; Han, R.; Tang, S.; Zhu, J. Microwave selective heating ultrafast construction of coral-like TiO2-MXene/graphene hybrid architectures for high-performance lithium-ion battery. J. Power Sources; 2022; 542, 231738. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231738]

15. Chen, X.; Zhan, Y.; Sun, A.; Feng, Q.; Yang, W.; Dong, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y. Anchoring the TiO2@ crumpled graphene oxide core–shell sphere onto electrospun polymer fibrous membrane for the fast separation of multi-component pollutant-oil–water emulsion. Sep. Purif. Technol.; 2022; 298, 121605. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121605]

16. Boaz, P.T.; Livonia, M. Glass Sheets Carrying Water Based Paint 1. U.S. Patent; No. 5582920, 10 December 1996.

17. Ansari, A.R.; Ansari, S.A.; Parveen, N.; Ansari, M.O.; Osman, Z. Silver nanoparticles decorated on the surface of reduced graphene oxide coated titanium oxide nanocomposite for enhanced electrochemical supercapacitance performance. Ionics; 2022; 28, pp. 4793-4804. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11581-022-04685-2]

18. Qin, Z.; Wang, C.; Ma, Y.; Zhong, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, P. ZIF-67/GNs derived Co3O4/GNs multilayer flower and porous structure as an efficient electromagnetic wave absorbing material for excellent absorbing properties. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2022; 575, 151789. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151789]

19. Fu, H.; Cai, H.; Gray, K.A. Metal oxide encapsulated by 3D graphene oxide creates a nanocomposite with enhanced organic adsorption in aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater.; 2023; 444, 130340. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130340]

20. Taheri, M.; Maaref, S.; Kantzas, A.; Bryant, S.; Trudel, S. Improving the colloidal stability of PEGylated BaTiO3 nanoparticles with surfactants. Chem. Phys.; 2023; 564, 111701. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2022.111701]

21. Gao, P.; Liu, W.; Yang, J. Using “intercalation bridging” to effectively improve the electrothermal properties of sheet graphite/ultrafine carbon powder conductive paste for screen printing. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.; 2022; 33, pp. 17599-17618. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-08625-8]

22. Jiang, H.; Wang, H.; Liu, G.; Su, Z.; Wu, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, W. Light-weight, flexible, low-voltage electro-thermal film using graphite nanoplatelets for wearable/smart electronics and deicing devices. J. Alloys Compd.; 2017; 699, pp. 1049-1056. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.435]

23. Peng, T.; Si, Y.; Qian, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, X.; Zhu, C.; Hong, X. Reduced graphene oxide/MnFe2O4 nanocomposite papers for fast electrical heating and microwave absorption. Appl. Surf. Sci.; 2023; 613, 156001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.156001]

24. Tembei, S.A.; Ali, M.K.; Hessein, A.; El-Bab, A.M.F.; Abd El-Moneim, A. High-performance flexible electrothermal Joule heaters from laser reduced FN Co-doped graphene oxide with extended Sp2 networks. FlatChem; 2022; 36, 100437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2022.100437]

25. Owji, E.; Ostovari, F.; Keshavarz, A. Electro-thermal properties and characterization of the flexible polyurethane-graphene nanocomposite films. Phys. Scr.; 2022; 97, 105704. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac8c05]