Green Processing of Neat Poly(lactic acid) Using

Full text

Turn on search term navigation

1. Introduction

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is a synthetic aliphatic polyester produced by the polymerization of lactic acid derived from renewable resources (plants as feedstock), such as agricultural waste and by-products, as a cheap and abundant source of lignocellulosic biomass [1]. It is extensively tested both at academic and industrial levels due to non-toxic components for its manufacturing as well as its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and/or compostability [2,3,4,5,6]. The emerging bio-based applications of materials coupled with the need of society to replace conventional plastics, as well as regulations that restrict plastic usage, encourage growth in the number of PLA-based products available to consumers. Several companies are working intensively towards the development of new and/or improved PLA types (Table 1).

NatureWorks is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of different types of PLA-based resins, with a capacity of 150,000 t/y [7]. TotalEnergies Corbion has a global marketing and sales network. Its facility in Rayong (Thailand) operates a capacity of 75,000 t/y [8]. This company has successfully produced PLA resin from alternative, second-generation feedstock, obtaining the same properties as current commercially available PLA resins. Evonik is a global leader company in PLA biomaterials for medical implants [9], while ThyssenKrupp helps the bioplastics’ PLA achieve its breakthrough in the food industry as beverage bottles [10]. With the rising demand, the costs of bioplastics have been continuously decreasing over the last decade [11]. Novel biorefinery concepts and policies concerning lactic acid production from agricultural waste and by-products, as well as newly developed processing methods that increased production and broader PLA commercial applications, should further decrease the price of PLA [7]. The current market price of PLA is 1.4–3.16 USD/kg [12,13].

Although PLA has good properties, including processability, its mass production and utilization are currently restricted due to low melt strength, slow crystallization, poor thermal resistance, brittleness, and/or sensitivity to moisture [2,5,14,15]. PLA treatment using CO₂ under elevated pressure was suggested to improve material properties, endow material with new functionalities, or prepare material for a specific application [16,17]. Both dense (d-CO₂) and supercritical CO₂ (sc-CO₂) were successfully used for PLA processing. Sc-CO₂ is at conditions above its critical pressure (P_c) of 7.38 MPa and critical temperature (T_c) of 31.1 °C [18,19,20,21], whereas d-CO₂ is at conditions close to but below its P_c and/or T_c. The main advantage of d-CO₂ and sc-CO₂ utilization in PLA processing is that they are an alternative green media to environmentally harmful solvents currently used in the industry. D-CO₂ and sc-CO₂ are inexpensive, non-flammable, chemically inert with zero ozone-depletion potential, and generally regarded as having a safe status (GRAS) [4,5,18,20]. The versatility of CO₂ under an elevated pressure for PLA processing is due to its special properties such as tunable solubility and diffusivity, which significantly increase with the change of CO₂ from gas, liquid, and dense to a supercritical state [5]. Sc-CO₂ can be dissolved in amorphous and semicrystalline polymers resulting in polymer plasticization, i.e., the increased segmental and chain mobility lowering their resistance to rotation, decrease in crystallization temperature (T_cr), and decrease in glass transition temperature (T_g) [2,5,15,18,19,22]. The Lewis acid–base interaction between CO₂ and carbonyl groups as well as the C–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonding facilitate the interaction of PLA with CO₂ under elevated pressure [11,23,24]. When compressed, small changes in the process pressure and temperature can significantly influence the CO₂ interaction with PLA. Moreover, due to the fact that CO₂ is a gas under ambient conditions, its removal from the final product is easy, complete, and performed by venting, which avoids the post-processing for solvent removal [18].

The growing interest in d-CO₂ and sc-CO₂-assisted methods as environmentally friendly technologies for PLA processing and the preparation of advanced materials is evident from the available patents and scientific literature published in the last decade. The patent survey by Espacenet for PLA processing using CO₂ under elevated pressure, for the period 2012–2022, revealed 65 patents (Figure 1a). To include all processing techniques of interest for the present manuscript as accurately as possible, the keywords used were “PLA” or “poly(lactic acid)” and “supercritical CO₂” or “high-pressure CO₂” or “dense CO₂” and “drying” or “foaming” or “impregnation” or “particle generation”. The highest number of patents (over 70%) as well as the fastest-growing trend was observed in the domain of PLA foaming. The graph presented in Figure 1b was based on a scientific literature survey of the Web of Science database for the same period and the same keywords. It showed a similar trend with a gradual increase in the number of publications by the year 2017, after which the number of publications rapidly increased. Among 211 reports, 76% are in the domain of foaming, confirming the high scientific interest in PLA processing into foams, which appears to be both increasingly attractive and the most promising new material option.

Several review articles from the available literature have suggested PLA processing using CO₂ under elevated pressure [2,5,16,17,19,25,26] and, as mentioned, almost all of them are focused on foaming. However, the present article is the first systematic review of the process mechanisms, fundamental properties, and up-to-date technologies of drying, foaming, impregnation, and particle generation applied for the processing of PLA using d-CO₂ and sc-CO₂. This article also discusses the effect of process parameters on the application of the obtained PLA materials. A short overview for processes of interest and properties of the obtained advanced PLA materials is given in Table 2. Generally, this review is intended to stimulate further research on the application of green processing media (d-CO₂ and sc-CO₂) for polymer science and the engineering of advanced materials.

2. Drying of PLA Solutions, Gels, and Emulsions

Solvent-free porous PLA material can be obtained by the drying of solutions, gels, or emulsions by the removal of a liquid solvent. This can be performed either by evaporative drying, freeze-drying, or supercritical drying. Evaporative (air) drying at an ambient pressure results in xerogels with collapsed pores as a consequence of the vapor–liquid surface tension forming inside the wet matrix [27,28], while freeze-drying is time-consuming and may lead to a solvent crystal growth during freezing and, consequently, pore growth that develops stress inside pores and leads to fractures [29,30]. Supercritical drying techniques overcome the problems encountered with traditional drying methods and preserve the high and open porosity of wet materials in a dry form [31]. To decrease the vapor–liquid surface tension, increase the rate of drying, or remove potentially toxic solvents, the replacement of a solvent contained in a polymer matrix with a non-solvent (such as ethanol or acetone) prior to the supercritical drying is suggested [32]. Supercritical drying allows the solvent or non-solvent extraction from a wet material through the formation of a supercritical mixture between CO₂ and liquid present in the polymer matrix. The supercritical mixture shows no surface tension and can be easily eliminated by system venting [33]. The rate of solvent/non-solvent removal from a polymer matrix depends on numerous parameters [34]. Two of the most important are solvent/non-solvent solubility in sc-CO₂ and diffusivity in a polymer matrix. For instance, dioxane has high solubility, and it was reported that the amount of remaining dioxane in the PLA scaffold was 263 ppm after 4 h and only 5 ppm after 6 h of sc-CO₂ drying [35].

2.1. Methods for Sc-CO₂-Assisted Drying of Wet PLA

The drying of wet PLA materials using sc-CO₂ can be roughly divided into static and dynamic methods. The static method implies the contact of wet material and sc-CO₂ at constant pressure and temperature without the introduction of “fresh” CO₂ into the vessel. Reverchon et al. [35] applied static sc-CO₂-drying for the preparation of PLLA scaffolds and aerogels with a porosity of 95% at 20 MPa and 33 °C. They reported that an increase in pressure increases the sc-CO₂ solvation power, enabling a faster solvent elimination, and that an increase in operating time from 4 to 8 h significantly affects the solvent (dioxane) elimination, pinpointing 6 h as the optimal time [35]. Dynamic drying implies applying a constant flow of “fresh” sc-CO₂ through the vessel (Figure 2). It was reported that dynamic supercritical drying is beneficial to the environment and is thriftier in energy consumption compared with the classical freeze-drying process. Various life cycle assessment methodologies indicated the possible reduction in the environmental impact, as between 50 and 90% were attributed to the supercritical process [36]. A combination of a static and dynamic supercritical drying (SCD) of wet PLA was also reported, where after a certain time in the discontinuous mode, sc-CO₂ enriched with the solvent/non-solvent of a gel is replaced with fresh sc-CO₂ by applying its continuous flow through the vessel for a certain time [37,38,39]. This combined process can be run for several cycles, while at the same time maintaining a constant process pressure and temperature.

There are several variations on supercritical techniques for drying wet PLA reported in the literature such as supercritical drying combined with thermally induced phase separation (STIPS) [36], supercritical freeze extraction process (SFEP) [40,41], supercritical drying combined with particle leaching (SPL) [35,39], and supercritical emulsion extraction (SEE) [42,43,44] (Table 3).

Thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) implies cooling the PLA solution to a temperature, where the solvent and PLA are not miscible to trigger the phase separation. It is one of the most effective processes for the production of a material with tunable biodegradability, mechanical properties, porosity, pore diameters, and pores’ interconnectivity [36]. The morphology of PLA material can be controlled by adjusting the TIPS process conditions such as the polymer concentration and molecular weight, the selection of solvent, the cooling rate, and temperature during solvent replacement [36,37]. The STIPS process refers to TIPS, after which the supercritical drying is applied. Salerno and Domingo [33] modulated the material porosity from 95 to 90% and the specific surface area from 69 to 95 m²/g by increasing the PLA concentration in a solution with ethyl lactate from 3 to 5.5 wt%, which was followed by solvent replacement (first with water and afterward with ethanol) prior to STIPS. This increase in concentration also increased the mean fiber diameter of aerogels from 100 to 200 nm and a pore volume fraction from 0.044 to 0.055 cm³/g. Solvent selection is an additional parameter that significantly affects the morphology of the final PLA material [17], as can be observed in Figure 2. The choice of a solvent is primarily important for the complete dissolution of a polymer. Selection of an appropriate solvent for PLA is relatively limited and eliminates most of the more environmentally friendly solvents that have good solubility in sc-CO₂ used in the drying process (such as ethanol). It was previously reported that among the tested solvents (ethyl lactate, tetrahydrofuran, chloroform, dioxane, and dichloromethane), the highest PLA material porosity (73%) was obtained using chloroform [37]. Differences between obtained materials can be explained by the differences in the individual Hansen solubility parameters, the viscosity of the obtained solutions, and the rate of solvent evaporation [45]. Although miscibility between PLA and chloroform or dichloromethane is high, dichloromethane has Hansen parameters most similar to PLA. Moreover, the PLA solution with chloroform had a higher viscosity compared with the solution with dichloromethane [45]. Finally, dichloromethane evaporates faster compared with chloroform. In addition, it was previously reported that PLA-dichloromethane solutions can lead to the polymer chain entanglement and the physicochemical interaction between the solvent and PLA. An additional parameter to control the sc-CO₂ drying of polymers with low T_g is the polymer crystallinity degree [46]. Namely, PLA properties vary significantly, depending on its isomers’ (poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA), poly(D-lactic acid) (PDLA), and poly(D,L-lactic acid) (PDLLA)) content [47,48,49,50]. PLA with L-content higher than 93% tends to crystallize, while PLA with L-content in the range from 50 to 93% is amorphous [2,51,52]. Bueno et al. [46] tested the gelation of semicrystalline PLLA and amorphous PDLLA using the solvents chloroform + methanol or DMSO + ethanol, TIPS, ethanol as a replacement solvent, and sc-CO₂ drying at 40 °C and 10 MPa for 1 h [46]. They concluded that the STIPS resulted in the structural collapse of amorphous polymers in all cases, while a minimum crystallinity degree of 25% combined with a second non-solvent exchange with liquid CO₂ before the drying process allowed the preparation of aerogels with a surface area up to 85 m²/g. It was also reported that the PLLA concentration of about 5 wt% and cooling temperature below −80 °C favored the formation of open pore structures with the scaffold’s surface connectivity, while an increase in the PLLA molecular weight induced a significant decrease in the pores’ diameter, from 10 to 1 μm [36].

The SFEP process combines the advantages of TIPS [39,53,54] and immediate supercritical drying. The process was successfully used to generate 3D PLA scaffolds characterized by a micrometric cellular structure and wrinkled pores’ walls, with porosity ranging between 93% (for 5% w/w PLLA scaffold) and 84% (for 20% w/w PLLA scaffold) [40]. It was reported that an increase in PLA concentration from 5 to 20% w/w led to a decrease in the mean pore size (from about 15 to 3 μm) and pore size distribution.

The SPL process implies particle leaching from a material that was initially dried using the supercritical fluid. The SPL technique helps in achieving a fine control over the porous scaffold architecture network by the selection of the appropriate concentration and the size of the particulate porogen [39]. Reverchon et al. [35] prepared PLA scaffolds with elevated porosities to 97.2%, surface areas of 45 m²/g, and good mechanical properties (compressive modulus up to 81 kPa) in the formation of a PLA gel loaded with fructose, sc-CO₂ drying, and washing with water to eliminate the porogen. It was also reported that the combination of TIPS with SPL techniques can improve the preparation of PLA scaffolds [39]. This three-step process aimed to induce an additional interconnected network and create the nanometer-scale fibrous architecture combined with large pores of the PLA matrix.

Table 3

Literature reports on the drying of PLA solutions, gels, and emulsions using sc-CO₂ (2012–2022).

Material	Producer	Method	Regime	P(MPa)	T(°C)	t(h)	Material Properties	Material Application	Lit
PLLA	PuracBiochem	STIPS	Static	19	39	1.5	ε = 90–95%S = 70–95 m²/g	Tissue engineering scaffolds	[33]
2500HP4060D	Natureworks	STIPS	Dynamic	10	40	1	S = 29–85 m²/g	Pharmaceutical	[46]
PLLA	Purac Biochem	STIPSSPL	Static	19	39	1.5	ε = 79–98%D_ave = 171–440 μmS = 29–39 m²/g	Tissue engineering scaffolds	[39]
PLLA with ibuprofen	Boehringer Ingelheim	SFEP	Static	10–20	35–55	4	ε = 78–89%R_aver = 8–30 μmD_aver = 8–30 μm	Tissue engineering scaffolds	[40]
PLLA	Boehringer Ingelheim	SFEP	Static	10–25	35	4	ε = 84–93%D_aver = 3–15 μm	Tissue engineering scaffolds	[41]
3052D	NatureWorks	SCDSTIPS	Static and dynamic	15, 19	35, 39	2.7	ρ = 337–468 kg/m³ε = 63–73%D_aver = 0.08–5.1 μm	Wastewater treatment	[37,38]
PLLA	synthetized	STIPS	Dynamic	15	35	4	ρ = 75–310 kg/m³ε = 75–94% D_aver = 3–138 μm	Tissue engineering scaffolds	[36]
203H	Evonik Industries	SEE	Dynamic	8	38	n.i.a.	R_aver = 0.2–0.9 μm	Bactericidal nanocomposites	[42]
708H	Evonik Industries	SEE	Dynamic	8	38	n.i.a.	R_aver = 1.5 μm	Nutraceutical formulation	[43]
203H	Evonik Industries	SEE	Dynamic	8	39	n.i.a.	R_aver = 0.4–3 μm	Growth factor delivery	[44]

P—pressure; T—temperature; t—time; ε—porosity; S—surface area; D_aver—average pore diameter; R_aver—particle mean size; ρ—bulk density; n.i.a.—no information available.

The SEE technique is a continuous process that involves the countercurrent extraction of a solvent in the oily phase of the emulsion (the emulsion is introduced at the top of the column while sc-CO₂ is introduced from the bottom). A refrigerated separator is located downstream of the column for the collection of the oily phase. Another separator is located at the bottom of the column to collect the particles suspended in water [43,44]. During the evaporation or extraction of the emulsion, the oily droplets dispersed in the water external phase are hardened, leading to the formation of micro/nanoparticles [44]. This method, reported for the preparation of micro and nano-carriers, has been described as excellent given its mild processing conditions and easier solvent removal. SEE assured an improved batch-to-batch reproducibility and accurate carrier size control thanks to a fixed droplet shrinkage without aggregation phenomena, lower solvent residue, and controlled drug encapsulation efficiency [44]. SEE at 8 MPa and 45 °C in a packed column was used for the efficient elimination of the benzyl alcohol residue from lipid nanoparticles [42]. When the nanosuspension was treated with sc-CO₂, fast and complete elimination of the residual benzyl alcohol led to particle disaggregation and the formation of nanoparticles with a strongly reduced mean diameter. The SEE technology enabled the preparation of PLA carriers with the advanced control of their size and morphology. It was also reported that carriers with different mean sizes from 0.4 to 3 μm can be obtained by the removal of ethyl acetate from emulsions at 8 MPa and 39 °C [44].

Based on the results presented in the available literature on the drying of wet PLA, it can be concluded that the selection of an sc-CO₂ drying regime, operating pressure, time, selection of PLA type, solvent for PLA, PLA/solvent ratio, addition of porogen, and addition of antisolvent significantly affect the final material properties and its application. The influence of temperature was only rarely studied, since it had to be as low as possible while maintaining supercritical conditions. However, this technique is challenging to apply for the drying of PLA gels if the polymer has low T_g, which further decreases in the presence of sc-CO₂ [46]. Namely, if the processing temperature during sc-CO₂-assisted drying is above the polymers’ T_g, it may result in the gel collapse producing the final material with a low surface area [39,46]. Therefore, the operating temperature for sc-CO₂ drying in all reported studies (Table 3) was the lowest possible to maintain CO₂ at supercritical conditions and at the same time to avoid crossing the T_g of PLA.

2.2. Application of Dried PLA Materials

Highly porous PLA could be used in several applications, from wastewater treatment to tissue engineering or drug delivery. PLA aerogels can be designed with various morphologies (monoliths, beads, particles, etc.), mesoporous and/or microporous structures, large surface areas, and large porosity. It was reported that aerogels possess unique transport, adsorption, structural, and biophysical properties suitable for technological and biomedical applications [33,55]. The high and open porosity of aerogels is of significant relevance for wound healing, as it allows a gas permeability, avoiding hypoxia episodes and allowing transpiration and/or evaporation equilibrium at the wound site as well as a high liquid absorption capacity [55]. It is interesting to notice that PLA aerogels usually have lower surface areas (below 100 m²g⁻¹) compared with other organic aerogels (200–300 m²g⁻¹), possibly due to the low mesoporous volume that is either lost during the gelation or during the supercritical drying [46]. Generally, aerogel scaffolds have a 3D structure that can provide mechanical integrity and an appropriate surface to support regenerating tissues [19,55]. The key to tissue engineering is to temporarily surrogate the biological tissue as a replacement for diseased or damaged tissues with immunologically tolerant living/viable tissue that can grow with the patient [19]. Being able to control the pore size and its distribution by variation in parameters of CO₂-assisted processes is essential in creating scaffolds and aerogels suitable for tissue engineering [56]. An important parameter of PLA aerogels is that they are biocompatible and have mechanical properties similar to cancellous bone, making them suitable for tissue engineering applications [57]. It was reported that biomimetic PLA scaffolds, consisting of interconnected networks with nanometer-scale fibrous architecture and pores in the range of 100–200 μm and 400–600 μm, are highly suitable for cell colonization and migration [39]. PLA aerogels could also be prepared in the form of microparticles as nutraceutical formulations (i.e., carriers of bioactive components such as β-carotene, α-tocopherol, and rosmarinic acid that exhibit high antioxidant activity) [43]. In addition, porous PLA (pores’ mean size from 0.4 to 3 μm) provided the sustained release of a growth factor over 25 days without intrinsic toxicity, revealing that they can be safely introduced within biomedical structures [44].

3. PLA Foaming Using CO₂ under Elevated Pressure

Polymer foam is defined as a gas–polymer two-phase system, a material whose matrix contains a large number of macro, micro, and/or nanosized pores [58]. Although PLA foaming can be performed using organic blowing agents, their traces in foams could be harmful to material end-users [5]. Therefore, the replacement of organic with physical blowing agents such as CO₂ under high pressure gained significant scientific attention. PLA foaming using d-CO₂ or sc-CO₂ can be performed in several steps: (1) exposure of PLA to CO₂ at a certain pressure and temperature that allows the diffusion and/or dissolution of CO₂ into the polymer matrix (diffused and/or dissolved CO₂ increases the intermolecular distance causing polymer swelling, despite the hydrostatic pressure effect), (2) induction of a pressure drop or a temperature increase that cause cell nucleation and growth due to the thermo-dynamic instability from the supersaturation of CO₂, and (3) separation of CO₂ from the PLA-CO₂ mixture and stabilization of the foam structure by cooling [2,5,18]. Setting the pressure and temperature conditions for the treatment of the polymer–CO₂ mixture, to lock in the desired properties as cells develop during the phase separation, is essential for the generation, growth, and connectivity of pores [15,22]. As the pressure increases, causing a change in the CO₂ state from dense to supercritical, more CO₂ molecules dissolve in the PLA matrix, increasing the volume of the PLA/CO₂ mixtures. In other words, the dissolved fluid increases the intermolecular distance, causes swelling, and consequently, both the free volume and the volume of the polymer/fluid mixture increase. In addition, when the temperature rises, the PLA’s molecular movement further increases. Thus, the free volume and the specific volume increase. In addition, if the decompression rate is high, nucleation is rapidly leading to a large number of nucleation sites. Each pore will develop so fast that the CO₂ diffusion will be negligible and the resulting material will have a uniform distribution of small pores [19]. On the other hand, if the nucleation is very slow, the pores that nucleated first will be significantly larger compared with later-formed others, due to the diffusion of CO₂ from the surrounding polymer matrix. The resulting material will have a wide distribution of pore size [19].

Foaming is highly influenced by the solubility of CO₂ in PLA, which depends on employed process conditions (pressure and temperature), the affinity of CO₂ towards polymer, and polymer chemistry [59,60,61,62,63,64]. Mahmood et al. [60] tested the solubility at the pressure range of 6.9–21 MPa and temperature range of 80–100 °C, concluding that the CO₂ solubility in PLA was 0.096 g/g achieved at 20.7 MPa and 80 °C. They also demonstrated that an increase in temperature increased PLA swelling and decreased CO₂ solubility, whereas an increase in pressure increased both PLA swelling and CO₂ solubility. Li et al. [61] tested the solubility at a wider pressure and temperature range (3.5–28 MPa and 180–200 °C, respectively), concluding that the CO₂ solubility in PLA was 0.104 g/g achieved at 28 MPa and 180 °C. The CO₂ solubility in semi-crystalline PLA is more complex compared with amorphous PLA because compressed CO₂ can accelerate the crystallization process [5,65,66,67]. Moreover, the presence of crystals decreases the CO₂ solubility in the PLA matrix and dramatically affects cell nucleation and cell growth [59,65,68].

3.1. Methods and Parameters for PLA Foaming under High-Pressure CO₂

PLA foaming using CO₂ under an elevated pressure can be performed as pressure-induced or temperature-induced foaming in a static (batch) or continuous regime (Figure 3) [2]. When a thermodynamic instability is caused by the opening of an outlet valve, the pressure drops, the heated polymer becomes over-saturated and it cannot retain the previously dissolved CO₂ [2]. Then, phase separation occurs and cell nucleation and growth take place, leading to the expansion of PLA and the formation of a porous structure. In the case of temperature-induced foaming, thermodynamic instability is caused by the immersion of a polymer with CO₂ under elevated pressure in hot water, glycerin, or oil. Foaming is initiated when the applied temperature increase leads to increased chain mobility as the polymer is softened and CO₂ solubility decreases, which results in cell nucleation and growth. The final cooling step ensures the stabilization of the foam [16,51].

A literature survey on the PLA foaming process during the last decade is shown in Table 4. Generally, it was reported that PLA foaming is significantly affected by the process parameters, i.e., pressure, temperature, soaking time, and depressurization rate [65,68,69,70,71,72]. It was reported that an increase in pressure during sc-CO₂ foaming increases PLA expansion ratios [71]. At higher pressures, the amount of CO₂ incorporated into the polymers is greater, and hence the polymer is highly supersaturated upon decompression. These greater supersaturation pressures lead to higher nucleation densities and hence smaller pores [73]. Kiran [69] reported that smaller pores were promoted when PLA foaming was carried out by depressurization from higher pressures. Several reports from available literature state that lower temperatures lead to the generation of smaller pores during the sc-CO₂ foaming process [69,73]. This observation is consistent with the notion of a greater level of CO₂ incorporation within PLA due to the increased density and solubility with a decreasing temperature at constant pressure, which is followed by the formation of a greater number of nucleation sites during decompression. For instance, lowering the process temperature from 55 to 35 °C at 23 MPa decreased the pore diameter from around 200 to 50 μm [73]. Yan et al. [72] reported that an increase in temperature from 130 to 160 °C at 20 MPa increases the PLA cell diameter from 0.2 to 110 μm and decreases the cell density from 10¹³ to 10³ cells/cm³. Yang et al. [65] reported that the crystallinity of PLA foams decreased with the increasing annealing temperature or pressure, while crystal morphologies were varied by controlling the temperature or pressure in the range of 70–120 °C and 8–24 MPa, respectively. Haham et al. [71] reported that an increase in soaking time from 5 to 20 min at 33 MPa resulted in a decrease in the mean pore size from 117 to 11 μm and an increased cell density up to 4 orders of magnitude. The soaking time mainly affects the distribution of d-CO₂ or sc-CO₂ through a polymer matrix. When a soaking time is insufficient, it will result in heterogeneous structures. On the other hand, the prolongation of soaking allows the dissolution of a higher amount of d-CO₂ or sc-CO₂, which leads to the formation of foams with higher cell densities and reduced pore diameters [74].

Besides process conditions, PLA foaming is affected by the selection of PLA type. It was reported that PLA has a molecular weight (M_w) in the range of 10–258 kg/mol, T_g in the range of 33–65 °C, and T_m in the range of 100–200 °C [17], which can determine the selection of process parameters and, consequently, the foam morphology (Figure 3). It was reported that foams of PLA (PDL02, M_w = 17 kg/mol) can be obtained at a lower pressure and temperature condition (10–15 MPa and 35–50 °C after a soaking time of 2–6 h) [75]. Kuska et al. [15] reported that already at pressures below 5 MPa, d-CO₂ present in the polymer matrix acted like a molecular lubricant. It enhanced the chain mobility by weakening intermolecular and intramolecular interactions and reduced T_m and T_sr as well as the melt viscosity of PLA. However, only at temperatures equal to or higher than 100 °C, foams of PLA with higher M_w (3052D of 160 kg/mol and 2003D of 210 kg/mol) could be obtained. For instance, PLA (2003D) foams with a porosity of 55–66%, density of 426–685 kg/m³, and average pore size of 15–200 μm could be obtained at pressures of 20–30 MPa and temperatures of 100–120 °C after 2 or 24 h of soaking [15].

PLA foaming with d-CO₂ or sc-CO₂ can be aided with an organic solvent that affects the CO₂ solubility in PLA [69,76]. The process can be performed by the (a) CO₂ introduction into a vessel containing a PLA solution in an organic solvent, (b) PLA solution spraying into a vessel containing CO₂, or (c) simultaneous spraying of a PLA solution and CO₂ into a vessel [69]. Kiran [69] reported PLA foaming using sc-CO₂ and acetone binary mixture at pressures in the range of 14–61 MPa. Even though PLA was not soluble in sc-CO₂ at the tested conditions, PLA was completely solubilized in mixtures of CO₂ and acetone, and foams with diameters of 10–20 μm were obtained [69].

One of the reported techniques for PLA foaming is CO₂-assisted extrusion. The extrusion foaming process implies the injection of CO₂ into the extruder barrel under the high pressure and continuous mixing of a PLA melt and CO₂ inside the barrel to dissolve or homogenize the CO₂ within the polymer melt [5]. The PLA-CO₂ mixture will flow along the extruder and emerge from the die, where the induced pressure drop will cause CO₂ separation from the melt and PLA foaming (Figure 4). One of the biggest advantages of this technique is its continuous work regime, which enables a relatively easy transition from the laboratory to an industrial level. The process is usually performed using d-CO₂, due to higher investment costs and process difficulties associated with the sc-CO₂-assisted extrusion, such as the pressure fluctuation inside the barrel at the injection point of CO₂, maintaining sufficient CO₂ pressure downstream, and prevention of injected CO₂ from leaking upstream, as well as ensuring good mixing [18]. PLA extrusion foaming using CO₂ as the blowing agent is marked as a 100% “green” technology that avoids the use of any organic solvent [26]. In addition, sc-CO₂ can enable the production of microcellular foams with an average cell density above 10⁹ cells/cm³, which demonstrated improved fatigue life, toughness, thermal stability, and insulating properties compared with conventional foams [26]. The introduction of d-CO₂ or sc-CO₂ in the barrel of an extruder lowers the polymer viscosity and allows lower operating temperatures compared with the standard extrusion processes, which consequently leads to less energy consumption [77].

Pore sizes of PLA foams and their distribution are significantly affected by extrusion conditions (i.e., barrel temperature, number of temperature zones, number of screws, design of screws, screw speed, torque, CO₂ inlet, die temperature, and die design) and mixture composition (i.e., PLA properties, CO₂/PLA ratio, eventual presence of an additive, PLA/additive ratio) [2,26,78]. Chauvet et al. [78] found that the temperature before and inside the die was the most prominent parameter to tune the PLA foam properties. They demonstrated that foam porosity as high as 96% could be obtained when the die temperature was between 109 and 112 °C, and the CO₂ injection pressure was between 19.7 and 23.8 MPa. In PLA foam extrusion experiments using a tandem-extrusion line consisting of a planetary roller extruder as a mixing and cooling extruder [79], similar results were reported for melt temperatures in the die between 103 and 114 °C, with lower CO₂ injection pressures between 7.9 and 11.2 MPa. Foaming conditions and SEM images of these samples with resulting foam morphologies perpendicular to the extrusion direction are shown in Figure 4.

Lee et al. [80] reported a decrease in the PLA foam density from around 300 to 200 kg/m³ with a decrease in the die temperature from 140 to 120 °C. It was also reported that the crystallinity of PLA helps foam properties but negatively affects its processing. A trade-off between these two parameters must be kept for satisfactory foam production [80]. Larsen and Neldin [52] reported that not only the variation in die temperature but also the pressure drop rate can affect PLA foam properties. They suggested that the pressure drop rate should be around 1 GPa/s or higher to achieve foams with densities of 24–29 kg/m³, pore diameters of 14–31 μm, and cell densities of 2.0–9.0·10⁸ cell/cm³. In addition, a relatively high CO₂/PLA ratio is required to sustain the fine-celled microcellular foam, because the smaller the bubble, the higher the surface tension force from the surrounding melt phase [80]. Reignier et al. [6] increased the CO₂ concentration from 1.8 to 9.4 wt% in a PLA melt, achieving pressures from 10.2 to 20.7 MPa, which resulted in more than 50% viscosity decrease, a decrease in foam density to less than 30 kg/m³, increase in cell density to 10⁸ cell/cm³, and decrease in pore size below 100 μm.

Table 4

Literature reports on PLA foaming using high-pressure CO₂ (2012–2022).

PLA	Producer	CO₂	RegimeMethod	P(MPa)	T(°C)	t(h)	Foam Properties	Foam Application	Lit
PDL02	Corbion Purac	sc-CO₂	Static	10, 15	35, 40, 50	2–24	T_g = 31 °CD_aver = 67 μm	Drug delivery	[75]
2003D	NatureWorks	sc-CO₂	Static	20–30	100–120	2, 24	ρ = 427–685 kg/m³ε = 45–66%	Food packaging	[15]
2002D	NatureWorks	sc-CO₂	Static	20–30	131,132	0.08–12	E_c = 61–82 MPaσ₆₀ = 9–11 MPa	n.i.a.	[70]
2003D	NatureWorks	sc-CO₂	Static	8–24	70–120	1	D_aver = 4–23 μmε = 43–80%	n.i.a.	[65]
2003D	NatureWorks	sc-CO₂	Static	10–20	130, 190	1	D_aver = 0–200 μm	n.i.a.	[81]
L175DO70	Total Corbion	sc-CO₂	Static	15	45	8	D_aver = 2–4 μmN_c ~2∙10¹⁰ cells/cm³	n.i.a.	[82]
4032D	NatureWorks	sc-CO₂	Extrusionand static	10–31	190115–155	0.25	D_aver = 0.7–22 μmN_c ~10¹¹ cells/cm³	Thermal insulation	[63]
4032D	NatureWorks	sc-CO₂	Extrusionand static	17–31	190118–143	0.03–1	D_aver = 1–22 μmN_c = 10⁸–10¹² cells/cm³	Oil sorption	[64]
4060D	NatureWorks	sc-CO₂	Extrusionand static	10–33	170–18040	0.08–0.5	D_aver = 11–117 μmN_c = 10³–10⁹ cells/cm³	n.i.a.	[71]
2003D	NatureWorks	sc-CO₂	Heat pressing and static	15	190(85–117)	2	D_aver = 31–1700 nmN_c = 10¹³–10¹⁵ cells/cm³	Thermal insulation	[83]
4032D	NatureWorks	d-CO₂sc-CO₂	Two-stepstatic	6.9–17.2	180(85–125)	0.67	D_aver = 25–287 μmN_c ~10⁴–10⁷ cells/cm³	Oil adsorption; thermal insulation	[68]
2003D	NatureWorks	d-CO₂sc-CO₂	Extrusion	6–8	140–190	n.i.a	D_aver = 0.1–1 mmχ = 1.5–15.5%	n.i.a.	[84]
PLE001	NaturePlast	sc-CO₂	Extrusion	17.7–23.8	100–180	n.i.a	ε = 55–96%T_m = 139.5–142.9 °C	Food packaging	[78]

P—pressure; T—temperature; t—time; T_g—glass transition temperature; T_m—melting temperature; D_aver—average pore diameter; ρ—foam density; N_c—cell density; ε—porosity; E_c—compressive module; σ₆₀—compressive strength that was needed to compress the sample cores at about 60% of their original lengths; χ—crystallinity; n.i.a.—no information available.

3.2. Application of PLA Foams

PLA foams have been considered substitutes for some petroleum-based foamed products due to their competitive material and processing costs, comparable mechanical properties, and environmentally friendly properties. They have a wide array of applications such as packaging, cushioning, construction, thermal insulation, sound insulation, plastic utensils, automotive, etc. [16,51,58,68,85].

CO₂-assisted processing techniques for the preparation of PLA microcellular structures enable the improvement of material properties, saving material and energy, leading to a significant lowering of the production cost. The reason for such a versatility of PLA materials lies in their chemistry. For instance, PLA with high M_w, high crystallinity, and hardness is suitable for the construction of bearing materials such as screws, plates, or scaffolds for use as orthopedic implants. On the other hand, PLA with low M_w and low crystallinity is suitable for the preparation of controlled drug release systems that require proper biodegradation characteristics and the incorporation of drugs [66]. In addition, the optimization of the PLA foaming process may open a wide range of opportunities for designing novel multi-functional materials and products.

Biodegradable PLA foams show great potential for oil adsorption and thermal insulation, which is crucial for oil-spill cleanup and energy saving [68]. The closed-cell foam, with an expansion ratio of 60, showed a thermal conductivity as low as 31.7 mW/m·k. The open-cell foam, with an expansion ratio of 43, showed a water contact angle of up to 123° and exhibited an adsorption capacity in the range of 10.9–31.2 g/g for various oils [68].

PLA foams can have excellent properties such as a controlled morphology and lightweight, which enable the release of bioactive components and drugs in a controlled manner [75]. They can also be used in tissue engineering, promoting cell adhesion, proliferation, and growth [63].

4. PLA Particle Generation

The preparation of PLA particles using CO₂ under elevated pressure avoids issues associated with conventional methods for particle generations such as long processing time, unwanted particle morphologies, particle agglomeration, undesired amorphous or crystalline forms, etc. [86,87]. Techniques for the generation of PLA particles use d-CO₂ and sc-CO₂, both as a solvent and anti-solvent. Besides the solubility of sc-CO₂ in PLA, the solubility of PLA in sc-CO₂ is an important parameter for the selection of appropriate particle generation techniques. The solubility of PLA in sc-CO₂ depends on its chemical structure as well as on its physicochemical and mechanical properties, e.g., molar mass, end groups, the architecture (branched or linear), T_g, and crystallinity. However, it also depends on the experimental conditions, such as pressure, temperature, and the presence or absence of a co-solvent in the system. The solubility of PLA in sc-CO₂ is limited, which was explained, among other factors, by its lower chain flexibility [88]. Nevertheless, the solubility of polyesters can be positively influenced, e.g., by decreasing its M_w. It was demonstrated that a PLA with a relatively high M_w of 128 kg/mol was not soluble in sc-CO₂ even at high-pressure conditions above 139.8 MPa [89]. However, it was possible to process PLA with a low M_w of 5.5 kg/mol in sc-CO₂ at the pressure of 25 MPa and temperature of 65 °C without the addition of any co-solvents for particle generation [90]. Still, if the polymer remains insoluble in sc-CO₂ even under high-pressure conditions, polar co-solvents such as ethanol or acetone can be used.

4.1. Methods for PLA Particle Generation Using CO₂ under Elevated Pressure

Several spraying or precipitation CO₂-assisted techniques could be employed for the preparation of PLA particles, such as Particles from Gas Saturated Solutions (PGSS), Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solutions (RESS), Supercritical Assisted Atomization (SAA), Supercritical Anti-Solvent (SAS), Solution Enhanced Dispersion by Supercritical fluids (SEDS), among others.

The PGSS process allows the formation of particles in several steps: (1) the polymer is melted or dissolved in an extruder or a vessel and transferred using a dosing system to a static mixer, (2) the CO₂ under elevated pressure is pumped into the same static mixer where both flows are homogenized, and (3) the CO₂-saturated mixture/solution is depressurized through a nozzle into a spray tower [86,91,92,93]. The nozzle construction enables the formation of fine droplets that become solidified due to the cooling effect of the expanding gas, i.e., polymer particles are precipitated based on the Joule–Thomson effect. High concentrations of sc-CO₂ in the liquefied mixture/solution lead to a significant reduction of viscosity and interfacial tension.

The RESS process is based on a rapid depressurization of a solution containing sc-CO₂ and polymer through a specially constructed nozzle into a vessel that maintains lower pressure (usually atmospheric), which leads to a decreased solubility of a polymer, supersaturation, and its precipitation [94,95,96,97]. To improve the solubility of PLA within sc-CO₂, co-solvents might be necessary. Spherical particles are created if the M_w of PLA is low enough [98,99].

The SAA process under a reduced pressure can be used to produce microparticles with a defined spherical morphology and controlled particle size [100,101]. SAA implies the formation of a solution (organic solvent and polymer) and its contact for an adequate soaking time with sc-CO₂ in a saturator to form an expanded liquid, which is characterized by reduced viscosity and surface tension [100]. The formed ternary solution is atomized through a nozzle to produce micro or sub-micro droplets, which upon drying can produce particles of a polymer [87,100]. The atomization is particularly efficient since CO₂ is released from the internal of the droplets and enhances their fragmentation (formation of secondary droplets). Particles are formed on the basis of a “one droplet one particle” mechanism [102,103]. The difference in particle sizes can depend on the different strength of the cohesive forces operating on the primary droplets (the surface tension and the viscosity). As a rule-of-thumb, the larger the quantity of CO₂ dissolved in the expanded liquid solution, the higher the reduction of the cohesive forces with the enhancement of the secondary atomization, which is leading to the production of particles with smaller diameters [100,102,103].

Examples of the utilization of CO₂ as an anti-solvent are processes such as SAS and SEDS. They depend on the diffusivity of sc-CO₂ into a solution of PLA and an organic solvent. In the SAS process, the organic solution with polymer is sprayed into sc-CO₂ to cause rapid contact between the two phases [104]. Sc-CO₂ acts as a solvent for the organic solvent used and as an antisolvent for PLA, which precipitates. The organic solvent is then eliminated from the system along with CO₂. The choice of the organic solvent for the SAS process is crucial [86], as it may have good miscibility with sc-CO₂ and PLA at the selected process conditions. PLA micron and submicron particles generated by using SAS are mainly solvent-free. For the SEDS process, the solution containing PLA and sc-CO₂ is co-introduced into the precipitation chamber through a specially designed coaxial nozzle where sc-CO₂ acts as both an anti-solvent and “spray enhancer” by mechanical effect [104,105]. The high-velocity turbulent sc-CO₂ is in favor of the mix and mass transfer, both generating higher super-saturation and prompter precipitation, which results in smaller and finely dispersed particles generated by this method [88]. SEDS can be also run using ultrasound for an additionally enhanced mass transfer (SEDS-EM). It can be applied to generate extremely small droplets, yielding PLA nanoparticles of a uniform shape [106].

As previously described in Section 2.1, the SEE process exploits the solubility of organic solvents in sc-CO₂, whereby the diffusion and solubility depend on several parameters, including temperature and pressure. By using double emulsions, PLA is dissolved in an organic solvent. While sc-CO₂ is extracting the solvent, PLA particles containing the suspension are recovered. The final particle size depends on the emulsion droplet size. The SEE process can be run batch-wise or continuously (SEE-C) [42,107,108]. SEE-C allows the improved control of particle size distribution by the reduction of the emulsion processing times and prevention of any droplet/particle aggregation [108].

Table 5 shows a summary of PLA particles prepared via the d-CO₂ or sc-CO₂ reported during the last decade. Generally, processes that employ d-CO₂ for particle generation require less energy and high-pressure equipment of a lower price. However, processes with sc-CO₂ enable the production of particles with improved properties. It was reported that an increase in process temperature above T_c for CO₂ decreases particle agglomeration and increases particles’ uniformity in shape and size [106]. In addition, a pressure increase from below to above P_c increases the CO₂ density and reduces the interfacial tension between the solvent and the antisolvent resulting in the reduction of the solution droplet size and consequently the reduction of particles’ size [106]. Besides particle preparation, there are also several reports on modifications to reduce particle size, prevent particle agglomeration, reduce operating pressure and temperature, and improve particle morphology [109,110].

4.2. Application of PLA Particles

PLA is approved by the food and drug association agency (FDA) and is one of the most established polymers for application in biomedical and pharmaceutical fields [110], including particle systems. The drugs can be encapsulated in PLA particles or can be attached to the matrix of particles themselves. PLA micro- and nanoparticles have been proposed for improving the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs and as drug carriers for the development of controlled-release devices [115,116,117,118,119]. For instance, it was reported that PLA particles with the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil and sized from 0.6 to 1.2 μm, obtained by the SAS process, enabled a prolonged and sustained drug release [115]. Besides oral drug delivery, PLA particles can be also developed for subcutaneous and pulmonary delivery [110]. Recently, vaccine vehicles based on PLA nanoparticles as well as the blank PLA microspheres as dermatological fillers for correcting facial wrinkles have received considerable attention [120].

Moreover, porous structures are very accommodative to cell cultures, because the 3D structure closely resembles in vivo conditions. In addition, microspheres of less than 300 μm in diameter undergo a homogeneous degradation with the rate of degradation of the core being equivalent to that at the surface [121]. Thus, PLA microspheres have proven to be useful in facilitating rapid bone growth [122]. In addition, it was reported that fibrous PLA particles obtained using the SAS process are biomaterials suitable for tissue engineering [21,123].

5. PLA Impregnation with Bioactive Components Using Sc-CO₂

The impregnation process under an elevated pressure implies the exposure of polymeric material to a supercritical solution, i.e., sc-CO₂ and a certain substance, usually a single bioactive component (BC). This process requires good solubility of the substance in question in sc-CO₂, which facilitates its mass transport within the polymeric matrix [18]. If the solubility of a BC in sc-CO₂ is low for the PLA impregnation process, it could be improved by the addition of a polar co-solvent such as ethanol [124,125]. After contact between a polymeric material and a BC for a certain soaking time, sc-CO₂ can be completely removed from the obtained material by a pressure decrease, while BC will remain within the polymer matrix due to precipitation or chemical bonding [86,126]. The supercritical solvent impregnation process (SSI) has significant advantages compared to conventional impregnation processes associated with sc-CO₂ properties. It allows the impregnation of polymeric materials with a variety of BCs including hydrophobic molecules such as essential oils [127]. This technique can improve polymer impregnation due to the low viscosity and good transport properties of sc-CO₂ as well as the high solvent power shown to organic molecules at moderate temperatures [4,126]. For instance, Trindade Coutinho et al. [128] reported that the SSI process of 3 h enabled 2.6 times higher drug loading into PLA film compared with the conventional soaking method that lasted 10 days. An additional advantage of SSI is that the BCs’ load and distribution through a polymer matrix can be easily tuned by changing the process conditions [15,25,129]. When sc-CO₂ leads to PLA plasticization and swelling, enabling the mobility of macromolecular chains and increased space, it favors the sorption of BCs [14,18,25]. In addition, the SSI technique allows work at relatively mild conditions in an oxygen-free environment that is often desirable for sensitive BCs [127,129]. BCs can be loaded into various polymeric forms such as porous and non-porous films, monoliths, scaffolds, aerogels, particles, or fibers using sc-CO₂. It was reported that the process of PLA impregnation with BCs can be performed using sc-CO₂ in a batch or a semi-continuous regime [14]. In the batch process, PLA and BC are placed in the same vessel with or without the provided mixing or circulation of the supercritical fluid solution (sc-CO₂+BC) (Figure 5). The semi-continuous impregnation involves the subsequent introduction of fresh CO₂ into the vessel, dissolution of additional amount of BC in sc-CO₂, and flow of the supercritical solution through PLA (Figure 6).

5.1. Methods for PLA Impregnation Using Sc-CO₂

The overview of the SSI process performed on PLA materials in various forms is shown in Table 6. Reports from the available literature indicate that the SSI process with sc-CO₂ allows the homogenous distribution of BC through the PLA matrix [130,131]. This is primarily attributed to the interaction of BC and PLA through the hydrogen bonding between the carbonyl groups of polyester and the hydroxyl groups of BC [14,132].

Besides the good solubility of BC in sc-CO₂, one of the main criteria for achieving high loadings is the good affinity between PLA and BC, as well as the selection of proper processing conditions [133]. The amount of incorporated BC into PLA can be controlled by variations in pressure and temperature. Usually, an increase in pressure increases BC loading, while an increase in temperature decreases BC loading [75,134]. However, it was also reported that BC loading into PLA can be increased both with pressure and temperature [20,125,129,135,136]. Considering that the pressure and temperature determine CO₂ density and its solvation power, this result can be obtained when the crossover pressure for BC dissolution in sc-CO₂ is reached/overcome [136]. It was reported that BC loading can be predicted mainly through the study of the phase behavior between BCs and sc-CO₂ [126]. An increase in BC loading with both the pressure and temperature can be also the result of changes in the PLA morphology during the SSI process. Namely, the CO₂ sorption and PLA swelling increase as the process temperature increases [136], as it gets closer to the in situ T_m of PLA [20,75,129,133]. In addition, it was also reported that an increase in pressure induces a depression of T_g and T_m, confirming that d-CO₂ and sc-CO₂ have a plasticizing effect on PLA [15]. As illustrated in Figure 6, the T_m of several types of PLA continually decreases when the pressure increases [15,137,138]. A greater variation in T_m depression for PLA with different M_w is observed at higher CO₂ pressures.

Figure 6

PLA melting point depression in the presence of CO₂ under elevated pressure and temperature (■—[15]; ●—[15]; ◄—[70]; —[138]; ▼—[137]; ♦—[137]; ►—[137]).

[Figure omitted. See PDF]

Usually, an increase in soaking time increases the BC loading into the PLA matrix [15,75,125,139]. Kuska et al. [15] reported an increase in thymol loading into PLA beads from 11.0 to 19.8% at 20 MPa and 120 °C by prolongation of the process from 2 to 24 h. This BC acted as a molecular lubricant, which resulted in the increased free volume of the PLA matrix and consequently in the higher sorption of a supercritical solution. The prolonged exposure of PLA to sc-CO₂ with thymol led to a 40–90% greater swelling extent in comparison to the first 2 h. A similar result was reported for the SSI of olive leaves extract into PLA filaments, where the prolongation in soaking time from 0.5 to 1 h increased both the swelling and loading [125]. However, an increase in the soaking time can also lead to a decrease in the loading of BC during the SSI process. Namely, it was reported that a longer processing time (15 h) led to a significant decrease in the thymol loading into PLA films due to the increased crystallinity of the polyester matrix saturated with sc-CO₂ over time [14]. The lowering of the amorphous phase and free volume of the polymer matrix consequently resulted in the lower sorption of sc-CO₂ and thymol in the polymer [14].

The decompression rate is an additional parameter that significantly affects the loading of BCs into the PLA matrix. Mainly, a decrease in the decompression rate increases the BC loading. For instance, an increase in ketoprofen loading into PLLA sutures from 11.8 to 19.8% was reported for a decrease in the decompression rate from 360 to 0.06 MPa/min for SSI performed at 30 MPa and 80 °C during 3 h [20]. Moreover, thymol loading into the PLA film increased from 14.7 to 20.4% for a decrease in the decompression rate from 10.0 to 0.1 MPa/min for SSI performed at 12 MPa and 40 °C during 3 h [4]. Namely, higher depressurization rates involve lower diffusion coefficient values, which were explained by a slight modification of the arrangement of the polymeric chains due to the rapid expansion at the last step of the impregnation processing [4]. On the other hand, Villegas et al. [127] reported that a variation in the decompression rate from 0.1 to 10 MPa/min at a pressure of 9 or 12 MPa was not significantly relevant for the amount of cinnamaldehyde incorporated into the PLA films, while it strongly influenced the film mechanical properties. The lowest decompression rate leads to an increase in the elongation at break and a decrease in the tensile modulus and strength of PLA films [127].

Table 6

Literature reports on PLA impregnation using sc-CO₂ (2012–2022).

PLA	PLA Form	Bioactive Component	P(MPa)	T(°C)	t(h)	Dec. (MPa/min)	MaterialProperties	Material Application	Lit
2003D	Film	Thymol	9, 12	40	3	0.1, 1, 10	L = 13–20%; σ = 13–21 MPaT_m = 130–141 °C; χ = 1.2–3.3%	Active food packaging	[4]
PLA	Filament	Ketoprofen	10–40	35–75	2	Fast	L = 0.1–9.0%Sw = 4–30%	Biomedical applications	[135,136]
2003D	Beads	Thymol	20–30	100–120	2, 24	180	L = 4.7–19.8%; Sw = 11–47%ρ ~470 kg/m³; ε~61%	Bioactive materials	[15]
PLLA	Suture fibers	Ketoprofen, aspirin	10–35	40–140	3	0.06, 6, 360	L = 0.5–32%;T_m = 155–170 °C	Bioactive sutures	[20]
PLA	Films	Multiflora extract	15, 25	45, 65	2, 8	0.5	L = 6.7–23.8%;T_m = 167.8 °C; IC₅₀ = 19.9 μg/mL	Active food packaging	[126]
2003D 3052D	Beads	Thyme extract	30	110	2–7	180	L = 0.2–0.7%; ε = 64–76% ρ = 299.4–433.2 kg/m³	Bioactive materials	[15]
PLLA	Fibers	Ketoprofen	30, 35	80, 90	3	0.06, fast	L = 12–33%;DR = 3 days–3 months	Bioactive sutures	[129]
PDL02	Flakes	Thymol	10, 15	35–50	2–24	30	L = 2.3–18.8%; T_g = 32.4 °C;D_aver ~51.4 μm; DR = 1 month	Biomedical devices	[75]
PLA	Filaments	Mango extract	10.1, 25.3, 40.5	35–55	1–3	3	L = 1–9%; OI = 21–90%;IC₅₀ = 8.24 μg/mL;ADC = 4.3–25.0%	Bioactive materials	[134]
PLLA	Films	Aspirin, carvone, ketoprofen	9, 30	60, 80	3	Fast	L = 1.4–26.5%;DR = 20 days–2 months	Drug delivery	[128,133]
PLA	Films	R-carvone	8–17.8	40, 60	2	0.6, 6.0	L = 6.7–29.8%; T_g = 40.4 °C;T_m = 133.0 °C; χ = 25.7%	Active food packaging	[139]
3052D	Disc,film	Thymol	10	40	2–24	n.i.a.	L = 6–30%;Sw = 0.1–7.5%	Active food packaging	[140]
2003D	Film	Cinnamaldehyde	9, 12	40	3	0.1, 1, 10	L = 8–13%; χ = 0.6–3.1%;σ = 14.3–38.0 MPa	Active food packaging	[127]
PLA	Filaments discs	Mango leaf extract	10, 40	35, 55	2	4, 10	n.i.a	Endoprostheses	[141]

P—pressure; T—temperature; t—time; L—bioactive component loading; Sw—swelling extent; D_aver—average pore diameter; ε—porosity; σ—tensile strength; T_m—melting temperature; χ—crystallinity; ρ—foam density; ε− porosity; IC₅₀—concentration to scavenge 50% of DPPH radicals; DR− drug release; OI—oxidation inhibition; ADC—antidenaturant activity; D—diameter; n.i.a.—no information available.

Based on the literature reports, it can be concluded that the SSI process is complex and that it is affected by numerous parameters. Namely, the loading of BCs into PLA using sc-CO₂ is controlled by: (1) properties on neat PLA and BC, (2) the potential swelling and plasticizing effect of sc-CO₂, (3) the initial ratio of PLA/BC, sc-CO₂/BC, and sc-CO₂/PLA/BC, (4) the solubility of BC in sc-CO₂, (5) the affinity of BC towards PLA, (6) the interaction of PLA with BC, (7) the process pressure, (8) the temperature, (9) the contact time, (10) the decompression rate, and (11) the addition of a co-solvent.

5.2. Application of PLA Material Impregnated with Bioactive Substances

PLA impregnated using sc-CO₂ has been actively investigated for the development of active food packaging. These active materials are the driving force for innovation, as PLA is minimally processed in an environmentally friendly manner, and it can extend food shelf life, enhance food safety and/or sensory properties, and contribute to the preservation of food quality [58,126,127]. In addition, these materials can be recycled or they can degrade in the environment after disposal [139]. Villegas et al. [127] demonstrated that PLA films impregnated with thymol and cinnamaldehyde are active against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and could be potentially used for food packaging.

PLA materials impregnated with BCs by sc-CO₂ can be used for the preparation of drug delivery systems [66,133]. For instance, PLA was impregnated with aspirin used as an anti-inflammatory drug [128], triflusal used in the prevention of cardiovascular events [66], and paclitaxel used in cancer therapy [124]. In addition, sc-CO₂ has been widely used for the preparation of bioactive medical devices such as intraocular lenses, sutures, and scaffolds for tissue engineering. PLA-BC sutures can be used in surgery for wound closing or for a prosthesis to reduce pain, inflammation, and infection at the surgery site, as well as for oral drug administration [20,130]. This local delivery of drugs can limit drug side effects, provide bioactivity at site-specific places, and increase patient adherence [20]. Three-dimensional-printed filaments of PLA were impregnated with ethanolic olive leaves extracted for biomedical application [125]. These filaments demonstrated a 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical inhibition of 6–15% for the antioxidant loading of 0.2–0.5 mg/g, which can be used for a decrease in free radicals that induce oxidative damage in biomolecules (e.g., lipids and proteins).

6. Emerging Sc-CO₂ Techniques for PLA Processing

6.1. Integrated Processes of Supercritical Extraction of Bioactive Compounds and PLA Impregnation

Integrated processes of supercritical extraction and impregnation (SCE-SSI) imply the coupling of extraction from the plant material and the impregnation of polymeric material with plant extract using sc-CO₂ without the intermediate step of decompression. The main challenge in harmonizing the SCE-SSI process is the synchronization of the extraction and impregnation rates by choosing the adequate processing mode regarding the circulation of CO₂ and processing time to achieve a maximum extraction and impregnation yield, preventing the desorption of already impregnated extract from the carrier [142]. This integrated process minimizes the extract loss in the tubes and vessels of the high-pressure equipment, as well as the processing time and energy consumption [14,15,142,143]. Additionally, the exposure of a valuable bioactive extract to the air and light is avoided [143]. It can be performed in a semi-continuous regime (Figure 7). To the best of our knowledge, there are only two reports in the available literature on the application of the SCE-SSI process for the functionalization of PLA materials [14,15]. Kuska et al. [15] applied the integrated SCE-SSI for the separation of extract thyme and its impregnation into PLA at 30 MPa and 110 °C. It was reported that thyme extract does not interact chemically with the PLA matrix and that an operating time longer than 2 h had a negative effect on the thyme extract loading due to the desorption of the already impregnated extract from the PLA matrix. To increase the loading of thyme extract, the introduction of fresh CO₂ into the system was proposed (after 2 h of the supercritical solution circulation, the circulation was stopped, and only the adsorber was depressurized and then refilled and re-pressurized with fresh CO₂). The refill of fresh CO₂ led to a three-fold higher loading after an additional 2 h of impregnation. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that, besides the previously mentioned parameters that affect the batch SSI process of PLA, the number of cycles for the introduction of fresh CO₂ into the system also have an impact on BC loading.

6.2. Deposition of Metal Oxides onto PLA

Supercritical fluid deposition (SCFD) using sc-CO₂ is an attractive alternative process for the controlled dispersion of metallic species onto or within the surface of porous solid polymers [144]. This technique consists of three steps (Figure 8): (1) the dissolution of a metal complex (precursor) in a supercritical fluid, (2) its adsorption onto a polymer matrix, and (3) the conversion of the adsorbed complex to the target metal species [144,145,146]. Precursors usually used in SCFD are metal chelates, fluorinated metal chelates, and organometallic complexes soluble in sc-CO₂ [145]. Their solubility and phase behavior in sc-CO₂ are important parameters, since the following adsorption process depends on their concentration in the fluid phase. The sc-CO₂ solvent power and sorption of the metal complex can be adjusted by pressure and temperature change as well as the contact time of sc-CO₂ with a metal complex solution and a polymer [144]. Once a polymer–metal precursor composite is prepared, the metal precursor can be converted to its metal form using different methods: chemical conversion at low pressure after the depressurization process, chemical reduction using reducing agents such as alcohol, H₂, O₂, or by a thermal reduction in sc-CO₂, or thermal decomposition at a low pressure in an inert atmosphere [144,145,147]. Porous PLA-based composite materials were usually synthesized using common methods such as solvent casting, salt leaching, injection molding, 3D printing, phase separation, electrospinning, and freeze-drying. However, the only study to date on SCFD onto PLA was reported by Ivanovic et al. [144]. The authors reported that the sc-CO₂-assisted deposition combined with the PLA foaming process, followed by the in situ synthesis of ZnO, was carried out for the preparation of composite scaffolds. They used sc-CO₂ both as a physical blowing agent and medium for the deposition of organometallic precursors in a single step-process performed at a pressure of 30 MPa and temperature of 110 °C. Zinc bis(2-thenoyltrifluoroacetonate) was used as a ZnO precursor, and scaffolds impregnated with the precursor were treated with hydrazine solution in absolute ethanol for the chemical conversion. The applied procedure provided a good interaction of ZnO with the polymer substrate, a positive effect on the rearrangements of the crystalline structure, and improved compressive strength.

Although SCFD was mainly used for the production of nanostructured materials for catalysis, electronics, and optics, its great potential for the fabrication of medical devices has also been recognized as the possibility of the sc-CO₂-aided deposition of metal species with antibacterial activity onto different carriers [144]. The development of composites is one of the major methods to address some of the problems associated with PLA use in biomedicine, such as low cell adhesion, biological inertness, low degradation rate, and acid degradation by-products [148]. The incorporation of nano/micro inorganic fillers (e.g., clays, talc, apatite, and carbon) can improve the mechanical and bioactive properties of polymeric scaffolds, while the incorporation of metals and their oxides (e.g., Zn, Ag, Ca, Mg, and Ti) can provide antimicrobial activity [144]. Moreover, the presence of metallic nanofillers in/on PLA can provide a high thermal conductivity, increase degradation, improve surface roughness, and enhance cell adhesion [148]. There are numerous advantages in the preparation of PLA/metal nanocomposites using this supercritical approach. Specifically, the high sc-CO₂ diffusivity and the ability to swell the polymeric substrates, enabling the high penetration of organometallic reagents, as well as the outstanding control of the composites’ morphology, coupled with a good solubility of a wide range of possible precursors in sc-CO₂, promote the SCFD as a highly promising technique for the design of novel systems with tunable properties for tissue engineering applications.

7. Future Perspectives

PLA materials are already the number one choice for producers that are working towards sustainable production and for consumers that demand biocompatible and/or biodegradable products. In addition, the future of the commercialization of high-pressure CO₂ technologies for PLA processing looks bright, as it allows for the preparation of small and large-scale materials with precise and superior properties. However, the diverse composition and processing behavior of PLA, as well as various processing techniques combined with numerous process parameters and a lack of systematic characterization data, are accountable for the slow progress in technology and product development.

The investigation of high-pressure CO₂ technologies for the processing of PLA materials and especially the production of micro- and nanoparticles for biomedical applications is expected to expand. The pursuit of nanoscale porous PLA materials characterized by a 3D structure represents a new realm of research for functional materials design and fabrication. Using the 3D printing process for the production of new forms of biocompatible polymers can provide personalized devices that are efficient, safe, and precisely tailored to the patient’s compliance. Considering that high temperatures are employed for the 3D printing process, making it inapplicable for thermolabile bioactive compounds, the SSI process can emerge as a contributing process for enduing printed devices with bioactivity. There are few recent publications describing the 3D printing of PLA filaments and their impregnation with drugs and plant extracts. However, a combination of the mentioned processes can still be considered emerging. The technological combination of 3D printing technology and supercritical drying to produce 3D-printed aerogels could help solve the lack of the as-printed material nanostructuration, which is one of the current 3D printing limitations [149,150]. This strategy should enable obtaining biomaterials with improved performance and architecture or enhanced properties regarding their degradation behavior in biological fluids, mechanical integrity, and sterility to be compliant with regulations for implantable medical devices [149,150].

One of the technologies that could be combined with high-pressure CO₂ technologies is the laser-based additive manufacturing of polymer components, which is an established process in the automotive industry, among others. Unfortunately, most applications are limited to polyamides, as other polymers are hardly offered as suitable particle systems [151]. Sc-CO₂ can be used to produce spherical particles from other polymers in the size range required for additive manufacturing. PLA can also be converted, for example using the PGSS process, into a flowable powder that can be used for powder bed processes or for laser deposition processes to produce 3D components. Together with other powdered materials, additive manufacturing can also be used to produce hybrid components that cannot be created using classic manufacturing processes.

Blending PLA with other biopolymers or plant-based materials is an area of active research for improving the properties of PLA. Blending PLA with other biopolymers, such as starch, cellulose, or chitin, can improve the material’s mechanical properties, moisture barrier, and biodegradability. Bends can also reduce the brittle nature of pure PLA, which can improve its impact resistance. Another area of research is the use of plant-based materials, such as fibers or particles, as fillers in PLA composites. This can lead to improved strength and stiffness, as well as a reduced weight and cost. Using plant-based materials in PLA composites also can make the materials more sustainable and environmentally friendly. It is worth mentioning that the compatibility between different polymers, the dispersion, and the interphase adhesion are the main challenges that need to be overcome when working with biopolymer blends. Overall, blending PLA with other biopolymers or plant-based materials is a promising area of research for improving the properties and sustainability of PLA materials. With continuing development in these areas, it is expected that more advanced and functional materials can be produced using PLA and other biopolymers.

The reuse of long-life PLA products is possible; however, PLA is mainly used for the production of short-life products. To make PLA into a low-carbon material, the development of recycling facilities is necessary. A life cycle assessment study demonstrated that the recycling of PLA waste supports the reduction of environmental impacts [152]. All investigated recycling alternatives, namely mechanical, solvent-based, and chemical, were proved to be suitable and show clear environmental benefits. Besides the environmental benefits achieved by replacing the virgin PLA with PLA recyclates, it is also economically more favorable, since recyclates are sold for approximately two times a lower price compared to the primary material [152]. During the treatment of PLA waste, the material is exposed to external influences, which may cause physical alterations in the color and molecular masses, or result in the inclusion of impurities; hence, the generated products can have a lower quality than virgin PLA products [152]. The application of high-pressure CO₂ processing technologies to obtain new PLA products from recycled PLA materials, which will maintain good quality and acceptable properties, may also be a good direction towards the increased PLA sustainability.

Overall, despite a large number of scientific papers, the obvious advantages of sc-CO₂ for the processing of PLA, and a wide range of potential applications of the obtained materials with improved properties, the research on using the supercritical fluid processing for PLA is limited and has not yet reached a commercial scale. The main challenges for industrial supercritical fluid processing are cost, energy requirements, and scalability. However, the development of new techniques, such as the continuous supercritical fluid processing and the decreasing cost of CO₂ storage, may help overcome these barriers and make it more viable for commercial production. Therefore, with the future development of newer technologies and cost-effective methodologies, supercritical fluid processing could become a promising technique for the production of advanced PLA materials.

8. Conclusions

This review summarized state of the art on the processing of neat PLA using an environmentally friendly medium (i.e., dense and supercritical CO₂). It was demonstrated that easily tunable properties of CO₂ under an elevated pressure could be employed for the development of advanced PLA materials that can find a variety of applications from thermal insulation to biomedicine.

Dense and supercritical CO₂ can be successfully used for PLA material drying, foaming, particle generation, and impregnation processes. The review sums up the complexity of all of these processes by pinpointing the next parameters as crucial: (1) properties on neat PLA (melting temperature, glass transition temperature, crystallinity, etc.), (2) process pressure, (3) process temperature, (4) process operating time, (5) process decompression rate, (6) process regime (static, semi-continual, and dynamic), (7) effect of d-CO₂/sc-CO₂ on PLA (potential swelling and plasticizing effect), (8) extrusion parameters (barrel temperature, number of temperature zones, number of screws, design of screws, screw speed, torque, blowing agent inlet, die temperature, and die design), (9) selection of PLA solvent, (11) initial ratio of PLA and solvent, (12) addition of porogen or antisolvent, (13) initial ratio of components in the system (PLA vs. d-CO₂/sc-CO₂, PLA vs. bioactive component, d-CO₂/sc-CO₂ vs. bioactive component), (14) behavior of ternary system (d-CO₂/sc-CO₂+PLA+bioactive component), (15) solubility of bioactive component in d-CO₂/sc-CO₂, (16) affinity of bioactive component towards PLA, (17) chemical interaction of PLA with bioactive component, (18) number of cycles for the introduction of fresh CO₂ into the system, and (19) addition of a co-solvent. The mentioned parameters should be investigated and/or optimized for every individual CO₂-PLA system and process under an elevated pressure to improve the end product’s performance and develop superior PLA materials with controlled properties for advanced applications.

This review could stimulate the further development of PLA processing using CO₂-assisted techniques that may open a wide range of opportunities for designing novel, functional materials/products and drive the field forward in the green future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and I.L.; Methodology, S.M., I.L., G.H. and S.F.; Validation, S.M., I.L., G.H., Z.N., S.F., M.P. and C.A.G.-G.; Data Curation, S.M., I.L., G.H. and S.F.; Visualization, S.M., I.L., G.H. and S.F.; Funding Acquisition, S.M., I.L., G.H., Z.N., S.F., M.P. and C.A.G.-G.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.M., I.L., G.H., Z.N., S.F., M.P. and C.A.G.-G.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.M., I.L., G.H., Z.N., S.F., M.P. and C.A.G.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This publication is based upon work from COST Actions CA18125 “Advanced Engineering and Research of aeroGels for Environment and Life Sciences” (AERoGELS) and CA18224 “Green Chemical Engineering Network towards upscaling sustainable processes” (GREENERING), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Contract No. 451-03-68/2022-14/200135), MICINN [PID2020-120010RB-I00; PDC2022-133526-I00], Xunta de Galicia [ED431C 2020/17], Agencia Estatal de Investigación [AEI] and FEDER funds. Stoja Milovanovic and Ivana Lukic would like to give special thanks to Jasna Ivanovic, who sparked their interest in PLA materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures and Tables

View Image - Figure 1. State-of-the-art and state-of-technique data on PLA processing for the 2012–2022 period: (a) patent survey and (b) survey on published research reports based on the Web of Science database with methods of PLA processing (Keywords: (“PLA” or “poly(lactic acid)”) and (“supercritical CO2” or “high-pressure CO2” or “dense CO2”) and (“drying” or “foaming” or “impregnation” or “particle generation” on 15 November 2022).

Figure 1. State-of-the-art and state-of-technique data on PLA processing for the 2012–2022 period: (a) patent survey and (b) survey on published research reports based on the Web of Science database with methods of PLA processing (Keywords: (“PLA” or “poly(lactic acid)”) and (“supercritical CO2” or “high-pressure CO2” or “dense CO2”) and (“drying” or “foaming” or “impregnation” or “particle generation” on 15 November 2022).

View Image - Figure 2. Schematic presentation of high-pressure unit used for dynamic supercritical drying with CO2 recycling with images of obtained PLA aerogels.

Figure 2. Schematic presentation of high-pressure unit used for dynamic supercritical drying with CO2 recycling with images of obtained PLA aerogels.

View Image - Figure 3. Simplified presentation of the pressure-induced and temperature-induced batch foaming (adapted from [16]) with SEM images of obtained foams.

Figure 3. Simplified presentation of the pressure-induced and temperature-induced batch foaming (adapted from [16]) with SEM images of obtained foams.

View Image - Figure 4. Simplified presentation of the sc-CO2-assisted extrusion foaming process (adapted from [16]), foaming conditions for PLA 2003D in the planetary roller extruder, and SEM images of corresponding foams.

Figure 4. Simplified presentation of the sc-CO2-assisted extrusion foaming process (adapted from [16]), foaming conditions for PLA 2003D in the planetary roller extruder, and SEM images of corresponding foams.

Figure 5. Schematic presentation of the batch SSI process and images of PLA samples before/after SSI with thymol.

Figure 7. Schematic presentation of the semi-continuous SSI process and images of PLA samples before/after SCE-SSI of thyme extract.

Figure 8. Schematic presentation of supercritical fluid deposition.

Table 1

Leading PLA producers and processability/application possibilities of their PLA.

Company	Industrial Name	Intended Processing Methods	Applications
NatureWorks(Plymouth, MN, USA)	Ingeo^®	- Extrusion - Thermoforming - Injection molding - Films and cards - Three-dimensional printing - Fibers and nonwovens - Foaming	- Beauty and household - Building and construction - Cartons and non-food packaging - Electronics and appliances - Food and beverage packaging - Food service ware - Medical and hygiene - Landscape and agriculture
TotalEnergies Corbion (Gorinchem, The Netherlands)	Luminy^®	- High heat - Demanding applications - General purpose applications - Seal layer	- Rigid food packaging - Flexible packaging - Fresh food packaging - Durable goods - Non-wovens - Food service ware
Evonik Industries (Essen, Germany)	Resomer^®	- Three-dimensional printing - Fused filament fabrication	- Bioresorbable medical implants - Controlled release devices
ThyssenKrupp (Essen, Germany)	PLAneo^®	- Extrusion - Injection-molding	- Packaging material - Films and plastic bottles - Textile materials such

Table 2

Technologies that employ d-CO₂ and sc-CO₂ for PLA processing to obtain advanced functional products.

Technique	Product	Products’ Main Properties
Drying	AerogelsScaffolds	Low density High porosity High specific surface area
Foaming	Foams	Highly porous structure
Particle generation	MicroparticlesNanoparticles	Tunable size Controlled particle size distribution
Impregnation	Variety of forms	Material with organic or inorganic compounds Active material (bio or photocatalytic activity)

Table 5

Literature reports on PLA particle generation using d-CO₂ and sc-CO₂ (2012–2022).

PLA	Producer	Solvent	Method	P(MPa)	T(°C)	Particle Size	Application	Lit
PLLA, PDLA	Synthetized	DME, chloroform	StaticPGSS	10	60–100	d = 1.1–11.6 µm	Filler in composites	[111]
PLA	Sigma-Aldrich	Ethanol, acetone, DCM	RESS	27.5	35	d = 2–3 µm	Drug delivery	[99]
PLLA	Sigma-Aldrich	DCM, TCM, methanol, acetone	RESS,SAS	15–3010–25	45–10035	d_RESS = n.i.ad_SAS = 1–104 µm	Drug delivery	[112]
PLLA	Sigma-Aldrich	DCM	SAS	n.i.a.	35–50	d = 0.6–47.3 µm	Biomedical applications	[113]
PLLA	Purac	DCM	SAS	8–16	40	d = 5–25 µm	Veterinary applications	[101]
PLLA	Sigma-Aldrich	DCM	SAS	10–20	40	d = 0.08–1.43 µm	Drug delivery	[114]
PLA	Synthetized	DCM	SEDS-EM	7.9–9.8	24–38	d < 400–1000 nm	Controlled release	[106]
PLA	Evonik	Ethylacetate	SEE-C	8	38	d = 203 nm–0.9 µm	Bactericidal nanocomposites	[42]
PLA	Boehringer	Acetone	SEE-C	8	38	d = 212–233 nm	Controlled release	[108]
PLLA	Sigma-Aldrich	DMSO+DCM	SAS	18	50	d < 1 µm	Drug delivery	[115]

References

1. Singhvi, M.; Gokhale, D. Biomass to biodegradable polymer (PLA). RSC Adv.; 2013; 3, pp. 13558-13568. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ra41592a]

2. Peng, K.; Mubarak, S.; Diao, X.; Cai, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Wu, L. Progress in the Preparation, Properties, and Applications of PLA and Its Composite Microporous Materials by Supercritical CO₂: A Review from 2020 to 2022. Polymers; 2022; 14, 4320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14204320] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297898]

3. Wang, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, L. Understanding self-accelerated water diffusion within poly-lactic acid via molecular dynamics simulation. Chin. J. Chem. Eng.; 2019; 27, pp. 759-764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.09.009]

4. Torres, A.; Ilabaca, E.; Rojas, A.; Rodríguez, F.; Galotto, M.J.; Guarda, A.; Villegas, C.; Romero, J. Effect of processing conditions on the physical, chemical and transport properties of polylactic acid films containing thymol incorporated by supercritical impregnation. Eur. Polym. J.; 2017; 89, pp. 195-210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.01.019]

5. Nofar, M.; Park, C.B. Poly(lactic acid) foaming. Prog. Polym. Sci.; 2014; 39, pp. 1721-1741. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.04.001]

6. Reignier, J.; Gendron, R.; Champagne, M.F. Extrusion Foaming of Poly(Lactic acid) Blown with CO₂: Toward 100% Green Material. Cell. Polym.; 2007; 26, pp. 83-115. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026248930702600202]

7. About NatureWorks. Available online: https://www.natureworksllc.com/About-NatureWorks (accessed on 22 October 2022).

8. TotalEnergies Corbion. Available online: https://www.totalenergies-corbion.com/about-totalenergies-corbion/ (accessed on 22 October 2022).

9. Evonik, Products & Solutions. Available online: https://corporate.evonik.com/en/evonik-launches-resomer-filaments-for-the-3d-printing-of-bioresorbable-medical-implants-114379.html (accessed on 22 October 2022).

10. ThyssenKrupp, Industrial Solutions PLAneo^® Polylactide Technology. Available online: https://ucpcdn.thyssenkrupp.com/_legacy/UCPthyssenkruppBAIS/assets.files/products___services/chemical_plants___processes/polymer_plants/brochure_pla.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2022).

11. Djukić-Vuković, A.; Mladenović, D.; Ivanovic, J.; Pejin, J.; Mojović, L. Towards sustainability of lactic acid and poly-lactic acid polymers production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.; 2019; 108, pp. 238-252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.050]

12. Ioannidou, S.M.; Ladakis, D.; Moutousidi, E.; Dheskali, E.; Kookos, I.K.; Câmara-Salim, I.; Moreira, M.T.; Koutinas, A. Techno-economic risk assessment, life cycle analysis and life cycle costing for poly(butylene succinate) and poly(lactic acid) production using renewable resources. Sci. Total. Environ.; 2021; 806, 150594. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150594]

13. Available online: https://businessanalytiq.com/procurementanalytics/index/polylactic-acid-pla-price-index/ (accessed on 2 January 2023).

14. Milovanovic, S.; Hollermann, G.; Errenst, C.; Pajnik, J.; Frerich, S.; Kroll, S.; Rezwan, K.; Ivanovic, J. Supercritical CO₂ impregnation of PLA/PCL films with natural substances for bacterial growth control in food packaging. Food Res. Int.; 2018; 107, pp. 486-495. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.065]

15. Kuska, R.; Milovanovic, S.; Frerich, S.; Ivanovic, J. Thermal analysis of polylactic acid under high CO₂ pressure applied in supercritical impregnation and foaming process design. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2018; 144, pp. 71-80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2018.10.008]

16. Standau, T.; Zhao, C.J.; Castellón, S.M.; Bonten, C.; Altstädt, V. Chemical Modification and Foam Processing of Polylactide (PLA). Polymers; 2019; 11, 306. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11020306] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960290]

17. Milovanovic, S.; Pajnik, J.; Lukic, I. Tailoring of advanced poly(lactic acid)-based materials: A review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.; 2021; 139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.51839]

18. Lora, M.; Kikic, I. Polymer Processing with Supercritical Fluids. Polymer Sci.; 2000; 42, pp. 78-101. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03602549909351647]

19. Barry, J.J.A.; Silva, M.M.C.G.; Popov, V.; Shakesheff, K.; Howdle, S.M. Supercritical carbon dioxide: Putting the fizz into biomaterials. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.; 2005; 364, pp. 249-261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1687] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17464360]

20. Champeau, M.; Thomassin, J.-M.; Tassaing, T.; Jerome, C. Drug Loading of Sutures by Supercritical CO₂ Impregnation: Effect of Polymer/Drug Interactions and Thermal Transitions. Macromol. Mater. Eng.; 2015; 300, pp. 596-610. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mame.201400369]

21. Lopez-Periago, A.M.; Vega, A.; Subra, P.; Argemí, A.; Saurina, J.; A García-González, C.; Domingo, C. Supercritical CO₂ processing of polymers for the production of materials with applications in tissue engineering and drug delivery. J. Mater. Sci.; 2008; 43, pp. 1939-1947. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2461-0]

22. Milovanovic, S.; Djuris, J.; Dapčević, A.; Skoric, M.L.; Medarevic, D.; Pavlović, S.M.; Ibric, S. Preparation of floating polymer-valsartan delivery systems using supercritical CO₂. J. Polym. Res.; 2021; 28, 74. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02440-1]

23. Khanh, P.N.; Trung, N.T. Understanding Interaction Capacity of CO₂ with Organic Compounds at Molecular Level: A Theoretical Approach. Carbon Dioxide Chemistry, Capture and Oil Recovery; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; 105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71878]

24. Aschenbrenner, O.; Styring, P. Comparative study of solvent properties for carbon dioxide absorption. Energy Environ. Sci.; 2010; 3, pp. 1106-1113. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c002915g]

25. Tomasko, D.L.; Li, H.; Liu, D.; Han, X.; Wingert, M.J.; Lee, L.J.; Koelling, K.W. A Review of CO₂ Applications in the Processing of Polymers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.; 2003; 42, pp. 6431-6456. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie030199z]

26. Nofar, M.; Park, C.B. Extrusion Foaming of PLA and Its Compounds. Polylactide Foams: Fundamentals, Manufacturing, and Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 113-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813991-2.00005-6]

27. Placin, F.; Desvergne, J.-P.; Cansell, F. Organic low molecular weight aerogel formed in supercritical fluids. J. Mater. Chem.; 2000; 10, pp. 2147-2149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b001714k]

28. Rezabeigi, E.; Wood-Adams, P.M.; Drew, R.A. Production of porous polylactic acid monoliths via nonsolvent induced phase separation. Polymer; 2014; 55, pp. 6743-6753. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.063]

29. Chen, J.-S.; Tu, S.-L.; Tsay, R.-Y. A morphological study of porous polylactide scaffolds prepared by thermally induced phase separation. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.; 2010; 41, pp. 229-238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2009.08.008]

30. He, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, X.; Quan, D.; Liao, S.; Zeng, Y.; Lu, J.; Ramakrishna, S. Fabrication and characterization of poly(l-lactic acid) 3D nanofibrous scaffolds with controlled architecture by liquid–liquid phase separation from a ternary polymer–solvent system. Polymer; 2009; 50, pp. 4128-4138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2009.06.025]

31. García-González, C.A.; Alnaief, M.; Smirnova, I. Polysaccharide-based aerogels—Promising biodegradable carriers for drug delivery systems. Carbohydr. Polym.; 2011; 86, pp. 1425-1438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.066]

32. García-González, C.A.; Smirnova, I. Use of supercritical fluid technology for the production of tailor-made aerogel particles for delivery systems. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2013; 79, pp. 152-158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2013.03.001]

33. Salerno, A.; Domingo, C. Making microporous nanometre-scale fibrous PLA aerogels with clean and reliable supercritical CO₂ based approaches. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.; 2014; 184, pp. 162-168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.10.019]

34. Şahin, I.; Özbakır, Y.; Inönü, Z.; Ulker, Z.; Erkey, C. Kinetics of Supercritical Drying of Gels. Gels; 2018; 4, 4010003. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels4010003]

35. Reverchon, E.; Cardea, S.; Rapuano, C. A new supercritical fluid-based process to produce scaffolds for tissue replacement. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2008; 45, pp. 365-373. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2008.01.005]

36. Gay, S.; Lefebvre, G.; Bonnin, M.; Nottelet, B.; Boury, F.; Gibaud, A.; Calvignac, B. PLA scaffolds production from Thermally Induced Phase Separation: Effect of process parameters and development of an environmentally improved route assisted by supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2018; 136, pp. 123-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2018.02.015]

37. Milovanovic, S.; Markovic, D.; Pantic, M.; Pavlovic, S.M.; Knapczyk-Korczak, J.; Stachewicz, U.; Novak, Z. Development of advanced floating poly(lactic acid)-based materials for colored wastewater treatment. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2021; 177, 105328. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2021.105328]

38. Milovanović, S.L.; Marković, D.D.; Nikolić, I.D. Functionalization of PLA aerogels with TiO₂ nanoparticles. Tehnika; 2021; 76, pp. 403-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5937/tehnika2104403m]

39. Salerno, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, M.; del Barrio, J.S.R.; Domingo, C. Bio-safe fabrication of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by combining phase separation, porogen leaching and scCO₂ drying. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2015; 97, pp. 238-246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2014.10.029]

40. Cardea, S.; Baldino, L.; Scognamiglio, M.; Reverchon, E. 3D PLLA/Ibuprofen composite scaffolds obtained by a supercritical fluids assisted process. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.; 2014; 25, pp. 989-998. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-5130-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366467]

41. Cardea, S.; Baldino, L.; Pisanti, P.; Reverchon, E. 3-D PLLA scaffolds formation by a supercritical freeze extraction assisted process. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.; 2013; 25, pp. 355-362. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-5069-0]

42. Campardelli, R.; Della Porta, G.; Gomez, V.; Irusta, S.; Reverchon, E.; Santamaria, J. Encapsulation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in PLA microspheres using supercritical emulsion extraction to produce bactericidal nanocomposites. J. Nanoparticle Res.; 2013; 15, 1987. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1987-5]

43. Gimenez-Rota, C.; Palazzo, I.; Scognamiglio, M.; Mainar, A.; Reverchon, E.; Della Porta, G. β-Carotene, α-tocoferol and rosmarinic acid encapsulated within PLA/PLGA microcarriers by supercritical emulsion extraction: Encapsulation efficiency, drugs shelf-life and antioxidant activity. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2019; 146, pp. 199-207. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2019.01.019]

44. Palazzo, I.; Lamparelli, E.P.; Ciardulli, M.C.; Scala, P.; Reverchon, E.; Forsyth, N.; Maffulli, N.; Santoro, A.; Della Porta, G. Supercritical emulsion extraction fabricated PLA/PLGA micro/nano carriers for growth factor delivery: Release profiles and cytotoxicity. Int. J. Pharm.; 2021; 592, 120108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120108]

45. Oliveira, J.; Brichi, G.S.; Marconcini, J.M.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Glenn, G.M.; Medeiros, E.S. Effect of Solvent on the Physical and Morphological Properties of Poly(Lactic Acid) Nanofibers Obtained by Solution Blow Spinning. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr.; 2014; 9, 155892501400900414. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/155892501400900414]

46. Bueno, A.; Luebbert, C.; Enders, S.; Sadowski, G.; Smirnova, I. Production of polylactic acid aerogels via phase separation and supercritical CO2 drying: Thermodynamic analysis of the gelation and drying process. J. Mater. Sci.; 2021; 56, pp. 18926-18945. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06501-0]

47. Song, R.; Murphy, M.; Li, C.; Ting, K.; Soo, C.; Zheng, Z. Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications. Drug Des. Dev. Ther.; 2018; 12, pp. 3117-3145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s165440]

48. Gupta, B.; Revagade, N.; Hilborn, J. Poly(lactic acid) fiber: An overview. Prog. Polym. Sci.; 2007; 32, pp. 455-482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.005]

49. Zaaba, N.F.; Jaafar, M. A review on degradation mechanisms of polylactic acid: Hydrolytic, photodegradative, microbial, and enzymatic degradation. Polym. Eng. Sci.; 2020; 60, pp. 2061-2075. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.25511]

50. Farah, S.; Anderson, D.G.; Langer, R. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications—A comprehensive review. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.; 2016; 107, pp. 367-392. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27356150]

51. Jiménez, J.A.V.; Le Moigne, N.; Bénézet, J.-C.; Sauceau, M.; Sescousse, R.; Fages, J. Foaming of PLA Composites by Supercritical Fluid-Assisted Processes: A Review. Molecules; 2020; 25, 3408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153408]

52. Larsen, Å.; Neldin, C. Physical extruder foaming of poly(lactic acid)-processing and foam properties. Polym. Eng. Sci.; 2013; 53, pp. 941-949. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.23341]

53. Molladavoodi, S.; Gorbet, M.; Medley, J.; Kwon, H.J. Investigation of microstructure, mechanical properties and cellular viability of poly(L-lactic acid) tissue engineering scaffolds prepared by different thermally induced phase separation protocols. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.; 2013; 17, pp. 186-197. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.021]

54. Buzarovska, A.; Gualandi, C.; Parrilli, A.; Scandola, M. Effect of TiO₂ nanoparticle loading on Poly(l-lactic acid) porous scaffolds fabricated by TIPS. Compos. Part B Eng.; 2015; 81, pp. 189-195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.016]

55. Bernardes, B.; Del Gaudio, P.; Alves, P.; Costa, R.; García-Gonzaléz, C.; Oliveira, A. Bioaerogels: Promising Nanostructured Materials in Fluid Management, Healing and Regeneration of Wounds. Molecules; 2021; 26, 3834. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26133834]

56. García-González, C.A.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Processing of Materials for Regenerative Medicine Using Supercritical Fluid Technology. Bioconjugate Chem.; 2015; 26, pp. 1159-1171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc5005922]

57. Mao, D.; Li, Q.; Bai, N.; Dong, H.; Li, D. Porous stable poly(lactic acid)/ethyl cellulose/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds prepared by a combined method for bone regeneration. Carbohydr. Polym.; 2018; 180, pp. 104-111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.031]

58. Rojas, A.; Torres, A.; López, C.; de Dicastillo, C.L.; Velásquez, E.; Villegas, C.; Faba, S.; Rivera, P.; Guarda, A.; Romero, J. et al. Foaming with scCO₂ and Impregnation with Cinnamaldehyde of PLA Nanocomposites for Food Packaging. Processes; 2022; 10, 376. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr10020376]

59. Oliveira, N.S.; Dorgan, J.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Ferreira, A.; Daridon, J.L.; Marrucho, I.M. Gas solubility of carbon dioxide in poly(lactic acid) at high pressures. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys.; 2006; 44, pp. 1010-1019. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.20746]

60. Mahmood, S.; Keshtkar, M.; Park, C. Determination of carbon dioxide solubility in polylactide acid with accurate PVT properties. J. Chem. Thermodyn.; 2014; 70, pp. 13-23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2013.10.019]

61. Li, G.; Li, H.; Turng, L.; Gong, S.; Zhang, C. Measurement of gas solubility and diffusivity in polylactide. Fluid Phase Equilib.; 2006; 246, pp. 158-166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2006.05.030]

62. Yoon, Y.; Plummer, C.J.; Thoemen, H.; E Månson, J.-A. Liquid CO₂ processing of solid polylactide foam precursors. J. Cell. Plast.; 2016; 52, pp. 153-174. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021955X14537662]

63. Li, B.; Zhao, G.; Wang, G.; Zhang, L.; Gong, J. Fabrication of high-expansion microcellular PLA foams based on pre-isothermal cold crystallization and supercritical CO₂ foaming. Polym. Degrad. Stab.; 2018; 156, pp. 75-88. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.08.009]

64. Li, B.; Ma, X.; Zhao, G.; Wang, G.; Zhang, L.; Gong, J. Green fabrication method of layered and open-cell polylactide foams for oil-sorption via pre-crystallization and supercritical CO₂-induced melting. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2020; 162, 104854. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104854]

65. Yang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xia, C.; Chen, C.; Chen, X.; Yu, P. Foaming of poly(lactic acid) with supercritical CO₂: The combined effect of crystallinity and crystalline morphology on cellular structure. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2019; 145, pp. 122-132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2018.12.006]

66. López-Periago, A.; García-González, C.A.; Domingo, C. Solvent- and thermal-induced crystallization of poly-L-lactic acid in supercritical CO₂ medium. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.; 2009; 111, pp. 291-300. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.29111]

67. Plummer, C.J.G.; Yonghoon, Y.; Garin, L.; Månson, J.-A.E. Crystallization of polylactide during impregnation with liquid CO₂. Polym. Bull.; 2015; 72, pp. 103-116. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00289-014-1262-7]

68. Li, B.; Zhao, G.; Wang, G.; Zhang, L.; Gong, J.; Shi, Z. Super High-Expansion Poly(Lactic Acid) Foams with Excellent Oil-Adsorption and Thermal-Insulation Properties Fabricated by Supercritical CO₂ Foaming. Adv. Sustain. Syst.; 2021; 5, 2000295. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202000295]

69. Kiran, E. Foaming strategies for bioabsorbable polymers in supercritical fluid mixtures. Part II. Foaming of poly(ε-caprolactone-co-lactide) in carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide + acetone fluid mixtures and formation of tubular foams via solution extrusion. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2010; 54, pp. 296-307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2010.05.005]

70. Frerich, S.C. Biopolymer foaming with supercritical CO₂—Thermodynamics, foaming behaviour and mechanical characteristics. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2015; 96, pp. 349-358. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2014.09.043]

71. Haham, H.; Riscoe, A.; Frank, C.W.; Billington, S.L. Effect of bubble nucleating agents derived from biochar on the foaming mechanism of poly lactic acid foams. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv.; 2021; 3, 100059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100059]

72. Yan, Z.; Liao, X.; He, G.-J.; Li, S.; Guo, F.; Li, G. Green Method to Widen the Foaming Processing Window of PLA by Introducing Stereocomplex Crystallites. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.; 2019; 58, pp. 21466-21475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04147]

73. Tai, H.; Mather, M.; Howard, D.; Wang, W.; White, L.; Crowe, J.; Morgan, S.; Chandra, A.; Williams, D.; Howdle, S. et al. Control of pore size and structure of tissue engineering scaffolds produced by supercritical fluid processing—Discussion with reviewers. Eur. Cells Mater.; 2007; 14, pp. 76-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22203/ecm.vol014a07]

74. Santos-Rosales, V.; Iglesias-Mejuto, A.; García-González, C. Solvent-Free Approaches for the Processing of Scaffolds in Regenerative Medicine. Polymers; 2020; 12, 533. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12030533] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32131405]

75. Milovanovic, S.; Markovic, D.; Mrakovic, A.; Kuska, R.; Zizovic, I.; Frerich, S.; Ivanovic, J. Supercritical CO₂-assisted production of PLA and PLGA foams for controlled thymol release. Mater. Sci. Eng. C; 2019; 99, pp. 394-404. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.106]

76. Tsivintzelis, I.; Pavlidou, E.; Panayiotou, C. Porous scaffolds prepared by phase inversion using supercritical CO₂ as antisolvent: I. Poly(l-lactic acid). J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2007; 40, pp. 317-322. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2006.06.001]

77. Stoclet, G.; Sclavons, M.; Lecouvet, B.; Devaux, J.; Van Velthem, P.; Boborodea, A.; Bourbigot, S.; Sallem-Idrissi, N. Elaboration of poly(lactic acid)/halloysite nanocomposites by means of water assisted extrusion: Structure, mechanical properties and fire performance. RSC Adv.; 2014; 4, pp. 57553-57563. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4RA06845A]

78. Chauvet, M.; Sauceau, M.; Baillon, F.; Fages, J. Mastering the structure of PLA foams made with extrusion assisted by supercritical CO₂. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.; 2017; 134, 45067. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.45067]

79. Weishaupt, O.; Frerich, S. Empirical Modelling of Foam Extrusion Using Latin Hypercube Sampling and Machine Learning, ProcessNet High Pressure Technology. Available online: https://processnet.org/Veranstaltungen.html (accessed on 16 December 2022).

80. Lee, S.; Kareko, L.; Jun, J. Study of Thermoplastic PLA Foam Extrusion. J. Cell. Plast.; 2008; 44, pp. 293-305. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021955x08088859]

81. Yu, K.; Ni, J.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X.; Mi, J. Effects of in-situ crystallization on poly (lactic acid) microcellular foaming: Density functional theory and experiment. Polymer; 2020; 200, 122539. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122539]

82. Shi, X.; Wang, L.; Kang, Y.; Qin, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Fan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G. Effect of poly(butylenes succinate) on the microcellular foaming of polylactide using supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Polym. Res.; 2018; 25, 229. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10965-018-1620-5]

83. Ni, J.; Yu, K.; Zhou, H.; Mi, J.; Chen, S.; Wang, X. Morphological evolution of PLA foam from microcellular to nanocellular induced by cold crystallization assisted by supercritical CO₂. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2020; 158, 104719. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2019.104719]

84. Kuska, R.; Milovanovic, S.; Janowski, J.; Frerich, S.; Zizovic, I.; Ivanovic, J. Supercritical Foaming and Impregnation Processes Design based on Thermodynamic measurements of PLA under High Pressure CO₂. Proceedings of the 15th European Meeting on Supercritical Fluids (EMSF); Essen, Germany, 8–11 May 2016; pp. 9-11.

85. Li, B.; Zhao, G.; Wang, G.; Zhang, L.; Hou, J.; Gong, J. A green strategy to regulate cellular structure and crystallization of poly(lactic acid) foams based on pre-isothermal cold crystallization and CO₂ foaming. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.; 2019; 129, pp. 171-180. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.026]

86. Milovanović, S.; Lukić, I. An overview on the application of supercritical carbon dioxide for the processing of pharmaceuticals. Arh. za Farm.; 2022; 72, pp. 566-590. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5937/arhfarm72-39999]

87. Reverchon, E.; Antonacci, A. Drug–polymer microparticles produced by supercritical assisted atomization. Biotechnol. Bioeng.; 2007; 6, pp. 1626-1637. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.21370]

88. Girard, E.; Tassaing, T.; Marty, J.-D.; Destarac, M. Structure–Property Relationships in CO₂-philic (Co)polymers: Phase Behavior, Self-Assembly, and Stabilization of Water/CO₂ Emulsions. Chem. Rev.; 2016; 116, pp. 4125-4169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00420]

89. Conway, S.E.; Byun, H.-S.; McHugh, M.A.; Wang, J.D.; Mandel, F.S. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) solution behavior in supercritical CO₂, CHF₃, and CHC_lF₂. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.; 2001; 80, pp. 1155-1161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.1199]

90. Gregorowicz, J.; Bernatowicz, P. Phase behaviour of l-lactic acid based polymers of low molecular weight in supercritical carbon dioxide at high pressures. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2009; 51, pp. 270-277. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2009.08.002]

91. Fages, J.; Lochard, H.; Letourneau, J.-J.; Sauceau, M.; Rodier, E. Particle generation for pharmaceutical applications using supercritical fluid technology. Powder Technol.; 2004; 141, pp. 219-226. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2004.02.007]

92. Petermann, M. Supercritical fluid-assisted sprays for particle generation. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2018; 134, pp. 234-243. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.12.020]

93. Weidner, E.; Knez, Z.; Novak, Z. A Process and Equipment for Production and Fractionation of Fine Particles from Gas Saturated Solutions. World Patent; WO 95/21688, 1994.

94. Padrela, L.; Rodrigues, M.A.; Duarte, A.; Dias, A.M.; Braga, M.E.; de Sousa, H.C. Supercritical carbon dioxide-based technologies for the production of drug nanoparticles/nanocrystals—A comprehensive review. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.; 2018; 131, pp. 22-78. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.010] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026127]

95. Uchida, H.; Nishijima, M.; Sano, K.; Demoto, K.; Sakabe, J.; Shimoyama, Y. Production of theophylline nanoparticles using rapid expansion of supercritical solutions with a solid cosolvent (RESS-SC) technique. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2015; 105, pp. 128-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2015.05.005]

96. Sodeifian, G.; Sajadian, S.A.; Daneshyan, S. Preparation of Aprepitant nanoparticles (efficient drug for coping with the effects of cancer treatment) by rapid expansion of supercritical solution with solid cosolvent (RESS-SC). J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2018; 140, pp. 72-84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2018.06.009]

97. Weidner, E. High pressure micronization for food applications. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2009; 47, pp. 556-565. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2008.11.009]

98. Perinelli, D.; Bonacucina, G.; Cespi, M.; Naylor, A.; Whitaker, M.; Palmieri, G.; Giorgioni, G.; Casettari, L. Evaluation of P(L)LA-PEG-P(L)LA as processing aid for biodegradable particles from gas saturated solutions (PGSS) process. Int. J. Pharm.; 2014; 468, pp. 250-257. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.04.031]

99. Vergara-Mendoza, M.D.S.; Ortiz-Estrada, C.-H.; González-Martínez, J.; Quezada-Gallo, J.-A. Microencapsulation of Coenzyme Q10 in Poly(ethylene glycol) and Poly(lactic acid) with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.; 2012; 51, pp. 5840-5846. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie2014839]

100. Adami, R.; Liparoti, S.; Izzo, L.; Pappalardo, D.; Reverchon, E. PLA–PEG copolymers micronization by supercritical assisted atomization. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2012; 72, pp. 15-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2012.06.019]

101. Sacchetin, P.S.C.; Morales, A.R.; Moraes, M.; Rosa, P.D.T.V.E. Formation of PLA particles incorporating 17α-methyltestosterone by supercritical fluid technology. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2013; 77, pp. 52-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2013.02.029]

102. Reverchon, E. Supercritical-Assisted Atomization to Produce Micro- and/or Nanoparticles of Controlled Size and Distribution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.; 2002; 41, pp. 2405-2411. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie010943k]

103. Reverchon, E.; Della Porta, G. Micronization of antibiotics by supercritical assisted atomization. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2003; 26, pp. 243-252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-8446(02)00162-6]

104. Chen, A.-Z.; Li, Y.; Chau, F.-T.; Lau, T.-Y.; Hu, J.-Y.; Zhao, Z.; Mok, D.K.-W. Microencapsulation of puerarin nanoparticles by poly(l-lactide) in a supercritical CO₂ process. Acta Biomater.; 2009; 5, pp. 2913-2919. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.032]

105. Chen, F.; Yin, G.; Liao, X.; Yang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Gu, J.; Yao, Y.; Chen, X.; Gao, H. Preparation, characterization and in vitro release properties of morphine-loaded PLLA-PEG-PLLA microparticles via solution enhanced dispersion by supercritical fluids. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.; 2013; 24, pp. 1693-1705. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4926-1]

106. Jin, H.; Li, S.; Hu, D.; Zhao, Y. Preparation of PLA-PEG nanoparticles by the solution enhanced dispersion with enhanced mass transfer using ultrasound in supercritical CO₂. Powder Technol.; 2012; 227, pp. 17-23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.050]

107. Della Porta, G.; Falco, N.; Giordano, E.; Reverchon, E. PLGA microspheres by Supercritical Emulsion Extraction: A study on insulin release in myoblast culture. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.; 2013; 24, pp. 1831-1847. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2013.807457]

108. Della Porta, G.; Campardelli, R.; Reverchon, E. Monodisperse biopolymer nanoparticles by Continuous Supercritical Emulsion Extraction. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2013; 76, pp. 67-73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2013.01.009]

109. Sheth, P.; Sandhu, H.; Singhal, D.; Malick, W.; Shah, N.; Kislalioglu, M.S. Nanoparticles in the pharmaceutical industry and the use of supercritical fluid technologies for nanoparticle production. Curr. Drug Deliv.; 2012; 9, pp. 269-284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156720112800389052]

110. Gangapurwala, G.; Vollrath, A.; Luis, A.D.S.; Schubert, U.S. PLA/PLGA-Based Drug Delivery Systems Produced with Supercritical CO₂—A Green Future for Particle Formulation?. Pharmaceutics; 2020; 12, 1118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12111118] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33233637]

111. Im, S.H.; Lee, C.W.; Bibi, G.; Jung, Y.; Kim, S.H. Supercritical fluid technology parameters affecting size and behavior of stereocomplex polylactide particles and their composites. Polym. Eng. Sci.; 2017; 58, pp. 1193-1200. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.24681]

112. Montes, A.; Gordillo, M.; Pereyra, C.; de la Ossa, E.M. Supercritical CO₂ precipitation of poly(l-lactic acid) in a wide range of miscibility. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2013; 81, pp. 236-244. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2013.06.008]

113. Bakhbakhi, Y.; Asif, M.; Chafidz, A.; Ajbar, A. Formation of biodegradable polymeric fine particles by supercritical antisolvent precipitation process. Polym. Eng. Sci.; 2013; 53, pp. 564-570. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.23301]

114. Montes, A.; Kin, N.; Gordillo, M.; Pereyra, C.; de la Ossa, E.M. Polymer–naproxen precipitation by supercritical antisolvent (SAS) process. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2014; 89, pp. 58-67. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2014.02.004]

115. Cuadra, I.A.; Zahran, F.; Martín, D.; Cabañas, A.; Pando, C. Preparation of 5-fluorouracil microparticles and 5-fluorouracil/poly(l-lactide) composites by a supercritical CO₂ antisolvent process. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2019; 143, pp. 64-71. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2018.07.027]

116. Lee, B.K.; Yun, Y.; Park, K. PLA micro- and nano-particles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.; 2016; 107, pp. 176-191. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.020]

117. Kankala, R.K.; Zhang, Y.S.; Wang, S.-B.; Lee, C.-H.; Chen, A.-Z. Supercritical Fluid Technology: An Emphasis on Drug Delivery and Related Biomedical Applications. Adv. Heal. Mater.; 2017; 6, 1700433. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700433]

118. Tabernero, A.; Martin del Valle, E.M.; Galán, M.A. Supercritical fluids for pharmaceutical particle engineering: Methods, basic fundamentals and modelling. Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif.; 2012; 60, pp. 9-25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.06.004]

119. Soh, S.H.; Lee, L.Y. Microencapsulation and Nanoencapsulation Using Supercritical Fluid (SCF) Techniques. Pharmaceutics; 2019; 11, 21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11010021]

120. Qi, F.; Wu, J.; Li, H.; Ma, G. Recent research and development of PLGA/PLA microspheres/nanoparticles: A review in scientific and industrial aspects. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.; 2019; 13, pp. 14-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1729-4]

121. Spenlehauer, G.; Vert, M.; Benoit, J.; Boddaert, A. In vitro and In vivo degradation of poly(D,L lactide/glycolide) type microspheres made by solvent evaporation method. Biomaterials; 1989; 10, pp. 557-563. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(89)90063-X]

122. Anderson, J.M.; Shive, M.S. Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.; 2012; 64, pp. 72-82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.004]

123. Vega-González, A.; Subra-Paternault, P.; López-Periago, A.M.; García-González, C.A.; Domingo, C. Supercritical CO₂ antisolvent precipitation of polymer networks of l-PLA, PMMA and PMMA/PCL blends for biomedical applications. Eur. Polym. J.; 2008; 44, pp. 1081-1094. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.01.009]

124. Yoda, S.; Sato, K.; Oyama, H.T. Impregnation of paclitaxel into poly(dl-lactic acid) using high pressure mixture of ethanol and carbon dioxide. RSC Adv.; 2011; 1, pp. 156-162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1ra00070e]

125. Machado, N.D.; Cejudo-Bastante, C.; Goñi, M.L.; Gañán, N.A.; Casas-Cardoso, L.; Mantell-Serrano, C. Screening of the Supercritical Impregnation of Olea europaea Leaves Extract into Filaments of Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) and Polylactic Acid (PLA) Intended for Biomedical Applications. Antioxidants; 2022; 11, 1170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox11061170]

126. Ardestani, N.S.; Rojas, A.; Esfandiari, N.; Galotto, M.J.; Babhadiashar, A.; Sajadian, S.A. Supercritical Fluid Extraction from Zataria multiflora Boiss and Impregnation of Bioactive Compounds in PLA for the Development of Materials with Antibacterial Properties. Processes; 2022; 10, 1787. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr10091787]

127. Villegas, C.; Torres, A.; Rios, M.; Rojas, A.; Romero, J.; de Dicastillo, C.L.; Valenzuela, X.; Galotto, M.J.; Guarda, A. Supercritical impregnation of cinnamaldehyde into polylactic acid as a route to develop antibacterial food packaging materials. Food Res. Int.; 2017; 99, pp. 650-659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.06.031] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784528]

128. Coutinho, I.; Maia-Obi, L.; Champeau, M. Aspirin-Loaded Polymeric Films for Drug Delivery Systems: Comparison between Soaking and Supercritical CO₂ Impregnation. Pharmaceutics; 2021; 13, 824. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13060824]

129. Champeau, M.; Coutinho, I.T.; Thomassin, J.-M.; Tassaing, T.; Jérôme, C. Tuning the release profile of ketoprofen from poly(l-lactic acid) suture using supercritical CO₂ impregnation process. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.; 2020; 55, 101468. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101468]

130. Sugiura, K.; Ogawa, S.; Tabata, I.; Hori, T. Impregnation of Tranilast to the Poly(lactic acid) Fiber with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and the Release Behavior of Tranilast. Sen′i Gakkaishi; 2005; 61, pp. 159-165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2115/fiber.61.159]

131. Lukic, I.; Vulic, J.; Ivanovic, J. Antioxidant activity of PLA/PCL films loaded with thymol and/or carvacrol using scCO₂ for active food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life; 2020; 26, 100578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100578]

132. Jawaid, M.; Boonruang, K.; Chinsirikul, W.; Hararak, B.; Kerddonfag, N.; Chonhenchob, V.; Kenawy, E.-R. Antifungal Poly(lactic acid) Films Containing Thymol and Carvone. MATEC Web Conf.; 2016; 67, 6107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166706107]

133. Coutinho, I.T.; Champeau, M. Synergistic effects in the simultaneous supercritical CO₂ impregnation of two compounds into poly(L-lactic acid) and polyethylene. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2020; 166, 105019. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.105019]

134. Rosales, J.; Cejudo, C.; Verano, L.; Casas, L.; Mantell, C.; de la Ossa, E.M. Supercritical Impregnation of PLA Filaments with Mango Leaf Extract to Manufacture Functionalized Biomedical Devices by 3D Printing. Polymers; 2021; 13, 2125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13132125]

135. Naranjo, L.V.; Cejudo-Bastante, C.; Casas, L.; Mantell, C.; De La Ossa, E.J.M. In Vitro Study of the Release of Drugs Impregnated by Supercritical Technology in Polylactic Acid for Biomedical Applications. Chem. Eng. Trans.; 2021; 86, pp. 1063-1068. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET2186178]

136. Naranjo, L.V.; Bastante, C.C.; Cardoso, L.C.; Serrano, C.M.; Fernández, E.M.d.l.O. Supercritical Impregnation of Ketoprofen into Polylactic Acid for Biomedical Application: Analysis and Modeling of the Release Kinetic. Polymers; 2021; 13, 1982. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13121982]

137. Roß, N.; Frerich, S.C. High pressure differential scanning calorimetry of poly(lactic acid) in presence of CO₂ up to 100 MPa. Thermochim. Acta; 2021; 706, 179076. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2021.179076]

138. Huang, E.; Liao, X.; Zhao, C.; Park, C.B.; Yang, Q.; Li, G. Effect of Unexpected CO₂’s Phase Transition on the High-Pressure Differential Scanning Calorimetry Performance of Various Polymers. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2016; 4, pp. 1810-1818. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00008]

139. Miranda-Villa, P.P.; Gañán, N.A.; Martini, R.E.; Goñi, M.L. Supercritical CO₂-assisted impregnation of polylactic acid films with R-carvone: Effect of processing on loading, mass transfer kinetics, and final properties. J. CO2 Util.; 2022; 61, 102029. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102029]

140. Milovanović, S.L.; Kuska, R.M.; Škorić-Lučić, M.L.; Kalagasidis-Krušić, M.T.; Frerich, S.; Žižović, I.T.; Ivanović, J.Z. Swelling kinetics and impregnation of PLA with thymol under supercritical CO₂ conditions. Tehnika; 2016; 71, pp. 16-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5937/tehnika1601016m]

141. Grosso, P.; Cejudo, C.; Sánchez-Gomar, I.; Durán-Ruiz, M.C.; Moreno-Luna, R.; Casas, L.; Pereyra, C.; Mantell, C. Supercritical Impregnation of Mango Leaf Extract into PLA 3D-Printed Devices and Evaluation of Their Biocompatibility with Endothelial Cell Cultures. Polymers; 2022; 14, 2706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14132706]

142. Lukic, I.; Pajnik, J.; Nisavic, J.; Tadic, V.; Vági, E.; Szekely, E.; Zizovic, I. Application of the Integrated Supercritical Fluid Extraction–Impregnation Process (SFE-SSI) for Development of Materials with Antiviral Properties. Processes; 2022; 10, 680. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pr10040680]

143. Lukic, I.; Pajnik, J.; Tadic, V.; Milovanovic, S. Supercritical CO₂-assisted processes for development of added-value materials: Optimization of starch aerogels preparation and hemp seed extracts impregnation. J. CO₂ Util.; 2022; 61, 102036. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102036]

144. Ivanovic, J.; Rezwan, K.; Kroll, S. Supercritical CO₂ deposition and foaming process for fabrication of biopolyester-ZnO bone scaffolds. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.; 2018; 135, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.45824]

145. Bozbağ, S.E.; Erkey, C. Supercritical deposition: Current status and perspectives for the preparation of supported metal nanostructures. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2015; 96, pp. 298-312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2014.09.036]

146. Erkey, C. Preparation of metallic supported nanoparticles and films using supercritical fluid deposition. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2009; 47, pp. 517-522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2008.10.019]

147. Türk, M.; Erkey, C. Synthesis of supported nanoparticles in supercritical fluids by supercritical fluid reactive deposition: Current state, further perspectives and needs. J. Supercrit. Fluids; 2018; 134, pp. 176-183. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.12.010]

148. Liu, S.; Qin, S.; He, M.; Zhou, D.; Qin, Q.; Wang, H. Current applications of poly(lactic acid) composites in tissue engineering and drug delivery. Compos. Part B Eng.; 2020; 199, 108238. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108238]

149. Iglesias-Mejuto, A.; García-González, C.A. 3D-printed alginate-hydroxyapatite aerogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C; 2021; 131, 112525. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112525]

150. Iglesias-Mejuto, A.; García-González, C.A. 3D-Printed, Dual Crosslinked and Sterile Aerogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers; 2022; 14, 1211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14061211]

151. Thiele, M.; Kutlu, Y.; Dobbelstein, H.; Petermann, M.; Esen, C.; Ostendorf, A. Direct generation of 3D structures by laser polymer deposition. J. Laser Appl.; 2021; 33, 022002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2351/7.0000166]

152. Maga, D.; Hiebel, M.; Thonemann, N. Life cycle assessment of recycling options for polylactic acid. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.; 2019; 149, pp. 86-96. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.018]

Word count: 17206

Show less

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Translate

This review provides a concise overview of up-to-date developments in the processing of neat poly(lactic acid) (PLA), improvement in its properties, and preparation of advanced materials using a green medium (CO₂ under elevated pressure). Pressurized CO₂ in the dense and supercritical state is a superior alternative medium to organic solvents, as it is easily available, fully recyclable, has easily tunable properties, and can be completely removed from the final material without post-processing steps. This review summarizes the state of the art on PLA drying, impregnation, foaming, and particle generation by the employment of dense and supercritical CO₂ for the development of new materials. An analysis of the effect of processing methods on the final material properties was focused on neat PLA and PLA with an addition of natural bioactive components. It was demonstrated that CO₂-assisted processes enable the control of PLA properties, reduce operating times, and require less energy compared to conventional ones. The described environmentally friendly processing techniques and the versatility of PLA were employed for the preparation of foams, aerogels, scaffolds, microparticles, and nanoparticles, as well as bioactive materials. These PLA-based materials can find application in tissue engineering, drug delivery, active food packaging, compostable packaging, wastewater treatment, or thermal insulation, among others.

Details

Title

Green Processing of Neat Poly(lactic acid) Using Carbon Dioxide under Elevated Pressure for Preparation of Advanced Materials: A Review (2012–2022)

Author

Milovanovic, Stoja¹; Lukic, Ivana²

; Horvat, Gabrijela³; Novak, Zoran³

; Frerich, Sulamith⁴

; Petermann, Marcus⁴; García-González, Carlos A⁵

¹ Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; Łukasiewicz Research Network—New Chemical Syntheses Institute, Al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 13a, 24-110 Puławy, Poland
² Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
³ Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
⁴ Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
⁵ I+D Farma Group (GI-1645), Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, iMATUS and Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, E-15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

First page

860

Publication year

2023

Publication date

2023

Publisher

MDPI AG

e-ISSN

20734360

Source type

Scholarly Journal

Language of publication

English

DOI

https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040860

ProQuest document ID

2780005496

Green Processing of Neat Poly(lactic acid) Using Carbon Dioxide under Elevated Pressure for Preparation of Advanced Materials: A Review (2012–2022)

Jump to:

Full text

Abstract

Details

Suggested sources