It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Alcobiosis, the symbiosis of algae and corticioid fungi, frequently occurs on bark and wood. Algae form a layer in or below fungal basidiomata reminiscent of the photobiont layer in lichens. Identities of algal and fungal partners were confirmed by DNA barcoding. Algal activity was examined using gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence techniques. Carbon transfer from algae to fungi was detected as 13C, assimilated by algae, transferred to the fungal polyol. Nine fungal partners scattered across Agaricomycetes are associated with three algae from Trebouxiophycae: Coccomyxa sp. with seven fungal species on damp wood, Desmococcus olivaceus and Tritostichococcus coniocybes, both with a single species on bark and rain-sheltered wood, respectively. The fungal partner does not cause any obvious harm to the algae. Algae enclosed in fungal tissue exhibited a substantial CO2 uptake, but carbon transfer to fungal tissues was only detected in the Lyomyces-Desmococcus alcobiosis where some algal cells are tightly enclosed by hyphae in goniocyst-like structures. Unlike lichen mycobionts, fungi in alcobioses are not nutritionally dependent on the algal partner as all of them can live without algae. We consider alcobioses to be symbioses in various stages of co-evolution, but still quite different from true lichens.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.424923.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2035 1455); University of South Bohemia CZ, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.14509.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 4904)
2 Independent Researcher, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.14509.39)
3 University of South Bohemia CZ, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.14509.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 4904); Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418338.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2255 8513)
4 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Science, Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.15866.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 631X)
5 University of South Bohemia, Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.14509.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 4904)