Recent Advances in Asymmetric Synthesis of Pyrrolidine-Based Organocatalysts and Their Application: A 15-Year Update

Abstract

In 1971, chemists from Hoffmann-La Roche and Schering AG independently discovered a new asymmetric intramolecular aldol reaction catalyzed by the natural amino acid proline, a transformation now known as the Hajos–Parrish–Eder–Sauer–Wiechert reaction. These remarkable results remained forgotten until List and Barbas reported in 2000 that L-proline was also able to catalyze intermolecular aldol reactions with non-negligible enantioselectivities. In the same year, MacMillan reported on asymmetric Diels–Alder cycloadditions which were efficiently catalyzed by imidazolidinones deriving from natural amino acids. These two seminal reports marked the birth of modern asymmetric organocatalysis. A further important breakthrough in this field happened in 2005, when Jørgensen and Hayashi independently proposed the use of diarylprolinol silyl ethers for the asymmetric functionalization of aldehydes. During the last 20 years, asymmetric organocatalysis has emerged as a very powerful tool for the facile construction of complex molecular architectures. Along the way, a deeper knowledge of organocatalytic reaction mechanisms has been acquired, allowing for the fine-tuning of the structures of privileged catalysts or proposing completely new molecular entities that are able to efficiently catalyze these transformations. This review highlights the most recent advances in the asymmetric synthesis of organocatalysts deriving from or related to proline, starting from 2008.

1. Introduction

Substituted chiral pyrrolidines represent one of the most common heterocyclic structural motifs that are present in biologically active natural and synthetic compounds [1,2]. Meanwhile, this scaffold also plays a crucial role as a building block in organic synthesis and it characterizes the structure of many ligands [3,4]. Furthermore, since the advent of organocatalysis, chiral pyrrolidines have assumed a leading position as organocatalysts [5,6], as they are able to efficiently promote several different transformations in an enantioselective and environmentally friendly way, avoiding the use of metals. In this context, an important challenge is represented by the design and synthesis of structurally innovative organocatalysts. Starting from the first employed entities, such as natural proline and derivatives [7,8], MacMillan’s imidazolidinones [9], and Jørgensen and Hayashi’s diarylprolinol silyl ethers [10,11] (Figure 1a), a huge number of diverse pyrrolidine-based chiral organocatalysts have been proposed. The peculiar structure and substitution pattern of these organocatalysts determine the activation mode of the catalyst, leading to an enantioselective transformation (Figure 1b–e) [12,13].

In fact, chiral pyrrolidines, characterized by a hydrogen bonding donor in the C-2-side chain (proline, prolinamides, prolinols, triazole, etc.; Figure 1c), usually act by covalently binding a substrate and coordinating the second one through hydrogen bonds. Conversely, chiral pyrrolidines, lacking hydrogen bonding donors at C-2 and characterized by high steric hindrance or structural rigidity (Figure 1d,e), act by shielding one face of the substrate and driving the attack onto the other face. Based on the knowledge of their mode of action, the structures of pyrrolidine-derived organocatalysts have been extensively modified with the aim of optimizing the efficiency and selectivity of the catalysts and adapting them to the use of increasingly complex or less reactive substrates.

The huge interest in this structural motif has led to great efforts in developing novel and efficient synthetic strategies for the asymmetric construction of substituted chiral pyrrolidines. Some reviews surveyed an aspect of the synthetic protocols according to a peculiar focus, usually related to a specific chemical transformation: asymmetric syntheses of pyrrolidines exploiting organocatalysis [14], asymmetric [3 + 2]-cycloadditions involving azomethine ylides [15], catalytic asymmetric 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions [16], aryl-sulfinamides in the synthesis of N-heterocycles [17], synthesis of N-phosphorylated pyrrolidines [18], annulation strategies for the construction of multisubstituted pyrrolidines as natural products [19], or palladium-catalyzed alkene aminoarylation reactions [20]. Conversely, in this review, we focus on the advances achieved in the last 15 years (between 2008 and 2022) in the asymmetric synthesis of novel chiral pyrrolidine-based organocatalysts, including all of the proposed synthetic approaches. The catalysts developed in this period have been divided and described in three chapters (proline-related, prolinol-related, and diarylprolinol-related organocatalysts) according to their key structural features and, consequently, their activation mode.

We included the catalysts in which the structural variations involve the interaction with the substrates and, therefore, the transition state formation. The supported/immobilized/heterogeneous catalysts were considered beyond the scope of this survey of the literature, because the structural modifications are aimed at the catalyst’s recovery and reuse. Readers are kindly addressed to specific reviews covering the topic of pyrrolidine-based recyclable organocatalysts [21,22,23,24,25,26].

2. Proline-Related Organocatalysts

Proline can be considered the simplest aldolase in terms of structure, and since the seminal reports by List and Barbas on the direct asymmetric aldol reaction [27,28], proline has been successfully employed in a variety of asymmetric transformations [7]. Proline has assumed a leading role as a chiral privileged organocatalyst due to the presence of (i) a secondary amine involved in a five-membered ring, able to promptly form structurally defined enamines by reacting with enolizable carbonyl compounds, and (ii) a carboxylic acid which is able to coordinate a reacting electrophilic partner through hydrogen bonding interactions and to drive it specifically towards one of the two diastereotopic faces of the transient enamine [29]. Despite the great advantages offered by proline as an organocatalyst, some drawbacks limit its general application in synthetic transformations. First, proline is mostly insoluble in organic solvents; therefore, high catalyst loadings were commonly used to obtain acceptable reactivities. Moreover, the achieved enantioselectivities were moderate (<90% ee) and it was not usable in water, nowadays attracting great interest as an abundant, safe, and environmentally friendly reaction medium. On these bases, a huge number of structurally different organocatalysts were designed and synthesized to overcome these limitations, mainly introducing different groups on the C2-position of the pyrrolidine ring which were still able to act as efficient hydrogen-bond donors.

2.1. Prolinamides

Among the huge number of structurally different organocatalysts developed to overcome the limitations of proline, prolinamides enjoyed great success. In fact, they maintain the typical mode of action of proline coupled with improved properties due to the amidic sidechain. On the basis of their structure, these organocatalysts can be divided into “simple” amides and those containing additional functional groups which are capable of participating in the substrates coordination. Chiral prolinamides were exploited mainly to promote the asymmetric direct aldol reaction; however, some examples of the conjugate addition of carbonyl compounds to electron-poor π-systems were also reported. Since the synthesis of prolinamides generally relies on well-established synthetic procedures developed for the synthesis of peptides, this chapter will mainly focus on the structure of the newly proposed organocatalysts and on the peculiar activation modes of the reaction partners.

In 2010, Carter and coworkers proposed the new ester-containing proline aryl sulfonamide 1 (Scheme 1), which is able to catalyze the conjugate addition of racemic α,α-disubstituted aldehydes to acyclic unsaturated ketones, leading to cyclohexenones containing two adjacent stereocenters and including an all-carbon-quaternary carbon in high enantio- and diastereo-selectivity [29,30]. In this multicomponent coupling, benzylamine was crucial, presumably forming the enamine of the aldehyde which reacts with the chiral iminium ion of the ketone (Scheme 1). The lipophilic substituent on the aryl sulfonamide significantly improved the catalystsolubility in apolar solvents and its reactivity compared to proline.

In 2012, Sirit et al. investigated the enantioselective Michael addition of aldehydes to nitrostyrenes in apolar solvents mediated by two prolinamides which were fully substituted on the amide moiety (Figure 2), thus lacking the hydrogen-bond donor group typical of proline [31]. The use of a co-catalyst containing an acidic hydroxyl group was mandatory to achieve good performance, with (S)-1,1′-bi-2-naphthol providing the best results as a matched pair. The authors suggested a transition state model organized by a network of hydrogen bonding interactions (Figure 2), in which the amide acts as bulky substituent and the better enantioselectivity of catalyst 3 with respect to 2 could derive from the additional stereocenter.

The same asymmetric conjugate addition was investigated in 2012 by Kelleher’s research group, which proposed a series of 4-hydroxyprolinamides (Scheme 2b) to examine the impact of the 4-hydroxy and the 2-methyl groups on the enantioselectivity of the prolinamide organocatalysts [32]. The synthetic route started with the α-methylation of the fully protected trans-4-hydroxyproline, followed by the diastereoisomers separation, the usual steps for the amide synthesis, and the 4-hydroxy-deprotection (Scheme 2a). The coupling with N,α-dimethylbenzylamine provided the N-methylated prolinamides in low yields, due to the hindered nature of both of the coupling partners. The final Boc-removal proved to be problematic due to the high aqueous solubility of the products. For comparison, the analogous simple 4-hydroxy NH and N-methyl prolinamides were prepared in a similar manner. The application of all of the catalysts in the model conjugate addition showed that: (i) the cis relative position of the 4-OH was detrimental in the N-methyl amide, (ii) the removal of the α-methyl group provided improved results, (iii) the simplest hydroxyprolinamides 6c and 6d gave excellent performance, and (iv) replacing the N-1-phenylethyl side-chain to either a more, or less, sterically hindered moiety was detrimental to the stereoselectivity. DFT calculations suggested that the key role was played by the structure of the amide sidechain affecting the relative stability of the E-enamines derived from each catalyst. Small changes in the substrates structure can lead to profound differences in the enamine’s stabilities and transition states.

Lin and Wei, in 2014, exploited the reactivity of two new prolinamides characterized by bulky achiral substituents on the amide function (Figure 3) [33]. The most efficient Michael addition was achieved with the most hindered catalyst (S)-N-tritylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide 7b (10 mol%) at −20 °C, which provided good yields and enantiocontrol but moderate dr with some substrates.

Afterwards (2019), Ramapanicker and co-workers prepared five D-prolinamides from the corresponding 2-(trifluoromethylsulfonamidoalkyl)pyrrolidines (Scheme 3), to be used in the Michael addition of aldehydes to β-nitroalkenes at room temperature without additives [34]. The authors envisaged that the trifluoromethanesulfonamide (−NHTf) group could offer useful catalytic performance, acting as an H-bond donor instead of the carboxylic or phosphonic acids present in the peptidic catalysts which were previously proposed by Wennemers [35] and Lecouvey [36]. The synthetic strategy started with the preparation of the NHTf-substituted pyrrolidines in four high yielding steps from the corresponding aldehydes (reductive amination, hydrogenolysis, sulfonamide synthesis, and N-Boc deprotection; Scheme 3). The following coupling with N-Boc-D-proline and deprotection furnished the catalysts. The superior results obtained in the nitro-Michael reaction with catalyst 8c suggested that an optimal distance between the secondary amine and the hydrogen bond donor (NHTf) is needed. Good yields and stereoselectivities were observed; however, an excess of aldehyde, 10 mol% of catalyst, and at least two days were required.

Regarding the asymmetric direct aldol reaction, in 2008, Nájera et al. reported on the preparation of two new prolinamides derived from (1S,2R)-cis-1-aminoindan-2-ol and (R)-1-aminoindane, and on the corresponding prolinethioamides, using Lawesson’s reagent (Figure 4) [37]. Their reactivity was evaluated in enantioselective solvent-free inter- and intramolecular aldol reactions. The best results were achieved with thioamide 9d, which showed good performance in low loading (5 mol%) and with only one equivalent of ketone. Further, 9d proved to be a superior catalyst to L-Pro and the corresponding prolinamides for the solvent-free tested reactions. Moreover, it was easily recovered and reused by a simple acid/base work-up.

The same research group later proposed two pyrimidine-derived prolinamides containing (R,R)- or (S,S)-trans-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine as bifunctional organocatalysts (Figure 5) to be applied in the same solvent-free aldol processes [38]. DFT calculations suggested that the aldehyde is coordinated by two NH groups through H-bonding, explaining the preferential formation of the anti-isomer with both the diastereomeric catalysts (proline stereocenter governs the stereoselectivity) and confirming the beneficial role of the bifunctional system. Both the inter- and intra-molecular aldol reactions were scaled up to 1 g, and the organocatalysts were recovered (extractive work-up) and reused without a significant loss in activity.

In 2009, Chen and co-workers synthesized a family of pyrrolidinyl-camphor-containing bifunctional organocatalysts, deriving from proline or 4-hydroxyproline, by means of simple synthetic steps (Scheme 4) [39]. They were designed to synergistically activate both the nucleophilic and electrophilic reacting partners via enamine and hydrogen bonding. Moreover, the rigid bicyclic camphor moiety can act as a stereocontrolling element. The stereo and electronic properties of the catalysts were finely tuned through structural modifications and the obtained amphiphilic organocatalysts were tested in the asymmetric aldol reaction either in organic solvents or in the presence of water. Excellent yield and stereocontrol were achieved with thiourea 14c in the model reaction in water, although 20 mol% of both catalyst and additive (dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid acting as both acid promoter and surfactant) and 36 h were required.

A series of prolinamides, characterized by different carbocyclic rings or variably substituted aromatics (Figure 6), was synthesized in 2011 by Fu et al., aiming to establish a simple, inexpensive, and efficient route to enantiomerically enrich aldol products for industrial applications [40]. The simplest and least expensive catalyst, 17a, showed the best performance working in m-xylene at −20 °C. This catalyst was successfully employed in large-scale reactions (150 mmol of aromatic aldehyde), easily recovered by acid treatment, and reused for five cycles without a significant drop of enantioselectivity.

In the same year, Moorthy and coworkers applied a series of new prolinamides in the enantioselective organocatalytic Biginelli reaction [41]. The catalysts, containing one or two H-bonding donors, were easily synthesized starting from L-proline or trans-4-hydroxy L-proline (7b,c, 18a–h–20, Scheme 5a), and the cis-4-tosylamide derivatives (18i,j) were obtained by exploiting the usual strategy for OH-replacement with NH₂ (Scheme 5b). The sterically hindered N-arylprolinamide 18j, having chirality reinforced by an additional stereocenter and a very acidic hydrogen bond donor at C-4, performed well with uniformly high enantiocontrol (94–99%) in the cyclocondensation of aliphatic as well as aromatic aldehydes with urea and ethyl acetoacetate, and in the presence of pentafluorobenzoic acid and tritylammonium trifluoroacetate as additives, which increased the yields and ees.

A different approach, based on plant-derived chiral β-aminoalcohols, to construct bifunctional prolinamide-based organocatalysts was proposed in 2011 by Zlotin et al., which conjugated (S)-proline with stereoisomeric 2-hydroxy-3-aminopinanes (Figure 7) [42]. The catalytic properties were studied in the asymmetric aldol reaction in water, as it is an environmentally friendly medium. The authors assumed that catalyst 21b, owing to its syn-orientated NH– and OH– groups, provided better results thanks to the more efficient hydrogen bonding network with the aldehyde in the transition state of the addition.

The aldol reaction of isatin with acetone was selected by Lennon and coworkers in 2011 to evaluate the reactivity and selectivity of a family of simple prolinamides, among which were N-pyridyl and N-quinolinyl derivatives (Scheme 6) [43]. The authors hypothesized that a combination of hydrogen bonding and π–π stacking of the aromatic rings of the catalysts with isatin were responsible for the observed catalytic performance. The nitrogen position in the aromatic ring had a significant effect on the enantioselectivity, with the 3- and 4-aminopyridinyl catalysts 22c and 22f, and the 3-aminoquinolinyl catalyst 22i, yielding the best results. The presence of a second stereogenic center in the organocatalyst led to inferior stereocontrol. The amide N–H played a crucial role and an enhanced N–H acidity led to interesting results (catalysts 17e and 24a, the last containing a sulfonamide). Conversely, the binding to the N–H of isatin may not have played a significant role.

In the same year, Nakamura’s group investigated the enantioselective cross-aldol reaction between acetone and trihalomethyl ketones or imines promoted by N-(8-quinolinesulfonyl)prolinamide 24f and found it to be the best organocatalyst (Scheme 7) [44]. The MO calculations suggested that the hydrogen bonding between the sulfonimide proton and the 8-quinolyl nitrogen plays a remarkable role in determining the reaction enantioselectivity.

In 2012, Ventura’s group described the synthesis of a series of new pyrrolidine-based organocatalysts derived from tartaric and glyceric acids (Scheme 8) [45]. The authors supposed that the addition of extra stereocenters and suitably positioned functional groups can contribute to create new effective organocatalysts. The synthesis of catalysts 25a–d was accomplished in eight and nine steps, starting from dimethoxy-2,3-dimethyl-1,4-dioxane-5,6-dicarboxylate I-9, obtained in turn from L- or D-tartaric acid (Scheme 8a). The cis-catalyst 25e was prepared with some difficulties from dithioester I-12 (Scheme 8b). Organocatalyst 25f was readily obtained from glyceric acid methyl ester (Scheme 8c) and organocatalyst 26g was prepared from bicyclic product I-17 (Scheme 8d). The application of these catalysts to an asymmetric aldol reaction led to modest results. The catalysts were not generally applicable, probably because of the high conformational rigidity conferred by the dioxane ring.

A structural variation of the sulfonamide-based organocatalysts already proposed by Carter [30] and Lennon [43] was developed by Wan and Hao in 2014, who proposed N-prolyl sulfinamides containing two stereogenic centers (Figure 8) [46]. Four organocatalysts (neutral sulfonamide 27a, its corresponding enantiomeric TFA salts 27b, 27c, and diastereomeric salt 27d) were applied in the asymmetric aldol reaction under the solvent-free condition, it being a more efficient and environmentally friendly system. Good performance was achieved with 27b at 0 °C, although some days were required to reach high conversion. The reactivity of neutral 27a was inferior, whereas a much poorer enantioselectivity and reactivity were observed with diastereomeric catalyst 27d, as it presented a reversed asymmetric induction, confirming that the enantioswitching is dominated by the configuration of the prolyl unit. (S)-N-(methylsulfonyl) pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide promoted the same reaction with worse results, supporting the profitable role of the additional stereocenter that is present in these sulfinamides.

In 2014, the phthalimido-prolinamide 28 (Figure 9) was developed by Kumar et al. to promote the enantioselective direct aldol reaction of aromatic aldehydes with ketones under solvent- and additive-free conditions [47]. A small amount of water (5 mol%) improved the reaction rate and, slightly, the enantioselectivity. The authors supposed that water contributes to creating a more compact transition state, leading to higher stereoselectivity (Figure 9).

New bifunctional organocatalysts based on a nucleoside and proline, named AZT-prolinamides (Figure 10), were synthesized by Chandrasekhar et al. in 2014 to mediate the same enantioselective aldol reaction in additive-free water [48]. The results obtained with catalyst 29b were slightly inferior to those obtained for catalyst 29a, with both used at 15 mol% loading. The authors suggested that the nucleoside moiety acts as a steric controller and contributes to hydrogen bond stabilization along with the amide group. The prolinamide 29a provides an additional hydrogen bond due to the presence of the hydroxy group (A); conversely, the silylated prolinamide 29b exerts extensive steric coverage (B).

Some of the 4-hydroxy-prolinamides (Figure 11) synthesized by Kelleher et al. [32] in 2012 were applied by Singh in 2015 in the asymmetric aldol reaction using low catalyst loading (10 mol%) under solvent-free conditions, according to the green chemistry principles [49]. The trans-4-Hydroxy-(S)-prolinamide 6d, containing (S)-1-phenylethylamine, proved to be the best catalyst. The (S)-1-phenylethylamine and the additional 4-hydroxyl group in the trans position both positively influenced the enantioselectivity of the predominant anti-aldol product, with the 4-OH probably forming a network of intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Figure 11). Catalyst 6d can be reused for up to five cycles for the asymmetric aldol reaction between cyclohexanone (1.2 mmol) and p-nitrobenzaldehyde (0.4 mmol) using acetic acid (10 mol%) as the additive at 15 °C, obtaining a slightly lower ee but an improved dr.

In 2016, the same prolinamides, with or without the 4-hydroxy group, were also applied by Singh as organocatalysts in the asymmetric aldol reaction of isatins with acetone [50]. With the best catalyst, 6d (Figure 11), the reaction proceeded at −35 °C with acetone as a co-solvent under additive-free conditions, providing the aldol products in high yields (up to 99%) and with moderate enantioselectivities (up to 80%).

The asymmetric aldol reaction between acetone and aromatic aldehydes was selected to evaluate the performance of the novel bifunctional organocatalysts proposed by de Parrodi and coworkers in 2015 [51]. The homochiral L-prolinamido-sulfonamides 30a–h (Figure 12) were easily synthesized from enantiomerically pure (R,R)-11,12-diamino-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene as a 1,2-diamine structural motif to be derivatized as both prolinamide and sulfonamide. The best results were achieved with catalyst 30d, bearing a strong electron-withdrawing substituent; however, the reaction scope was limited. To confirm the role of the sulfonamide-NH, the model reaction was carried out with the corresponding -NMe catalyst, leading to worse yield and stereocontrol. The diastereoisomeric organocatalyst obtained from the enantiomeric 1,2-diamine also provided worse ee. The calculated transition state structure evidenced an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the sulfonamide NH and the prolinamide C=O which may lock the proline conformation, affecting the selectivity.

2.2. Peptides

Peptidic organocatalysts have a modular nature which allows for easily change both their structure and properties while maintaining the profitable hydrogen bonding interactions that are typical of proline. As already mentioned, for prolinamides, the synthesis of peptides is accomplished through well-established synthetic approaches; therefore, in this chapter we will mainly focus on the key structural features of the recently proposed peptidic organocatalysts, describing their interactions with the reacting substrates. Peptides [52] characterized by proline, such as N-terminal amino acid, are typically used to catalyze asymmetric aldol reactions more efficiently than proline. However, the peculiar arrangement of the key functional groups (the N-terminal secondary amine and the carboxylic acid) in the peptide plays a crucial role. This was demonstrated by Wennemers et al. in 2008 by synthesizing a series of analogues of the tripeptide organocatalyst H-Pro-Pro-Asp-NH₂ 31a (Figure 13) [53]. All of the peptides were prepared by solid phase synthesis on a 500-mg scale, and they were then isolated and used as TFA salts. It was found that small structural modifications significantly modify the conformational and catalytic behavior, making the purely rational design of peptidic catalysts very challenging. In particular, the carboxylic acid position strongly affects the enantioselectivity, whereas the carboxamide tunes the reactivity. Moreover, all of the diastereoisomers of tripeptide 31a provided the aldol products in lower yields and stereoselectivities.

Novel tripeptides were also proposed in 2014 by Kokotos and Moutevelis-Minakakis to catalyze the asymmetric aldol reaction [54]. In this case, the organocatalysts were based on Pro-Phe (Figure 14) and used as tert-butyl esters in an organic solvent or water. The addition of 4-nitrobenzoic acid (20 mol%) and NaBr provided the best results in water, employing only two equivalents of ketone. The C-terminal amino acid determines the ability of the tripeptide (Pro-Phe-AA-OtBu) to perform efficiently in water or toluene.

Kohari and coworkers, in 2019, developed unnatural tripeptides as organocatalysts for the asymmetric aldol reaction of isatins with acetone [55]. The authors hypothesized that high enantioselectivity could be achieved by employing a tripeptide that engaged a peculiar conformation due to the presence of a D-amino acid. In this case, H-Pro-Gly-D-Ala-OH, characterized by the D-alanine as the C-terminal residue, provided the best enantioselectivity (up to 97% ee). The transition state structure was investigated via DFT calculations, which confirmed the essential role of the C-terminal D-alanine residue.

The same research group proposed the tripeptide 33, which consists of 4-trans-siloxyproline as N-terminal residue, the central L-tert-leucine unit, and glycine as C-terminal amino acid (Scheme 9), as an efficient organocatalyst for the asymmetric aldol reaction between acetone and α-ketoesters [56] or α-keto amides [57], as it generated optically active acyclic tertiary alcohols. The achieved enantiocontrol was higher for α-keto amides than α-ketoesters; however, 20 mol% of catalyst and five days were required to obtain good yields at −40 °C. Experimental data and DFT calculations showed that the tert-butyl group played a remarkable role in the reaction rate and enantioselectivity.

Not only tripeptides, but also dipeptides are able to promote a direct asymmetric aldol reaction. In 2009, Chandrasekhar proposed the new proline–threonine dipeptide, 34 (Scheme 10), which was applied in the reaction between various aldehydes and acetone [58]. Due to the lipophilic silylated protecting group present on the threonine-OH, the best results were obtained in CHCl₃. It was found that, in this case, the enantioselectivity was higher than that achieved using the known catalyst with methyl ester and the free hydroxyl group in threonine moiety [59].

Three enantiomerically pure N-(1-carbamoyl-1,1-dialkyl-methyl)-(S)-prolinamides, resembling dipeptides involving proline and characterized by two amide functional groups (Figure 15), were synthesized by Drabina et al. and tested as organocatalysts in the aldol reaction [60]. The results were mediocre, with the (S)-valinamide-derived catalyst 35c (tertiary and not quaternary α-carbon) providing the best enantiocontrol.

Zhang and Wang, in 2015, prepared a family of dipeptide-like organocatalysts (Figure 16) that were applied with low loading (1 mol%) in the asymmetric aldol reactions in brine, which proved to be a better medium than water [61]. Aromatic aldehydes and acetone provided good yields and moderate enantioselectivities, whereas using cyclohexanone provided high yields, good ees, and excellent des. A multi-gram scale synthesis of these catalysts using commercially available materials was reported by the authors.

Aiming to develop sustainable enantioselective reactions, in 2015, Juaristi and co-workers applied three novel proline-based α,β-dipeptides to the asymmetric aldol reaction under solvent-free, high-speed ball milling (HSBM) conditions (Figure 17) [62]. The transformation proceeded in shorter times and with higher stereoselectivity with respect to the conventional protocols. The organocatalysts’ synthesis was carried out in solution, employing propanephosphonic acid anhydride (T3P) as an activating agent. Regarding the catalysts structure, it was found that: (i) the presence of a second stereocenter in the α,β-dipeptide did not improve the stereoselectivity, (ii) the free carboxylic group (37b vs. 37a) had no effect on the stereoselectivity and, (iii) due to the poor solubility of 37b under HSBM conditions, the aldol reaction showed low conversion.

In 2018, Moutevelis-Minakakis and Kokotos synthesized proline-based fluorinated dipeptides as organocatalysts for the asymmetric aldol reaction both in organic and aqueous media [63]. The catalyst design aimed to improve the hydrogen bonding interactions and/or change the catalyst conformation that was adopted in the transition state (Figure 18). It was established that both the amide and fluorine moieties are essential to obtain good results in both organic and aqueous media (brine), with the 2-trifluoromethyl-aniline 38e being the best-performing dipeptide.

The same authors, in the same year, also proposed new hybrids which combined a dipeptide moiety with a 2-pyrrolidinone scaffold (Figure 19), derived from pyroglutamic acid, which promoted the asymmetric aldol reaction in both organic and aqueous media [64]. The authors observed: (i) a beneficial effect of the pyrrolidinone ring with respect to simple dipeptide, (ii) a matched effect between the peculiar absolute configurations of Phe and the stereocenter on the pyrrolidinone, (iii) that, in brine, more distance between the Pro-Phe dipeptide backbone and 2-pyrrolidinone is profitable, and (iv) that substituted pyrrolidinones provided worse results. Catalyst 39a was successfully recovered (73%); however, the enantioselectivity dropped when it was reused in a second reaction. These catalysts also showed interesting catalytic activity in the aldol reaction of ketone with ketones.

Effective organocatalytic enantioselective direct aldol reactions were also promoted by pseudopeptides. In 2011, Pearson and coworkers investigated a series of structures (Figure 20) that were characterized by the anthranilamide moiety [65]. They obtained a good reaction performance in employing pseudotripeptides, showing a favourite conformation which derives from an intramolecular hydrogen bonding (Figure 20c), leading to a defined binding pocket (Figure 20b). The best results with various aldehydes and ketones were achieved with catalyst 40f, due to the free carboxylic acid, the presence of a α-substituent in the C-terminal aminoacid, and the methyl group at C-6 on the aromatic ring.

Kokotos proposed, in 2012, a prolinamide-thiourea consisting of (S)-prolinamide, (1S,2S)-diphenylethylenediamine, and (S)-di-tert-butyl aspartate (Scheme 11) as an efficient organocatalyst for the challenging asymmetric aldol reaction between ketones and perfluoroalkyl ketones. Tertiary alcohols were obtained in high yields and good enantioselectivities were obtained (up 81% ee) by employing this tripeptide-like catalyst at low loading (2 mol%) [66].

Proline-based peptides were also employed in the asymmetric Michael reaction between ketones and nitroolefins. In 2009, Tsogoeva et al. synthesized some di- and tri-peptides (Figure 21) and applied them in the enantioselective construction of γ-nitroketones “on water” (without organic co-solvents). Good yields and dr were achieved using cyclic ketones and aromatic nitroalkenes, and the ees reached a maximum of 70% [67]. The authors demonstrated the key role of sodium hydroxide as an additive and the beneficial effect of the lipophilic side chains (L-Phe and L-Val) compared to the functionalized L-Tyr residue. The peptide size seems to affect the performance of this transformation “on water,” since the addition of a C-terminal phenylalanine led to worse results and simple L-proline was unable to promote the reaction.

Wennemers et al. devoted many efforts to the development of peptidic organocatalysts to efficiently promote the asymmetric conjugate addition of aldehydes to nitroolefins. In 2009, they identified the tripeptide H-D-Pro-Pro-Glu-NH₂ (43a, Figure 22) as a very effective organocatalyst which provided excellent performance under mild conditions and in the absence of additives [35]. The D-Pro-Pro moiety is the major factor responsible for the high stereoselectivity, whereas the C-terminal amide and the spacer to the free carboxylic acid contribute to the fine-tuning of the stereoselectivity. In 2010, the authors performed kinetic studies which revealed that, in the peptide-catalyzed process, the rate-limiting steps are both the reaction of enamine with the electrophile and the hydrolysis of the resulting imine (and not the enamine formation) [68]. These findings allowed the authors to decrease the loading of tripeptide catalyst 43a to 0.1 mol% for a broad range of substrates. Their work demonstrated the key role of mechanistic insights based on kinetic studies for the optimization of organocatalytic reactions.

Afterwards (2017), the same research group studied the impact of the amide bond conformation on the stereoselectivity of H-Pro-Pro-Xaa-NH₂-type peptide organocatalysts in conjugate addition reactions (Figure 23) [69]. The middle Pro unit within the catalyst was replaced with analogues of varying ring sizes to generate different trans/cis ratios. It was found that there was a direct correlation between the trans/cis amide bond ratio and the enantio- and diastereo-selectivity of structurally related catalysts. H-D-Pro-Pip-Glu-NH₂ (43b, Figure 23; Pip: piperidine carboxylic acid), characterized by an enhanced population of the trans conformer, was identified as a highly reactive and stereoselective peptidic catalyst, and was well-performing at 0.05 mol%, which was the lowest catalyst loading achieved thus far for organocatalyzed reactions that rely on an enamine-based mechanism.

In 2012, Wennemers et al. focused on poorly reactive α,β-disubstituted nitroolefins, which are interesting due to providing synthetically useful γ-nitroaldehydes with three adjacent stereocenters (Scheme 12) [70]. Fifteen tripeptides Pro-Pro-Xaa (Xaa = acidic amino acid) were evaluated and H-Pro-Pro-D-Gln-OH and H-Pro-Pro-Asn-OH proved to be efficient organocatalysts in this transformation. The combination of rigidity (H-Pro-Pro) and a certain degree of conformational flexibility (Gln-OH or Asn-OH) seemed to be the key to their catalytic efficiency. Moreover, these organocatalysts strongly favour the conjugate addition reaction over the competing homo-aldol reaction, and this high chemoselectivity becomes crucial when poorly reactive α,β-disubstituted nitroolefins are used as substrates. Mechanistic investigations showed that the configuration of all three of the stereocenters in the product was induced by the peptidic catalyst.

Shortly after (2013), the same authors also studied the asymmetric conjugate addition of aldehydes to β,β-disubstituted nitroalkenes, generating an all-carbon quaternary stereocenter adjacent to a tertiary stereocenter (Scheme 13) [71]. In this case, the carboxylic acid at the C-terminus of the peptide had a detrimental effect, whereas the highest conversions were obtained with peptides bearing a methylester and/or aromatic residues. Dipeptide H-D-Pro-Pro-NHCH(Ph)CH₂-4-Me-C₆H₄ (43d) provided the best reaction performance.

In 2016, Xie and Wang synthesised a family of novel bifunctional L-prolinamides which resembled dipeptides, characterized by the (S)-proline, a central aminoacidic unit and a terminal bulky amide (Figure 24) [72]. The nitro-Michael reaction promoted by catalyst 44b (5 mol%) gave excellent results under mild conditions. It is noteworthy that α,α-disubstituted aldehydes also showed a good reaction performance.

In the same year, Deschamp and Lecouvey proposed a small library of novel bifunctional tripeptides which carry a phosphonic acid (Scheme 14) [36]. The authors aimed to combine aminocatalysis and phosphonic acid activation to promote the stereoselective Michael addition of aldehydes to nitroalkenes. Their strategic synthesis relies on introducing the phosphonic acid moiety on a commercially available serine before its coupling with the dipeptide. The aspartic acid analogue I-20a was obtained through a Mitsunobu reaction leading to a γ-lactone, readily substituted by trimethyl phosphite, and final Boc-deprotection. The glutamic acid analogue I-20b was prepared starting from Garner’s aldehyde I-19, which was subjected to a sequence of high yielding reactions: (i) Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction, (ii) double bond hydrogenation, (iii) ketal acidic deprotection, (iv) alcohol oxidation to the corresponding carboxylic acid, (v) Boc-deprotection, and (vi) esterification. After the coupling with the dipeptide, the N-Boc-proline and the phosphonate diester protecting groups were simultaneously removed with bromotrimethylsilane, the pH was adjusted, and the catalysts were lyophilized as sodium salts. This method avoided the use of an external base, allowing easier catalyst recovery. In fact, due to their water solubility, the catalysts were easily recyclable and could be reused over several cycles without any significant loss of selectivity. Applied in the asymmetric Michael reaction, these catalysts provided opposite absolute configurations compared to Wennemer’s catalysts. The different spatial geometry and activation mode of carboxylic acid and phosphonic acid could probably explain this divergent behavior [73]. Catalyst 45d, derived from pre-adjusted pH to 11.5, was the most effective catalyst at a low loading (1 mol%) and used at 0 °C. It was observed that the catalysts protonation state played a remarkable role in the mechanism and reaction outcome.

In 2017, Martín’s research group was inspired by the idea to combine two chiral building blocks (amino acids and carbohydrates), and they proposed a series of new hybrid dipeptide-like organocatalysts which are structurally based on proline and pyranoid ε- or ζ-amino acids (Figure 25) [74]. The asymmetric Michael addition of aldehydes to β-nitrostyrenes provided good results under mild conditions, using the trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) salts of the dipeptides (5 mol%) and N-methylmorpholine (NMM). In these bifunctional organocatalysts, proline residue which was attached near the tetrahydropyran ring led to better stereocontrol, whereas the tetrahydropyran moiety (decorated with a methoxy group at C-4 in equatorial position) induced a well-defined conformation which is responsible for the catalyst’s efficiency. The best results were collected with catalyst 46k, which involved the carbohydrate motif embedded in a ζ-amino acid.

Very recently (2020), Wennemers et al. developed a novel tripeptide which is able to catalyse the anti-selective conjugate addition reaction between aldehydes and nitroolefins [75]. It was a very remarkable achievement, since the numerous already-proposed amine organocatalysts promote this transformation resulting in syn-configured products. The crucial role in obtaining anti selectivity was played by the substituents that were installed at C-δ of the catalytically active proline ring, which favour the formation of the intermediate s-cis enamine, reacting in a Curtin–Hammett scenario more promptly than the s-trans isomer (Scheme 15a). After a careful optimization of both its catalyst structure and reaction conditions, tripeptide 43e (Scheme 15b) was able to provide excellent yields and stereoselectivities on a wide range of substrates.

Peptides were successfully employed in the asymmetric conjugate addition of aldehydes not only to nitroolefins, but also to maleimide, generating products which were readily derivatized to pyrrolidines, lactams, lactones, and peptide-like compounds [76]. Extensive studies on the optimal catalyst (H-D-Pro-Pro-Asn-NH₂) showed the importance of the hydrogen bonding interactions between unprotected maleimide and peptidic organocatalyst to achieve high stereoselectivity and to avoid side-reactions. These findings suggest that differential coordination, which underlies the substrate specificity of enzymes, can be implemented in peptidic organocatalysts.

2.3. Substituted Prolines

As has already been mentioned, proline has a leading role as a chiral organocatalyst due to its widespread application [77]. However, it also has several limitations. The design and synthesis of prolinamides (Section 2.1) and peptides (Section 2.2) represent a useful approach to overcome these issues, while maintaining the proline’s ability to form H-bonds. An alternative strategy consists of the functionalization of other portions of the proline scaffold, leaving the secondary amine and the carboxyl function unchanged.

An interesting contribution in this field was provided by Loh et al. in 2010, which reported on the rational design and synthesis of a new structurally rigid tricyclic amphibian chiral organocatalyst based on the hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole skeleton (Scheme 16) [78]. The authors referred to it as a chemzyme possessing a well-organized chiral pocket which provided asymmetric induction, and a hydrophobic pocket enabling the organocatalytic reactions to proceed both in organic solvents and in water. The tricyclic catalyst 47a was easily synthesized in four steps (esterification, acid-mediated ring closure, carbamylation, and final protecting groups removal; Scheme 16a) from cheap and commercially available Nα-carbobenzyloxy-L-tryptophan in 74% total yield. Catalyst 47a was tested in the enantioselective Michael addition of aldehydes to nitroalkenes, furnishing excellent performance unlike other catalysts such as proline, 47b, or 47c (Scheme 16c). These findings supported the key role of this peculiar skeleton and suggested that the proline skeleton and not the hydrogen bonding interaction was responsible for its failure in this process. DFT calculations determined that the ethyl carbamate group induces the enamine to adopt the syn conformation. Being the process carried out in protic solvent (MeOH or H₂O), the enamine Si face is hindered by hydrogen-bond networks; therefore, nitrostyrene will attack the less-hindered enamine Re face (Scheme 16b).

In 2011, Lombardo and Quintavalla described the new cis-ion-tagged organocatalyst 48a, which is characterized by an amide linkage between the imidazolium tag at C-4 and the proline ring (Scheme 17) [79]. The ionic group installed at C-4 is supposed to increase the catalyst lipophilicity and solubility (also exploiting the hydrophobic bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide counterion, NTf₂); however, at the same time, the ionic group should improve the catalyst activity by means of a stabilizing electrosteric effect. The organocatalyst was synthesized in four steps (amide synthesis, Cl-substitution by N-methyl imidazole, counterion exchange, and simultaneous removal of the two protecting groups; Scheme 17a) starting from cis-4-amino-L-proline 4 in 50% total yield. Catalyst 48a was tested in the asymmetric aldol condensation between ketones and aldehydes “in the presence” of water (1.2 equivalents), and displayed an excellent efficiency in terms of catalyst loading (2–5 mol%) and stereochemical outcome. Moreover, 48a was bench-stable; therefore, it was more practical and profitable than the more sensitive cis-ester 48b (Scheme 17b) [80]. A combined experimental and computational investigation offered a rationalization for the higher reactivity of cis-ion-tagged proline compared to its tagged trans analogue and to the cis or trans tag-free organocatalysts [81]. The transition state involving cis-ion-tagged proline is significantly stabilized by a complex network of hydrogen bonds, π-stacking interactions involving the aldehyde aromatic ring, and π-interactions between the proline carboxyl group and the imidazole ring (Scheme 17c).

The same research group, in collaboration with Gruttadauria’s group, proposed, in 2012, an innovative two-stage liquid–liquid biphasic homogeneous protocol for the asymmetric organocatalytic aldol reaction [82]. The cis-ion-tagged proline 48a was dissolved in the liquid film of a 26 multi-layered ionic liquid which was covalently bonded to silica gel (catalyst loading 13.8 wt%). In the first stage, this catalytically-active material acts as a catalyst reservoir, delivering 48a to the cyclohexanone phase, which allows the reaction to take place conveniently under homogeneous conditions. In the second stage, the ketone is removed under vacuum and the products are selectively extracted, whereas 48a is redissolved in the supported ionic liquid film, acting as a catalyst sponge. The developed catalytic material can be easily reused several times (up to 15 cycles) with high cumulative productivity values (up to 523).

In 2014, Bhowmick et al. described a new organocatalyst which was synthesized from two inexpensive, naturally occurring substrates, 4-hydroxy-L-proline and abietic acid, in three simple steps with an overall yield of 75% (Scheme 18) [83]. It was applied to the asymmetric aldol reactions in water in the presence of a sulfonic acid additive, furnishing excellent yields and stereoselectivities. The reaction was particularly fast, and the catalyst loading was reduced to 1 mol%.

3. Prolinol-Related Organocatalysts

As has already been demonstrated by the huge number of applications of proline as an organocatalyst, the five-membered secondary amine structure of chiral pyrrolidines proved to be a privileged structure which is able to activate the carbonyl substrates that are reacting with different partners. The importance of the pyrrolidine ring in determining the activity and stereoselectivity of the derived enamine was already highlighted in 2000 by List and Barbas in the aldol reaction between acetone and pNO₂-benzaldehyde, where N-methyl-valine and piperidine-2-carboxylic acid failed to give acceptable conversions and azetidine-2-carboxylic acid was significantly less reactive and stereoselective than proline [28]. While proline and its derivatives (Section 2) are characterized by a carboxyl or amide group as a hydrogen bond donor directly linked at C-2, many other proposed catalysts possess prolinol-derived structures which are characterized by a methylene linker between the pyrrolidine ring and the variously substituted chain at C-2. In almost all cases, the substituent introduced in the sidechain is designed to be able to coordinate the electrophilic reaction partner, subsequently directing its approach selectively onto one of the two diastereotopic faces of the chiral enamine, either by protonation in the presence of an acid co-catalyst, or by dipole–dipole interactions. This strategy was introduced by Barbas back in 2002, by employing simple pyrrolidine amines in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid for the efficient asymmetric construction of quaternary carbon centers using organocatalysis [84,85].

In 2008, Headley and co-workers prepared a series of pyrrolidine-based chiral pyridinium ionic liquids (ILs), starting from the commercially available (S)-(2-aminomethyl)-1-N-Boc-pyrrolidine [86]. The catalysts 50a–d, differing for the nature of the counter-anion, were efficiently prepared in two or three steps, starting from Zincke salt [87], with overall excellent yields (78–83%, Scheme 19). These pyrrolidines were tested in the asymmetric Michael addition of cyclohexanones to nitrostyrenes, returning good yields and excellent selectivities. Catalyst 50b was also recycled up to three times in the same reaction, with only a moderate decrease in performance during the third run.

In the same year, Xu and co-workers prepared 2-[(imidazolylthio)methyl]pyrrolidines (51a–c) as trifunctional organocatalysts for the same asymmetric Michael addition. The catalysts were prepared in three steps, starting from L-proline; unfortunately, the yield of the last step was not reported (Scheme 20) [88]. Catalyst 51a afforded good yields (83–95%) and selectivities (dr 80:20–93:7, 83–95% ee) in the proposed Michael addition, using salicylic acid as the co-catalyst and iPrOH as the solvent.

Starting from N-Boc-protected proline azide, which was in turn derived from N-Boc-L-proline [89], Wang and coworkers prepared recyclable ionic-liquid-supported pyrrolidine catalysts by exploiting a copper-catalyzed Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition (Scheme 21) [90]. Using catalyst 52a in EtOH and in the presence of TFA as a co-catalyst, the benchmark Michael addition of cyclohexanone to nitrostyrenes afforded the desired products in high yields (85–95%) and with excellent diastereoselectivities (>99:1) and enantioselectivities (91–>99%). Furthermore, the catalyst was recovered and recycled at least eight times, with only a modest loss of its catalytic activity, and with excellent stereoselectivities.

Similarly, ionic-liquid supported pyrrolidine catalysts were prepared by Headley, Ni, and coworkers, starting from the commercially available (S)-(2-aminomethyl)-1-N-Boc-pyrrolidine and exploiting a sulfonamide linkage. Catalysts 53a,b were thus prepared in 54 and 66% overall yield, in a short three-step synthetic sequence (Scheme 22) [92]. Both catalysts, 53a,b, were effective in the asymmetric Michael addition of aldehydes to nitrostyrenes, giving high yields and diastereoselectivities, and good enantioselectivities (up to 85%). On the other hand, 53a was found to be more stereoselective in the case of α,α-branched aldehydes, while 53b was more stereoselective in the case of α-monosubstituted ones. Finally, these catalysts were recycled and reused up to five times without a significant loss of catalytic activities and enantioselectivities.

A year later, the same authors proposed a new recyclable ionic liquid-supported pyrrolidine sulfonamide organocatalyst (54, Scheme 23) for the asymmetric Michael addition of ketones to nitroolefins with high enantio- and diastereo-selectivities, which introduced the sulfonyl group on the C-2 position of the imidazolium cation. This structural modification makes the NH group more acidic and enhances the formation of hydrogen bonds that are pivotal in the transitions states of the corresponding reactions [93].

In the same year, Kilburn and coworkers prepared a series of bifunctional pyrrolidine catalysts to promote the asymmetric Michael addition of cyclohexanone to trans-β-nitrostyrene, with excellent stereocontrol. Among the different catalysts that were prepared, 55a,b, incorporating two thiourea moieties in the sidechain, gave the best overall performances. These catalysts were prepared in a five-step synthetic sequence starting from commercially available N-Boc-L-proline and in 32 and 19% overall yield, respectively (Scheme 24) [94].

During that year, Zhong et al. rationally designed a highly stereoselective pyrrolidine organocatalyst bearing a polar P=O bond on the sidechain to improve the asymmetric Michael addition of cyclic ketones to nitroolefins. The pivotal role of the polarized P=O bond in determining, by hydrogen bonding, the high stereoselectivity in the reaction (98:2 to >99:1 dr, 92% to >99% ee) was demonstrated by preparing the analogue catalysts which were lacking the polarized bond or which had a weaker polar bond (P=S), which afforded much worse results. Catalyst 56 was prepared in a four-step sequence and in 79% overall yield, starting from the commercially available N-Boc-L-prolinol (Scheme 25) [95].

In 2009, Chen’s group prepared new pyrrolidine-camphor organocatalysts for the challenging asymmetric Michael additions of α,α-disubstituted aliphatic aldehydes [96] and of simpler aldehydes [97] to β-nitroalkenes. Just a few months later, the same authors applied similar pyrrolidine-camphor organocatalysts to the direct α-amination of aldehydes with azodicarboxylates [98]. The next year, Chen and coworkers optimized the catalyst structure by varying the substitution pattern both on the pyrrolidine ring and on the camphor scaffold, and applied the new catalysts to the conjugate addition of ketones to alkylidene malonates [99] and to the asymmetric Michael addition of aldehydes and ketones to β-nitroalkenes [100]. Among all of the catalysts that they tested, pyrrolidines 57a,b, obtained by joining the trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline scaffold and camphor by a sulfide link, were the most efficient. The catalysts were prepared starting from a N-Boc-O-tosyl prolinol derivative; however, unfortunately, no details are given for their synthesis of the advanced intermediates. The starting materials can be prepared starting from the commercially available N-Boc-trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline and camphorsulfonic acid, following the reported procedures [101,102]. Thus, 57a could be synthesized in a six-step sequence in 28% overall yield, and 57b in a related seven-step sequence in 38% overall yield (Scheme 26).

An alternative synthesis of a pyrrolidinyl–camphor bifunctional catalyst (58) was later proposed by the same authors, which was able to catalyse, in neat conditions, the asymmetric Michael addition of aldehydes and ketones to different nitroolefins in high yields and stereoselectivity [103]. The required key amino ketone intermediate can be prepared from camphorsulfonic acid, or eventually from the commercially available, although quite expensive, ketopinic acid. Again, the pyrrolidine-aldehyde required for this procedure can be prepared from the commercially available N-Boc-L-proline methyl ester. Thus, 58 was prepared in seven steps, and 11% overall yield (Scheme 27).

Later that year, Wang and coworkers proposed simple pyrrolidines bearing a pyridine ring on the sidechain as catalysts for the highly enantioselective Michael addition of aldehydes and ketones to nitroolefins. The catalysts 59a–d were prepared in two steps, starting from the commercially available N-Boc-L-prolinol (Scheme 28). Detailed yields were reported for the preparation of 59a (65% overall yield); however, only the yields of the last step were reported for 59b–d [104].

Peng and coworkers prepared 4-trifluoromethanesulfonamidyl prolinol tert-butyldiphenylsilyl ether 60 as a bifunctional organocatalyst for the Michael addition of ketones and aldehydes to nitroolefins. The catalyst was prepared in a 12-step synthetic sequence starting from 4-trans-L-hydroxyproline and in 27% overall yield (Scheme 29) [105]. Probably due to a typo, the authors reported in the experimental section the use of NaN₃ in DCM instead of DMF for step (i): these conditions should be avoided, since the very dangerous diazidomethane could be produced [106]. Catalyst 60 was more recently employed by the same authors in an asymmetric Michael reaction for the preparation of chiral nonnatural 2,4-disubstituted pyrrolidines from aldehydes and nitroolefins [107].

In 2010, Du and coworkers prepared a new L-proline-based binaphthyl sulfonimide, starting from the commercially available (S)-2-amino-1-N-Boc-pyrrolidine. The catalyst 61 was prepared in 16% overall yield using a six-step synthetic sequence, and was used to profitably catalyze the asymmetric Michael addition of ketones to nitroalkenes (Scheme 30) [108].

In the same year, Wang, Zhang, and coworkers prepared a sugar-based pyrrolidine as a highly enantioselective organocatalyst for the same asymmetric Michael addition, which afforeded the desired products in good yields and excellent stereoselectivities under solvent-free conditions. The catalyst 62 was prepared in 40% overall yield and using a five-step sequence starting from the commercially available N-Fmoc-L-prolinol, exploiting click-chemistry to insert the commercially available diacetone-D-glucose on the catalyst side-chain (Scheme 31) [109].

A similar strategy was adopted by Chandrasekhar et al., in the same year, to introduce hydroxyphthalimide on the sidechain of pyrrolidine via an azide linker. The obtained catalyst was employed in the asymmetric Michael addition of ketones to nitroolefins, using an acid co-catalyst and water as the solvent; this catalyst returnedgood yields of the desired products, although with general lower stereoselectivities [110].

Hiraga and coworkers proposed, in 2010, different phosphonate-pyrrolidine derivatives as efficient organocatalysts for asymmetric Michael addition, with excellent yields and good selectivities. Among the catalysts that were prepared, the aminophosphonic acid monoester 63 was the most effective in terms of enantioselectivity. Further, 63 was prepared starting from L-proline, in eight steps, and in 42% overall yield (Scheme 32) [111].

Sulfone-substituted pyrrolidines were prepared in the same year by Lin and coworkers as highly stereoselective organocatalysts for Michael addition “on water,” and they provided excellent results. The best catalyst, 64, was synthesized in six steps and 49% overall yield, starting from L-proline (Scheme 33) [112].

By combining two privileged scaffolds, Chen, Xiao, and coworkers designed a novel thiourea-amine bifunctional catalyst for the asymmetric conjugate addition of ketones and aldehydes to nitroalkenes, with diastereoselectivities up to 98:2 and enantioselectivities up to 96%. The most efficient catalyst, 65, was prepared starting from the commercially available (S)-(2-aminomethyl)-1-N-Boc-pyrrolidine and from the cinchonidine-derived amine, in five steps and 22% overall yield (Scheme 34) [113].

Similar bifunctional thiourea-pyrrolidines, derived from the reaction of 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl isocyanate and (S)-2-amino-1-N-Boc-pyrrolidine, were prepared in the same year by Li, Wang, Tang, and coworkers. Unexpectedly, the catalysts that were able to participate with a single hydrogen bond in the transition state of the addition were superior to the one possessing the unprotected thiourea moiety. DFT calculations were made to rationalize this peculiar behavior [114].

A bifunctional catalyst, possessing a 2-amino-pyridine ring on the sidechain of pyrrolidine, was designed in 2011 by Yu and coworkers. Catalyst 66 was prepared in five steps and 43% overall yield starting from L-proline (Scheme 35), and it was able to efficiently promote the asymmetric Michael addition of ketones to nitroolefins with excellent yields and stereoselectivities in ethanol and in the presence of benzoic acid as the co-catalyst [115].

In the same year, Zhang, Zheng, and coworkers prepared a bifunctional pyrrolidine organocatalyst which possessed a 1H-benzo[d]imidazole moiety on the side-chain, which was successfully applied to the aqueous phase asymmetric Michael reaction of cyclohexanone with various nitroolefins and returned high stereoselectivities [116]. Catalyst 67 was prepared starting from (S)-(2-aminomethyl)-1-N-benzyl-pyrrolidine; however, no details were given for the synthesis of this starting material. A possible preparation starts from the commercially available L-proline methyl ester hydrochloride. Using the reported procedures, 67 could thus be obtained in six steps and 12% overall yield (Scheme 36).

From 2009 to 2012, Peng and coworkers designed and synthesized a series of pyrrolidine-based organocatalysts which are characterized by various H-bond donors at the 4-position and a stereocontrolling silyl ether group in the side-chain at the 2-position (Scheme 37b) [83,105,117]. The synthetic strategy consists of many steps (Scheme 37a), starting from trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline: protection of both carboxyl and amine functions, Mitsunobu reaction and hydrolysis to invert the C4-stereocenter, re-esterification of the carboxyl group, OH mesylation, reduction to prolinol and its silylation, azidation with inversion of the C4 configuration, reduction to amine and installation of the proper H-bond donor, and final Boc removal. Catalyst 68a, owing an aromatic thiourea, performed better than the analogues with aliphatic thiourea, sulfonamide, and squaramide at C4, and it was identified as the most efficient organocatalyst for various types of anti-Mannich reactions. It is noteworthy that challenging substrates in the Mannich reaction, such as sulfones with ortho-substituents or strong electron withdrawing groups on the aromatic ring, also performed well. The authors suggested that the bulky group (–CH₂OTBDPS) shields the enamine Re-face, and both the thiourea protons in the catalyst form hydrogen bonding interactions with the imine nitrogen, activating the imine substrate (Scheme 37c).

In 2010, Cai and Zhang designed and synthesised a novel recyclable fluorous (S)-pyrrolidine–thiourea bifunctional organocatalyst (Scheme 38) [118]. The fluorous tag has a dual purpose: (i) its strong electron-withdrawing effect should enhance the NH acidity, thus providing a stronger hydrogen-bonding interaction with the electrophile, and (ii) it allows for the catalyst recovery (87%) by fluorous solid-phase extraction while ensuring the advantages of a homogeneous organocatalytic reaction. Catalyst 69 was prepared via the condensation of 4-(perfluorooctyl)aniline with phenyl chlorothioformate, followed by the phenol substitution by (S)-tert-butyl 2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, and the subsequent Boc removal (Scheme 38). It was employed in the enantioselective α-chlorination of aldehydes, and showed high activity and enantioselectivity.

In 2011, Kokotos’s group presented novel pyrrolidine-based bifunctional organocatalysts which incorporated a thiohydantoin or a 2-thioxotetrahydropyrimidin-4-one ring that was able to provide hydrogen bonds and/or a bulky environment (Scheme 39) [119]. The synthesis started from the commercially available (S)-β-phenylalanine methyl ester which was converted to the corresponding isothiocyanate and coupled with (S)-tert-butyl-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, affording the corresponding thiourea (Scheme 39a). The following acidic cyclization furnished the heterocyclic ring with simultaneous Boc removal, providing catalyst 70a. The synthesis of the corresponding five-membered thiohydantoin derivative 71 was carried out in a similar fashion, starting from the proper α-aminoacid. The reactivity of these catalysts was evaluated in the Michael reaction between six-membered cyclic ketones and nitroolefins, in the presence of a low catalyst loading (1–2.5 mol%) and a slight excess of ketone (from 1.2 to 2 equivalents). The best performance was obtained with the six-membered catalyst 70a; however, the substituted thiohydantoin derivatives (71b–d) provided similar results, suggesting that similar conformations in the transition state were adopted by the two different rings. A similar ee and dr were recorded regardless of the substituent and the absolute configuration of the thiohydantoin stereocenter. As expected for this type of catalyst, the authors postulated that the high enantioselectivity derives from stabilizing H-bond interactions between the heterocyclic ring and the nitroolefin (Scheme 39b).

In the same year, Chen and Xiao investigated the same Michael addition promoted by structurally different bifunctional pyrrolidinyl-sulfamide organocatalysts (Scheme 40), designed because they believed the sulfamides should possess more acidic N–H bonds than the corresponding (thio)ureas [120]. The substituted sulfamide moiety was linked to the pyrrolidine scaffold of (S)-tert-butyl-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, exploiting two similar synthetic pathways, both starting from catechol sulfate and characterized by a reversed order of the synthetic steps (Scheme 40). The aryl substituted sulfamides 73 proved to be slightly superior catalysts; however, they required high catalyst loading (10 mol%), a low temperature (−10 °C), and a long reaction time to provide the best performance. It is noteworthy that nitrodienes also reacted smoothly.

In 2011, Li’s research group proposed the use of catalysts composed of polyoxometalate (POM) acid (H₃PW₁₂O₄₀) and chiral diamines with different alkyl chain lengths (Figure 26) in the asymmetric direct cross-aldol reaction of aliphatic aldehydes with aromatic aldehydes in emulsion media [121]. In fact, catalysis in emulsion has attracted much attention as a strategy to improve the mass-diffusion limitation in liquid multiphase systems. This type of catalyst acts as a surfactant and the authors hypothesized that the observed high reactivity and enantioselectivity were mainly due to a metastable emulsion formed in the organic-aqueous biphasic systems. The mixture containing catalysts 74c or 74d, having a longer alkyl chain, formed more stable emulsions and showed higher reactivities. Catalyst 74d can be precipitated by adding methanol and recycled three times without a significant drop in activity and selectivity.

The following year (2012), Jørgensen and coworkers described a new bifunctional squaramide-based aminocatalyst which was designed on the basis of the simultaneous dual activation of aldehydes and nitroolefins by amino- and hydrogen-bonding catalysis, respectively [122]. In particular, appropriately positioned functional groups capable of H-bonding interactions could control both the regio- and stereo-selectivity of the processes involving the remote γ-functionalization of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. Computational studies suggested the formation of three H-bonds between squaramide and the nitro group, and a π-stacking between the nitroolefin and the dienamine (Scheme 41a). The new catalysts were prepared in high overall yield (81–91%) in two steps, starting from (S)-tert-butyl 2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate and the proper methoxycyclobutene-1,2-dione (Scheme 41b). The same authors successfully employed the squaramide-based catalyst 75a in remarkably low loading and also in the asymmetric Diels–Alder reaction of anthracenes using nitroalkenes as dienophiles (Scheme 41c) [123].

In the same year, Singh et al. described the chiral secondary–secondary diamine 77 as an organocatalyst obtained from L-proline and (R)-α-methylbenzyl amine in four simple and high yielding steps: Boc protection, amide synthesis, Boc removal, and amide to amine reduction (Scheme 42) [124]. The catalyst design was based on the identified trend in enantioselectivity and reactivity versus the catalyst side-chain pKa value [115], revealing that a higher pKa favours higher enantioselectivity and reactivity (Scheme 42). This catalyst proved to be effective in the asymmetric Michael addition of cyclohexanone to β-nitrostyrenes, although it was used in high loading (20 mol%). The absolute configuration of the stereocenter on the methyl benzylamine moiety plays no significant role.

Zlotin’s group synthesized, in 2013, a family of stereoisomeric natural pinane-derived bifunctional pyrrolidine organocatalysts (Scheme 43) whose catalytic behaviour was examined in the asymmetric conjugate addition of six-membered cyclic ketones to nitrostyrenes [125]. The use of a properly positioned hydroxyl group as a hydrogen bonding donor is supposed to coordinate the nitroalkene, contributing to enhancing the stereocontrol. The 2-hydroxy-3-[(2-pyrrolidinyl)methylamino] pinanes 78a–d with different configurations at the C-2 and C-3 stereocenters were obtained by the reduction of the corresponding hydroxyamides (Scheme 43). The best stereochemical arrangement was found for catalyst 78b, which furnished the desired products with excellent yield and dr, and good ee.

The same model reaction was selected by Singh and coworkers to test the catalytic activity of (2S)-2-[(phenylsulfinyl)methyl]pyrrolidine bearing a sulfoxide moiety (Scheme 44) [126]. It was prepared by the reduction of Boc-L-proline to prolinol, which was tosylated and substituted with benzenethiol. The following thioether oxidation and Boc-deprotection furnished the desired catalyst in 57% overall yield as an unseparable 57:43 mixture of two diastereoisomers. It was used to synthesize γ-nitrocarbonyl compounds in excellent yield and stereoselectivity without additives, although a high catalyst loading (20 mol%) was employed. These findings confirmed that the sulfur atom stereochemistry does not affect the Michael reaction stereoselectivity. Moreover, the authors proved that the performance of the corresponding thioether and sulfone was inferior.

In 2014, Miura et al. proposed the pyrrolidine organocatalyst 80a, characterized by the diaminomethylenemalononitrile moiety as a novel hydrogen bonding donor, to promote the asymmetric conjugate addition of cyclohexanone to nitroalkenes under solvent-free conditions [127]. The catalyst was prepared in three steps: 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzylamine and malononitrile derivative I-22 was reacted to produce intermediate I-23, which was coupled with N-Boc-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine and then deprotected (33% overall yield, Scheme 45). γ-Nitroketones were obtained with good performance, although five equivalents of ketone, and 10 mol% of organocatalyst and acid additive were required. Afterwards, the same authors developed the fluorous analogue diaminomethylenemalononitrile organocatalyst 80b, with a slight improvement in the reaction performance [128].

In 2014, Liu’s group designed a novel fluorine containing pyrrolidine organocatalyst, which was based on the remarkable impact on the pyrrolidine conformation exerted by different substituents and, in particular, by the fluorine–ammonium ion gauche effect [129]. The catalyst synthesis was performed in six steps starting from trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline: protection of both amine and carboxyl groups, DAST-mediated fluorination at C4, ester reduction to aldehyde and reductive amination to insert the second pyrrolidine unit, and final Boc-removal (Scheme 46). To test the catalyst (10 mol%), the usual Michael addition of ketones to nitroolefins was carried out under neat conditions with an excess of ketone. It was observed that the fluorine substituent improved yield and ee, probably because the fluorine–ammonium ion gauche effect further stabilized the (E)-trans-C^γ-endo favoured enamine conformation (Scheme 46).

The same fluorine gauche effect was exploited by Kokotos and coworkers to make the pyrrolidine ring more rigid in the development of new pyrrolidinine-thioxotetrahydropyrimidinone-based organocatalysts [130]. Both the trans- and cis-diastereomers, bearing either a fluorine or a hydroxyl group, were synthesized (Scheme 47) starting from protected 4-hydroxy-L-proline. The basic synthetic sequence to construct cis-catalyst 70c consists of OH-replacement by fluorine, ester reduction and mesylation, azide insertion and its reduction to amine, thiourea synthesis and cyclization, and Boc removal. The corresponding trans isomer 70b was achieved with the same pathway, preceded by the mesylation/benzoylation/hydrolysis sequence which inverted the absolute configuration at C4. The 4-hydroxy organocatalysts were obtained in the same manner after silylation of the 4-OH. The catalytic activity of the new pyrrolidines was evaluated in some asymmetric transformations, which were efficiently promoted by 70c with an almost stoichiometric amount of reagents in brine, whereas the previous catalyst, lacking the fluorine, only worked in organic media. Both the cis-catalysts represent the matched case, while the trans ones proved to be the mismatched case.

In 2014, sugar amide-pyrrolidine derivatives owning D-glucose in its furanose form (Scheme 48) were developed by Kumar et al. as organocatalysts for the asymmetric Michael addition of ketones to nitroolefins under solvent- and additive-free conditions [131]. The catalysts were easily obtained in high yields by coupling the N-Cbz-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine with the carboxyl acid of the proper carbohydrate, followed by Cbz-removal (Scheme 48). The sugar moiety was itnended to provide a bulky environment and an additional hydrogen bonding site. The hydroxy-catalyst 82b promoted the reaction with good results, whereas the amino-catalyst 82a furnished low enantiocontrol, probably due to the enamine formation by the primary amine.

Within a few years, the same research group proposed other structurally different catalysts. In 2014, they synthesized pyrrolidine-oxyimides from N-Boc-L-prolinol and hydroxyimides (Scheme 49) [132]. In promoting asymmetric Michael addition in water, catalyst 83a (10 mol%) was found to be superior to catalyst 83b in all respects. Water is supposed to provide effective hydrogen bonding interactions, which bring the substrates closer in an appropriate orientation, leading to high stereoselectivity (Scheme 49). The same organocatalysts (15 mol%) were employed in the enantioselective Michael addition of α,α-disubstituted aldehydes to nitroolefins under neat conditions at 0 °C [133]. In a possible transition state, the phthalimide could act as a steric controller and also provide H-bonding interactions involving the acid additive, generating a pocket-like compact transition state (Scheme 49).

In 2016, a pyrrolidine-oxytriazole catalyst was developed for the enantioselective additive-free Michael addition of cyclohexanone to nitroolefins in water [134]. The simple synthetic protocol started from Boc-prolinol and commercially available hydroxybenzotriazole, which was coupled under Mitsunobu conditions, followed by Boc-deprotection (Scheme 50).

In 2014, Zhao et al. designed and synthesized a family of new axially unfixed biaryl-based bifuctional organocatalysts (Scheme 51) to be applied in the asymmetric Michael reaction of cyclohexanone with nitroolefins in water [135]. The underlying idea was that a significant hydrophobicity of the organocatalyst is required to strictly arrange the substrates and achieve high stereocontrol in Michael reactions carried out in water. Moreover, the biaryl group can direct the spatial orientation of the catalytically active functional groups. The catalysts were obtained by the reduction of the corresponding amides in low to moderate yields (Scheme 51). The C₂-symmetric catalysts 86 and 87 were also synthesized as comparisons. Catalysts 85a–c showed much higher reactivities and slightly lower enantioselectivities than catalysts 86 and 87, whereas prolinamide 88 provided a very low enantiocontrol under the same conditions.

Luo and coworkers proposed, in 2016, the simple perhydroindolinol 89 as an organocatalyst for the asymmetric Michael addition of aldehydes to nitroalkenes in brine, with excellent yields and high stereoselectivities [136]. The catalyst was prepared starting from the commercially available (2S,3αS,7αS)-perhydroindoline-2-carboxylic in two steps and in overall 92% yield (Scheme 52).

In 2017, Juaristi and coworkers prepared different stereoisomeric pyrrolidine sulfinamides and studied them in the asymmetric Michael addition of cyclohexanone to nitrostyrenes. The best results were obtained with a combination of catalyst (1R,2S)-90 and (R)-mandelic acid, giving the desired products in good yields and high stereoselectivities. The catalyst was prepared in a five-step synthetic sequence and in 43% overall yield, starting from the commercially available Fmoc-D-proline (Scheme 53) [137].

Kaur’s group described, in 2018, the novel ((S)-pyrrolidin-2-yl)methyl-phenylcarbamate and -phenylthiocarbamate as organocatalysts for the benchmark conjugate addition of ketones to nitroolefins without additives [138]. The synthetic route consists of three simple steps, starting from N-Boc-L-proline: reduction to prolinol, addition to phenyl iso(thio)cyanate, and Boc removal (Scheme 54). The carbamate (20 mol%) promoted the Michael addition in toluene with good results, whereas the thiocarbamate provided much worse results.

In 2019, pyrrolidine-oxadiazolone-based organocatalysts were proposed by Kundu and Pramanik, and their performances were assessed in the asymmetric Michael reaction [139]. The authors selected the oxadiazolone ring as a bioisostere for the proline carboxylic acid (similar pKa), which showed an improved solubility in organic solvents, being non-ionic. Starting from proline, three simple steps (reduction, N-Boc protection, and tosylation) provided O-tosyl prolinol, which was converted to cyano derivative and then to the oxime-type compound (Scheme 55). The cyclization enabled by carbonyldiimidazole and the Boc removal furnished the two organocatalysts 92a and 92b. They were used as hydrochloride salts in the presence of a base and worked well in ethanol (92a) or water (92b).

In the same year, Mečiarová and Šebesta designed and prepared bifunctional thiosquaramide organocatalysts (93a–c, Scheme 56) to be assessed in the asymmetric Michael addition of aldehydes to nitroalkenes, aiming to synthesize precursors of substituted chiral pyrrolidines [140]. Thiosquaramide derivatives are though to be promising catalysts, possessing higher acidity and improved solubility in non-polar solvents compared to the corresponding squaramides. Thiosquaramide catalysts were synthesized from squaric acid, which was converted into dicyclopentyl thiosquarate I-29 (Scheme 56). The sequential substitution of the two cyclopentyloxy groups with the proper primary amines led to the desired catalysts. The results obtained in the tested process for thiosquaramides were inferior to those of squaramides, especially in terms of reactivity.

The same research group proposed, in 2021, N-sulfinylpyrrolidine-containing ureas 95 and thioureas 94 as bifunctional organocatalysts in which the sulfinyl group could act as both an acidifying and a stereoinducing group [141]. The catalysts’ synthesis (Scheme 57) started from Boc-(S)-prolinol, which was then converted to 2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine by exploiting the Mitsunobu/Staudinger sequence, which led to a more easily purified product. Isothiocyanate I-31a (using thiophosgene) and isocyanate I-31b were obtained in high yields. The following attachment of tert-butanesulfinamide and Boc removal provided the desired catalysts, although the addition of lithium sulfinamide to the isocyanate furnished low yields. The organocatalysts were tested in the Michael addition of aldehydes to nitroalkenes, which afforded a medium stereocontrol, with ureas performing better than thioureas and without a significant stereoinduction played by the stereogenic sulfur.

Very recently (2022), Kupai and co-workers synthesized the squaramide 77c and thiosquaramide 93a organocatalysts (Scheme 58) [142], which were structurally very similar to those already proposed by Jørgensen [122] and Šebesta [140]. Their catalytic performances were tested in the asymmetric Diels–Alder reaction of (anthracen-9-yl)acetaldehyde and trans-β-nitrostyrene with good results, and were also tested in the asymmetric conjugate addition of 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone to ethyl (E)-2-oxo-4-phenylbut-3-enoate (Scheme 58), which provided high yields but low enantiocontrol.

In the same year, Moriyama et al. proposed a family of chiral aminomethylpyrrolidine organocatalysts (96) which were characterized by an aromatic sulfonamide bearing a benzylic substituent (Scheme 59a) [143]. The first three steps of the synthetic strategy (tosylation, substitution with azide, and reduction) transformed (S)-N-Boc-prolinol into an aminomethylpyrrolidine intermediate. Then, the sulfonamide synthesis, its alkylation, and the final Boc deprotection led to the desired catalysts. They were applied to an enantioselective Michael/hemiaminal formation cascade reaction between α,β-unsaturated iminoindoles and aldehydes, which provided anti-2-hydroxy-hydro-1H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (anti-α-carbolinol) derivatives (Scheme 59b). This result was remarkable because the reported methods usually furnished syn-disubstituted tetrahydro-α-carbolinones. The best results were obtained by employing catalysts bearing both an electron deficient sulfonyl group and a benzyl substituent. DFT calculations showed that various non-covalent interactions between the enamine and the α,β-unsaturated iminoindole result in a significantly favoured transition state for the Michael reaction step, which led to high enantioselectivity (Scheme 59b). The same research group also synthesized a family of iodinated organocatalysts (97, Scheme 59c) which were assessed in the same cascade reaction with similar results [144]. The authors suggested that the iodine atom acts as a bulky functional group, although not as a halogen-bonding donor.

4. Diarylprolinol-Related Organocatalysts

Diarylprolinol silyl ethers, introduced independently by Jørgensen and Hayashi in 2005 [145,146], are unquestionably among the most efficient, versatile, and applied organocatalysts that have been thus far proposed [10,11,147]. Not only are they simply synthesized starting from proline, but they are also general and extremely stereoselective. Moreover, from the initial discovery of the classic enamine and iminium ion activation modes, their reactivity has been further expanded to dienamines, trienamines, tetraenamines, vinylogous, and bis-vinylogous iminium-ions [148]. In this class of organocatalysts, the diastereotopic discrimination of the different faces of the chiral reaction partner, most commonly an enamine or an iminium ion, is determined by the relevant steric hindrance of the substituent on the pyrrolidine ring, with opportunely protected diaryl-methanols being the most effective ones. Nevertheless, many different structural variations of Jørgensen–Hayashi catalysts have been proposed in the last twenty years, in particular with the aim to improve the catalysts’ chemical stability, eventually making the catalytic system recyclable, and in some cases its reactivity.

In 2008, Alexakis and coworkers prepared a series of chiral pyrrolidines which were characterized by the presence of an aminal moiety on the 2-position. Catalysts 98a–f were prepared from commercially available Cbz-L-proline in a four-step synthetic sequence, and in moderate to good yields (37–60%, Scheme 60) [149]. These catalysts were successfully tested in the Michael addition of propanal to trans-β-nitrostyrene, returning quantitative conversions in all cases, with 98a exhibiting the best results in terms of stereoselectivity (75:25 dr, 79% ee). The scope of 98a was further extended in the addition of different aliphatic aldehydes to trans-β-nitrostyrene and to vinylsulfone. When the catalysts were tested in the more challenging addition of cyclohexanone to trans-β-nitrostyrene, 98a–c gave good conversions, while 98d–f were almost unreactive. In this case, 98b was found to be the best catalyst in terms of stereoselectivity (90:10 dr, 80% ee).

In the same year, Juaristi and coworkers pioneered the preparation of (S)-(pyrrolidin-2-yl)diphenyl methyl amine (99) for the enantioselective reduction of prochiral ketones which was catalyzed by the corresponding diazaborolidine with borane-dimethyl sulfide [150]. This nitrogen-substituted analogue of α,α-diphenyl-(S)-prolinol was prepared in six steps, starting from natural (S)-proline, in overall 49% yield, by a S_N1-type reaction of the tertiary hydroxyl group using the azide anion as a nucleophile. (Scheme 61).

A few years later, Zhong et al. prepared (S)-2-(azidodiphenylmethyl)pyrrolidine (100) through the direct reaction of an excess of sodium azide using α,α-diphenyl-(S)-prolinol in trifluoroacetic acid as the solvent (Scheme 62). Catalyst 100 was efficiently used in the stereoselective preparation of densely functionalized cis-isoxazoline N-oxides [151]. In 2013, Lee and coworkers proposed an alternative one-pot protective group-free synthesis of 100 starting from α,α-diphenyl-(S)-prolinol, using a biphasic reaction media of H₂SO₄ and CHCl₃. Furthermore, 99 was easily obtained directly from 100 using a Staudinger reaction (Scheme 62) [152].

More recently, 100 and some of its derivatives were tested by Juaristi in the enantioselective organocatalytic Michael addition of aliphatic aldehydes to nitrostyrenes [153], and their performances were also compared with the analogue α,α-diphenyl prolinol and its derivatives [154]. In all of the organocatalytic reactions which were tested, 100 always afforded the best performances in terms of stereoselectivity, with respect to 99.

In 2009, Maruoka explored the organocatalyzed benzoylation of aliphatic aldehydes using benzoylperoxide in the presence of different pyrrolidine catalysts and hydroquinone [155]. Among all of the organocatalysts which were tested, (S)-2-trityl-pyrrolidine (101) exhibited the best results, affording the desired product in improved yield and very good enantioselectivity. Catalyst 101 was prepared starting from the achiral pyrrolidine cyclic nitrone, in a two-step synthetic sequence, exploiting a final resolution step to obtain the enantiopure catalyst in overall 16% yield (Scheme 63).

More recently, the same authors optimized the synthesis of trityl-pyrrolidines by applying the synthetic sequence to a chiral cyclic nitrone which was derived from 4-trans-L-hydroxyproline via TBS protection of hydroxy group and Murahashi decarboxylative oxidation. The so obtained catalysts showed comparable performances in terms of reactivity and selectivity in the asymmetric benzoylation of 3-phenylpropanal, with respect to the original catalyst 101 [156].

In the same year, Lu and coworkers explored the potential of various perhydroindole derivatives as organocatalysts in the asymmetric Michael reaction of aldehydes to nitroalkenes. In particular, silylated perhydroindolinylmethanol catalyst 102 was prepared starting from the commercially available (2S,3αS,7αS)-perhydroindoline-2-carboxylic acid, in a four-step synthetic sequence, and in overall 68% yield (Scheme 64), obtaining excellent results in terms of stereoselectivity, even though it was slightly less reactive than Hayashi–Jørgensen organocatalysts [157].

In 2009, Headley, Ni, and coworkers prepared an analogue of Hayashi–Jørgensen silylated diphenylprolinol by using N-methylimidazole as the aromatic substituent. This catalyst, used in water and in combination with sodium bicarbonate, proved to be extremely efficient in the Michael addition of aldehydes to nitroolefins, returning high yields and excellent enantioselectivities [158]. The di(methylimidazole)prolinol silyl ethers 103a,b were prepared in three steps and in 32–35% overall yield, starting from the commercially available N-Boc-L-proline methyl ester (Scheme 65).

Later that year, Lombardo, Quintavalla et al. prepared an ionic-tagged analogue of Hayashi–Jørgensen organocatalysts (104) that displayed excellent performance in the stereoselective Michael addition of aliphatic aldehydes to nitrostyrenes. Catalyst 104 was prepared in five steps and overall 64% yield, starting from the known N-benzyl-α,α-diphenyl-(S)-prolinol (Scheme 66) [159].

In 2010, Alexakis and coworkers extended the family of chiral aminal-pyrrolidine organocatalysts, starting from the commercially available N-Cbz-hydroxy-L-proline. Among all of the catalysts which were prepared, the ones possessing a phenoxy on the 4-position were the most efficient (105a,b). Catalysts 105a,b were prepared in moderate yields (~25%), and by exploiting a stereospecific Mitsunobu reaction, with inversion of stereochemical configuration, to introduce the phenoxy group on the 4-position (Scheme 67). Exploiting a synergistic effect, these catalysts were able to promote the α-functionalization of a wide range of linear and branched aldehydes/ketones, with excellent enantiocontrol and reactivity [160].

Almost concurrently, Bolm and coworkers [161] and Christmann, Strohmann, and coworkers [162] proposed a series of 2-silylated pyrrolidines (106) as analogues of 2-tritylpyrrolidine 101. These catalysts were prepared by exploiting the stereoselective functionalization of N-Boc-pyrrolidine using sec-BuLi/(−)sparteine (Scheme 68), which was pioneered by Beak, who prepared (S)-2-trimethylsilyl-N-Boc-pyrrolidine back in 1991 [163]. While the introduction of the Ph₂MeSi group was very efficient (106c), Bolm reported that the Ph₃Si group gave very disappointing results in terms of stereoselectivity (4% ee). Christmann and Strohmann were able to obtain this last catalyst (106d) by reacting, first, N-Boc-pyrrolidine with dimethoxydiphenylsilane, followed by substitution of the methoxy group with phenyllithium. Both 106c and 106d exxhibited excellent results in the Michael addition of aliphatic aldehydes to nitrostyrenes, albeit with slightly less enantioselectivities with respect to Hayashi–Jørgensen organocatalysts.

Interestingly, the increased reactivity of fluorosilanes with Grignard reagents for the synthesis of sterically hindered silanes was reported by Eaborn more than 70 years ago [164]. Exploiting the reactivity of fluorosilanes, in 2011, Franz and coworkers proposed an improved synthesis of 2-silylated pyrrolidines, both by increasing the stereoselectivity of the addition process and by further directly introducing more sterically hindered silyl substituents on the 2-position (Scheme 69) [165].

In 2009, Gilmour and coworkers proposed the commercially available, although rather expensive, (S)-(−)-2-(fluorodiphenylmethyl)pyrrolidine (107) as an efficient organocatalyst for the asymmetric epoxidation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, exploiting the fluorine-iminium ion gauche effect, a conformational change caused by the charge-dipole interaction that was responsible for the preorganization of the transient intermediates involved in the secondary amine catalyzed processes [166]. The next year, the same authors published an improved five-step synthesis of 107 (Scheme 70), which was characterized by the S_N1-type replacement of the hydroxyl group of α,α-diphenyl-(S)-prolinol by fluorine using diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST), returning the desired fluorinated catalyst in 47% overall yield [167]. In 2011, the use of catalyst 107 was successfully extended by the same authors to the challenging epoxidation of cyclic α,β-disubstituted enals, β,β-disubstituted enals, and an α,β,β-trisubstituted enal with excellent enatioselectivities [168].

The opportunity to conformationally stabilize the intermediates involved in secondary amines’ organocatalysis by fluorine insertion was similarly exploited by Alexakis and coworkers in 2011, who prepared the fluorinated analogues 108 (Scheme 71) of catalysts 105 (Scheme 67) and tested them successfully in different organocatalytic transformations [169]. The fluorinated catalysts 108a,b were, again, prepared starting from the commercially available N-Cbz-hydroxy-L-proline and using DAST to insert the fluorine atom stereospecifically in the 4-position, which returned the desired catalysts in 41 and 44% overall yields, respectively (Scheme 71).

In 2012, Cossío and coworkers exploited chiral ferrocenyl ligands for the stereoselective synthesis of unnatural densely substituted pyrrolidines 109a,b (Scheme 72), which possessed four defined contiguous stereogenic centers in the heterocyclic skeleton, via (3 + 2) cycloaddition reactions between azomethine ylides and trans-β-nitrostyrene. Interestingly, these catalysts were efficiently used to promote the highly stereocontrolled synthesis of pyrrolidine cycloadducts by employing the same chemistry which was used to prepare the catalysts themselves [170]. Later on, the same authors studied, in detail, the behavior of these organocatalysts in aldol reactions [171]; more recently, a review on the application of 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions between azomethine ylides and alkenes for the synthesis of catalysts and other biologically active compounds was published [172].

In the same year, Lombardo, Quintavalla, and coworkers prepared a new family of conformationally constrained bicyclic diarylprolinol silyl ethers (110a–d), starting from the commercially available N-Cbz-hydroxy-L-proline and exploiting an intramolecular Mitsunobu reaction to concurrently invert the chiral center on the 4-position and to assemble the lactone required for the installation of the aromatic substituents (Scheme 73). Catalysts 110a–d were successfully tested in different organocatalytic transformations, with 110d returning stereoselectivities that were similar or greater than Hayashi–Jørgensen organocatalysts [173]. A detailed study of the reactivity of 110a–d in organocatalytic transformations was published a few years later [174].

In 2014, Kesavan and coworkers prepared a series of bifunctional pyrrolidine-thiourea organocatalysts and tested them in the Michael addition of 1,3-dicarbonyls to nitroolefins. Catalysts 111a–c were prepared in modest overall yields (8–11%) using a seven-step synthetic sequence, starting from N-trityl-prolinol, while 111d was prepared starting from Juaristi’s azide [150,153,154] in 24% overall yield (Scheme 74) [175].

In 2015, Tu and coworkers reported the synthesis of a family of spiro-pyrrolidines and their application to the catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of nitrometane to 3,3-disubstituted enals for the construction of all-carbon quaternary centers. The catalysts 112a,b were prepared in 29% overall yield using an eight-step synthetic sequence in which the pyrrolidine ring was assembled by a tandem hydroamination/semipinacol rearrangement and the stereochemistry was controlled using a simple chiral auxiliary (Scheme 75) [176]. Interestingly, while Hayashi–Jørgensen organocatalysts failed to promote the Michael reaction, catalyst 112b exhibited excellent results both in terms of reactivity and selectivity. Later on, catalyst 112b was also successfully employed in the construction of hydrophenanthridine derivatives using an Aza-Michael/Michael/Aldol cascade [177].

Similar pyrrolidinyl spirooxindoles were more recently proposed by Wang, Wan, and coworkers for enantioselective aldol condensation between isatins and acetone, with good activities (up to 97% yield) but only moderate stereoselectivities (up to 82% ee) [178].

In 2017, Melchiorre and coworkers prepared sterically hindered 4-bis-fluorinated pyrrolidine organocatalysts to efficiently catalyze the photochemical enantioselective β-alkylation of enals [179]. Catalyst 113, more recently used by the same authors and others in photocatalytic transformations [180,181,182], was also prepared in seven steps and in 24% overall yield by Alemán and coworkers, starting from the commercially available trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline (Scheme 76).

In 2018, capitalizing on previous results by Ellmann [183], Ruano [184], De Kimpe [185], and Reddy [186,187], Prasad reported an effective diastereoselective synthesis of diphenylprolinol methyl ether through the addition of lithium anions to chiral sulfinimines bearing a good leaving group on the 4-position [188]. The required diphenylmethanol methyl ether can be prepared in many different ways, a particularly attractive one being the metal-free boron trifluoride catalyzed etherification which was recently proposed by Chen, Xiong, and coworkers [189]. Organocatalyst 114 [190,191] could be obtained using this procedure with >99% ee in a five-step sequence and in 48% overall yield (Scheme 77).

In 2019, Tu and coworkers prepared spiro bifunctional organocatalysts and applied them via a cascade Mannich/acylation/Wittig reaction to the total asymmetric synthesis of naucleofficine I and II, which are natural products isolated from Nauclea genus and exhibit antibacterial and antiviral biological activities. The most efficient catalyst (115) was obtained in four steps, starting from the accessible N-Boc-1-azaspiro[4.4]nonan-6-one (Scheme 75) in 68% overall yield (Scheme 78) [192].

5. Conclusions

In this review, the synthetic protocols reported in the literature from 2008 to 2022 for the synthesis of chiral pyrrolidines that are able to efficiently promote organocatalytic transformations have been summarized. More than 20 years of intense academic research from the initial proposals by List, Barbas, and MacMillan have allowed researchers to reach outstanding results; however, the field of organocatalysis is not yet exhausted. In his 2021 Nobel Prize lecture, MacMillan envisioned a future “fuelled by sustainable catalysis,” namely by “organocatalysis, photocatalysis, biocatalysis and electrocatalysis”. In the same year, List also stressed the importance of organocatalysis as an emergent technology, imaging a future in which asymmetric organocatalysis will be applied in a sustainable fashion and will “play a major role in large-scale processes in fine chemical, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries” [193,194]. The actual real-world applications of organocatalytic transformations are still very scarce and are limited to the use of Jørgensen–Hayashi diphenylprolinol trimethylsilyl ether. Thus, the proper design of new economic and efficient organocatalytic systems still remains an exciting challenge that will contribute to driving our future towards sustainability in fine chemical and pharmaceutical applications. This review aims to summarize the state of the art in the synthesis of chiral privileged pyrrolidine-based catalysts and hopes to inspire exciting new discoveries in the field of organocatalysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, resources, A.Q. and M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Q. and M.L.; writing—review and editing, A.Q., M.L. and D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures and Schemes

Figure 1. (a) Structures of the progenitors and most-commonly used organocatalysts; (b)–(e) the fundamental stereoselective activation mode of pyrrolidine-based organocatalysts.

Scheme 1. Use of the ester-containing proline aryl sulfonamide 1 in the conjugate addition of disubstituited aldehydes to acyclic ketones.

Figure 2. Fully substituted prolinamide organocatalysts 2 and 3 and the proposed transition state for the Michael addition of aldehydes to nitrostyrenes.

Scheme 2. (a) Synthesis of 4-hydroxyprolinamides 4a,b and 5a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) LiHMDS, THF, −20 °C; 1.5 h; (ii) CH3I, THF, 18 h, −20 °C to rt; I-1a: 48%, I-1b: 26%; (b) NaOH in MeOH/H2O (1:1), reflux, 5 h; I-2: 48%, I-4′: 76%, (c) for I-3a and I-5a: (S)-1-Phenylethylamine, HATU, DIPEA, DMF, rt, 4 h; I-3a: 42%, I-5a: 50%; for I-3b and I-5b: (S)-N,α-dimethylbenzylamine HATU, DIPEA, DMF, rt, 4 h; I-3b: 33%, I-5b: 31%; (d) TBAF (1M), THF, 0° C, 5 h; I-3a’: 92%, I-3b’: 98%, I-4: quantitative (e) 50% TFA/DCM, rt, 16 h., 4a: 28%, 4b: 23%, 4c: 27%, 4d: 24%. (b) Other hydroxyprolinamide catalysts obtained by Kelleher and co-workers.

Figure 3. Prolinamide organocatalysts 7a,b and the proposed transition state for the organocatalytic Michael addition of aldehydes to nitrostyrene.

Scheme 3. Synthesis of trifluoromethanesulfonamide-substituted prolinamides 8a–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) NHBn2, NaBH(OAc)3, 1,2-DCE, rt, 16 h; (b) (i) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, MeOH, rt, 24 h; (ii) Tf2O, Et3N, DMAP, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 1 h; (c) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 6 h; (d) EDC HCl, HOBt, DIPEA, DCM, 0 °C to rt.

Figure 4. Prolinamides 9a–d.

Figure 5. Bifunctional prolinamide catalysts 10a,b and the corresponding transition states.

Scheme 4. (a) Synthesis of prolinamides organocatalyst 11, 12, and 13a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) ClCO2Et, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to rt; (b) (i) Camphorsulfonyl chloride, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C. 1 h; (ii) TFA, DCM, 0 °C, 1 h, 65%; (c) (i) Ketopinic chloride, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C. 1 h; (ii) TFA, DCM, 0 °C, 1 h, 65%; (d) For 13a: (i) thiocyanatobenzene, DCM, 0 °C to rt; (ii) TFA, DCM, 0 °C, 1 h, 60%; For 13b: (i) 1-thiocyanato-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene, DCM, 0 °C to rt; (ii) TFA, DCM, 0 °C, 1 h, 64%. (b) Synthesis of prolinamides organocatalyst 14a–c. Reagents and conditions: (e) (i) SOCl2, reflux; (ii) NH4SCN, acetone; (iii) o-phenylenediamine; (f) For 14a: N-Boc-L-Proline, ethylchloroformiate; for 14b,c: N-Boc-4-hydroxy-L-Proline, ethylchloroformiate; (g) Only for 14c: TBDPSCl, DMAP, DCM; (h) TFA, DCM. (c) Synthesis of prolinamides organocatalyst 15a,b. Reagents and conditions: (i) (i) RCH2Br, NaH, THF, 0 °C; (ii) TFA, DCM; 15a: 61%, 15b: 45%.

Figure 6. Series of prolinamide-based organocatalysts characterized by different carbocyclic rings or variably substituted aromatics.

Scheme 5. (a) Synthesis of prolinamide-organocatalysts 7b,c, 18a-h, 20 applied in the organocatalytic Biginelli reaction. (b) Synthesis of prolinamide-organocatalysts 18i,j applied in the same Biginelli reaction.

Figure 7. Bifunctional prolinamide-based organocatalysts 21a–d.

Scheme 6. Series of prolinamide-organocatalysts employed in the reaction of isatin with acetone (Py = pyridine, Qn = quinoline).

Scheme 7. Series of prolinamide-organocatalysts employed in the enantioselective cross-aldol reaction between acetone and trihalomethyl ketones or imines.

Scheme 8. (a) Synthesis of organocatalysts 25a–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) LiAlH4, THF, 0 °C to rt, 81–98%; (b) (i) NaH, THF, rt; (ii) TBDMSCl, 85–89%; (c) TsCl, pyr, DMAP, 0 °C to rt, 80–85%; (d) NaN3, DMF, 70 °C, 99%; (e) H2 (50 psi), Pd/C, AcOEt/EtOH, 88–90%; (f) L-Pro-Cbz, HOBt, EDC, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to r.t, 88–90%; (g) TBAF, THF, rt, 85–97%; (h) H2 (50 psi), Pd/C, MeOH, 25a: 91%, 25b: 87% , 25c:97%, 25d: 87%;(i) BAIB/Tempo, DCM/H2O, 84–97%. (b) Synthesis of organocatalysts 25e. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) LDA, THF, −78 °C; (ii) MeOH, 98%; (b) Ti(OiPr)4, iPrOH, 10 °C, 10 days, 82%; (c) LiAlH4, THF, 70 °C 96%; (d) (i) NaH, THF, rt; (ii) TBDMSCl, 60%; (e) NH3, DIAD, PPh3, THF, 0 °C, 84%; (f) H2 (50 psi), Pd/C, AcOEt/EtOH, 99%; (g) L-Pro-Cbz, HOBt, EDC, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to r.t, 81%; (g) TBAF, THF, rt, 98%; (h) H2 (50 psi), Pd/C, MeOH, 99%. (c) Synthesis of organocatalysts 25f. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) LDA, THF, 97%; (b) TsCl, pyr, DMAP, 0 °C to rt, 95%; (c) NaN3, DMF, 70 °C, 93%; (d) H2 (50 psi), Pd/C, AcOEt/EtOH, 99%; (e) L-Pro-Cbz, HOBt, EDC, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to r.t, 93%; (f) H2 (50 psi), Pd/C, MeOH, 99%. (d) Synthesis of organocatalysts 26g. Reagents and conditions: (c) TsCl, pyr, DMAP, 0 °C to rt, 87%; (d) NaN3, DMF, 70 °C, 90%; (e) H2 (50 psi), Pd/C, AcOEt/EtOH, 99%; (f) L-Pro-Cbz, HOBt, EDC, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to r.t, 83%; (h) H2 (50 psi), Pd/C, MeOH, 99%.

Figure 8. N-prolyl sulfinamide-catalysts 27a–d containing two stereogenic centers.

Figure 9. Phthalimido-prolinamide catalyst 28 and its transition state in the enantioselective direct aldol reaction of aromatic aldehydes with ketones.

Figure 10. AZT-Prolinamides 29a,b employed in the enantioselective direct aldol reaction.

Figure 11. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding network in the transition state involving catalysts 6c,d.

Figure 12. Homochiral L-prolinamido-sulfonamides 30a–h and their calculated transition state for the asymmetric aldol reaction between acetone and aromatic aldehydes.

Figure 13. Peptides 31b–g structurally related to organocatalyst 31a.

Figure 14. Tripeptides 32a–f employed to catalyze the asymmetric aldol reaction.

Scheme 9. Tripeptide 33 employed in the asymmetric aldol reaction between acetone and α-ketoesters or α-keto amides.

Scheme 10. Synthesis of dipeptide organocatalyst 34. Reagents and conditions: (a) CbzCl, NaOH, 0 °C, 2 h, 93%; (b) O-Bn-L-threonine, EDC, HOBt, DCM:DMF (4:1), rt, 14 h, 92%; (c) TBSCl, imidazole, DCM:DMF (10:1), rt, 24 h, 78%; (d) Pd(OH)2/C, H2 (1 atm), rt, 12 h, 74%.

Figure 15. Prolinamide catalysts 35a–c, resembling dipeptides.

Figure 16. Series of dipeptide-like organocatalysts 36a–h, employed in the asymmetric aldol reaction in brine.

Figure 17. Proline-based α,β-dipeptides 37a–c.

Figure 18. Proline-based dipeptides 38a–e as organocatalysts for the asymmetric aldol reaction both in organic and aqueous media.

Figure 19. Hybrids dipeptide-2-pyrrolidone organocatalysts 39a–f.

Figure 20. (a) Pseudotripeptide catalysts 40a–m, characterized by the anthranilamide moiety. (b) Binding pocket characteristic of this type of catalysts. (c) Intramolecular hydrogen bonding.

Scheme 11. Tripeptide-like catalyst 41 employed for asymmetric aldol reaction between ketones and perfluoroalkyl ketones.

Figure 21. Proline-based di- and tri-peptides 42a–d employed in the asymmetric Michael reaction between ketones and nitroolefins “on water.”

Figure 22. Tripeptide H-D-Pro-Pro-Glu-NH2 43a.

Figure 23. (a) Amide bond conformations of H-Pro-Pro-Xaa-NH2-type peptide organocatalysts. (b) Examples of the studied catalysts.

Scheme 12. (a) Conjugate addition reaction of aldehydes to α,β-disubstituted nitroolefins. (b) General structure of the evaluated organocatalysts (43c).

Scheme 13. Asymmetric conjugate addition of aldehydes to β,β-disubstituted nitroalkenes.

Figure 24. Series of bifunctional L-prolinamides organocatalysts 44a–d resembling dipeptides.

Scheme 14. (a) Synthesis of bifunctional tripeptides carrying phosphonic acid. Reagents and conditions: (a) Boc2O, Na2CO3, NaHCO3 (satd), rt, 24 h, >99%; (b) (i) DEAD, Ph3P, THF, −78 °C; (ii) 2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-3-hydroxypropanoic acid, THF, −78 °C to rt 2.5 h; (c) P(OMe)3, 70 °C, 24 h, 53% over two steps; (d) TFA, DCM, rt, 4 h, 74%; (e) LDA, tetraethyl methylenebis(phosphonate), −78 °C, 1 h, rt, 3 h, 98%, Z/E 60/40; (f) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, EtOH, rt, 2 h; (g) PTSA, MeOH, rt, 6 h, 85% over two steps; (h) BAIB, TEMPO, NaHCO3, 0 °C, 2 h, 90%; (i) TFA, rt, 4 h; (j) AcCl, MeOH, reflux, 2 h, >99% over two steps; (k) EDC∙HCl, HOBt, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C, 30 min, rt, 12 h, 40–60%; (l) (i) TMSBr, CH3CN, −10 °C to rt, 4 h; (ii) MeOH, 1 h, rt; (iii) NaOH; H2O then lyophilization, 95%. (b) Key functional groups of these tripeptides. (c) Series of synthesized phosphonic acid-containing tripeptides 45a–h.

Figure 25. Series of new hybrid dipeptide-like organocatalysts 46a–m.

Scheme 15. (a) Anti-selective conjugate addition between aldehydes and nitroolefins promoted by organocatalyst 43e (Curtin–Hammett scenario). (b) Best-performing catalyst, 43e.

Scheme 16. (a) Synthesis of the tricyclic chiral catalyst 47a. Reagents and conditions: (a) DCC, BnOH, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 2 h, 98%; (b) TFA, 32 h, rt, 88%; (c) ethylchloroformate, Na2CO3, 0 °C to rt, 12 h, 86%; (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, MeOH, rt, 12 h, 100%. (b) Calculated transition state. (c) Other tricyclic chiral catalyst 47b,c.

Scheme 17. (a) Synthesis of the cis-ion-tagged organocatalyst 48a. Reagents and conditions: (a) 2-chloroacetyl chloride, DCM, −20 °C, 3 h, 86%; (b) N-Me-Imidazole, MeCN, 16 h, 50 °C, 65%; (c) LiNTf2, DCM, rt, 12 h, 92%.; (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, MeOH, rt,12 h, 96%. (b) Ion-tagged cis-ester 48b. (c) Calculated transition state for catalyst 48a.

Scheme 18. Synthesis of organocatalyst 49. Reagents and conditions: (a) oxalyl chloride, DMF, benzene, rt, 12 h, 95%, (b) 4-hydroxy-L-proline, TFA, CF3SO3H, rt, 3 h, 87%, (c) Et3N, EtOAc, rt, 90%.

Scheme 19. Synthesis of pyridinium-pyrrolidines 50a–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) Zincke salt, nBuOH, reflux, 35 h, 82%; (b) (i) 4 M HCl/dioxane, rt, 5 h; (ii) solid NaHCO3, 98%; (c) 50b: AgBF4, CH3CN, 92%; 50c: KPF6, H2O, 1 h, 94%; 50d: LiNTf2, H2O, 1 h, 98%.

Scheme 20. Synthesis of thio-pyrrolidines 51a–c. Reagents and conditions: (a) NaBH4, I2, THF, rt, 5 h, reflux, 20 h, 88%; (b) (i) 20% HBr/H2O; (ii) EtOH, PBr3, reflux, 10 min, 86%; (c) substituted mercapto-imidazole, CH3CN, 80 °C, 8 h, yields not reported.

Scheme 21. Synthesis of ionic liquid anchored triazole-pyrrolidines 52a–c. Reagents and conditions: (a) BH3∙SMe2, THF, 0 °C, 5 h, rt, overnight, 95%; (b) TsCl, pyridine, rt, 6 h, 84%; (c) NaN3, DMSO, 64 °C, 19 h, 90%; (d) propargyl chloride, toluene, reflux, 8 h, >99% [91]; (e) CuI, DIPEA, EtOH, reflux, 24 h; (f) 5 M HCl, EtOH, 52a: 73%; (g) 52b: NaBF4, CH3CN/acetone (4:1), rt, 2 days, 95%; 52c: KPF6, CH3CN/acetone (4:1), rt, 2 days, 92%.

Scheme 22. Synthesis of ionic liquid anchored sulfonamido-pyrrolidines 53a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) chlorosulfonyl chloride, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 17 h, a: 72%, b: 98%; (b) a: (i) NaI, acetone, rt, 24 h, 96%; (ii) 1-methyl-imidazole, CH3CN, 65 °C, 14 h, 90%; b: 1-methyl-imidazole, toluene, reflux, 3 days, 75%; (c) (i) TFA/DCM (1:1), rt, 2 h; (ii) NaHCO3, LiNTf2, 1 h, rt, 55a: 88%, 53b: 90% over two steps.

Scheme 23. Synthesis of ionic liquid anchored sulfonamido-pyrrolidine 54. Reagents and conditions: (a) 1-methyl-2sufonylchlorideimidazole, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 1 h, 96%; (b) Me3OBF4, AcOEt, 0 °C to rt, 2 h, 90%; (c) 4 M HCl/dioxane, rt, 5 h, 95%.

Scheme 24. Synthesis of bifunctional pyrrolidines 55a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) benzyl (2-aminoethyl)carbamate (n = 1, HCl salt) or benzyl (3-aminopropyl)carbamate (n = 2, TFA salt), EDC, HOBt, iPr2NEt, DMF/THF, 0 °C to rt, 17 h, 79% (n = 1), 71% (n = 2); (b) BH3∙THF, THF, 0 °C to rt, 7 days, 69% (n = 1), 60% (n = 2); (c) Pd/C (10 mol%), H2 (1 atm), MeOH, rt, 5 h, 98%; (d) PhNCS, CHCl3, MeOH, aq NaHCO3, rt, 3 h, 68% (n = 1), 47% (n = 2); (e) 10% v/v TFA/DCM, rt, then aq K2CO3, rt, 30 min 88% (n = 1), >99% (n = 2).

Scheme 25. Synthesis of phosphine oxide substituted pyrrolidine 56. Reagents and conditions: (a) TsCl, pyridine, 0 °C, 4 h, 92%; (b) (i) Na, ClPPh2, dioxane, reflux, 15 h; (ii) (S)-N-tButoxycarbonylprolinol p-toluenesulfonate, rt, 19 h, 93%; (c) 30% H2O2, DCM, rt, 30 min; (d) TFA, DCM, rt, 12 h, 92% over two steps.

Scheme 26. Synthesis of pyrrolidinyl–camphor catalysts 57a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) BH3∙THF, 0 °C, 1 h, 96%; (b) pyridine, DCM, 40 °C, TsCl (syringe pump, 10 h), 8 h, 69%; (c) PCl5, 0 °C to rt, 1 h, 96%; (d) Ph3P, H2O/dioxane (1:4), reflux, 1 h, 82%; (e) NaH, THF, rt, 2 h, 88%; (f) NaBH4, DCM/MeOH (1:1), rt, 2 h; (g) TFA, DCM, rt, 1–3 h, 57a: 60%, 57b: 82% over two steps.

Scheme 27. Synthesis of pyrrolidinyl–camphor catalyst 58. Reagents and conditions: (a) PCl5, 0 °C to rt, 1 h, 96%; (b) Na2CO3, KMnO4, H2O, heat, 1 h, 40%; (c) (i) ethyl chloroformate, Et3N, acetone/H2O, NaN3, 0 °C to rt; (ii) 0.08 N HCl, 80 °C, 75%; (d) DIBAL-H, toluene, −78 °C, 2 h, 90%; (e) Ti(iPrO)4, THF, rt, 12 h; (f) NaBH4, EtOH, rt, 12 h, 52% over two steps; (g) TFA, DCM, rt, 19 h, 79%.

Scheme 28. Synthesis of pyrrolidine-pyridine-based catalysts 59a–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) NaH, THF, 0 °C to rt, 12 h; (ii) 2-bromopyridine, reflux, 24 h, 71%; (b) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 12 h, 92%.

Scheme 29. Synthesis of 4-trifluoromethanesulfonamidyl prolinol tert-butyldiphenylsilyl ether 60. Reagents and conditions: (a) SOCl2, MeOH, 0 °C to 40 °C, 2 h; (b) Boc2O, Na2CO3, THF/H2O (3:1), 0 °C to rt, 12 h; (c) PhCOOH, Ph3P, DIAD, THF, 0 °C to rt, 12 h; (d) LiOH∙H2O, THF/MeOH/H2O (1:1:1), 0 °C to rt, 12 h; (e) Me2SO4, K2CO3, acetone, 0 °C to rt, 12 h, 81% over five steps; (f) MsCl, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 12 h, 97%; (g) NaBH4, THF/MeOH, 0 °C to rt, 12 h, 99%; (h) TBDPSCl, imidazole, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 12 h, 95%; (i) NaN3, DMF, 70 °C, 12 h, 86%; (j) (i) Ph3P, THF, rt, 4 h; (ii) H2O, 80 °C, 12 h, 81%; (k) Tf2O, DIPEA, DCM, −78 °C to rt, 12 h, 70%; (l) TFA, DCM, 0 °C, 6 h, 76%.

Scheme 30. Synthesis of binaphthyl sulfonimide pyrrolidine 61. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) NaH, DMF, 0 °C, 2 h; (ii) N,N-dimethylthiocarbamoyl chloride, 85 °C, 4 h, 69%; (b) MW (300 W), 200 °C, 20 min, 65%; (c) N-chlorosuccinimide, 2 M HCl/CH3CN, 0 °C to 10–20 °C, 30 min; 87%; (d) DCM, Et3N, rt, 12 h; (e) TFA, DCM, rt, 4 h, 41% over two steps.

Scheme 31. Synthesis of sugar-based pyrrolidine 62. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) Ph3P, I2, imidazole, DCM, rt, 2 h; (ii) NaN3, DMF, rt, 5 h, 67% over two steps; (c) diacetone-D-glucose, NaH, THF, rt to 70 °C, 2 h, 76%; (d) CuI (20 mol%), DIPEA, CHCl3/EtOH/H2O (9:1:1), rt, 16 h; (e) DMF/piperidine, rt, 30 min, 78% over two steps.

Scheme 32. Synthesis of aminophosphonic acid monoester pyrrolidine 63. Reagents and conditions: (a) LiAlH4, THF, reflux, 2 h, >99%; (b) CbzCl, Et3N, DCM, rt, 18 h, 63%; (c) MsCl, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 3 h; (d) NaI, acetone, reflux, 12 h; (e) (EtO)2P(O)H, NaH, DMF, 55 °C, 5 days, 76% over three steps; (f) LiBr, CH3CN, reflux, 15 h; (g) 0.6 M HCl, rt, 30 min; (h) H2 (1 atm), Pd(OAc)2 (20 mol%), EtOH, rt, 4 days, 88% over three steps.

Scheme 33. Synthesis of sulfone pyrrolidine 64. Reagents and conditions: (a) Et3N, (Boc)2O, DCM, 0 °C, 2.5 h, 94%; (b) BH3∙THF, THF, 0 °C, 2 h, rt, 1 h, 82%; (c) TsCl, pyridine, 0 °C, 4 h, 92%; (d) (i) 2-naphthalenethiol, NaH, THF, 0 °C, 5 min; (ii) O-tosyl-pyrrolidinol, reflux, 5 h, 76%; (e) mCPBA, DCM, rt, 2.5 h, 90%; (f) TFA, DCM, rt, 5 h, 90%.

Scheme 34. Synthesis of thiourea-amine bifunctional organocatalyst 65. Reagents and conditions: (a) CS2, DCC, Et2O, 0 °C to rt, 3 h, rt 12 h, 76%; (b) Ph3P, HN3/benzene, DIAD, THF, 5 °C to rt, 3 h; (c) (i) Ph3P, THF, 40 °C; (ii) H2O, rt, 3 h, 61% over two steps; (d) DCM, rt, 9 h, 88%; (e) DCM, TFA, 12 h, rt, 55%.

Scheme 35. Synthesis of bifunctional 2-amino-pyridine pyrrolidine organocatalyst 66. Reagents and conditions: (a) CbzCl, NaOH, 0 °C, 4 h, 87%; (b) SOCl2, reflux, 2 h, 99%; (c) 2-aminopyridine, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C, 12 h, 74%; (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C (10%, w/w), CH3OH, 24 h, 92%; (e) LiAlH4, THF, rt, 24 h, 74%.

Scheme 36. Synthesis of 1H-benzo[d]imidazole-pyrrolidine bifunctional organocatalyst 67. Reagents and conditions: (a) BnBr, Et3N, DCM, 8 h, 99%; (b) LiAlH4, THF, 0 °C to rt, 20 h, 97%; (c) (i) Ph3P, phtalimide, THF, 10 min; (ii) DEAD, reflux, 8 h; (d) (i) hydrazine monohydrate, EtOH, reflux 2 h; (ii) HCl 1M, reflux 30 min, 70% over two steps; (e) HCl, urea, 130–140 °C, 6 h, 90%; (f) phosphoryl chloride, reflux, 2 h, 45%; (g) Et3N, 190–200 °C, 16 h; (h) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C (10 mol%), CH3OH, rt, 48 h, 41% over two steps.

Scheme 37. (a) Synthesis of pyrrolidine (thio)ureas 68a–e. Reagents and conditions: (a) MeOH, SOCl2, Et3N, 0 °C to 40 °C, 2 h; (b) Boc2O, Na2CO3, THF/H2O (3:1), 0 °C to rt (c) PhCOOH, Ph3P, DIAD, THF. 0 °C to rt; (d) LiOH, THF/MeOH/H2O (1:1:1), 0 °C to rt; (e) Me2SO4, K2CO3, acetone, 0 °C, 81%; (f) MsCl, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 97% (g) NaBH4, THF, MeOH, 0 °C to rt, 99%, (h) TBDPSCl, imidazole, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 95% (i) NaN3, DCM, rt, 86% (j) (i) Ph3P, THF, rt; (ii) H2O, 80 °C, 81%; (k) RNCS, rt; (l) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to RT, 6 h. 40–45% over two steps. (b) All the catalysts synthetized with a similar procedure. (c) Proposed transition state.

Scheme 38. Synthesis of fluorous (S)-pyrrolidine–thiourea bifunctional organocatalyst 69. Reagents and conditions: (a) DIPEA, pyridine, DCM, 58%; (b) TFA, DCM, 95%.

Scheme 39. (a) Synthesis of organocatalysts 70a and 71a–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) CSCl2, DCM, aq. NaHCO3; (b) tert-butyl (S)-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, DCM; (c) 6 N HCl/MeOH, AcOH, 100 °C, 3 h, 70a: 88%, 71a: 76%, 71b: 72%, 71c: 80%, 71d: 85%. (b) Transition state for catalyst 70a.

Scheme 40. Synthesis of pyrrolidinyl-sulfamide organocatalysts 72a–d and 73a–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) Et3N, DCM, 0 °C; (b) tert-butyl (S)-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, DCE, reflux; (c) TFA, DCM, 0° C to rt; (d) tert-butyl (S)-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C; (e) DCE, reflux.

Figure 26. Organocatalysts composed of the polyoxometalate acid and chiral diamines 74a–e.

Scheme 41. (a) Simultaneous dual activation of aldehydes and nitroolefins obtained employing catalyst type 75. (b) Synthesis of squaramide-based aminocatalysts 75a,b. (c) Asymmetric Diels–Alder reaction of anthracenes using nitroalkenes as dienophiles.

Scheme 42. Synthesis of organocatalysts 76 and 77. Reagents and conditions: (a) Boc2O, 83%; (b) ClCO2C2H5, Et3N, DCM then (R)-α-methylbenzyl amine, 85%; (c) HCOOH, 80%; (d) LiAlH4, 70%.

Scheme 43. Synthesis of organocatalysts 78a–d.

Scheme 44. Synthesis of organocatalyst 79. Reagents and conditions: (a) Me2S BH3, THF, 0 °C to rt, 92%; (b) TsCl, pyridine, 0 °C, 91%; (c) NaH, THF, 0 °C; PhSH, reflux, 5 h, 83%; (d) NaIO4, MeOH/H2O, 0 °C to rt, 92%; (e) TFA, DCM, 5 h, rt, 89%.

Scheme 45. Synthesis of organocatalyst 80a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) THF, reflux, 23 h, 80a: 98%, 80b: 84%; (b) For 80a: tert-butyl (R)-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, THF, reflux, 20 h; for 80b: tert-butyl (R)-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, THF, reflux, 50 h, 89%; (c) For 80a: TFA, DCM, rt, 30 min, 34% over the two steps; For 80b: TFA, DCM, rt, 3 h, 75%.

Scheme 46. Synthesis of organocatalyst 81 and proposed stereochemical model for the Michael addition of ketones to nitroolefins. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) SOCl2, MeOH, rt to 45 °C, 6 h; (ii) Boc2O, rt, 16 h, 95% over the two steps; (b) DAST, DCM, −78 °C, 16 h, 78%; (c) DIBAL-H, DCM, −78 °C, 6 h, 68%; (d) pyrrolidine, NaBH3CN, 4Å MS, MeOH, 0 °C, 12 h, 54%; (e) (i) HCl/Et2O, rt, overnight; (ii) 1M NaOH, rt, 2 h, 90% over two steps.

Scheme 47. Synthesis of organocatalysts 70b–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) MsCl, Et3N, DCM; (ii) PhCOONa, DCM, 90 °C; (iii) K2CO3, MeOH; (b) TBDMSCl, imidazole, DCM, rt; 82–88%; (c) DAST, DCM, −78 °C, 67–77%; (d) DIBAL-H, DCM, −78 °C, 51–61%; (e) MsCl, Et3N, DCM; (f) NaN3, DMF; 47–73% over two steps; (g) (i) PPh3, THF 65 °C; (ii) H2O, 65 °C; (h) methyl (S)-3-isothiocyanato-3-phenylpropanoate, 46–71% over two steps; (h) HCl 6 N/MeOH, AcOH; 70b: 64%, 70c: 92%, 70d: 44%, 70e: 55%.

Scheme 48. Synthesis of organocatalysts 82a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) EDC, HOBt, DCM, rt, 8 h, I-25a: 81%, I-25b: 81%; (b) Pd/C, H2 (1 atm), MeOH, rt, 12 h, 82a: 84%, 82b: 82%.

Scheme 49. Synthesis of organocatalysts 83a,b and transitions states for the Michael addition in water (A) and for the neat conditions in presence of p-nitrobenzoic acid (B). Reagents and conditions: (a) PPh3, DIAD, THF, 0 °C to rt, 4–6 h, I-27a: 93%, I-27b: 90%; (b) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 3 h, 83a: 91%, 83b: 87%.

Scheme 50. Synthesis of pyrrolidine-oxytriazole catalyst 84. Reagents and conditions: (a) PPh3, DIAD, THF, 0 °C to rt, 4–6 h, 88%; (b) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 3 h, 93%.

Scheme 51. Synthesis biaryl-based organocatalysts 85a–c.

Scheme 52. Synthesis of perhydroindolinol 89. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) SOCl2, MeOH, rt; (ii) LiAlH4, THF, rt, 92% over two steps.

Scheme 53. Synthesis of pyrrolidine sulfinamide 90. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) NaBH4, THF, 0 °C, 1 h; (ii) BF3∙Et2O, 0 °C, 18 h, 93%; (b) DMSO, oxalyl chloride, Et3N, DCM, −78 °C, 1 h, 0 °C, 30 min; (c) (S)-2-methylpropane-2-sulfinamide, CuSO4, DCM, rt, 48 h, 89% over two steps; (d) NaBH4, THF, 0 °C, 1 h, 86%; (e) Et2NH, THF, rt, 2 h, 52%.

Scheme 54. Synthesis of (thio)carbamate-derived organocatalysts 91a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) BH3∙Me2S, THF, 93%; (b) for 91a: isocyanatobenzene, DMAP, DCM, 91%; for 91b: isocyanatobenzene, BF3∙Et2O, THF, reflux, 42%; (c) HCOOC, 91a: 84%, 91b: 81%.

Scheme 55. Synthesis of organocatalyst 92a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) for I-28a: LiAlH4, THF, 70 °C, 3 h, 94%; for I-28b: LiBH4, rt, 48 h, 93%; (b) Boc2O, NaHCO3, THF:H2O (1:1), rt, 16 h, 58–98%; (c) TsCl, Et3N, DMAP, DCM, rt, 16 h, 62–95%; (d) NaCN, DMSO, 80 °C, 8 h, 45–68%; (e) 50% NH2OH (aq), EtOH, rt, 48 h; 74–83% (f) 1,1’-Carbonyldiimidazole, THF, 70 °C, 16 h; 37–63% (g) 4 M HCl in dioxane, rt, 4 h, 92a: 97%, 92b: 98%.

Scheme 56. Synthesis of thiosquaramide organocatalysts 93a–c. Reagents and conditions: (a) cyclopentanol, PhMe, reflux, 8 h, 86%; (b) Lawesson’s reagent, DCM, rt, 48 h, 62%; (c) I-30a–c, DCM, 0 °C to rt, I-30a: 80%, I-30b: not given, I-30c: 83%; (d) tert-butyl (R)-2-(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 1.5 h; (e) TFA, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 1.5 h, 93a: 73%, 93b: 51%, 93c: 55% over two steps.

Scheme 57. Synthesis of N-sulfinylpyrrolidine thioureas and ureas 94a,b and 95a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) PPh3, DIAD, DPPA, THF, rt; (b) PPh3, 75 °C; (c) H2O, 56% over 3 steps; (d) CSCl2, TEA, THF, rt, 86%; (e) bis(trichloromethyl)carbonate, DIPEA, THF, rt, 100%; (f) nBuLi, THF, 80–90% for thioureas, 24% for ureas; (g) TFA, DCM, 96–98%.

Scheme 58. Squaramide 75c and thiosquaramide 93a organocatalysts proposed by Kupai and organocatalyzed asymmetric conjugate addition.

Scheme 59. (a) Synthesis of amidomethylpyrrolidines 96. Reagents and conditions: (a) TsCl, KOH, DCM, rt, 93%; (b) NaN3, DMF, 80 °C, 80%; (c) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, MeOH, rt, 94%; (d) C6F5SO2Cl, Et3N, DCM, rt, 80%; (e) 3,5-(NO2)2C6H3CH2Br, K2CO3, DMF, rt, 74%; (f) TFA, DCM, rt, 90%. Yields reported for catalyst 96k. (b) Organocatalyzed cascade reaction to anti-α-carbolinol and proposed transition state. (c) Synthesized iodinated organocatalysts.

Scheme 60. Synthesis of aminal-pyrrolidine organocatalysts 98a–f. Reagents and conditions: (a) BH3∙SMe2, THF, 99%; (b) PCC, DCM, MS (4Å), 74%; (c) diamines, DCM, MS (4Å), K2CO3; (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, AcOEt, 51–82%.

Scheme 61. Synthesis of (S)-(pyrrolidin-2-yl)diphenyl methyl amine 99. Reagents and conditions: (a) SOCl2, MeOH, 0 °C, 1 h, 100%; (b) BnBr, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 8 h, 95%; (c) bromobenzene, Mg, THF, 25 °C, 12 h, 97%; (d) H2SO4/CHCl3, NaN3, 0 °C, 12 h, 96%; (e) LiAlH4, THF, reflux, 8 h, 95%; (f) H2 (60 psi), Pd/C, MeOH, 25 °C, 99%.

Scheme 62. Zhong (above) and Lee (below) one-pot synthesis of (S)-2-(azidodiphenylmethyl)pyrrolidine (100), starting from α,α-diphenyl-(S)-prolinol.

Scheme 63. Synthesis of 2-tritylpyrrolidine 101. Reagents and conditions: (a) trityllithium, −78 °C to rt, 2 h, 54%; (b) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, AcOH, 25 °C, 12 h, 98%; (c) (i) (S)-malic acid; H2O/EtOH, (ii) 1N NaOH, 30%.

Scheme 64. Synthesis of silylated perhydroindolinylmethanol catalyst 102. Reagents and conditions: (a) ClCOOEt, K2CO3, MeOH, rt, 98%; (b) PhMgBr, Et2O, 0 °C, 91%; (c) KOH, MeOH, 80 °C, 91%; (d) TMSCl, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 84%.

Scheme 65. Synthesis of di(methylimidazole)prolinol silyl ethers 103a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) 1-methyl-1H-imidazole, BuLi, THF, −78 °C to rt, 1 h; (ii) N-Boc-L-proline methyl ester, THF, −78 °C to rt, 12 h, 53%; (b) TFA, DCM, rt, 3 h, 82%; (c) TMSOTf or TESOTf, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 2 h, 103a: 80%, 103b: 74%.

Scheme 66. Synthesis of ionic-tagged silylated α,α-diphenyl-(S)-prolinol 104. Reagents and conditions: (a) 3-chloropropyl-dimethylchlorosilane, imidazole, DMF, 25 °C, 12 h, 81%; (b) 1-methyl-imidazole, 80 °C, 12 h, 94%; (c) LiNTf2, H2O/DCM, 25 °C, 2 h, 94%; (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, MeOH, 25 °C, 12 h, 90%.

Scheme 67. Synthesis of aminal-pyrrolidine organocatalysts 105a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) SOCl2, MeOH, 97%; (b) PPh3, DEAD, phenol, DCM, 63%; (c) (i) DIBAL-H, toluene; (ii) diamine, DCM, MS (4 Å), K2CO3; (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, AcOEt, 39–42%, over two steps.

Scheme 68. Synthesis of 2-silylated pyrrolidines 106. (A) Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) sec-BuLi/(−)sparteine, Et2O, −78 °C, 4 h; (ii) R3SiCl, −78 °C to rt, 12 h, 66–93%; (b) HCl/Et2O, HCl (conc.), rt, 12 h, 18–90%. (B) Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) sec-BuLi/(−)sparteine, Et2O, −78 °C, 4 h; (ii) Ph2Si(OMe)2, −78 °C to rt, 12 h; (b) (i) PhLi, Et2O, −78 °C to 0 °C, 3 h, 50% overall yield; (c) AcCl/EtOH, AcOEt, rt, 12 h, 70%.

Scheme 69. Synthesis of 2-silylated pyrrolidines 106 using fluorosilanes. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) sec-BuLi/(−)sparteine, Et2O, −78 °C, 5.5 h; (ii) Ph2RSiF, −78 °C to rt, 30 min, 90–93%; (b) (i) ZnBr2, DCM, 15 h, 85–86%; (ii) enantioenrichment (recrystallization from 99:1 DCM/MeOH or trituration with DCM/hexanes), 68–76%.

Scheme 70. Synthesis of (S)-(−)-2-(fluorodiphenylmethyl)pyrrolidine 107. Reagents and conditions: (a) SOCl2, MeOH, reflux, 2 h; (b) BnBr, diisopropylethylamine, toluene, reflux, 24 h, 97% overall yield; (c) PhBr, Mg, THF, rt, 16 h, 93%; (d) H2 (1 atm), HCl (aq), Pd/C, EtOH, rt, 18 h, 96%; (e) diethylaminosulfur trifluoride, DCM, rt, 6.5 h, 54%.

Scheme 71. Synthesis of fluorinated aminal-pyrrolidine organocatalysts 108a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) SOCl2, MeOH, 97%; (b) diethylaminosulfur trifluoride, DCM, −78 °C, 7 h, rt, 14 h, 74%; (c) (i) DIBAL-H, toluene, −78 °C, 6 h; (ii) diamine, DCM, MS (4 Å); (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, AcOEt, 57–61%, over two steps.

Scheme 72. Synthesis of densely substituted pyrrolidines 109. Reagents and conditions: (a) trans-β-nitrostyrene, sarcosine methyl ester hydrochloride, Et3N, MgSO4, toluene, reflux, 7 h, 56%; (b) glycine methyl ester hydrochloride, Et3N, MgSO4, DCM, rt, 20 h, 92%; (c) trans-β-nitrostyrene, Et3N, LiBr, THF, rt, 3 h, 66%.

Scheme 73. Synthesis of bicyclic diarylprolinol silyl ethers 110a–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) Ph3P, DEAD, THF, rt, 5 h; 67%. (b) ArMgBr, THF, rt, 2–8 h; 51–85%. (c) R2SiCl2, imidazole, DMF, rt, 18 h; 63–70%. (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, THF:MeOH (1:1), rt, 18–36 h; 55–85%.

Scheme 74. Synthesis of bifunctional pyrrolidine-thioureas 111a–d. Reagents and conditions: (a) pyridine–SO3, DIEA, DMSO, DCM, 0 °C, 82%; (b) PhMgBr, THF, −78 °C, 58% (98:2 dr); (c) PPh3, DEAD, DPPA, THF, rt, 80%; (d) HCl (4 M), Et2O, rt, 85%; (e) a: EtBr, K2CO3, DMF, rt, 77%; b: BnBr, K2CO3, DMF, rt, 80%; c: HCOOH, HCHO, H2O, 100 °C, 62%; (f) LiAlH4, THF, rt; (g) 1-isothiocyanato-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene, DCM, rt, 56–70%, over two steps. (h) (i) HCOOH, HCHO, H2O, 100 °C; (ii) LiAlH4, THF, rt; (iii) 1-isothiocyanato-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene, DCM, rt, 45% overall yield.

Scheme 75. Synthesis of spiro-pyrrolidines 112a,b. Reagents and conditions: (a) MsCl, Et3N, DCM, 0 °C, 5 min; (b) (R)-phenethylamine, CH3CN, 85 °C, 8 h, 87% over two steps; (c) Au(PPh3)Cl (0.5 mol%)/AgOTf (1 mol%), PTS, MS (4Å), DCM, reflux, 2 h, 43%; (d) H2 (1 atm), Pd(OH)2/C, MeOH, rt, 10 h; (e) Et3N, Boc2O, DCM, 0 °C to rt, 1 h; 95% over two steps; (f) NaBH4, MeOH, 10 min; (g) TFA, DCM, rt, 3 h; (h) imidazole, TBSCl or TBDPSCl, DMF, rt, 30 min; 83% over three steps.

Scheme 76. Synthesis of fluorinated pyrrolidine 113. Reagents and conditions: (a) AcCl, MeOH, reflux, 6 h; (b) BnCl, Et3N, DCM, reflux, 6 h, 41% over two steps; (c) trichloroisocyanuric acid, TEMPO, DCM, 0 °C, 1 h, 96%; (d) diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST), DCM, 0 °C to rt, 18 h, 72%; (e) 1-bromo-3,5-bis-(trifluoromethyl)-benzene, Mg, THF, 0 °C to rt, 15 h, 96%; (f) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, EtOH/AcOEt (1:1), rt, 26 h, 94%; (g) (i) NaH, THF, 0 °C; (ii) chloro-(2,3-dimethylbutan-2-yl)dimethylsilane, rt, 5 h, 94%.

Scheme 77. Synthesis of diphenylprolinol methyl ether 114. Reagents and conditions: (a) DIBAL-H, DCM, −65 °C, 30 min, 96%; (b) (S)-2-methylpropane-2-sulfinamide, Ti(OiPr)4, THF, rt, 12 h, 70%; (c) BF3∙Et2O (5 mol%), MeOH, reflux, 7 h, 91%; (d) (i) BuLi, TMEDA, THF, −40 °C, 30 min; (ii) sulfinimine, −78 °C, 1 h, 79%; (e) HCl/MeOH, 0 °C to rt, 4 h, 99%.

Scheme 78. Synthesis of spiro-pyrrolidine 115. Reagents and conditions: (a) NH2OH∙HCl, NaOAc, MeOH, reflux, 4 h; (b) NiCl2, NaBH4, MeOH, −15 °C, 2 h, rt, 12 h; (c) Tf2O, Et3N, DCM, −78 °C, 30 min; (d) TFA, DCM, 0 °C, 1.5 h, 68% over four steps.

References

1. Li Petri, G.; Raimondi, M.V.; Spanò, V.; Holl, R.; Barraja, P.; Montalbano, A. Pyrrolidine in Drug Discovery: A Versatile Scaffold for Novel Biologically Active Compounds. Top. Curr. Chem.; 2021; 379, 34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41061-021-00347-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373963]

2. Stocker, B.L.; Dangerfield, E.M.; Win-Mason, A.L.; Haslett, G.W.; Timmer, M.S.M. Recent Developments in the Synthesis of Pyrrolidine-Containing Iminosugars. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2010; 2010, pp. 1615-1637. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.200901320]

3. Martineau, D.; Beley, M.; Gros, P.C. Pyrrolidine-Containing Polypyridines: New Ligands for Improved Visible Light Absorption by Ruthenium Complexes. J. Org. Chem.; 2006; 71, pp. 566-571. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo051994k] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16408966]

4. Zhou, M.; El-Sayed, E.S.M.; Ju, Z.; Wang, W.; Yuan, D. The Synthesis and Applications of Chiral Pyrrolidine Functionalized Metal-Organic Frameworks and Covalent-Organic Frameworks. Inorg. Chem. Front.; 2020; 7, pp. 1319-1333. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9QI01103J]

5. Vega-Peñaloza, A.; Paria, S.; Bonchio, M.; Dell’Amico, L.; Companyó, X. Profiling the Privileges of Pyrrolidine-Based Catalysts in Asymmetric Synthesis: From Polar to Light-Driven Radical Chemistry. ACS Catal.; 2019; 9, pp. 6058-6072. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b01556]

6. Oliveira, V.D.G.; Cardoso, M.F.D.C.; Forezi, L.D.S.M. Organocatalysis: A Brief Overview on Its Evolution and Applications. Catalysts; 2018; 8, 605. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal8120605]

7. Liu, J.; Wang, L. Recent Advances in Asymmetric Reactions Catalyzed by Proline and Its Derivatives. Synthesis; 2017; 49, pp. 960-972. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1588901]

8. Thorat, B.R.; Mali, S.N.; Wavhal, S.S.; Bhagat, D.S.; Borade, R.M.; Chapolikar, A.; Gandhi, A.; Shinde, P. L-Proline: A Versatile Organo-Catalyst in Organic Chemistry. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen.; 2023; 26, pp. 1108-1140. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1386207325666220720105845]

9. Cozzi, P.G.; Gualandi, A.; Mengozzi, L.; Wilson, C.M. Imidazolidinones as Asymmetric Organocatalysts. Sustainable Catalysis: Without Metals or Other Endangered Elements, Part 2; North, M. Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2015; pp. 164-195.

10. Jensen, K.L.; Dickmeiss, G.; Jiang, H.; Albrecht, Ł.; Jørgensen, K.A. The Diarylprolinol Silyl Ether System: A General Organocatalyst. Acc. Chem. Res.; 2012; 45, pp. 248-264. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar200149w]

11. Gotoh, H.; Hayashi, Y. Diarylprolinol silyl ethers: Development and application as organocatalysts. Sustainable Catalysis: Challenges and Practices for the Pharmaceutical and Fine Chemical Industries; Dunn, P.J.; Hii, K.K.; Krische, M.J.; Williams, M.T. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 287-316.

12. Moyano, A. Activation modes in asymmetric organocatalysis. Stereoselective Organocatalysis; Torres, R.R. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; ISBN 9781118604755

13. Chen, Z.; Yang, Q.-Q.; Du, W.; Chen, Y.-C. Asymmetric Organocatalysis Involving Double Activation. Tetrahedron Chem; 2022; 2, 100017. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tchem.2022.100017]

14. Han, M.Y.; Jia, J.Y.; Wang, W. Recent Advances in Organocatalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Polysubstituted Pyrrolidines. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2014; 55, pp. 784-794. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.11.048]

15. Pandey, G.; Banerjee, P.; Gadre, S.R. Construction of Enantiopure Pyrrolidine Ring System via Asymmetric [3 + 2]-Cycloaddition of Azomethine Ylides. Chem. Rev.; 2006; 106, pp. 4484-4517. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr050011g]

16. Adrio, J.; Carretero, J.C. Stereochemical Diversity in Pyrrolidine Synthesis by Catalytic Asymmetric 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of Azomethine Ylides. Chem. Commun.; 2019; 55, pp. 11979-11991. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9CC05238K]

17. Philip, R.M.; Treesa, G.S.S.; Saranya, S.; Anilkumar, G. Applications of Aryl-Sulfinamides in the Synthesis of N-Heterocycles. RSC Adv.; 2021; 11, pp. 20591-20600. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1RA04099E]

18. Smolobochkin, A.V.; Gazizov, A.S.; Turmanov, R.A.; Abdullaeva, D.S.; Burilov, A.R.; Pudovik, M.A. N-Phosphorylated Pyrrolidines: An Overview of Synthetic Approaches. Synthesis; 2020; 52, pp. 2162-2170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1690889]

19. Li, J.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, Y. Cycloaddition/Annulation Strategies for the Construction of Multisubstituted Pyrrolidines and Their Applications in Natural Product Synthesis. Org. Chem. Front.; 2018; 5, pp. 864-892. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7QO01077J]

20. Schultz, D.M.; Wolfe, J.P. Recent Developments in Palladium-Catalyzed Alkene Aminoarylation Reactions for the Synthesis of Nitrogen Heterocycles. Synthesis; 2012; 44, pp. 351-361. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chin.201216239]

21. Gruttadauria, M.; Giacalone, F.; Noto, R. Supported Proline and Proline-Derivatives as Recyclable Organocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2008; 37, pp. 1666-1688. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b800704g]

22. Singh, S. Recent Development of Recoverable MacMillan Catalyst in Asymmetric Organic Transformations. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2021; 363, pp. 629-656. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.202000994]

23. Susam, Z.D.; Tanyeli, C. Recyclable Organocatalysts in Asymmetric Synthesis. Asian J. Org. Chem.; 2021; 10, pp. 1251-1266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajoc.202100165]

24. Ferré, M.; Pleixats, R.; Wong Chi Man, M.; Cattoën, X. Recyclable Organocatalysts Based on Hybrid Silicas. Green Chem.; 2016; 18, pp. 881-922. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5GC02579F]

25. Fulgheri, T.; Della Penna, F.; Baschieri, A.; Carlone, A. Advancements in the Recycling of Organocatalysts: From Classical to Alternative Approaches. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem.; 2020; 25, 100387. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100387]

26. Shajahan, R.; Sarang, R.; Saithalavir, A. Polymer Supported Proline-Based Organocatalysts in Asymmetric Aldol Reactions: A Review. Curr. Organocatalysis; 2022; 9, pp. 124-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2213337209666220112094231]

27. Bui, T.; Barbas, C.F. A Proline-Catalyzed Asymmetric Robinson Annulation Reaction. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2000; 41, pp. 6951-6954. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01180-1]

28. List, B.; Lerner, R.A.; Barbas III, C.F. Proline-Catalyzed Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2000; 122, pp. 2395-2396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja994280y]

29. Bahmanyar, S.; Houk, K.N.; Martin, H.J.; List, B. Quantum Mechanical Predictions of the Stereoselectivities of Proline-Catalyzed Asymmetric Intermolecular Aldol Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2003; 125, pp. 2475-2479. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja028812d]

30. Yang, H.; Carter, R.G. Synthesis of All-Carbon, Quaternary Center-Containing Cyclohexenones through an Organocatalyzed, Multicomponent Coupling. Org. Lett.; 2010; 12, pp. 3108-3111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol1011955]

31. Naziroglu, H.N.; Durmaz, M.; Bozkurt, S.; Demir, A.S.; Sirit, A. Application of L-Prolinamides as Highly Efficient Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Michael Addition of Unmodified Aldehydes to Nitroalkenes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2012; 23, pp. 164-169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2012.01.008]

32. Watts, J.; Luu, L.; McKee, V.; Carey, E.; Kelleher, F. Structure-Reactivity Studies of Simple 4-Hydroxyprolinamide Organocatalysts in the Asymmetric Michael Addition Reaction of Aldehydes to Nitroolefins. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2012; 354, pp. 1035-1042. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201100028]

33. Wang, Y.; Lin, J.; Wei, K. Aromatic L-Prolinamide-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition of Aldehydes to Nitroalkenes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2014; 25, pp. 1599-1604. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.11.006]

34. Gorde, A.B.; Ramapanicker, R. D-Prolyl-2-(Trifluoromethylsulfonamidopropyl)Pyrrolidine: An Organocatalyst for Asymmetric Michael Addition of Aldehydes to β-Nitroalkenes at Ambient Conditions. J. Org. Chem.; 2019; 84, pp. 1523-1533. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.8b02945]

35. Wiesner, M.; Neuburger, M.; Wennemers, H. Tripeptides of the Type H-D-Pro-Pro-Xaa-NH₂ as Catalysts for Asymmetric 1,4-Addition Reactions: Structural Requirements for High Catalytic Efficiency. Chem.–A Eur. J.; 2009; 15, pp. 10103-10109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.200901021] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19697376]

36. Cortes-Clerget, M.; Gager, O.; Monteil, M.; Pirat, J.L.; Migianu-Griffoni, E.; Deschamp, J.; Lecouvey, M. Novel Easily Recyclable Bifunctional Phosphonic Acid Carrying Tripeptides for the Stereoselective Michael Addition of Aldehydes with Nitroalkenes. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2016; 358, pp. 34-40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201500794]

37. Almaşi, D.; Alonso, D.A.; Nájera, C. Prolinamides versus Prolinethioamides as Recyclable Catalysts in the Enantioselective Solvent-Free Inter- and Intramolecular Aldol Reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2008; 350, pp. 2467-2472. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200800430]

38. Vizcaíno-Milla, P.; Sansano, J.M.; Nájera, C.; Fiser, B.; Gómez-Bengoa, E. Pyrimidine-Derived Prolinamides as Recoverable Bifunctional Organocatalysts for Enantioselective Inter- and Intramolecular Aldol Reactions under Solvent-Free Conditions. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2015; 2015, pp. 2614-2621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201500007]

39. Tzeng, Z.H.; Chen, H.Y.; Reddy, R.J.; Huang, C.T.; Chen, K. Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Direct Aldol Reactions Promoted by Water-Compatible Organocatalysts Bearing a Pyrrolidinyl-Camphor Structural Scaffold. Tetrahedron; 2009; 65, pp. 2879-2888. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2009.02.022]

40. Xu, J.; Fu, X.; Wu, C.; Hu, X. Simple, Inexpensive, and Facile L-Prolinamide Used as a Recyclable Organocatalyst for Highly Efficient Large-Scale Asymmetric Direct Aldol Reactions. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2011; 22, pp. 840-850. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.05.008]

41. Saha, S.; Moorthy, J.N. Enantioselective Organocatalytic Biginelli Reaction: Dependence of the Catalyst on Sterics, Hydrogen Bonding, and Reinforced Chirality. J. Org. Chem.; 2011; 76, pp. 396-402. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo101717m] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21192642]

42. Siyutkin, D.E.; Kucherenko, A.S.; Frolova, L.L.; Kuchin, A.V.; Zlotin, S.G. 2-Hydroxy-3-[(S)-Prolinamido]Pinanes as Novel Bifunctional Organocatalysts for Asymmetric Aldol Reactions in Aqueous Media. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2011; 22, pp. 1320-1324. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.07.013]

43. Kinsella, M.; Duggan, P.G.; Lennon, C.M. Screening of Simple N-Aryl and N-Heteroaryl Pyrrolidine Amide Organocatalysts for the Enantioselective Aldol Reaction of Acetone with Isatin. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2011; 22, pp. 1423-1433. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.07.016]

44. Hara, N.; Tamura, R.; Funahashi, Y.; Nakamura, S. N-(Heteroarenesulfonyl)Prolinamides-Catalyzed Aldol Reaction between Acetone and Aryl Trihalomethyl Ketones. Org. Lett.; 2011; 13, pp. 1662-1665. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol2001039]

45. Maycock, C.D.; Rita Ventura, M. New Organocatalysts Derived from Tartaric and Glyceric Acids for Direct Aldol Reactions. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2012; 23, pp. 1262-1271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2012.08.008]

46. Wan, W.; Gao, W.; Ma, G.; Ma, L.; Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, S.; Hao, J. Asymmetric Aldol Reaction Organocatalyzed by Bifunctional N-Prolyl Sulfinamides under Solvent-Free Conditions. RSC Adv.; 2014; 4, pp. 26563-26568. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4RA03362K]

47. Kumar, T.P.; Vavle, N.C.; Patro, V.; Haribabu, K. Phthalimido-Prolinamide: A New Chiral Catalyst for Solvent Free Enantioselective Aldol Reactions. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2014; 25, pp. 457-461. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.01.008]

48. Naresh, T.; Kumar, T.P.; Haribabu, K.; Chandrasekhar, S. AZT-Prolinamide: The Nucleoside Derived Pyrrolidine Catalysts for Asymmetric Aldol Reactions Using Water as Solvent. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2014; 25, pp. 1340-1345. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.08.007]

49. Yadav, G.D.; Singh, S. Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions Catalysed by Trans-4-Hydroxy-(S)-Prolinamide in Solvent-Free Conditions. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2015; 26, pp. 1156-1166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2015.09.003]

50. Yadav, G.D.; Singh, S. Trans-4-Hydroxy-L-Prolinamide as an Efficient Catalyst for Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reaction of Acetone with Isatins. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2016; 27, pp. 463-466. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2016.04.008]

51. Rojas Cabrera, H.; Huelgas, G.; Hernández Pérez, J.M.; Walsh, P.J.; Somanathan, R.; Anaya De Parrodi, C. Homochiral L-Prolinamido-Sulfonamides and Their Use as Organocatalysts in Aldol Reactions. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2015; 26, pp. 163-172. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2015.01.009]

52. Davie, E.A.C.; Mennen, S.M.; Xu, Y.; Miller, S.J. Asymmetric Catalysis Mediated by Synthetic Peptides. Chem. Rev.; 2007; 107, pp. 5759-5812. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr068377w]

53. Revell, J.D.; Wennemers, H. Investigating Sequence Space: How Important Is the Spatial Arrangement of Functional Groups in the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction Catalyst H-Pro-Pro-Asp- NH₂?. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2008; 350, pp. 1046-1052. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200800053]

54. Psarra, A.; Kokotos, C.G.; Moutevelis-Minakakis, P. Tert-Butyl Esters of Tripeptides Based on Pro-Phe as Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction in Aqueous or Organic Medium. Tetrahedron; 2014; 70, pp. 608-615. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2013.12.007]

55. Kon, K.; Kohari, Y.; Murata, M. Unnatural Tripeptide as Highly Enantioselective Organocatalyst for Asymmetric Aldol Reaction of Isatins. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2019; 60, pp. 415-418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.12.049]

56. Kon, K.; Takai, H.; Kohari, Y.; Murata, M. Tripeptide-Catalyzed Asymmetric Aldol Reaction Between α-Ketoesters and Acetone Under Acidic Cocatalyst-Free Conditions. Catalysts; 2019; 9, 514. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/catal9060514]

57. Kon, K.; Takai, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Kohari, Y.; Murata, M. Organocatalyzed Asymmetric Aldol Reaction of α-Keto Amides with A Tripeptide Catalyst. Synlett; 2021; 32, pp. 829-832. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1380-6436]

58. Chandrasekhar, S.; Johny, K.; Reddy, C.R. Proline-Threonine Dipeptide as an Organocatalyst for the Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2009; 20, pp. 1742-1745. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2009.06.018]

59. Tang, Z.; Jiang, F.; Cui, X.; Gong, L.Z.; Mi, A.Q.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Wu, Y.D. Enantioselective Direct Aldol Reactions Catalyzed by L-Prolinamide Derivatives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2004; 101, pp. 5755-5760. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307176101]

60. Panov, I.; Drabina, P.; Hanusek, J.; Sedlák, M. The Synthesis and Characterisation of N-(1-Carbamoyl-1,1-Dialkyl-Methyl)-(S)-Prolinamides and Related Pyrrolidin-2-yl-4,5-Dihydro-1H-Imidazol-5-Ones as Potential Enantioselective Organocatalysts. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2011; 22, pp. 215-221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.01.018]

61. Hu, X.M.; Zhang, D.X.; Zhang, S.Y.; Wang, P.A. Highly Modular Dipeptide-like Organocatalysts for Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions in Brine. RSC Adv.; 2015; 5, pp. 39557-39564. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5RA07019H]

62. Machuca, E.; Rojas, Y.; Juaristi, E. Synthesis and Evaluation of (S)-Proline-Containing α,β-Dipeptides as Organocatalysts in Solvent-Free Asymmetric Aldol Reactions under Ball-Milling Conditions. Asian J. Org. Chem.; 2015; 4, pp. 46-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajoc.201402170]

63. Ahmetlli, A.; Spiliopoulou, N.; Magi-Oikonomopoulou, A.; Gerokonstantis, D.T.; Moutevelis-Minakakis, P.; Kokotos, C.G. Proline Dipeptides Containing Fluorine Moieties as Oganocatalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Tetrahedron; 2018; 74, pp. 5987-5995. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2018.08.038]

64. Vlasserou, I.; Sfetsa, M.; Gerokonstantis, D.T.; Kokotos, C.G.; Moutevelis-Minakakis, P. Combining Prolinamides with 2-Pyrrolidinone: Novel Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Tetrahedron; 2018; 74, pp. 2338-2349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2018.03.054]

65. Pearson, A.J.; Panda, S. N-Prolinylanthranilamide Pseudopeptides as Bifunctional Organocatalysts for Asymmetric Aldol Reactions. Org. Lett.; 2011; 13, pp. 5548-5551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol202284n] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21958056]

66. Kokotos, C.G. Construction of Tertiary Alcohols Bearing Perfluoroalkyl Chains Catalyzed by Prolinamide-Thioureas. J. Org. Chem.; 2012; 77, pp. 1131-1135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo2020104] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22185511]

67. Freund, M.; Schenker, S.; Tsogoeva, S.B. Enantioselective Nitro-Michael Reactions Catalyzed by Short Peptides on Water. Org. Biomol. Chem.; 2009; 7, pp. 4279-4284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b910249c] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19795068]

68. Wiesner, M.; Upert, G.; Angelici, G.; Wennemers, H. Enamine Catalysis with Low Catalyst Loadings—High Efficiency via Kinetic Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2010; 132, pp. 6-7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja9068112] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19791790]

69. Schnitzer, T.; Wennemers, H. Influence of the Trans/Cis Conformer Ratio on the Stereoselectivity of Peptidic Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2017; 139, pp. 15356-15362. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b06194] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29043799]

70. Duschmalé, J.; Wennemers, H. Adapting to Substrate Challenges: Peptides as Catalysts for Conjugate Addition Reactions of Aldehydes to α,β-Disubstituted Nitroolefins. Chem.–A Eur. J.; 2012; 18, pp. 1111-1120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201102484] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22189758]

71. Kastl, R.; Wennemers, H. Peptide-Catalyzed Stereoselective Conjugate Addition Reactions Generating All-Carbon Quaternary Stereogenic Centers. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2013; 52, pp. 7228-7232. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201301583]

72. Xu, D.; Wang, J.; Yan, L.; Yuan, M.; Xie, X.; Wang, Y. Novel Bifunctional L-Prolinamide Derivatives as Highly Efficient Organocatalysts for Asymmetric Nitro-Michael Reactions. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2016; 27, pp. 1121-1132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2016.08.019]

73. Cortes-Clerget, M.; Jover, J.; Dussart, J.; Kolodziej, E.; Monteil, M.; Migianu-Griffoni, E.; Gager, O.; Deschamp, J.; Lecouvey, M. Bifunctional Tripeptide with a Phosphonic Acid as a Brønsted Acid for Michael Addition: Mechanistic Insights. Chem.—A Eur. J.; 2017; 23, pp. 6654-6662. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201700604]

74. Borges-González, J.; Feher-Voelger, A.; Crisóstomo, F.P.; Morales, E.Q.; Martín, T. Tetrahydropyran-Based Hybrid Dipeptides as Asymmetric Catalysts for Michael Addition of Aldehydes to β-Nitrostyrenes. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2017; 359, pp. 576-583. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201601193]

75. Schnitzer, T.; Budinská, A.; Wennemers, H. Organocatalysed Conjugate Addition Reactions of Aldehydes to Nitroolefins with Anti Selectivity. Nat. Catal.; 2020; 3, pp. 143-147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0406-4]

76. Grünenfelder, C.E.; Kisunzu, J.K.; Wennemers, H. Peptide-Catalyzed Stereoselective Conjugate Addition Reactions of Aldehydes to Maleimide. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2016; 55, pp. 8571-8574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201602230] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27254460]

77. Panday, S.K. Advances in the Chemistry of Proline and Its Derivatives: An Excellent Amino Acid with Versatile Applications in Asymmetric Synthesis. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2011; 22, pp. 1817-1847. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.09.013]

78. Xiao, J.; Xu, F.X.; Lu, Y.P.; Loh, T.P. Chemzymes: A New Class of Structurally Rigid Tricyclic Amphibian Organocatalyst Inspired by Natural Product. Org. Lett.; 2010; 12, pp. 1220-1223. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol9029758] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20158252]

79. Montroni, E.; Sanap, S.P.; Lombardo, M.; Quintavalla, A.; Trombini, C.; Dhavale, D.D. A New Robust and Efficient Ion-Tagged Proline Catalyst Carrying an Amide Spacer for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2011; 353, pp. 3234-3240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201100595]

80. Lombardo, M.; Easwar, S.; Pasi, F.; Trombini, C. The Ion Tag Strategy as a Route to Highly Efficient Organocatalysts for the Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2009; 351, pp. 276-282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200800608]

81. Bottoni, A.; Lombardo, M.; Miscione, G.P.; Montroni, E.; Quintavalla, A.; Trombini, C. Electrosteric Activation by Using Ion-Tagged Prolines: A Combined Experimental and Computational Investigation. ChemCatChem; 2013; 5, pp. 2913-2924. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201300399]

82. Montroni, E.; Lombardo, M.; Quintavalla, A.; Trombini, C.; Gruttadauria, M.; Giacalone, F. A Liquid-Liquid Biphasic Homogeneous Organocatalytic Aldol Protocol Based on the Use of a Silica Gel Bound Multilayered Ionic Liquid Phase. ChemCatChem; 2012; 4, pp. 1000-1006. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201200125]

83. Bhowmick, S.; Kunte, S.S.; Bhowmick, K.C. A New Organocatalyst Derived from Abietic Acid and 4-Hydroxy-L-Proline for Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions in Aqueous Media. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2014; 25, pp. 1292-1297. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.07.012]

84. Mase, N.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C.F. Rapid Fluorescent Screening for Bifunctional Amine-Acid Catalysts: Efficient Syntheses of Quaternary Carbon-Containing Aldols under Organocatalysis. Org. Lett.; 2003; 5, pp. 4369-4372. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol035651p] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14602002]

85. Mase, N.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C.F. Synthesis of β-Hydroxyaldehydes with Stereogenic Quaternary Carbon Centers by Direct Organocatalytic Asymmetric Aldol Reactions. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2004; 43, pp. 2420-2423. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200353546]

86. Ni, B.; Zhang, Q.; Headley, A.D. Pyrrolidine-Based Chiral Pyridinium Ionic Liquids (ILs) as Recyclable and Highly Efficient Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Michael Addition Reactions. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2008; 49, pp. 1249-1252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.12.024]

87. Barbier, D.; Marazano, C.; Das, B.C.; Potier, P. New Chiral Isoquinolinium Salt Derivatives from Chiral Primary Amines via Zincke Reaction. J. Org. Chem.; 1996; 61, pp. 9596-9598. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo961539b]

88. Xu, D.Q.; Wang, L.P.; Luo, S.P.; Wang, Y.F.; Zhang, S.; Xu, Z.Y. 2-[(Imidazolylthio)Methyl]Pyrrolidine as a Trifunctional Organocatalyst for the Highly Asymmetric Michael Addition of Ketones to Nitroolefins. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2008; 2008, pp. 1049-1053. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.200700856]

89. Dahlin, N.; Bøgevig, A.; Adolfsson, H. N-Arenesulfonyl-2-Aminomethylpyrrolidmes—Novel Modular Ligands and Organocatalysts for Asymmetric Catalysis. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2004; 346, pp. 1101-1105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200404098]

90. Miao, T.; Wang, L.; Li, P.; Yan, J. A Highly Efficient and Recyclable Ionic Liquid Anchored Pyrrolidine Catalyst for Enantioselective Michael Additions. Synthesis; 2008; 23, pp. 3828-3834. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chin.200914063]

91. Gaitor, J.C.; Paul, L.M.; Reardon, M.M.; Hmissa, T.; Minkowicz, S.; Regner, M.; Sheng, Y.; Michael, S.F.; Isern, S.; Mirjafari, A. Ionic Liquids with Thioether Motifs as Synthetic Cationic Lipids for Gene Delivery. Chem. Commun.; 2017; 53, pp. 8328-8331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7CC03235H] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28692087]

92. Zhang, Q.; Ni, B.; Headley, A.D. Asymmetric Michael Addition Reactions of Aldehydes with Nitrostyrenes Catalyzed by Functionalized Chiral Ionic Liquids. Tetrahedron; 2008; 64, pp. 5091-5097. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2008.03.073]

93. Ni, B.; Zhang, Q.; Dhungana, K.; Headley, A.D. Ionic Liquid-Supported (ILS) (S)-Pyrrolidine Sulfonamide, a Recyclable Organocatalyst for the Highly Enantioselective Michael Addition to Nitroolefins. Org. Lett.; 2009; 11, pp. 1037-1040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol900003e]

94. Carley, A.P.; Dixon, S.; Kilburn, J.D. Pyrrolidine-Based Organocatalysts for Enantioselective Michael Addition of Cyclohexanone to Trans-β-Nitrostyrene. Synthesis; 2009; 15, pp. 2509-2516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1216885]

95. Tan, B.; Zeng, X.; Lu, Y.; Chua, P.J.; Zhong, G. Rational Design of Organocatalyst: Highly Stereoselective Michael Addition of Cyclic Ketones to Nitroolefins. Org. Lett.; 2009; 11, pp. 1927-1930. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol900330p]

96. Chang, C.; Li, S.H.; Reddy, R.J.; Chen, K. Pyrrolidine-Camphor Derivative as an Organocatalyst for Asymmetic Michael Additions of α,α-Disubstituted Aldehydes to β-Nitroalkenes: Construction of Quaternary Carbon-Bearing Aldehydes under Solvent-Free Conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2009; 351, pp. 1273-1278. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200800771]

97. Reddy, R.J.; Kuan, H.H.; Chou, T.Y.; Chen, K. Novel Prolinamide-Camphor-Containing Organocatalysts for Direct Asymmetric Michael Addition of Unmodified Aldehydes to Nitroalkenes. Chem.—A Eur. J.; 2009; 15, pp. 9294-9298. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.200901254]

98. Liu, P.M.; Chang, C.; Reddy, R.J.; Ting, Y.F.; Kuan, H.H.; Chen, K. Remarkable Reaction Rate and Excellent Enantioselective Direct α-Amination of Aldehydes with Azodicarboxylates Catalyzed by Pyrrolidinylcamphor-Derived Organocatalysts. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2010; 2010, pp. 42-46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.200901151]

99. Magar, D.R.; Chang, C.; Ting, Y.F.; Chen, K. Highly Enantioselective Conjugate Addition of Ketones to Alkylidene Malonates Catalyzed by a Pyrrolidinyl-Camphor-Derived Organocatalyst. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2010; 2010, pp. 2062-2066. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201000072]

100. Ting, Y.F.; Chang, C.; Reddy, R.J.; Magar, D.R.; Chen, K. Pyrrolidinyl-Camphor Derivatives as a New Class of Organocatalyst for Direct Asymmetric Michael Addition of Aldehydes and Ketones to β-Nitroalkenes. Chem.—A Eur. J.; 2010; 16, pp. 7030-7038. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201000483]

101. Liu, P.M.; Magar, D.R.; Chen, K. Highly Efficient and Practical Pyrrolidine-Camphor-Derived Organocatalysts for the Direct α-Amination of Aldehydes. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2010; 2010, pp. 5705-5713. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201000695]

102. Vermote, A.; Brackman, G.; Risseeuw, M.D.P.; Coenye, T.; Van Calenbergh, S. Novel Hamamelitannin Analogues for the Treatment of Biofilm Related MRSA Infections–A Scaffold Hopping Approach. Eur. J. Med. Chem.; 2017; 127, pp. 757-770. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.056]

103. Anwar, S.; Lee, P.H.; Chou, T.Y.; Chang, C.; Chen, K. Pyrrolidine-Linker-Camphor Assembly: Bifunctional Organocatalysts for Efficient Michael Addition of Cyclohexanone to Nitroolefins under Neat Conditions. Tetrahedron; 2011; 67, pp. 1171-1177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2010.11.093]

104. Xu, D.Z.; Shi, S.; Wang, Y. Simple Chiral Pyrrolidine-Pyridine-Based Catalysts for Highly Enantioselective Michael Addition to Nitro Olefins. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2009; 2009, pp. 4848-4853. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.200900716]

105. Wang, C.; Yu, C.; Liu, C.; Peng, Y. 4-Trifluoromethanesulfonamidyl Prolinol Tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl Ether as a Highly Efficient Bifunctional Organocatalyst for Michael Addition of Ketones and Aldehydes to Nitroolefins. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2009; 50, pp. 2363-2366. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.02.211]

106. Conrow, R.E.; Dean, W.D. Diazidomethane Explosion. Org. Process Res. Dev.; 2008; 12, pp. 1285-1286. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/op8000977]

107. Zheng, B.; Wang, H.; Han, Y.; Liu, C.; Peng, Y. A Novel Method to Access Chiral Nonnatural 2,4-Disubstituted Pyrrolidines from Aldehydes and Nitroolefins Only with an α-Substituent. Chem. Commun.; 2013; 49, pp. 4561-4563. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3cc40583d]

108. Ban, S.; Du, D.M.; Liu, H.; Yang, W. Synthesis of Binaphthyl Sulfonimides and Their Application in the Enantioselective Michael Addition of Ketones to Nitroalkenes. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2010; 2010, pp. 5160-5164. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201000818]

109. Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Miao, T.; Zhou, W.; Li, P.; Ren, K.; Zhang, X. Sugar-Based Pyrrolidine as a Highly Enantioselective Organocatalyst for Asymmetric Michael Addition of Ketones to Nitrostyrenes. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2010; 352, pp. 2571-2578. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201000162]

110. Chandrasekhar, S.; Kumar, T.P.; Haribabu, K.; Reddy, C.R. Hydroxyphthalimide Allied Triazole-Pyrrolidine Catalyst for Asymmetric Michael Additions in Water. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2010; 21, pp. 2372-2375. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2010.08.012]

111. Widianti, T.; Hiraga, Y.; Kojima, S.; Abe, M. Novel Cyclic β-Aminophosphonate Derivatives as Efficient Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Michael Addition Reactions of Ketones to Nitrostyrenes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2010; 21, pp. 1861-1868. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2010.05.049]

112. Syu, S.-en; Kao, T.T.; Lin, W. A New Type of Organocatalyst for Highly Stereoselective Michael Addition of Ketones to Nitroolefins on Water. Tetrahedron; 2010; 66, pp. 891-897. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2009.11.093]

113. Chen, J.R.; Cao, Y.J.; Zou, Y.Q.; Tan, F.; Fu, L.; Zhu, X.Y.; Xiao, W.J. Novel Thiourea-Amine Bifunctional Catalysts for Asymmetric Conjugate Addition of Ketones/Aldehydes to Nitroalkenes: Rational Structural Combination for High Catalytic Efficiency. Org. Biomol. Chem.; 2010; 8, pp. 1275-1279. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b925962g]

114. Cao, X.Y.; Zheng, J.C.; Li, Y.X.; Shu, Z.C.; Sun, X.L.; Wang, B.Q.; Tang, Y. Pyrrolidine-Ureas as Bifunctional Organocatalysts for Asymmetric Michael Addition of Ketone to Nitroalkenes: Unexpected Hydrogen Bonding Effect. Tetrahedron; 2010; 66, pp. 9703-9707. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2010.10.038]

115. Yu, C.; Qiu, J.; Zheng, F.; Zhong, W. Highly Efficient Bifunctional Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Michael Addition of Ketones to Nitroolefins. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2011; 52, pp. 3298-3302. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.04.067]

116. Lin, J.; Tian, H.; Jiang, Y.J.; Huang, W.B.; Zheng, L.Y.; Zhang, S.Q. Novel Pyrrolidine-Aminobenzimidazole Bifunctional Organocatalysts for Asymmetric Nitro-Michael Reactions in Brine. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2011; 22, pp. 1434-1440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.08.002]

117. Zhang, H.; Chuan, Y.; Li, Z.; Peng, Y. 4-Aminothiourea Prolinol Tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl Ether: A Chiral Secondary Amine-Thiourea as Organocatalyst for Enantioselective Anti-Mannich Reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2009; 351, pp. 2288-2294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200900399]

118. Wang, L.; Cai, C.; Curran, D.P.; Zhang, W. Enantioselective α-Chlorination of Aldehydes with Recyclable Fluorous (S)-Pyrrolidine-Thiourea Bifunctional Organocatalyst. Synlett; 2010; 3, pp. 433-436. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chin.201023047] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717504]

119. Kokotos, C.G.; Limnios, D.; Triggidou, D.; Trifonidou, M.; Kokotos, G. Novel Pyrrolidine-Thiohydantoins/Thioxotetrahydropyrimidinones as Highly Effective Catalysts for the Asymmetric Michael Addition. Org. Biomol. Chem.; 2011; 9, pp. 3386-3395. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0ob01083a]

120. Chen, J.R.; Fu, L.; Zou, Y.Q.; Chang, N.J.; Rong, J.; Xiao, W.J. Pyrrolidinyl-Sulfamide Derivatives as a New Class of Bifunctional Organocatalysts for Direct Asymmetric Michael Addition of Cyclohexanone to Nitroalkenes. Org. Biomol. Chem.; 2011; 9, pp. 5280-5287. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1ob05442b] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21647476]

121. Gao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Lu, S.M.; Li, J.; Li, C. Recyclable Enamine Catalysts for Asymmetric Direct Cross-Aldol Reaction of Aldehydes in Emulsion Media. Green Chem.; 2011; 13, pp. 1983-1985. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1gc15473g]

122. Albrecht, Ł.; Dickmeiss, G.; Acosta, F.C.; Rodríguez-Escrich, C.; Davis, R.L.; Jørgensen, K.A. Asymmetric Organocatalytic Formal [2 + 2]-Cycloadditions via Bifunctional H-Bond Directing Dienamine Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2012; 134, pp. 2543-2546. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja211878x]

123. Jiang, H.; Rodríguez-Escrich, C.; Johansen, T.K.; Davis, R.L.; Jørgensen, K.A. Organocatalytic Activation of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds for Asymmetric Diels-Alder Reactions. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2012; 51, pp. 10271-10274. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201205836] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22976506]

124. Singh, K.N.; Singh, P.; Singh, P.; Lal, N.; Sharma, S.K. Pyrrolidine Based Chiral Organocatalyst for Efficient Asymmetric Michael Addition of Cyclic Ketones to β-Nitrostyrenes. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett.; 2012; 22, pp. 4225-4228. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.05.047]

125. Siyutkin, D.E.; Kucherenko, A.S.; Frolova, L.L.; Kuchin, A.V.; Zlotin, S.G. N-Pyrrolidine-2-ylmethyl)-2-Hydroxy-3-Aminopinanes as Novel Organocatalysts for Asymmetric Conjugate Additions of Ketones to α-Nitroalkenes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2013; 24, pp. 776-779. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2013.05.012]

126. Singh, K.; Singh, P.; Kaur, A.; Singh, P.; Sharma, S.; Khullar, S.; Mandal, S.K. (2 S)-2-[(Phenylsulfinyl)Methyl]Pyrrolidine-Catalyzed Efficient Stereoselective Michael Addition of Cyclohexanone and Cyclopentanone to Nitroolefins. Synthesis; 2013; 45, pp. 1406-1413. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1316917]

127. Nakashima, K.; Hirashima, S.I.; Kawada, M.; Koseki, Y.; Tada, N.; Itoh, A.; Miura, T. Pyrrolidine-Diaminomethylenemalononitrile Organocatalyst for Michael Additions of Carbonyl Compounds to Nitroalkenes under Solvent-Free Conditions. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2014; 55, pp. 2703-2706. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.03.042]

128. Hirashima, S.I.; Narushima, T.; Kawada, M.; Nakashima, K.; Hanai, K.; Koseki, Y.; Miura, T. Asymmetric Conjugate Additions of Carbonyl Compounds to Nitroalkenes under Solvent-Free Conditions Using Fluorous Diaminomethylenemalononitrile Organocatalyst. Chem. Pharm. Bull.; 2017; 85, pp. 1185-1190. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c17-00596] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29199223]

129. Wang, Y.; Jiang, M.; Liu, J.T. Enantioselective Michael Addition of Cyclic Ketones to Nitroolefins Catalyzed by a Novel Fluorine-Insertion Organocatalyst. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2014; 25, pp. 212-218. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2013.12.015]

130. Kaplaneris, N.; Koutoulogenis, G.; Raftopoulou, M.; Kokotos, C.G. 4-Fluoro and 4-Hydroxy Pyrrolidine-Thioxotetrahydropyrimidinones: Organocatalysts for Green Asymmetric Transformations in Brine. J. Org. Chem.; 2015; 80, pp. 5464-5473. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b00283]

131. Kumar, T.P.; Balaji, S.V. Sugar Amide-Pyrrolidine Catalyst for the Asymmetric Michael Addition of Ketones to Nitroolefins. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2014; 25, pp. 473-477. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.02.003]

132. Kumar, T.P.; Radhika, L.; Haribabu, K.; Kumar, V.N. Pyrrolidine-Oxyimides: New Chiral Catalysts for Enantioselective Michael Addition of Ketones to Nitroolefins in Water. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2014; 25, pp. 1555-1560. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.10.014]

133. Kumar, T.P. Pyrrolidine-Oxyimide Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition of α,α-Disubstituted Aldehydes to Nitroolefins. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2015; 26, pp. 907-911. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2015.07.009]

134. Kumar, T.P.; Prasad, S.S.; Haribabu, K.; Kumar, V.N.; Reddy, C.S. Pyrrolidine-HOBt: An Oxytriazole Catalyst for the Enantioselective Michael Addition of Cyclohexanone to Nitroolefins in Water. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2016; 27, pp. 1133-1138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2016.08.006]

135. Zhao, H.W.; Yang, Z.; Yue, Y.Y.; Li, H.L.; Song, X.Q.; Sheng, Z.H.; Meng, W.; Guo, X.Y. Asymmetric Direct Michael Reactions of Cyclohexanone with Aromatic Nitroolefins in Water Catalyzed by Novel Axially Unfixed Biaryl-Based Bifunctional Organocatalysts. Synlett; 2014; 25, pp. 293-297. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1340289]

136. Hu, X.; Wei, Y.F.; Wu, N.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, C.; Luo, R.S. Indolinol-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Reaction of Aldehydes to Nitroalkenes in Brine. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2016; 27, pp. 420-427. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2016.03.006]

137. Reyes-Rangel, G.; Vargas-Caporali, J.; Juaristi, E. Asymmetric Michael Addition Reaction Organocatalyzed by Stereoisomeric Pyrrolidine Sulfinamides under Neat Conditions. A Brief Study of Self-Disproportionation of Enantiomers. Tetrahedron; 2017; 73, pp. 4707-4718. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2017.05.016]

138. Kaur, A.; Singh, K.N.; Sharma, E.; Rani, P.; Sharma, S.K. Pyrrolidine-Carbamate Based New and Efficient Chiral Organocatalyst for Asymmetric Michael Addition of Ketones to Nitroolefins. Tetrahedron; 2018; 74, pp. 6137-6143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2018.09.002]

139. Mahato, C.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Kundu, M.; Pramanik, A. Pyrrolidine-Oxadiazolone Conjugates as Organocatalysts in Asymmetric Michael Reaction. J. Org. Chem.; 2019; 84, pp. 1053-1063. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.8b02393]

140. Ormandyová, K.; Bilka, S.; Mečiarová, M.; Šebesta, R. Bifunctional Thio/Squaramide Catalyzed Stereoselective Michael Additions of Aldehydes to Nitroalkenes towards Synthesis of Chiral Pyrrolidines. ChemistrySelect; 2019; 4, pp. 8870-8875. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201902652]

141. Polácková, V.; Krištofíková, D.; Némethová, B.; Górová, R.; Meciarová, M.; Šebesta, R. N-Sulfinylpyrrolidine-Containing Ureas and Thioureas as Bifunctional Organocatalysts. Beilstein J. Org. Chem.; 2021; 17, pp. 2629-2641. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.17.176] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795800]

142. Dargó, G.; Nagy, S.; Kis, D.; Bagi, P.; Mátravölgyi, B.; Tóth, B.; Huszthy, P.; Drahos, L.; Kupai, J. Application of Proline-Derived (Thio)Squaramide Organocatalysts in Asymmetric Diels-Alder and Conjugate Addition Reactions. Synthesis; 2022; 54, pp. 3823-3830. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1719886]

143. Moriyama, K.; Oka, Y. Enantioselective Cascade Michael/Hemiaminal Formation of α,β-Unsaturated Iminoindoles with Aldehydes Using a Chiral Aminomethylpyrrolidine Catalyst Bearing a SO₂C₆F₅ Group as a Strongly Electron Withdrawing Arylsulfonyl Group. ACS Catal.; 2022; 12, pp. 7436-7442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c01182]

144. Moriyama, K.; Oka, Y.; Kaiho, T. A Chiral N-Tetrafluoroiodobenzyl-N-Sulfonyl Aminomethylpyrrolidine Catalyst for the Enantioselective Michael/Hemiaminal Formation Cascade Reaction of α,β-Unsaturated Iminoindoles with Aldehydes. Synlett; 2022; 33, pp. 1763-1769. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1893-7329]

145. Marigo, M.; Wabnitz, T.C.; Fielenbach, D.; Jørgensen, K.A. Enantioselective Organocatalyzed Alpha-Sulfenylation of Aldehydes. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2005; 44, pp. 794-797. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200462101] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15657970]

146. Hayashi, Y.; Gotoh, H.; Hayashi, T.; Shoji, M. Diphenylprolinol Silyl Ethers as Efficient Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Michael Reaction of Aldehydes and Nitroalkenes. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2005; 44, pp. 4212-4215. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200500599]

147. Hayashi, Y.; Hatano, Y.; Mori, N. Asymmetric Michael Reaction of Malononitrile and α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes Catalyzed by Diarylprolinol Silyl Ether. Synlett; 2022; 33, pp. 1831-1836. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1846-5007]

148. Reyes-Rodríguez, G.J.; Rezayee, N.M.; Vidal-Albalat, A.; Jørgensen, K.A. Prevalence of Diarylprolinol Silyl Ethers as Catalysts in Total Synthesis and Patents. Chem. Rev.; 2019; 119, pp. 4221-4260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00583]

149. Quintard, A.; Bournaud, C.; Alexakis, A. Diversity-Oriented Synthesis towards Conceptually New Highly Modular Aminal-Pyrrolidine Organocatalysts. Chem.—A Eur. J.; 2008; 14, pp. 7504-7507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.200801212]

150. Luis Olivares-Romero, J.; Juaristi, E. Synthesis of Three Novel Chiral Diamines Derived from (S)-Proline and Their Evaluation as Precursors of Diazaborolidines for the Catalytic Borane-Mediated Enantioselective Reduction of Prochiral Ketones. Tetrahedron; 2008; 64, pp. 9992-9998. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2008.07.080]

151. Shi, Z.; Tan, B.; Leong, W.W.Y.; Zeng, X.; Lu, M.; Zhong, G. Catalytic Asymmetric Formal [4 + 1] Annulation Leading to Optically Active Cis-Isoxazoline N-Oxides. Org. Lett.; 2010; 12, pp. 5402-5405. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol102181r]

152. Roy, H.N.; Pitchaiah, A.; Kim, M.; Hwang, I.T.; Lee, K.I. Protective Group-Free Synthesis of New Chiral Diamines via Direct Azidation of 1,1-Diaryl-2-Aminoethanols. RSC Adv.; 2013; 3, pp. 3526-3530. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ra23205k]

153. Reyes-Rangel, G.; Vargas-Caporali, J.; Juaristi, E. In Search of Diamine Analogs of the α,α-Diphenyl Prolinol Privileged Chiral Organocatalyst. Synthesis of Diamine Derivatives of α,α-Diphenyl-(S)-Prolinol and Their Application as Organocatalysts in the Asymmetric Michael and Mannich Reactions. Tetrahedron; 2016; 72, pp. 379-391. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2015.11.032]

154. Vargas-Caporali, J.; Juaristi, E. The Diamino Analogues of Privileged Corey-Bakshi-Shibata and Jorgensen-Hayashi Catalysts: A Comparison of Their Performance. Synthesis; 2016; 48, pp. 3890-3906. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1562793]

155. Kano, T.; Mii, H.; Maruoka, K. Direct Asymmetric Benzoyloxylation of Aldehydes Catalyzed by 2-Tritylpyrrolidine. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2009; 131, pp. 3450-3451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja809963s]

156. Shimogaki, M.; Maruyama, H.; Tsuji, S.; Homma, C.; Kano, T.; Maruoka, K. Synthesis of Chiral Tritylpyrrolidine Derivatives and Their Application to Asymmetric Benzoyloxylation. J. Org. Chem.; 2017; 82, pp. 12928-12932. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.7b02562] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29092400]

157. Luo, R.S.; Weng, J.; Ai, H.B.; Lu, G.; Chan, A.S.C. Highly Efficient Asymmetric Michael Reaction of Aldehydes to Nitroalkenes with Diphenylperhydroindolinol Silyl Ethers as Organocatalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2009; 351, pp. 2449-2459. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200900355]

158. Wu, J.; Ni, B.; Headley, A.D. Di(Methylimidazole)Prolinol Silyl Ether Catalyzed Highly Michael Addition of Aldehydes to Nitroolefins in Water. Org. Lett.; 2009; 11, pp. 3354-3356. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol901204b]

159. Lombardo, M.; Chiarucci, M.; Quintavalla, A.; Trombini, C. Highly Efficient Ion-Tagged Catalyst for the Enantioselective Michael Addition of Aldehydes to Nitroalkenes. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2009; 351, pp. 2801-2806. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200900599]

160. Quintard, A.; Belot, S.; Marchai, E.; Alexakis, A. Aminal-Pyrrolidine Organocatalysts—Highly Efficient and Modular Catalysts for α-Functionalization of Carbonyl Compounds. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2010; 2010, pp. 927-936. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.200901283]

161. Husmann, R.; Jörres, M.; Raabe, G.; Bolm, C. Silylated Pyrrolidines as Catalysts for Asymmetric Michael Additions of Aldehydes to Nitroolefins. Chem.—A Eur. J.; 2010; 16, pp. 12549-12552. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201001764] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20878809]

162. Bauer, J.O.; Stiller, J.; Marqués-López, E.; Strohfeldt, K.; Christmann, M.; Strohmann, C. Silyl-Modified Analogues of 2-Tritylpyrrolidine: Synthesis and Applications in Asymmetric Organocatalysis. Chem.—A Eur. J.; 2010; 16, pp. 12553-12558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201002166]

163. Kerrick, S.T.; Beak, P. Asymmetric Deprotonations: Enantioselective Syntheses of 2-Substituted (Tert-Butoxycarbonyl)Pyrrolidines. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 1991; 113, pp. 9708-9710. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00025a066]

164. Eaborn, C. Organosilicon Compounds. Part III. Some Sterically Hindered Compounds. J. Chem. Soc.; 1952; 0, pp. 2840-2846. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/jr9520002840]

165. Jentzsch, K.I.; Min, T.; Etcheson, J.I.; Fettinger, J.C.; Franz, A.K. Silyl Fluoride Electrophiles for the Enantioselective Synthesis of Silylated Pyrrolidine Catalysts. J. Org. Chem.; 2011; 76, pp. 7065-7075. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo200991q] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21766880]

166. Sparr, C.; Schweizer, W.B.; Senn, H.M.; Gilmour, R. The Fluorine-Iminium Ion Gauche Effect: Proof of Principle and Application to Asymmetric Organocatalysis. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2009; 48, pp. 3065-3068. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200900405] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19322862]

167. Sparr, C.; Tanzer, E.M.; Bachmann, J.; Gilmour, R. A Concise Synthesis of (S)-2-(Fluorodiphenylmethyl)Pyrrolidine: A Novel Organocatalyst for the Stereoselective Epoxidation of α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes. Synthesis; 2010; 8, pp. 1394-1397. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1218636]

168. Tanzer, E.M.; Zimmer, L.E.; Schweizer, W.B.; Gilmour, R. Fluorinated Organocatalysts for the Enantioselective Epoxidation of Enals: Molecular Preorganisation by the Fluorine-Iminium Ion Gauche Effect. Chem.—A Eur. J.; 2012; 18, pp. 11334-11342. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201201316]

169. Quintard, A.; Langlois, J.B.; Emery, D.; Mareda, J.; Guénée, L.; Alexakis, A. Conformationally Stabilized Catalysts by Fluorine Insertion: Tool for Enantioselectivity Improvement. Chem.—A Eur. J.; 2011; 17, pp. 13433-13437. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201102757]

170. Conde, E.; Bello, D.; De Cózar, A.; Sánchez, M.; Vázquez, M.A.; Cossío, F.P. Densely Substituted Unnatural L- and D-Prolines as Catalysts for Highly Enantioselective Stereodivergent (3 + 2) Cycloadditions and Aldol Reactions. Chem. Sci.; 2012; 3, pp. 1486-1491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2sc20199b]

171. De Gracia Retamosa, M.; de Cózar, A.; Sánchez, M.; Miranda, J.I.; Sansano, J.M.; Castelló, L.M.; Nájera, C.; Jiménez, A.I.; Sayago, F.J.; Cativiela, C. et al. Remote Substituent Effects on the Stereoselectivity and Organocatalytic Activity of Densely Substituted Unnatural Proline Esters in Aldol Reactions. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2015; 2015, pp. 2503-2516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201500160]

172. Arrastia, I.; Arrieta, A.; Cossío, F.P. Application of 1,3-Dipolar Reactions between Azomethine Ylides and Alkenes to the Synthesis of Catalysts and Biologically Active Compounds. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2018; 2018, pp. 5889-5904. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201800911]

173. Lombardo, M.; Montroni, E.; Quintavalla, A.; Trombini, C. A New Family of Conformationally Constrained Bicyclic Diarylprolinol Silyl Ethers as Organocatalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2012; 354, pp. 3428-3434. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201200922]

174. Lombardo, M.; Cerisoli, L.; Manoni, E.; Montroni, E.; Quintavalla, A.; Trombini, C. Properties and Reactivity of Conformationally Constrained Bicyclic Diarylprolinol Silyl Ethers as Organocatalysts. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2014; 2014, pp. 5946-5953. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201402732]

175. Vinayagam, P.; Vishwanath, M.; Kesavan, V. New Class of Bifunctional Thioureas from L-Proline: Highly Enantioselective Michael Addition of 1,3-Dicarbonyls to Nitroolefins. Tetrahedron Asymmetry; 2014; 25, pp. 568-577. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2014.02.011]

176. Tian, J.M.; Yuan, Y.H.; Tu, Y.Q.; Zhang, F.M.; Zhang, X.B.; Zhang, S.H.; Wang, S.H.; Zhang, X.M. The Design of a Spiro-Pyrrolidine Organocatalyst and Its Application to Catalytic Asymmetric Michael Addition for the Construction of All-Carbon Quaternary Centers. Chem. Commun.; 2015; 51, pp. 9979-9982. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CC02765A] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25998622]

177. Tian, J.M.; Yuan, Y.H.; Xie, Y.Y.; Zhang, S.Y.; Ma, W.Q.; Zhang, F.M.; Wang, S.H.; Zhang, X.M.; Tu, Y.Q. Catalytic Asymmetric Cascade Using Spiro-Pyrrolidine Organocatalyst: Efficient Construction of Hydrophenanthridine Derivatives. Org. Lett.; 2017; 19, pp. 6618-6621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03330]

178. Zou, Y.; Li, C.Y.; Xiang, M.; Li, W.S.; Zhang, J.; Wan, W.J.; Wang, L.X. New Scaffold Organocatalysts of Chiral 3,2′-Pyrrolidinyl Spirooxindoles Promoted Enantioselective Aldol Condensation between Isatins and Acetone. Tetrahedron Lett.; 2022; 97, 153780. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2022.153780]

179. Silvi, M.; Verrier, C.; Rey, Y.P.; Buzzetti, L.; Melchiorre, P. Visible-Light Excitation of Iminium Ions Enables the Enantioselective Catalytic β-Alkylation of Enals. Nat. Chem.; 2017; 9, pp. 868-873. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2748]

180. Berger, M.; Carboni, D.; Melchiorre, P. Photochemical Organocatalytic Regio- and Enantioselective Conjugate Addition of Allyl Groups to Enals. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2021; 60, pp. 26373-26377. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.202111648] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34695283]

181. Wong, T.H.F.; Ma, D.; Di Sanza, R.; Melchiorre, P. Photoredox Organocatalysis for the Enantioselective Synthesis of 1,7-Dicarbonyl Compounds. Org. Lett.; 2022; 24, pp. 1695-1699. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.2c00326]

182. Rodríguez, R.I.; Sicignano, M.; Alemán, J. Fluorinated Sulfinates as Source of Alkyl Radicals in the Photo-Enantiocontrolled β-Functionalization of Enals. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed.; 2022; 61, e202112632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.202112632]

183. Brinner, K.M.; Ellman, J.A. A Rapid and General Method for the Asymmetric Synthesis of 2-Substituted Pyrrolidines Using Tert-Butanesulfinamide. Org. Biomol. Chem.; 2005; 3, pp. 2109-2113. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b502080h]

184. Ruano, J.L.G.; Alemán, J.; Cid, M.B. Quick Access to Optically Pure 2-(1-Hydroxybenzyl)Piperidine and Pyrrolidine. Synthesis; 2006; 4, pp. 687-691. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-926306]

185. Leemans, E.; Mangelinckx, S.; De Kimpe, N. Asymmetric Synthesis of 2-Arylpyrrolidines Starting from γ-Chloro N-(Tert-Butanesulfinyl)Ketimines. Chem. Commun.; 2010; 46, pp. 3122-3124. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b925209f] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20358047]

186. Reddy, L.R.; Das, S.G.; Liu, Y.; Prashad, M. A Facile Asymmetric Synthesis of Either Enantiomer of 2-Substituted Pyrrolidines. J. Org. Chem.; 2010; 75, pp. 2236-2246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo902710s]

187. Reddy, L.R.; Prashad, M. Asymmetric Synthesis of 2-Substituted Pyrrolidines by Addition of Grignard Reagents to γ-Chlorinated N-Tert-Butanesulfinyl Imine. Chem. Commun.; 2010; 46, pp. 222-224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B917435D] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20024332]

188. Reddy, A.A.; Prasad, K.R. Addition of the Lithium Anion of Diphenylmethanol Methyl/Methoxymethyl Ether to Nonracemic Sulfinimines: Two-Step Asymmetric Synthesis of Diphenylprolinol Methyl Ether and Chiral (Diphenylmethoxymethyl)Amines. J. Org. Chem.; 2018; 83, pp. 10776-10785. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.8b01381] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30129765]

189. Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Shen, H.; Liu, Q.; Pan, J.; Hu, W.; Xiong, Y.; Chen, C. Boron Trifluoride•Diethyl Ether-Catalyzed Etherification of Alcohols: A Metal-Free Pathway to Diphenylmethyl Ethers. Adv. Synth. Catal.; 2015; 357, pp. 3115-3120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201500663]

190. Enders, D.; Kipphardt, H.; Gerdes, P.; Brena-Valle, L.J.; Bhushan, V. Large Scale Preparation of Versatile Chiral Auxiliaries Derived from (S)-Proline. Bull. Soc. Chin. Belg.; 1988; 97, pp. 691-704. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bscb.19880970809]

191. Ho, C.Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Wong, M.K.; Yang, D. Fluorinated Chiral Secondary Amines as Catalysts for Epoxidation of Olefins with Oxone. J. Org. Chem.; 2005; 70, pp. 898-906. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo048378t]

192. Yuan, Y.H.; Han, X.; Zhu, F.P.; Tian, J.M.; Zhang, F.M.; Zhang, X.M.; Tu, Y.Q.; Wang, S.H.; Guo, X. Development of Bifunctional Organocatalysts and Application to Asymmetric Total Synthesis of Naucleofficine I and II. Nat. Commun.; 2019; 10, 3394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11382-8]

193. Aukland, M.H.; List, B. Organocatalysis Emerging as a Technology. Pure Appl. Chem.; 2021; 93, pp. 1371-1381. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pac-2021-0501]

194. Han, B.; He, X.H.; Liu, Y.Q.; He, G.; Peng, C.; Li, J.L. Asymmetric Organocatalysis: An Enabling Technology for Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2021; 50, pp. 1522-1586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00196A] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33496291]