An internal pilot phase of a trial is often undertaken to establish recruitment and retention. The decision criteria at the juncture of trial progression also provide an opportunity for adaptation if pre-specified in the design. Adaptation can increase trial efficiency and relevance. We present methods to justify and implement adaptation from a two to 3-group trial at progression from an internal pilot to main trial.
A multi-centre RCT with an internal pilot to establish recruitment also included plans to consider adaption from a two to three-group trial at the time of progression. Plans to expand the trial were based on analysis of new evidence and on-going RCTs and scrutiny of current NHS and private practice to understand rates of the new and existing interventions.
Recruitment in the pilot phase was successful. Systematic review evidence and analysis of trials did not reveal competing studies or new evidence. Practice data showed similar incidence of all three interventions supporting the need for an adaption. The revised and expanded 3-group trial with updated hypotheses was funded meaning that modification of the protocol, patient-related documents and study database was required. The randomisation system had to move from two to 3-groups and provide three balanced groups at the end of the trial. Study website and publicity materials were adapted to account for the three groups.
Implementing the adaptation, while recruitment to the trial continued was challenging and not to be underestimated. This approach allows an existing trial to maintain research of relevance to practice.
Acknowledgement and disclaimer
This project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 09/127/53). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© Edwards et al. 2015. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000000419367603)