Abstract
Background
The commonest opioid used for pain relief in labour is pethidine (meperidine); however, its effectiveness has long been challenged and the drug has known side effects including maternal sedation, nausea and potential transfer across the placenta to the foetus. Over a third of women receiving pethidine require an epidural due to inadequate pain relief. Epidural analgesia increases the risk of an instrumental vaginal delivery and its associated effects. Therefore, there is a clear need for a safe, effective, alternative analgesic to pethidine. Evidence suggests that remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) reduces epidural conversion rates compared to pethidine; however, no trial has yet investigated this as a primary endpoint. We are, therefore, comparing pethidine intramuscular injection to remifentanil PCA in a randomised controlled trial.
Methods/design
Women in established labour, requesting systemic opioid pain relief, will be randomised to either intravenously administered remifentanil PCA (intervention) or pethidine intramuscular injection (control) in an unblinded, 1:1 individual randomised trial.
Following informed consent, 400 women in established labour, who request systemic opioid pain relief, from NHS Trusts across England will undergo a minimised randomisation by a computer or automated telephone system to either pethidine or remifentanil. In order to balance the groups this minimisation is based on four parameters; parity (nulliparous versus multiparous), maternal age (<20, 20 < 30, 30 < 40, 40+ years), ethnicity (South Asian (Pakistani/Indian/Bangladeshi) versus Other) and induced versus spontaneous labour.
The effectiveness of pain relief provided by each technique will be recorded every 30 min after time zero, until epidural placement, delivery or transfer to theatre, quantified by Visual Analogue Scale. Incidence of maternal side effects including sedation, delivery mode, foetal distress requiring delivery, neonatal status at delivery and rate of initiation of breastfeeding within the first hour of birth will also be recorded.
Maternal satisfaction with her childbirth experience will be determined by a postpartum questionnaire prior to discharge from the delivery ward.
Discussion
The RESPITE trial’s primary outcome is the proportion of women who have an epidural placed for pain relief in labour in each arm.
Trial Registration
Current Controlled Trials registration number: ISRCTN29654603. Registered on 23 July 2013.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Bradley, Linda; Dinesh, Seetharama; Melody, Teresa; Allen, Cody; Davies, Karen; Kerr, Jennie; Moore, Philip; Whitehouse, Diane; Chana, Rebecca; Horner, Deborah; Ngenda, Aongola; Syson, Jennifer; Brittain, Lesley; Krishnan, Kodaganallur; Potter, Sarah; Armstrong, Sarah; Oatley, Alexandra; Snipe, Carol; Naresh, Sandur; Davenport, Sarah; Deeks, Laurie; Murray, Sebastian; Krishnan, Priya; Msiska, Maines; Corfe, Jeremy; Turner, Elizabeth; Johnson, Elaine; Lucas, Nuala; Allt, Jules; Fleming, Anna; Redford, Amanda; Okoisor, Maria; Tebbutt, Julie; Hillen, Jane; Polanco, Angela; Reddy, Megha; D’Souza, Zoe; Guy, Anna; Rose, Peter; Alcock, Holly; Roche, Samantha; Taylor, Suzanne1 University of Sheffield, Anaesthesia, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000000419369262)
2 University of Birmingham, Maternal and Child Epidemiology, Public Health Building, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000000419367486)
3 University of Birmingham Research Laboratories, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Perioperative, Critical Care and Trauma Trials Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, Centre of Translational Inflammation Research, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.415490.d) (ISNI:000000012177007X)
4 University of Birmingham, Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (BCTU), Public Health Building, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000000419367486)




