Abstract
Background
Hospital readmissions remain highly prevalent despite being the target of policies and financial penalties. Evidence comparing the effectiveness and costs of interventions to reduce readmissions is lacking, leaving healthcare systems with little guidance on how to improve quality and avoid costly penalties. Effective interventions likely need to bridge inpatient and outpatient settings, incorporate information technology, and use dedicated providers. Such complex innovations will require rigorous evaluation. The framework of quality improvement research provides an approach that both improves care locally and contributes to closing the current knowledge gaps for readmissions. In this trial, we will study a comprehensive intervention that incorporates these recommendations into an integrated practice unit, called transition services, with an aim of reducing 30-day readmission rates.
Methods/design
We describe a nonblinded, pragmatic, controlled trial with two parallel groups comprising an evaluation of the effect of referral to a provider-led integrated practice unit, inclusive of comprehensive multidisciplinary care, dedicated paramedicine providers, and virtual visits, on 30-day readmission rates for high-risk hospitalized patients. An automated risk-scoring system will randomly generate referrals to either transition services or usual care for 1520 hospitalized patients who score as high-risk for readmission. Transition services will then engage with patients in the hospital setting using a patient navigator and provide bridging outpatient services for the 30 days following discharge. All outcome data are retrieved electronically from administrative medical records. After reapplication of inclusion and exclusion criteria at the time of hospital discharge, analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle such that patients will be analyzed on the basis of the referral group to which they were initially randomized.
Discussion
The hospital transition program under study is complex and integrates the latest recommendations for readmission reduction strategies. As healthcare systems innovate to address readmissions through such complex interventions, there is significant benefit for stakeholders to have a clear understanding of the potential reach, cost, and real-world effectiveness. The pragmatic methods described here provide a template for conducting quality improvement research that fits seamlessly into existing care delivery and improvement efforts, leading to better-informed strategic decisions and the investments necessary to transform care and value for patients.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02763202. Registered 3 March 2016 (retrospectively registered).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Roberge, Jason 2 ; Moore, Charity G. 3 ; Ashby, Avery 2 ; Rossman, Whitney 3 ; Murphy, Stephanie 4 ; McCall, Stephannie 4 ; Brown, Ryan 4 ; Carpenter, Shannon 5 ; Rissmiller, Scott 5 ; Furney, Scott 6 1 Carolinas HealthCare System, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Charlotte, USA (GRID:grid.427669.8) (ISNI:0000000403870597); Carolinas HealthCare System, Carolinas Hospitalist Group, Charlotte, USA (GRID:grid.427669.8) (ISNI:0000000403870597)
2 Carolinas HealthCare System, Dickson Advanced Analytics, Charlotte, USA (GRID:grid.427669.8) (ISNI:0000000403870597)
3 Carolinas HealthCare System, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Charlotte, USA (GRID:grid.427669.8) (ISNI:0000000403870597)
4 Carolinas HealthCare System, Carolinas Hospitalist Group, Charlotte, USA (GRID:grid.427669.8) (ISNI:0000000403870597)
5 Carolinas HealthCare System, Medical Group Acute Care Division, Charlotte, USA (GRID:grid.427669.8) (ISNI:0000000403870597)
6 Carolinas HealthCare System, Department Internal Medicine, Charlotte, USA (GRID:grid.427669.8) (ISNI:0000000403870597)




