It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This registered clinical trial sought to validate a laboratory test system devised to screen medications for alcoholism treatment (TESMA) under different contingencies of alcohol reinforcement. Forty-six nondependent, but at least medium-risk drinkers were given the opportunity to earn intravenous infusions of ethanol, or saline, as rewards for work in a progressive-ratio paradigm. Work demand pattern and alcohol exposure dynamics were devised to achieve a gradual shift from low-demand work for alcohol (WFA) permitting quickly increasing breath alcohol concentrations (BrAC) to high-demand WFA, which could only decelerate an inevitable decrease of the previously earned BrAC. Thereby, the reward contingency changed, modeling different drinking motivations. The experiment was repeated after at least 7 days of randomized, double-blinded treatment with naltrexone, escalated to 50 mg/d, or placebo. Subjects treated with naltrexone reduced their cumulative WFA (cWFA) slightly more than participants receiving placebo. This difference was not statistically significant in the preplanned analysis of the entire 150 min of self-administration, i.e., our primary endpoint (p = 0.471, Cohen’s d = 0.215). Naltrexone serum levels correlated with change in cWFA (r = −0.53; p = 0.014). Separate exploratory analyses revealed that naltrexone significantly reduced WFA during the first, but not the second half of the experiment (Cohen’s d = 0.643 and 0.14, respectively). Phase-dependent associations of WFA with changes in subjective stimulation, wellbeing and desire for alcohol suggested that the predominant reinforcement of WFA was positive during the first phase only, and might have been negative during the second. We conclude that the TESMA is a safe and practical method. It bears the potential to quickly and efficiently screen new drugs for their efficacy to attenuate positively reinforced alcohol consumption. It possibly also provides a condition of negative reinforcement, and for the first time provides experimental evidence suggesting that naltrexone’s effect might depend on reward contingency.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.412282.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1091 2917)
2 Technische Universität Dresden, Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.4488.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2111 7257)
3 University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Hospital-Pharmacy, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.412282.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1091 2917)
4 University of Heidelberg, Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 4373); Bethanian Hospital for Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany (GRID:grid.7700.0)
5 Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Indianapolis, USA (GRID:grid.257413.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 3919)
6 MVZ Medizinische Labore Dessau Kassel GmbH, Department of Toxicology, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany (GRID:grid.257413.6)
7 University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.412282.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1091 2917); kbo Isar-Amper-Klinikum Region München, Department of Addiction Medicine and Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.412282.f)