It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Recent studies have investigated post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC, or long COVID) using real-world patient data such as electronic health records (EHR). Prior studies have typically been conducted on patient cohorts with specific patient populations which makes their generalizability unclear. This study aims to characterize PASC using the EHR data warehouses from two large Patient-Centered Clinical Research Networks (PCORnet), INSIGHT and OneFlorida+, which include 11 million patients in New York City (NYC) area and 16.8 million patients in Florida respectively. With a high-throughput screening pipeline based on propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting, we identified a broad list of diagnoses and medications which exhibited significantly higher incidence risk for patients 30–180 days after the laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to non-infected patients. We identified more PASC diagnoses in NYC than in Florida regarding our screening criteria, and conditions including dementia, hair loss, pressure ulcers, pulmonary fibrosis, dyspnea, pulmonary embolism, chest pain, abnormal heartbeat, malaise, and fatigue, were replicated across both cohorts. Our analyses highlight potentially heterogeneous risks of PASC in different populations.
In this study, the authors characterise post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) in two large cohorts based on electronic health records from the USA. They identify a broad range of PASC-related conditions which were only partially replicated across the two cohorts, indicating possible heterogeneity between populations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, New York, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
2 University of Florida, Department of Health Outcomes Biomedical Informatics, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091)
3 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
4 Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Neurology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
5 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Center for Health Services Research, Nashville, USA (GRID:grid.412807.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9916)
6 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Harvard Medical School, Department of Population Medicine, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
7 Louisiana Public Health Institute, New Orleans, USA (GRID:grid.468191.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0626 8374)