Content area

Abstract

In this article, we report research participants’ experiences providing professional bondage, discipline, sadism, masochism (BDSM), and other fetish services in Canada. Like many sexual service providers, professional dominatrices often argue that their work challenges patriarchal and oppressive systems of sexual and gender conformity. These women assert that Canadians misunderstand the range of activities that fall under “BDSM” and the dynamics of power within the provider/client relationship. As a result, misrepresentations and inaccuracies form the basis of Canadian laws, which open professional BDSM practitioners to criminalization and remove provider and client autonomy to consent. The 35 professional dominatrices who participated in our mixed-method study challenge this narrow interpretation of their work, suggesting that Canadian law denying bodily autonomy in this context fails to reflect the realities of professional BDSM. Rather than protection from violence, the mischaracterization of the services as criminal in nature serves to perpetuate marginalization, increase vulnerability to exploitation, and maintain stigmatization of non-normative sexualities.

Details

Title
Commodified BDSM Services: Professional Dominatrices’ Views on Their Work and Its Criminalization
Author
O’Doherty, Tamara 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Cherrington, Kathleen 2 

 Simon Fraser University, School of Criminology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Burnaby, Canada (GRID:grid.61971.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7494) 
 York University, Department of Gender, Feminist, and Women’s Studies, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.21100.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9430) 
Pages
1285-1298
Publication year
2023
Publication date
Apr 2023
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
00040002
e-ISSN
15732800
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2800384353
Copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.