It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Rainwater harvesting reliability, the proportion of days annually when rainwater demand is fully met, is challenging to estimate from cross-sectional household surveys that underpin international monitoring. This study investigated the use of a modelling approach that integrates household surveys with gridded precipitation data to evaluate rainwater harvesting reliability, using two local-scale household surveys in rural Siaya County, Kenya as an illustrative case study. We interviewed 234 households, administering a standard questionnaire that also identified the source of household stored drinking water. Logistic mixed effects models estimated stored rainwater availability from household and climatological variables, with random effects accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. Household rainwater availability was significantly associated with seasonality, storage capacity, and access to alternative improved water sources. Most households (95.1%) that consumed rainwater faced insufficient supply of rainwater available for potable needs throughout the year, with intermittencies during the short rains for most households with alternative improved sources. Although not significant, stored rainwater lasts longer for households whose only improved water source was rainwater (301.8 ± 40.2 days) compared to those having multiple improved sources (144.4 ± 63.7 days). Such modelling analysis could enable rainwater harvesting reliability estimation, and thereby national/international monitoring and targeted follow-up fieldwork to support rainwater harvesting.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Shanghai Institute of Technology, Fengxian campus, School of Ecological Technology and Engineering, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.419102.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1755 0738); University of Southampton, School of Geography and Environmental Science, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
2 Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya (GRID:grid.33058.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0155 5938)
3 Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya (GRID:grid.33058.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0155 5938); Washington State University, Paul G Allen School for Global Animal Health, Pullman, USA (GRID:grid.30064.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 6568)
4 Victoria Institute for Research on Environment and Development (VIRED) International, Rabuor, Kenya (GRID:grid.30064.31)
5 University of Brighton, Environmental and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Applied Sciences, Brighton, UK (GRID:grid.12477.37) (ISNI:0000000121073784)
6 University of Southampton, School of Geography and Environmental Science, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)