It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Data scarcity is a major challenge when training deep learning (DL) models. DL demands a large amount of data to achieve exceptional performance. Unfortunately, many applications have small or inadequate data to train DL frameworks. Usually, manual labeling is needed to provide labeled data, which typically involves human annotators with a vast background of knowledge. This annotation process is costly, time-consuming, and error-prone. Usually, every DL framework is fed by a significant amount of labeled data to automatically learn representations. Ultimately, a larger amount of data would generate a better DL model and its performance is also application dependent. This issue is the main barrier for many applications dismissing the use of DL. Having sufficient data is the first step toward any successful and trustworthy DL application. This paper presents a holistic survey on state-of-the-art techniques to deal with training DL models to overcome three challenges including small, imbalanced datasets, and lack of generalization. This survey starts by listing the learning techniques. Next, the types of DL architectures are introduced. After that, state-of-the-art solutions to address the issue of lack of training data are listed, such as Transfer Learning (TL), Self-Supervised Learning (SSL), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Model Architecture (MA), Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), and Deep Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (DeepSMOTE). Then, these solutions were followed by some related tips about data acquisition needed prior to training purposes, as well as recommendations for ensuring the trustworthiness of the training dataset. The survey ends with a list of applications that suffer from data scarcity, several alternatives are proposed in order to generate more data in each application including Electromagnetic Imaging (EMI), Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Medical imaging, Meteorology, Wireless Communications, Fluid Mechanics, Microelectromechanical system, and Cybersecurity. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review that offers a comprehensive overview on strategies to tackle data scarcity in DL.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Queensland University of Technology, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1024.7) (ISNI:0000000089150953); Queensland University of Technology, QUASR-ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre—Joint Biomechanics, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1024.7) (ISNI:0000000089150953); Queensland University of Technology, Centre for Data Science, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1024.7) (ISNI:0000000089150953)
2 Queensland University of Technology, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1024.7) (ISNI:0000000089150953); Queensland University of Technology, QUASR-ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre—Joint Biomechanics, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1024.7) (ISNI:0000000089150953)
3 Queensland University of Technology, School of Computer Science, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1024.7) (ISNI:0000000089150953)
4 University of Jaén, Department of Computer Science, Jaén, Spain (GRID:grid.21507.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2096 9837)
5 Universiti Pendidikan Sultan, Department of Computing, Tanjung Malim, Malaysia (GRID:grid.21507.31)
6 Charles III University of Madrid, Department of Computer Science and Technology, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.7840.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 9183)
7 University of Sumer, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Thi Qar, Iraq (GRID:grid.7840.b)
8 University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St. Lucia, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
9 University of Baghdad, Biomedical Engineering Department, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, Baghdad, Iraq (GRID:grid.411498.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2108 8169)
10 University of Missouri, Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Columbia, USA (GRID:grid.134936.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2162 3504)
11 Manchester Metropolitan University, School of Engineering, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.25627.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 5329)
12 Queensland University of Technology, QUASR-ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre—Joint Biomechanics, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1024.7) (ISNI:0000000089150953)
13 Valahia University of Targoviste, Department of Electronics, Targoviste, Romania (GRID:grid.42050.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 1604)