It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Animal feces from livestock farming can be a major source of antibiotic resistance to the environment, but a clear gap exists on how the resistance reservoir in feces alters as farming activities intensify. Here, we sampled feces from eight Chinese farms, where yak, sheep, pig, and horse were reared under free-range to intensive conditions, and determined fecal resistance using both genotype and phenotype approaches. Animals reared intensively exhibited increased diversity of antibiotic resistance genes and greater resistance phenotypes in feces, which were cross-correlated. Furthermore, at the metagenome contig level, antibiotic resistance genes were co-located with mobile genetic elements at a higher frequency (27.38%) as farming intensified, with associated resistance phenotypes being less coupled with bacterial phylogeny. Intensified farming also expanded the multidrug resistance preferentially carried on pathogens in fecal microbiomes. Overall, farming intensification can increase antibiotic resistance genotypes and phenotypes in domestic animal feces, with implications for environmental health.
Intensively reared animals have higher levels of antibiotic resistance in feces than those living in small-scale and free-range ways, according to genotype and phenotype profiles of antibiotic resistance in animal feces from eight Chinese farms.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.458454.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1806 6411); Southwest Forestry University, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plateau Wetland Conservation, Restoration and Ecological Services, National Plateau Wetlands Research Center, Kunming, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.412720.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 2943)
2 Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.458460.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 155X)
3 Southwest Forestry University, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plateau Wetland Conservation, Restoration and Ecological Services, National Plateau Wetlands Research Center, Kunming, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.412720.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 2943)
4 Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.458454.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1806 6411)
5 Newcastle University, School of Engineering, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (GRID:grid.1006.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0462 7212)