1. Introduction
Introduced in 1903 by Whittaker [1], the and functions are defined as follows:
(1)
and(2)
respectively, where denotes the gamma function and . These functions, called Whittaker functions, are closely associated with the following confluent hypergeometric function (Kummer function):(3)
where denotes the generalized hypergeometric function.For particular values of the parameters and , the Whittaker functions can be reduced to a variety of elementary and special functions. Whittaker [1] discussed the connection between the functions defined in (1) and (2) and many other special functions, such as the modified Bessel function, the incomplete gamma functions, the parabolic cylinder function, the error functions, the logarithmic and the cosine integrals, and the generalized Hermite and Laguerre polynomials. Monographs and treatises dealing with special functions [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] present properties of the Whittaker functions with more or less extension.
The Whittaker functions are frequently applied in various areas of mathematical physics (see for example [11,12,13]), such as the well-known solution of the Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator [14].
and are usually treated as functions of variable x with fixed values of the parameters and . However, there are other investigations which consider and as variables. For instance, Laurenzi [15] discussed methods to calculate derivatives of and with respect to when this parameter is an integer. Using the Mellin transform, Buschman [16] showed that the derivatives of the Whittaker functions with respect to the parameters for certain particular values of these parameters can be expressed in finite sums of Whittaker functions. López and Sesma [17] considered the behaviour of as a function of . They derived a convergent expansion in ascending powers of and an asymptotic expansion in descending powers of . Using series of Bessel functions and Buchholz polynomials, Abad and Sesma [18] presented an algorithm for the calculation of the nth derivative of the Whittaker functions with respect to the parameter. Becker [19] investigated certain integrals with respect to the parameter. Ancarini and Gasaneo [20] presented a general case of differentiation of generalized hypergeometric functions with respect to the parameters in terms of infinite series containing the digamma function. In addition, Sofostasios and Brychkov [21] considered derivatives of hypergeometric functions and classical polynomials with respect to the parameters.
The primary focus of this research is a systematic investigation of the first derivatives of with respect to the parameters. We primarily base our findings on two distinct methods. The first pertains to the series representation of , whereas the second pertains to the integral representations of . Regarding the first approach, direct differentiation of (1) with respect to the parameters leads to infinite sums of quotients of digamma and gamma functions. It is possible to calculate such sums in closed form for particular values of the parameters. The parameter differentiation of the integral representations of leads to finite and infinite integrals of elementary functions, such as products of algebraic, exponential, and logarithmic functions. These integrals are similar to those investigated by Kölbig [22] and Geddes et al. [23]. As in the case of the first approach, it is possible to calculate such integrals in closed form for some particular values of the parameters.
In the Appendices, we calculate the first derivative of the incomplete gamma functions and with respect to the parameter . These results are used when we calculate several of the integrals found in the second approach mentioned above. In addition, we calculate new reduction formulas of the integral Whittaker functions which we recently introduced in [24]. These are defined in a similar way as other integral functions in the mathematical literature:
(4)
(5)
Finally, we include a list of reduction formulas for the Whittaker function in the Appendices.
2. Parameter Differentiation of via Kummer Function
As mentioned above, the Whittaker function is closely related to the confluent hypergeometric function . Likewise, the parameter derivatives of are related to the parameter derivatives of . Below, we introduce the following notation set by Ancarini and Gasaneo [20].
Define the parameter derivatives of the confluent hypergeometric function as
(6)
and(7)
According to (3), we have
Additionally, according to [25], we have
(8)
and(9)
Because one of the integral representations of the confluent hypergeometric function is ([6], Section 6.5.1)
(10)
by direct differentiation of (10) with respect to parameters a and b we obtain andBecause our main focus is the systematic investigation of the parameter derivatives of , we present these parameter derivatives as Theorems throughout the paper and the corresponding results for and as Corollaries. Additionally, note that all the results regarding can be transformed according to the next Theorem.
The following transformation holds true:
Differentiate Kummer’s transformation formula ([8], Equation 13.2.39) with respect to a:
to obtain the desired result. □2.1. Derivative with Respect to the First Parameter
Using (1) and (3), the first derivative of with respect to the first parameter is
(11)
where denotes the digamma function and(12)
For and for , , the following parameter derivative formula of holds true:
(13)
For , Equation (11) becomes
Apply ([26], Equation 6.2.1(60))
(14)
to obtain (13), completing the proof. □For , , and for , the following reduction formula holds true:
(15)
Direct differentiation of (1) yields
(16)
thus, by comparing (16) with to (13), we arrive at (15), as we wanted to prove. □For , and for , the following sum holds true:
where denotes the lower incomplete gamma function (A1).
According to (8) and the reduction formula ([9], Equation 7.11.1(15))
we have(17)
Comparing (15) to (17) completes the proof. □
Table 1 presents explicit expressions for particular values of (13) and , obtained with the help of the MATHEMATICA program. Note that the and functions are defined in (61) and (62), respectively.
Next, we present other reduction formula of from the result found in [15] for :
(18)
where denotes the exponential integral, and for(19)
and(20)
In order to calculate the finite sum provided in (20), we derive the following Lemma.
The following finite sum holds true
(21)
Split the sum in two as
where andTake , , and in the quadratic transformation ([8], Equation 15.18.3)
to obtainNow, apply Gauss’s summation theorem ([8], Equation 15.4.20)
and the formula ([7], Equation 43:4:3) to arrive atTherefore, is a pure imaginary number. Because is a real number, we conclude that , as we wanted to prove. □
The following reduction formula holds true for and :
(22)
where denotes the Laguerre polynomials (A14) and the n-th harmonic number.From (21) and (20), we can see that
(23)
Additionally, according to ([8], Equation 13.18.1),
(24)
By performing the transformations , and in (A13), we obtain
(25)
Finally, we have the following for ([27], Equation 1.3.7):
(26)
Now, insert (19) and (20)–(26) in (18) to arrive at (22), as we wanted to prove. □
The following reduction formula holds true for and ,
Consider (16) and (22) to arrive at the desired result. □
In Table 2, we collect particular cases of (22) for obtained with the help of the MATHEMATICA program.
2.2. Derivative with Respect to the Second Parameter
Using (1) and (3), the first derivative of with respect to the parameter is
(27)
where is provided in (12) and the series is(28)
For and , the following parameter derivative formula of holds true:
(29)
For , we have ; therefore, (27) becomes
whereThus, using (14),
(30)
Because, according to (1) and (3),
(30) now takes the simple form provided in (29), as we wanted to prove. □For , , and , the following reduction formula holds true:
(31)
Direct differentiation of (1) yields
(32)
thus, comparing (32) with to (29) and taking into account (15), we arrive at (31), as we wanted to prove. □Using (29), the derivative of with respect can be calculated for particular values of and with ; as obtained with the help of MATHEMATICA, these are presented in Table 3.
Note that for , we obtain an indeterminate expression in (29). For this case, we present the following result.
The following parameter derivative formula of holds true for :
(33)
where denotes the modified Bessel function.Differentiating with respect to the expression ([8], Equation 13.18.8)
(34)
we obtain (33), as we wanted to prove. □The order derivative of the modified Bessel function is provided in terms of the Meijer-G function and the generalized hypergeometric function [28]:
(35)
where is the modified Bessel function of the second kind, or in terms of generalized hypergeometric functions, only , [29]:(36)
There are different expressions for the order derivatives of the Bessel functions [30,31]. This subject is summarized in [32], where more general results are presented in terms of convolution integrals, while order derivatives of Bessel functions are found for particular values of the order.
Using (33), (35), and (36), derivatives of with respect to can be calculated for ; these are presented in Table 4 as obtained with the help of MATHEMATICA.
3. Parameter Differentiation of via Integral Representations
3.1. Derivative with Respect to the First Parameter
Integral representations of can be obtained via integral representations of confluent hypergeometric functions ([6], Section 7.4.1); thus,
(37)
(38)
where(39)
denotes the beta function. In order to calculate the first derivative of with respect to parameter , we introduce the following finite logarithmic integrals.
(40)
(41)
Differentiation of (37) and (38) with respect to parameter yields, respectively,
(42)
(43)
Note that from (42) and (43) we have
(44)
Likewise, we can depart from other integral respresentations of ([6], Section 7.4.1) (note that there are several typos in this reference regarding these integral representations) to obtain
(45)
(46)
and consequently, we have(47)
(48)
where we have defined the following logarithmic integrals.
(49)
(50)
Note that from (47) and (48), we have
(51)
Because , , and are reduced to the calculation of , we next calculate the latter integral.
The following integral holds true for :
(52)
Comparing (42) to (16) and taking into account (1), we arrive at (52), as we wanted to prove. □
For , Equation (52) is reduced to
(53)
For and , with , the following integral holds true for :
(54)
where(55)
and the functions and denote the hyperbolic sine and cosine integrals.From the definition of provided in (40), we have
We can change the variables in the first integral above to arrive at
(56)
where we have set(57)
Taking into account the binomial theorem and the integral (A9) calculated in Appendix A, i.e.,
we can calculate(58)
Now, we can apply the differentiation formula ([8], Equation 16.3.1)
to obtain(59)
According to ([9], Equation 7.12.2(67)), we have
(60)
In order to obtain similar expressions to those obtained in Table 1, we can derive an alternative form of (60). Indeed, from the definition of the hyperbolic sine and cosine integrals ([8], Equations 6.2.15–6.2.16), ,
(61)
(62)
it is easy to prove that(63)
(64)
Additionally, from the definition of a complementary exponential integral ([8], Equation 6.2.3)
and the property ([8], Equation 6.2.7) it is easy to prove that thus, taking into account (63) and (64), we have(65)
We can insert (65) in (60) to obtain
(66)
Finally, by substituting (66) in (59) while taking into account (55), we arrive at
Similarly, we can calculate
(67)
Finally, according to (56), we arrive at (54), as we wanted to prove. □
Table 5 shows the integral for and particular values of the parameters and/or obtained from (52) and (54) with the aid of MATHEMATICA program.
For and , with , the following reduction formula holds true for :
(68)
where we have set the polynomials:(69)
According to the definition of (1), we have
(70)
Applying the property ([7], Equation 18:5:1)
and the reduction formula ([9], Equation 7.11.1(12)) where and , after some algebra we arrive at(71)
We can now insert (71) in (70) to obtain (68), as we wanted to prove. □
In addition to (68), other reduction formulas for the Whittaker function are presented in Appendix C. A large list of reduction formulas for is available in [24] and in other monographs dealing with the special functions [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,26].
For and , with , the following reduction formula holds true for :
(72)
According to (42), we have
Now, we can apply (39) and the property (26) to obtain
Finally, by applying the results provided in (54) and (68), we arrive at (72), as we wanted to prove. □
For and , with , the following reduction formula holds true for :
(73)
Set (16) for and and compare the result to (72). □
Table 6 shows the first derivative of with respect to the parameter for particular values of and and for , which are calculated from (72) and are not contained in Table 1.
3.2. Application to the Calculation of Infinite Integrals
Additional integral representations of the Whittaker function in terms of Bessel functions ([6], Section 6.5.1) are known:
(74)
(75)
Let us next introduce the following infinite logarithmic integrals.
(76)
(77)
Differentiation of (74) and (75) with respect to the parameter respectively yields
(78)
(79)
Note that from (42) and (78) we have
(80)
while from (42) and (79) we have(81)
For and , with , the following infinite integrals holds true for :
(82)
and(83)
Substitute the results provided in (54) and (68) into (80) and (81) and apply (26). □
3.3. Derivative with Respect to the Second Parameter
In order to calculate the first derivative of with respect to parameter , we introduce the following finite logarithmic integrals.
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
Differentiation of (37) and (38) with respect to the parameter provides us with
(88)
(89)
For the other integral representations provided in (45) and (46), we have
(90)
(91)
From (88)–(91), we obtain the following interrelationships:
Because , , and are reduced to the calculation of , we next calculate the latter integral.
According to the notation introduced in (6) and (7), the following integral holds true:
(92)
Comparing (88) to (32) while taking into account (1), we arrive at (92), as we wanted to prove. □
For and , with , the following integral holds true for :
(93)
From the definition of provided in (84), we have
By performing a change of variables in the second integral above, we arrive at
(94)
where we follow the notation in (57) for the integral . According to the results obtained in (58) and (67), we arrive at (93), as we wanted to prove. □For and , with , the following reduction formula holds true for :
(95)
Insert (68) and (93) into (88) and apply (26). □
Table 7 shows the first derivative of with respect to the parameter for particular values of and and for , which are calculated from (95) and are not contained in Table 3 and Table 4.
For and , with , the following reduction formula holds true for :
(96)
Take and in (32), and substitute the results provided in (68), (73), and (95). After simplification, we arrive at (96), as we wanted to prove. □
3.4. Application to the Calculation of Finite Integrals
For and , the following finite integral holds true:
(97)
where is provided by (35) or (36).First, consider that . Take in (88) and substitute (34) to arrive at
(98)
Next, equate (98) to the expression provided in (33), and solve for to obtain
(99)
Now, apply the property ([8], Equation 5.5.8)
for to simplify (99) as(100)
where (100) holds true for . Finally, note that by performing the change of variables in (84) we obtain the reflection formula(101)
thus, from (100) and (101) we arrive at (97), as we wanted to prove. □For and , the following finite integral holds true:
(102)
where is provided by (35) or (36).Consider . Take in (90) and susbtitute (34) to obtain
(103)
Now, insert in (103) the result in (100) and simplify to obtain the following for :
(104)
Finally, note that by performing the change of variables in (86) we obtain the reflection formula
(105)
thus, from (104) and (105) we arrive at (102), as we wanted to prove. □Table 8 shows the integral for particular values of the parameters and and for obtained from (92), (93), and (97) with the aid of the MATHEMATICA program.
4. Conclusions
The Whittaker function is defined in terms of the Kummer confluent hypergeometric function; hence, its derivative with respect to the parameters and can be expressed as infinite sums of quotients of the digamma and gamma functions. In addition, parameter differentiation of the integral representations of leads to finite and infinite integrals of elementary functions. These sums and integrals have been calculated for particular values of the parameters and in closed form. As an application of these results, we have obtained several reduction formulas for the derivatives of the confluent Kummer function with respect to the parameters, i.e., and . Additionally, we have calculated finite integrals containing a combination of the exponential, logarithmic, and algebraic functions, as well as several infinite integrals involving the exponential, logarithmic, algebraic, and Bessel functions. It is worth noting that all the results presented in this paper have been checked both numerically and symbolically with the MATHEMATICA program.
In Appendix A, we obtain the first derivative of the incomplete gamma functions in closed form. These results allow us to calculate a finite logarithmic integral, which is used to calculate one of the integrals appearing in the body of the paper.
In Appendix B, we calculate new reduction formulas for the integral Whittaker functions and from two reduction formulas of the Whittaker function . One of the latter seems to have not been previously reported in the literature.
Finally, in Appendix C, we collect a number of reduction formulas for the Whittaker function .
Conceptualization, A.A. and J.L.G.-S.; Methodology, A.A. and J.L.G.-S.; Resources, A.A.; Writing—original draft, A.A. and J.L.G.-S.; Writing—review and editing, A.A. and J.L.G.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We are grateful to Francesco Mainardi from the Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, for his kind encouragement and interest in our work.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Derivative of
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
Derivative of
|
|
|
---|---|---|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Derivative of
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative of
|
|
|
---|---|---|
0 |
|
|
0 | 0 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 | 1 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 | 2 |
|
Integral
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative of
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Derivative of
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
Integral
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
0 | 0 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 | 1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Appendix A. Parameter Differentiation of the Incomplete Gamma Functions
The lower incomplete gamma function is defined as follows [
The upper incomplete gamma function is defined as follows ([
The relation between both functions is
The lower incomplete gamma function has the following series expansion ([
In addition, the following integral representations in terms of infinite integrals hold true ([
From (
The parameter derivative of the lower incomplete gamma function is
According to (
Now, we apply the sum formula ([
The parameter derivative of the upper incomplete gamma function is
Differentiate (
From (
The following integral holds true for
Perform the change of variables
Comparing (
According to the notation provided in (
Knowing that ([
Appendix B. Reduction Formulas for Integral Whittaker Functions Miκ,μ and miκ,μ
In [
The following reduction formula holds true for
Next, we can apply to the definition of the Whittaker function (
Finally, taking into account the definition of the lower incomplete gamma function (
Taking
The following reduction formula holds true for
Following similar steps as in the previous theorem, here we instead consider the definition of the upper incomplete gamma function (
The following reduction formula holds true for
From the property for
We can apply (
Now, by inserting (
Finally, takeing into account the definition of the lower incomplete gamma function (
It is worth noting here that we could not locate the reduction Formula (
Appendix C. Reduction Formulas for the Whittaker Function Mκ,μ(x)
For the convenience of readers, reduction formulas for the Whittaker function
Whittaker function
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 | 0 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 | 1 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
1 | 1 |
|
1 |
|
|
1 | 2 |
|
2 | 2 |
|
References
1. Whittaker, E.T. An expression of certain known functions as generalized hypergeometric functions. Bull. Am. Math. Soc.; 1903; 10, pp. 125-134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1903-01077-5]
2. Whittaker, E.T.; Watson, G.N. A Course of Modern Analysis; 4th ed. Cabrigdge University Press: Cabrigdge, UK, 1963.
3. Buchholz, H. The Confluent Hypergeometric Function; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1969.
4. Erdélyi, A.; Magnus, W.; Oberhettinger, F.; Tricomi, F.G. Higher Transcendental Functions; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1953; Volume 1.
5. Gradstein, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products; 8th ed. Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015.
6. Magnus, W.; Oberhettinger, F.; Soni, R.P. Formulas and Theorems for the Special Functions of Mathematical Physics; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 52.
7. Oldham, K.B.; Myland, J.; Spanier, J. An Atlas of Functions: With Equator, the Atlas Function Calculator; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
8. Olver, F.W.J.; Lozier, D.W.; Boisvert, R.F.; Clark, C.W. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010.
9. Prudnikov, A.P.; Brychkov, Y.A.; Marichev, O.I. Integrals and Series: More Special Functions; Gordon & Breach Science Publishers: Langhorne, PA, USA, 1990; Volume 3.
10. Slater, L.J. Confluent Hypergeometric Functions; Cambrigde University Press: Cambrigde, UK, 1960.
11. Chaudhry, M.A.; Zubair, S.M. Remarks on the Whittaker functions. Appl. Math. Lett.; 1992; 5, pp. 25-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0893-9659(92)90057-G]
12. Omair, M.A.; Tashkandy, Y.A.; Askar, S.; Alzaid, A.A. Family of distributions derived from Whittaker function. Mathematics; 2022; 10, 1058. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10071058]
13. Rusin, T.M.; Zawadzki, W. Green’s function of electrons in monolayer and bilayer graphene in a magnetic field. J. Phys. A-Math. Theor.; 2011; 44, 105201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/10/105201]
14. Lagarias, J.C. The Schrödinger operator with morse potential on the right half-line. Commun. Number Theory; 2009; 3, pp. 323-361. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4310/CNTP.2009.v3.n2.a3]
15. Laurenzi, B.J. Derivatives of Whittaker functions Wκ,1/2 and Mκ,1/2 with respect to order κ. Math. Comput.; 1973; 27, pp. 129-132.
16. Buschman, R.G. Finite sum representations for partial derivatives of special functions with respect to parameters. Math. Comput.; 1974; 28, pp. 817-824. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1974-0371019-7]
17. López, J.L.; Sesma, J. The Whittaker function Mκ,μ, as a function of κ. Constr. Approx.; 1999; 1, pp. 83-95. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003659900098]
18. Abad, J.; Sesma, J. Successive derivatives of Whittaker functions with respect to the first parameter. Comput. Phys. Commun.; 2003; 156, pp. 13-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00369-2]
19. Becker, P.A. Infinite integrals of Whittaker and Bessel functions with respect to their indices. J. Math. Phys.; 2009; 50, 123515. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3265924]
20. Ancarani, L.U.; Gasaneo, G. Derivatives of any order of the hypergeometric function pFq(a1,…,ap;b1,…,bq;z) with respect to the parameters ai and bi. J. Phys. A-Math. Theor.; 2010; 43, 085210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/8/085210]
21. Sofotasios, P.C.; Brychkov, Y.A. On derivatives of hypergeometric functions and classical polynomials with respect to parameters. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct.; 2018; 29, pp. 852-865. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2018.1504042]
22. Kölbig, K.S. On the integral
23. Geddes, K.O.; Glasser, M.L.; Moore, R.A.; Scott, T.C. Evaluation of classes of definite integrals involving elementary functions via differentiation of special functions. Appl. Algebr. Eng. Comm.; 1990; 1, pp. 149-165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01810298]
24. Apelblat, A.; González-Santander, J.L. The Integral Mittag-Leffler, Whittaker and Wright functions. Mathematics; 2021; 9, 3255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math9243255]
25. Ancarani, L.U.; Gasaneo, G. Derivatives of any order of the confluent hypergeometric function 1F1(a,b,z) with respect to the parameter a or b. J. Phys.; 2008; 49, 063508.
26. Brychkov, Y.A. Handbook of Special Functions: Derivatives, Integrals, Series and Other Formulas; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008.
27. Lebedev, N.N. Special Functions and Their Applications; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1965.
28. González-Santander, J.L. Closed-form expressions for derivatives of Bessel functions with respect to the order. J. Math. Anal. Appl.; 2018; 466, pp. 1060-1081. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.06.043]
29. Brychkov, Y.A. Higher derivatives of the Bessel functions with respect to the order. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct.; 2016; 27, pp. 566-577. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2016.1164156]
30. Apelblat, A.; Kravitsky, N. Integral representations of derivatives and integrals with respect to the order of the Bessel functions Jν(t), Iν(t), the Anger function Jν(t) and the integral Bessel function Jiν(t). IMA J. Appl. Math.; 1985; 34, pp. 187-210. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/imamat/34.2.187]
31. Brychkov, Y.A.; Geddes, K.O. On the derivatives of the Bessel and Struve functions with respect to the order. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct.; 2005; 16, pp. 187-198. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10652460410001727572]
32. Apelblat, A. Bessel and Related Functions: Mathematical Operations with Respect to the Order; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2020.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
In this paper, first derivatives of the Whittaker function
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer