It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Anthropogenic stressors, such as plastics and fishing, are putting coastal habitats under immense pressure. However, sound pollution from small boats has received little attention given the importance of sound in the various life history strategies of many marine animals. By combining passive acoustic monitoring, propagation modelling, and hearing threshold data, the impact of small-boat sound on the listening spaces of four coastal species was determined. Listening space reductions (LSR) were greater for fishes compared to crustaceans, for which LSR varied by day and night, due to their greater hearing abilities. Listening space also varied by sound modality for the two fish species, highlighting the importance of considering both sound pressure and particle motion. The theoretical results demonstrate that boat sound hinders the ability of fishes to perceive acoustic cues, advocating for future field-based research on acoustic cues, and highlighting the need for effective mitigation and management of small-boat sound within coastal areas worldwide.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Waipapa Taumata Rau The University of Auckland, Leigh Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine Science, Leigh, New Zealand (GRID:grid.9654.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 3343)
2 Waipapa Taumata Rau The University of Auckland, Leigh Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine Science, Leigh, New Zealand (GRID:grid.9654.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 3343); Waipapa Taumata Rau The University of Auckland, School of Biological Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand (GRID:grid.9654.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 3343)
3 University of Victoria, Department of Biology, Victoria, Canada (GRID:grid.143640.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9465)
4 Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Centre for Environment, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK (GRID:grid.14332.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 0746 0155)