Abstract

Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73–4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06–4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41–4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13–4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92–4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement.

Details

Title
Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
Author
McLean, Kenneth A. 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Sgrò, Alessandro 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Brown, Leo R. 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Buijs, Louis F. 2 ; Daines, Luke 4 ; Potter, Mark A. 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley 4 ; Harrison, Ewen M. 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 University of Edinburgh, Department of Clinical Surgery, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988); University of Edinburgh, Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988) 
 Western General Hospital, Colorectal Unit, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.417068.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0624 9907) 
 University of Edinburgh, Department of Clinical Surgery, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988) 
 University of Edinburgh, Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988) 
Pages
85
Publication year
2023
Publication date
Dec 2023
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
23986352
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2809997642
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.