It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We employ U–Pb calcite dating of structurally-controlled fracture fills within crystalline Caledonian basement in western Norway to reveal subtle large-scale tectonic events that affected this rifted continental margin. The ages (15 in total) fall into four distinct groups with ages mainly ranging from latest Cretaceous to Pleistocene. (1) The three oldest (Triassic-Jurassic) ages refine the complex faulting history of a reactivated fault strand originated from the Caledonian collapse and broadly correlate with known rifting events offshore. (2) Two ages of ca. 90–80 Ma relate to lithospheric stretching and normal fault reactivation of a major ENE-WSW trending late Caledonian shear zone. (3) We correlate five ages between ca. 70 and 60 Ma with far-field effects and dynamic uplift related to the proto-Iceland mantle plume, the effect and extent of which is highly debated. (4) The five youngest ages (< 50 Ma) from distinct NE–SW trending faults are interpreted to represent several episodes of post-breakup fracture dilation, indicating a long-lived Cenozoic deformation history. Our new U–Pb data combined with structural and isotopic data show that much larger tracts of the uplifted continental margin of western Norway have been affected by far-field tectonic stresses than previously anticipated, with deformation continuing into the late Cenozoic.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Bergen, Department of Earth Science, Bergen, Norway (GRID:grid.7914.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7443)
2 The University of Dublin, Department of Geology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Norway (GRID:grid.7914.b)
3 University of Bergen, Department of Earth Science, Bergen, Norway (GRID:grid.7914.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7443); Equinor, Fornebu, Norway (GRID:grid.422595.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 7043)
4 Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Department of Environmental Sciences, Bergen, Norway (GRID:grid.477239.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1754 9964); Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Norway (GRID:grid.438521.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 1034 0453)
5 Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Department of Environmental Sciences, Bergen, Norway (GRID:grid.477239.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1754 9964)