It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In this study GC–MS-based untargeted metabolomics was used to identify the metabolic response of earthworm; Eudriluseugeniae exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of chlorpyrifos-CHL, cypermethrin-CYP, Glyphosate-GLY, and Combined-C (all three pesticides) at the concentrations of 3, 6, and 12 mg/kg. Principal component analysis of the obtained datasets revealed a clear distinction between the control and treatment groups. The mean weight of the worms in the treated groups decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Among the identified metabolites, oleic acid (~ 93.47%), lysine (~ 92.20%), glutamic acid (~ 91.81%), leucine (~ 90.20%), asparagine (~ 94.20%), methionine (~ 92.27%), malic acid (~ 93.37%), turanose (~ 95.04%), maltose (~ 92.36%), cholesta-3,5-diene (~ 86.11%), galactose (~ 93.20%), cholesterol (~ 91.56%), tocopherol (~ 85.09%), decreased significantly (p < 0.05), whereas myoinositol (~ 83%) and isoleucine (78.09%) increased significantly (p < 0.05) upon exposure to the CHL, CYP, GLY, and C. Overall, the findings suggest that earthworms might be a new entry point for the pesticides into the food chain. The present study highlights that metabolomics can be a reliable approach to understand the effect of different xenobiotics including pesticides on the metabolic response of earthworms.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Yadav, Shweta 6 ; Kumari, Sheena 7 1 Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Department of Zoology, Sagar, India; Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Metagenomics and Secretomics Research Laboratory, Department of Botany, Sagar, India
2 Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Metagenomics and Secretomics Research Laboratory, Department of Botany, Sagar, India
3 Ministry of Youth and Sports, GOI, IRMS, National Dope Testing Laboratory, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.454780.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0683 2228)
4 CSIR-Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine, Quality Control & Quality Assurance Division, Jammu, India (GRID:grid.418225.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1802 6428)
5 Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Metagenomics and Secretomics Research Laboratory, Department of Botany, Sagar, India (GRID:grid.418225.8); University of Allahabad (A Central University), Metagenomics and Secretomics Research Laboratory, Department of Botany, Prayagraj, India (GRID:grid.411343.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0213 924X)
6 Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Department of Zoology, Sagar, India (GRID:grid.411343.0)
7 Durban University of Technology, Institute for Water and Wastewater Technology, Durban, South Africa (GRID:grid.412114.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9360 9165)




