Abstract
The field of environmental DNA (eDNA) is advancing rapidly, yet human eDNA applications remain underutilized and underconsidered. Broader adoption of eDNA analysis will produce many well-recognized benefits for pathogen surveillance, biodiversity monitoring, endangered and invasive species detection, and population genetics. Here we show that deep-sequencing-based eDNA approaches capture genomic information from humans (Homo sapiens) just as readily as that from the intended target species. We term this phenomenon human genetic bycatch (HGB). Additionally, high-quality human eDNA could be intentionally recovered from environmental substrates (water, sand and air), holding promise for beneficial medical, forensic and environmental applications. However, this also raises ethical dilemmas, from consent, privacy and surveillance to data ownership, requiring further consideration and potentially novel regulation. We present evidence that human eDNA is readily detectable from ‘wildlife’ environmental samples as human genetic bycatch, demonstrate that identifiable human DNA can be intentionally recovered from human-focused environmental sampling and discuss the translational and ethical implications of such findings.
The recovery of human genomic data from environmental DNA samples raises ethical questions regarding consent, privacy, surveillance and data ownership, which will need to be grappled with as the environmental DNA field moves forward.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Farrell, Jessica A. 3 ; Stammnitz, Maximilian R. 4
; Koda, Samantha A. 5
; Mashkour, Narges 5 ; Summers, Victoria 5 ; Osborne, Todd 5
; Whilde, Jenny 5 ; Duffy, David J. 3
1 University of Florida, Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, St. Augustine, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Limerick, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Limerick, Ireland (GRID:grid.10049.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9692)
2 University of Florida, Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, St. Augustine, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Department of Chemistry, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091)
3 University of Florida, Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, St. Augustine, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Department of Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091)
4 Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.473715.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 6475 7299)
5 University of Florida, Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, St. Augustine, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091)




