Abstract

Background

Implant design and apical stability are principal parameters involved in achieving successful primary stability. Using polyurethane models to simulate post-extraction sockets, we investigated the effects of using differing blade designs on the primary stability of tapered implants and the impact of apical depth.

Method

Six polyurethane blocks were used to simulate post-extraction pockets. One of the implants presented self-tapping blades (Group A), while the other (Group B) did not. Seventy-two implants were placed at 3 different depths (5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm), and a torque wrench was used to measure the stability of the implants.

Results

When evaluating the implants (placed at 5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm apical to the socket), we observed that the torque of the Group B implants was higher than that of Group A implants (P < 0.01). At the 9-mm depth, there was no difference between the groups (Drive GM 34.92 Ncm and Helix GM 32.33 Ncm) (P > 0.001), and considering the same implant groups, those placed at 7-mm and 9-mm depths presented higher torques (p < 0.01) than those placed at 5-mm (p > 0.01).

Conclusion

Considering both groups, we concluded that an insertion depth of greater than 7 mm is needed for initial stability, and in situations involving reduced supportive bone tissue or low bone density, a non-self-tapping thread design improves implant stability.

Details

Title
Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study
Author
Marcelo Sales Cavalcante; Ferraro-Bezerra, Marcelo; Paulo Goberlanio de Barros Silva; Gabriel Silva Andrade; Phillipe Nogueira Barbosa Alencar; Josfran da Silva Ferreira Filho; Lucas Alexandre Maia; Raul Anderson Domingues Alves da Silva; Danna Mota Moreira; Rafael Linard Avelar
Pages
1-6
Section
Research
Publication year
2023
Publication date
2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
e-ISSN
14726831
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2827038785
Copyright
© 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.