Evolution of reproductive morphology among recently diverged taxa in the Drosophila mojavensis species cluster

Abstract

The morphological evolution of sexual traits informs studies of speciation due to the potential role of these characters in reproductive isolation. In the current study, we quantified and compared genitalic variation within the Drosophila mojavensis species cluster to infer the mode of evolution of the male aedeagus. This system is ideal for such studies due to the opportunity to test and compare levels of variation along a divergence continuum at various taxonomic levels within the group. Shape variation was quantified using elliptic Fourier descriptors and compared among the four D. mojavensis host races, and between D. mojavensis and its sister species Drosophila arizonae. Aedeagus shape was diagnostic for D. arizonae, and among three of the four D. mojavensis subspecies. In each of these cases, there was less variation within subspecies than among subspecies, which is consistent with the pattern predicted if genitalia are evolving according to a punctuated change model, and are involved with mate recognition. However, aedeagus shape in Drosophila mojavensis sonorensis was highly variable and broadly overlapping with the other three subspecies, suggesting aedeagus evolution in this subspecies is more complex and subject to additional evolutionary factors. These results are interpreted and discussed in the context of selection on mate recognition systems and the potential for failed copulation.

References Andersson, M. B. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ . Arbuthnott, D. , M. G. Elliot , M. A. Mcpeek , and B. J. Crespi . 2010. Divergent patterns of diversification in courtship and genitalic characters of Timema walking-sticks. J Evol Biol 23:1399–1411. Arnqvist, G. , and L. Rowe . 2002. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56:936–947. Boake, C. R. B. , M. P. DeAngelis , and D. K. Andreadis . 1997. Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:12442–12445. Coyne, J. A. 1993. The Genetics of an Isolating Mechanism between two sibling species of Drosophila . Evolution 47:778–788. Coyne, J. A. , J. Rux , and J. R. David . 1991. Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives. Genet. Res. 57:113–122. Eberhard, W. G. , B. A. Huber , R. S. Lucas Rodriguez , D. Briceno , I. Salas , and V. Rodriguez . 1998. One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution 52:415–431. Eberhard, W. G. , R. L. Rodriguez , and M. Polihronakis . 2009. Pitfalls in understanding the functional significance of genital allometry. J. Evol. Biol. 22:435–445. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford , U.K . Gowaty, P. A. , and S. P. Hubbell . 2009. Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106:10017–10024. Gröning, J. , and A. Hochkirch . 2008. Reproductive interference between animal species. Q. Rev. Biol. 83:257–282. Hocutt, G. 2000. Reinforcement of premating barriers to reproduction between Drosophila arizonae and Drosophila mojavensis . Ph.D. diss., Arizona State University , AZ . Pp. xiii + 173. Henry, C. S. 1985. The Proliferation of cryptic species in Chrysoperla green lacewings through song divergence. Fla. Entomol. 68:18–38. Hosken, D. J. , and P. Stockley . 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:87–93. Iwata, H. , and Y. Ukai . 2002. SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J. Hered. 93:384–385. Krebs, R. A. , and T. A. Markow . 1989. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation in Drosophila mojavensis . Evolution 43:908–913. Liu, J. , J. M. Mercer , L. F. Stam , G. C. Gibson , Z. B. Zeng , and C. C. Laurie . 1996. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana . Genetics 142:1129–1145. Machado, C. A. , L. M. Matzkin , L. K. Reed , and T. A. Markow . 2007. Multilocus nuclear sequences reveal intra- and interspecific relationships among chromosomally polymorphic species of cactophilic Drosophila . Mol. Ecol. 16:3009–3024. Markow, T. A. 1981. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis . Evolution 35:1022–1026. Markow, T. A. 1991. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis . Evolution 45:1525–1529. Masly, J. P. , J. E. Dalton , S. Srivastava , L. Chen , and M. N. Arbeitman . 2011. The genetic basis of rapidly evolving male genital morphology in Drosophila . Genetics 189:357–374. Massie, K. 2006. Sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae . MS thesis, University of Arizona , Tucson , Arizona . Matzkin, L. M. , T. J. S. Merritt , C.-T. Zhu , and W. F. Eanes . 2005. The structure and population genetics of the breakpoints associated with the cosmopolitan chromosomal inversion In (3R)Payne in Drosophila melanogaster . Genetics 170:1143–1152. McPeek, M. A. , and S. Gavrilets . 2006. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60:1967–1980. McPeek, M. A. , L. Shen , J. Z. Torrey , and H. Farid . 2008. The tempo and mode of three-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. Am. Nat. 171:E158–E178. McPeek, M. A. , L. Shen , and H. Farid . 2009. The correlated evolution of three-dimensional reproductive structures between male and female damselflies. Evolution 63:73–83. Pfeiler, E. , S. Castrezana , and L. K. Reed . 2009. Genetic, ecological and morphological differences among populations of the cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis from southwestern USA and northwestern Mexico, with descriptions of two new subspecies. J. Nat. Hist. 43:923–938. Reed, L. K. , and T. A. Markow . 2004. Early events in speciation: polymorphism for hybrid male sterility in Drosophila . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101:9009–9012. Reed, L. K. , M. Nyboer , and T. A. Markow . 2006. Evolutionary relationships of Drosophila mojavensis geographic host races and their sister species Drosophila arizonae . Mol. Ecol. 16:1007–1022. Richmond, J. Q. , E. L. Jockusch , and A. M. Latimer . 2011. Mechanical reproductive isolation facilitates parallel speciation in western North American scincid lizards. Am. Nat. 178:320–332. Ruiz, A. , W. B. Heed , and M. Wasserman . 1990. Evolution of the mojavensis cluster of cactophilic Drosophila with descriptions of two new species. J. Hered. 81:30–42. Tanabe, T. , and T. Sota . 2008. Complex copulatory behavior and the proximate effect of genital and body size differences on mechanical reproductive isolation in the millipede genus Parafontaria . Am. Nat. 171:692–699. Wasserman, M. , and H. R. Koepfer . 1977. Character displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis . Evolution 31:812–823. Zouros, E. , and C. J. Dentremont . 1980. Sexual Isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34:421–430.