It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The plant microbiome has recently emerged as a reservoir for the development of sustainable alternatives to chemical fertilizers and pesticides. However, the response of plants to beneficial microbes emerges as a critical issue to understand the molecular basis of plant-microbiota interactions. In this study, we combined root colonization, phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses to unravel the commonalities and specificities of the response of rice to closely related Burkholderia s.l. endophytes. In general, these results indicate that a rice-non-native Burkholderia s.l. strain, Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN, is able to colonize the root endosphere while eliciting a markedly different response compared to rice-native Burkholderia s.l. strains. This demonstrates the variability of plant response to microbes from different hosts of origin. The most striking finding of the investigation was that a much more conserved response to the three endophytes used in this study is elicited in leaves compared to roots. In addition, transcriptional regulation of genes related to secondary metabolism, immunity, and phytohormones appear to be markers of strain-specific responses. Future studies need to investigate whether these findings can be extrapolated to other plant models and beneficial microbes to further advance the potential of microbiome-based solutions for crop production.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Montpellier, l’Institut Agro, Plant Health Institute of Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.121334.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 0141); Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)–Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentación (INIA/CSIC), Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP), Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain (GRID:grid.5690.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 2978)
2 University of Montpellier, l’Institut Agro, Plant Health Institute of Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.121334.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 0141); University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Induced Resistance and Plant Bioprotection (RIBP) – EA 4707, SFR Condorcet – FR CNRS 3417, Reims, France (GRID:grid.11667.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0618)
3 University of Montpellier, l’Institut Agro, Plant Health Institute of Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.121334.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 0141)
4 Montpellier GenomiX (MGX), c/o Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.509520.b)