It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Oceanic Transform Faults are major plate boundaries representing the most seismogenic part of the mid ocean ridge system. Nonetheless, their structure and deformation mechanisms at depth are largely unknown due to rare exposures of deep sections. Here we study the mineral fabric of deformed mantle peridotites - ultramafic mylonites - collected from the transpressive Atobá ridge, along the northern fault of the St. Paul transform system in the Equatorial Atlantic Ocean. We show that, at pressure and temperature conditions of the lower oceanic lithosphere, the dominant deformation mechanism is fluid-assisted dissolution-precipitation creep. Grain size reduction during deformation is enhanced by dissolution of coarser pyroxene grains in presence of fluid and contextual precipitation of small interstitial ones, leading to strain localization at lower stresses than dislocation creep. This mechanism potentially represents the dominant weakening factor in the oceanic lithosphere and a main driver for the onset and maintenance of oceanic transform faults.
Deformed mantle rocks exhumed by oceanic transform faults recorded fluid-assisted ductile deformation at high temperatures and pressures, corresponding to the root of the fault. This deformation mechanism controls deep faulting at plate boundaries.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Geo-Ocean, Univ Brest, CNRS, IFREMER, UMR6538, Plouzané, France; Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Modena, Italy (GRID:grid.7548.e) (ISNI:0000000121697570)
2 CNRS-CNES-IRD-Université Toulouse III, Observatoire Midi Pyrénées, Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET), Toulouse, France (GRID:grid.440476.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0730 0223)
3 Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Modena, Italy (GRID:grid.7548.e) (ISNI:0000000121697570); Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria, IGAG-CNR, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.503064.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 9736)
4 Geo-Ocean, Univ Brest, CNRS, IFREMER, UMR6538, Plouzané, France (GRID:grid.503064.4)
5 Rio Grande do Norte Federal University, Department of Geology, Natal, Brazil (GRID:grid.503064.4)
6 Federal Fluminense University, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Niteroi, Brazil (GRID:grid.411173.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2184 6919)