It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Unveiling catalytic mechanisms at a molecular level aids rational catalyst design and selectivity control for process optimization. In this study, we find that the Brønsted acid site density of the zeolite catalyst efficiently controls the guaiacol catalytic pyrolysis mechanism. Guaiacol demethylation to catechol initiates the reaction, as evidenced by the detected methyl radicals. The mechanism branches to form either fulvenone (c-C5H4 = C = O), a reactive ketene intermediate, by catechol dehydration, or phenol by acid-catalyzed dehydroxylation. At high Brønsted acid site density, fulvenone formation is inhibited due to surface coordination configuration of its precursor, catechol. By quantifying reactive intermediates and products utilizing operando photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy, we find evidence that ketene suppression is responsible for the fivefold phenol selectivity increase. Complementary fulvenone reaction pathway calculations, along with 29Si NMR-MAS spectroscopy results corroborate the mechanism. The proposed, flexible operando approach is applicable to a broad variety of heterogeneous catalytic reactions.
Unveiling catalytic mechanisms at a molecular level aids selectivity control of lignin catalytic fast pyrolysis. Here authors show that the suppression of highly reactive ketenes is responsible for the five-fold phenol selectivity increase.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Puente-Urbina, Allen 2
; Batool, Syeda Rabia 3 ; Bodi, Andras 4
; Wu, Xiangkun 4 ; Zhang, Zihao 4 ; van Bokhoven, Jeroen A. 1
; Hemberger, Patrick 4
1 Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5991.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 7501); ETH Zurich, Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
2 ETH Zurich, Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Renewable Resources and Enabling Sciences Center, Golden, USA (GRID:grid.419357.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2199 3636)
3 ETH Zurich, Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
4 Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5991.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 1090 7501)




