It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves functional capacity in heart failure patients, a blunted heart rate (HR) response remains after treatment. So we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the physiological pacing rate (PPR) in CRT patients.
Methods
A cohort of 30 clinical mildly symptomatic CRT patients underwent the six‐minute walk test (6MWT). During the 6MWT, HR, blood pressure, and maximum walking distance were assessed. The measurements were obtained in a pre to post manner, with CRT at nominal settings and with the physiological phase (CRT PPR), in which HR was increased by 10% above the maximum HR achieved previously. The CRT cohort also comprised a matched control group (CRT CG). In the CRT CG, the 6MWT was repeated after the standard evaluation with no PPR. The evaluations were blinded for patients and for the 6MWT evaluator.
Results
During the 6MWT, CRT PPR led to an increase in walking distance of 40.5 m (9.2%; P < 0.0001) when compared with baseline trial. Additionally, CRT PPR increased the maximum walking distance compared with CRT CG 479.3 ± 68.9 m vs. 420.3 ± 44.8 m, respectively, P = 0.001. In the CRT CG, CRT PPR increased the variation in walking distance, compared with baseline trials, respectively 2.40 ± 3.8% vs. 9.25 ± 7.0%, P = 0.007.
Conclusions
In mildly symptomatic CRT patients PPR is feasible, leading to improvements in functional capacity. In this regard, the efficacy of PPR must be confirmed by controlled randomized trials.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Siqueira, Sergio F. 1 ; Oliveira, Camila Parente 1 ; Guiarão Gomes, Cinthya I. 1 ; Alves, Maria Janieire de N. N. 1 ; Filho, Martino Martinelli 1 1 Department of Artificial Cardiac Pacemaker Stimulation and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil





