Abstract
Memorization and generalization are complementary cognitive processes that jointly promote adaptive behavior. For example, animals should memorize safe routes to specific water sources and generalize from these memories to discover environmental features that predict new ones. These functions depend on systems consolidation mechanisms that construct neocortical memory traces from hippocampal precursors, but why systems consolidation only applies to a subset of hippocampal memories is unclear. Here we introduce a new neural network formalization of systems consolidation that reveals an overlooked tension—unregulated neocortical memory transfer can cause overfitting and harm generalization in an unpredictable world. We resolve this tension by postulating that memories only consolidate when it aids generalization. This framework accounts for partial hippocampal–cortical memory transfer and provides a normative principle for reconceptualizing numerous observations in the field. Generalization-optimized systems consolidation thus provides new insight into how adaptive behavior benefits from complementary learning systems specialized for memorization and generalization.
The authors derive a neural network theory of systems consolidation to assess why some memories consolidate more than others. They propose that brains regulate consolidation to optimize generalization, so only predictable memory components consolidate.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA (GRID:grid.443970.d)
2 Harvard University, Center for Brain Science, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
3 Harvard University, Center for Brain Science, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X); University of Oxford, Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit & Sainsbury Wellcome Centre, UCL, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars Program, CIFAR, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.440050.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0408 2525)