Abstract
Background
Endometrial hyperplasia is one of the common causes of bleeding in perimenopausal women. Variable treatment options aim to induce regression. The current study evaluated the regression rate of endometrial hyperplasia after treatment with levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG- IUS) versus Metformin.
Methods
This randomized clinical trial was conducted at the obstetrics and gynecology department of Suez Canal University hospital. We recruited women diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Patients were allocated into two groups. Group one included patients treated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and group two treated with Metformin. The rate of regression of hyperplasia in both groups after six months of intervention was the main outcome measure.
Results
Significant regression of hyperplasia was noted in the LNG-IUS group (96% versus 64%, p-value 0.009). There was a significant decrease in the endometrial thickness after treatment in both groups (17.65 ± 4.62 and 5.3 ± 2.01 in the LNG- IUS with a p-value < 0.001) (19.57 ± 6.84 and 11.22 ± 7.51 in the metformin group with a p-value < 0.001). Factors that correlated with the Δ endometrial thickness included parity in the LNG- IUS group (p-value 0.019) and age and BMI in the metformin group (p-value 0.043 and 0.004 respectively).
Conclusion
Metformin had a regressive effect on endometrial hyperplasia; however, it was not significant as that achieved with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system.
Trial registrations
PACTR201908498370196.
Date of registration: 21/8/2019.
Date of first patient enrollment: 25/8/2019.
URL: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/Researcher/TrialRegister.aspx?TrialID=9335
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Abd-Elgelil, Mohammed M. 1 ; Kishk, Eman A. 2 ; Shaaban, Mohammed 1 ; Khamees, Rasha E. 1 1 Suez Canal University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ismailia, Egypt (GRID:grid.33003.33) (ISNI:0000 0000 9889 5690)
2 Suez Canal University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ismailia, Egypt (GRID:grid.33003.33) (ISNI:0000 0000 9889 5690); Al- Baha University, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.448646.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 9046)





