It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Climate change is gaining importance on the agenda of senior decision makers in the private sector. Hence, corporate renewable electricity (RE) procurement may become more relevant to the energy transition. RE100 is the largest corporate initiative to foster RE procurement with 315 corporate members as of 2021. Yet, the contribution of such initiatives to the energy transition remains unclear, because public reporting is aggregated on the global level. Here, we develop an approach to map the electricity procured by RE100 companies to jurisdictions worldwide, which allows estimating whether and where RE100 can have a transformative impact. We find that these companies source electricity in 129 jurisdictions, accounting for <1% of total electricity generation (RE and non-RE), thus dampening the hopes about the impact of RE100 on the global energy transition. RE100 companies procure 1.4% of available RE, exceeding 20% in nine jurisdictions. To increase its impact, RE100 should focus on interim targets and expansion. By 2030, stringent and frequent interim targets could lead to a cumulated additional 361 TWh of RE procured by RE100 companies, and a realistic membership expansion could lead to procurement of 7.7% of globally available RE by RE100 companies.
Corporate procurement initiatives, such as RE100, can increase their impact on the energy transition by formulating ambitious interim targets and sourcing requirements, and by orchestrating corporate interests in countries with less ambitious renewable energy targets.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Energy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, UCL, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
2 Energy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
3 Energy and Technology Policy Group, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); Institute for Science, Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
4 Institute for Science, Technology and Policy, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780); Climate Finance Policy Group, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)




