Abstract

While numerous studies report shifts in vegetation phenology, in this regard eddy covariance (EC) data, despite its continuous high-frequency observations, still requires further exploration. Furthermore, there is no general consensus on optimal methodologies for data smoothing and extracting phenological transition dates (PTDs). Here, we revisit existing methodologies and present new prospects to investigate phenological changes in gross primary productivity (GPP) from EC measurements. First, we present a smoothing technique of GPP time series through the derivative of its smoothed annual cumulative sum. Second, we calculate PTDs and their trends from a commonly used threshold method that identifies days with a fixed percentage of the annual maximum GPP. A systematic analysis is performed for various thresholds ranging from 0.1 to 0.7. Lastly, we examine the relation of PTDs trends to trends in GPP across the years on a weekly basis. Results from 47 EC sites with long time series (> 10 years) show that advancing trends in start of season (SOS) are strongest at lower thresholds but for the end of season (EOS) at higher thresholds. Moreover, the trends are variable at different thresholds for individual vegetation types and individual sites, outlining reasonable concerns on using a single threshold value. Relationship of trends in PTDs and weekly GPP reveal association of advanced SOS and delayed EOS to increase in immediate primary productivity, but not to the trends in overall seasonal productivity. Drawing on these analyses, we emphasise on abstaining from subjective choices and investigating relationship of PTDs trend to finer temporal trends of GPP. Our study examines existing methodological challenges and presents approaches that optimize the use of EC data in identifying vegetation phenological changes and their relation to carbon uptake.

Details

Title
Methodological challenges and new perspectives of shifting vegetation phenology in eddy covariance data
Author
Panwar, Annu 1 ; Migliavacca, Mirco 2 ; Nelson, Jacob A. 1 ; Cortés, José 1 ; Bastos, Ana 1 ; Forkel, Matthias 3 ; Winkler, Alexander J. 1 

 Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Jena, Germany (GRID:grid.419500.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0491 7318) 
 European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Lombardia, Italy (GRID:grid.434554.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1758 4137) 
 TUD Dresden University of Technology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.4488.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2111 7257) 
Pages
13885
Publication year
2023
Publication date
2023
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2856663184
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.