It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mutualism is commonly observed in nature but not often reported for bacterial communities. Although abiotic stress is thought to promote microbial mutualism, there is a paucity of research in this area. Here, we monitor microbial communities in a quasi-natural composting system, where temperature variation (20 °C–70 °C) is the main abiotic stress. Genomic analyses and culturing experiments provide evidence that temperature selects for slow-growing and stress-tolerant strains (i.e., Thermobifida fusca and Saccharomonospora viridis), and mutualistic interactions emerge between them and the remaining strains through the sharing of cobalamin. Comparison of 3000 bacterial pairings reveals that mutualism is common (~39.1%) and competition is rare (~13.9%) in pairs involving T. fusca and S. viridis. Overall, our work provides insights into how high temperature can favour mutualism and reduce competition at both the community and species levels.
Abiotic stress is thought to promote microbial mutualism, although there is a paucity of research in this area. Here, Zhao et al. study microbial communities in a quasi-natural composting system, where temperature variation (20°C−70°C) is the main abiotic stress, showing how high temperature favours mutualism and reduces competition at both the community and species levels.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Zhejiang University, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X)
2 Hangzhou Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34)
3 Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Key Laboratory for Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco‐Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309); University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, College of Resources and Environment, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410726.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1797 8419)
4 Zhejiang University, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X); Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory for Water Pollution Control and Environmental Safety, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X); Zhejiang University, Key Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Resource Sciences, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X)