1. Introduction
A disability is defined as a condition or function judged to be significantly impaired relative to the usual standard of an individual or group. The term is used to refer to individual functioning, including physical impairment, sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, intellectual impairment mental illness, and various types of chronic disease [1]. According to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) report, Over 1 billion people in the world live with some form of disability [2]. Women account for the majority of the disabled population in the world; globally, one in five women lives with a disability compared to one in eight men. In low and middle-income countries, women are estimated to comprise up to three-quarters of persons with disabilities [3].
Family planning is "the ability of individuals and couples to anticipate and attain their desired number of children and the spacing and timing of their births [4]. It is the information, means, and methods that allow individuals to decide if and when to have children [5]. Access to safe, voluntary family planning is a human right and is critical in ensuring gender equality and women’s empowerment, and it is a key factor in reducing poverty and improving livelihoods [5–7]. Persons with disabilities have a right to make their own choices about their bodies, health, and lives, especially regarding their sexual and reproductive health and rights and freedom from discrimination and violence [8]. They have the same sexual and reproductive health needs and rights as people without disabilities, but often they are not given information about reproductive and sexual health or adequate care [9,10].
Studies indicate that disabled women were at higher risk of experiencing sexual violence than nondisabled women [11–13], and experience more challenges than women without disabilities in having their reproductive health needs met. Women with Disabilities (WWDs) face multiple barriers to quality contraceptive care [14], whether through stigma, increased risk of violence or abuse, lack of access to care [15], prejudices, and discrimination from healthcare service providers [14,16]and receive poor quality services [2,17].
So there is an urgent need to scale up disability inclusion in all levels of the health system, particularly primary health care [2] like family planning [15]. According to a review conducted in Low-and Middle-Income countries, contraception use among WWDs ranged from 13% to 31.1%, with 24.3 percent of unmet needs [18]. This study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence and associated factors for FP service utilization among WWDs in Ethiopia.
2. Methods and materials
2.1.Study design and search strategy
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the pooled prevalence of family planning utilization and associated factors among women with disabilities in Ethiopia using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines [19,20]. We searched the PROSPERO database to see whether there were any comparable on-going systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Three authors searched the following databases for relevant studies: From Pub Med/MEDLINE (681), Google Scholar (426), African Journal of Online (AJOL) (36), CINAHL (211),HINARI (191),Scopus (86), Science Direct (62),Excerpta Medica database (EMBA, SE) (113), DOAJ (38),Web of Science (26),Google (271), and other organization’s websites (2) by using the full title (Utilization of family planning and associated factors among women with disability in Ethiopia) and using the following searching keywords or terms; ’’Family planning utilization’’, ’’use of family planning methods, ’’utilization of family planning services’’, ’’State of family planning’’, ’’Family Planning Service Utilization’’, ’’practice of family planning’’, ’’Providing family planning services’’, ’’Contraceptive utilization’’, ’’Influencing Factors’’, ’’associated factors’’, ’’ factors influencing’’, ’’Disabled women, ’’disables’’, ’’Women with disability’’, ’’disability’’, ’’disabilities’’ and, ’’Ethiopia" In order to find any further missed studies, the reference lists of all included published and unpublished studies were reviewed. All fields and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms with Boolean operators ("OR" and/or "AND") were used to search studies in the advanced PubMed search engine (S1 File).
2.2.Eligibility criteria
Both published and unpublished observational studies in English that report the prevalence and/or associated factors of family planning utilization among disabled women in Ethiopia were included [21–27]. This review also included studies done up until November 15, 2022. Studies with a different operational definition or outcome of interest, as well as those whose full texts were unavailable, were excluded [28–32].
2.3.Outcome measurement, study selection, and quality assessment
Family planning utilization was considered when the women with disability had ever used any modern method of contraceptive during her sexual life and/or she is current user [23,26,27]. After studies were searched from different international databases and organization websites, studies were screened by using the following criteria (duplication, relevancy, accessibility of full text, and outcomes of interest). Finally, the quality of each study was assessed using the standard quality assessment tool [Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)] [33] and was assessed by five authors (TL, BTT, TM, MSC, and MA) independently using the following components: selection, comparability, and outcome; which were graded by five stars, two stars, and three stars respectively. Any disagreements between the five authors during quality appraisal were resolved by another author (MS) through discussion and re-evaluation of selected studies. For analysis, only the primary studies with a medium score (fulfilling 50% of the quality evaluation criteria) and above were included [34] (S2 File).
Operational definition.
Women with disability: - women having hearing, visual and physical impairments or limb defects [23,27].
Family planning utilization: - The women with disability had ever used any modern method of contraceptive during her sexual life and or she is current user [23,26,27].
Total fertility rate (TFR): - is the measure of children a women would have over her life time if she were to follow current age-specific fertility rates [26].
Data extraction process.
Three independent authors (TL, MS, and BTT) extracted the data using a data extraction format prepared in a Microsoft Excel 2010 spreadsheet. The following information was extracted: the first author’s name, the year of study, the study area, the Region, the study design, the sample size, the sampling method, the prevalence of family planning, and the associated factors with their odds ratios. Differences during data extraction were resolved through discussion and consensus by involving the fourth author (TM).
Data synthesis and statistical analysis.
For analysis, STATA Version 11 software was used. Because high heterogeneity across studies was identified using inverse variance (I2) statistics with its corresponding p-value (I2 = 94.6%, p < 0.001) [35–37], a random effects model was applied to determine the pooled prevalence of family planning utilization. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were also used to identify the source of heterogeneity across studies by using year of study, and region. To check for publication bias, a funnel plot and Egger’s test were used [38]. The statistical significance of publication bias was determined using a p-value less than 0.05 [39]. Texts, tables, and forest plots with effect and 95% CI measures were used to present the results.
3. Result
3.1.Study selection
Using various search strategies, a total of 2080 studies were retrieved from various international databases and Ethiopian university institutional repositories. All retrieved studies were screened using the Endnote 7 reference manager, and 1421 were removed due to duplication. Then, 652 studies were eliminated due to unrelated titles, abstracts, inaccessibility of full text, and differences in outcomes of interest. Finally, for the meta-analysis, seven studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered (Fig 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
3.2.Characteristics of included studies
This systematic review and meta-analysis included seven primary studies. All of the studies included were cross-sectional, with sample sizes ranging from 162–701 [25,26]. Regarding the study’s region, three articles were from the Amhara region [22,23,26], two from Addis Ababa [24,25], one from SNNP [21] and one from the Tigray [27] region with years of study ranging from 2013 to 2020. The highest prevalence of family planning utilization was reported by Abera S. (44.4%) [25], which was done in the Addis Ababa, while the lowest utilization was reported in the Amhara region by Beyene GA, et al. (15.8%) (23) (Table 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
3.3.Prevalence of family planning utilization among women with disability
A total of 7 (five published and two unpublished) studies with 2787 women were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of family planning utilization among women with disabilities in Ethiopia. Accordingly, the overall estimated pooled prevalence of family planning utilization among women with disabilities with a random effects model was 29.57% (95% CI: 22.30, 36.83) with a heterogeneity index (I2) of 94.6% (p = 0.000) (Fig 2).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
3.4.Publication bias and Heterogeneity
To check for publication bias, a funnel plot and Egger’s test [37] were used. The statistical significance of publication bias was determined using a p-value less than 0.05 [38]. Accordingly, the funnel plot results revealed a symmetrical pattern, indicating that the included studies do not have a publishing bias (Fig 3). Furthermore, Egger’s regression test is not significant, indicating that there was no publication bias in the studies (Table 2).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
3.5.Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis
Significant heterogeneity was observed among included primary studies. To identify the source of heterogeneity, sub-group analysis was performed based on the region and year of study. As a result, the overall prevalence of family planning utilization was found to be high in Addis Ababa region studies [32.61, (26.39, 38.82)] (Fig 4A) and studies conducted after 2015 [32.61, (26.39, 38.82)] (Fig 4B).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
A. Subgroup analysis based on the region among women with disability in Ethiopia. B. Subgroup analysis based on year of study among women with disability in Ethiopia.
A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was done to check the effect of individual studies on the pooled estimate of family planning utilization. The result indicated removing a single study did not have a significant influence on pooled prevalence and the pooled prevalence of family planning utilization was observed low at 25.63% (3.93, 167.08%) and high at 31.78% (5.22, 193.66%) when Abera S. and Beyene GA, et al. were omitted respectively (Table 3).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
3.6.Factors associated with family planning utilization among women with disability
Nine variables (age, marital status, discussion with partner, kowledge on FP methods, presence of FP providing nearby health facility, women’s educational status, economic status, decision maker to use FP methods, and health facility keep the confidentiality & privacy) were extracted to identify factors associated with family planning utilization among women with disability. Of this marital status, discussion with a partner marital status, kowledge on FP methods, presence of FP providing nearby health facility, economic status, decision maker to use FP methods, and health facility keep the confidentiality & privacy were found to be significantly associated with family planning utilization among WWDs (Table 4). However, there was no statistically significant association between women’s age, educational status and FP utilization.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
The pooled effect of the marital status on FP utilization among women with disabilities was evaluated by using three primary studies (21,24,27) The result of this study revealed that marital status was significantly associated with FP utilization and the likelihood of utilizing FP was 8.6 times higher among those women who had in marital union than their counterparts [OR: 8.63; 95% CI (3.17, 23.46); P<0.001], with heterogeneity (I2 = 91.5%, p-value <0.001) (Fig 5).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
To determine the pooled effects of women’s discussions with their partners on FP utilization, two studies were included [25,26]. The findings revealed that women’s discussion with their partners was significantly associated with the use of FP; those who discussed with their partner were 6 times more likely to use FP than those who did not [OR: 6.08; 95% CI (1.64, 22.53); P = 0.007] with heterogeneity (I2 = 84.2%, p-value = 0.012) (Fig 6).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
A total of two primary studies [21,22] were included to assess the association between knowledge on FP and utilization of FP among women with disabilities. Accordingly, women who had good knowledge were 1. 77 times more likely to utilize FP than those who had poor kowledge [OR = 1. 77, 95% CI = (1.22, 2.56); P = 0.003] with a mild type of heterogeneity between two variables (I 2 = 0.0%, p value = 0.383) (Fig 7).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
The finding of this study revealed that the economic status were significantly associated with FP utilization among women with disabilities [23] and the likelihood of utilizing FP service were 6.66 times higher in those mothers who had rich economic status [OR = 6.66, 95% (CI = 2.94,15.05); P <0.001] with heterogeneity index of (I 2 = 0.0%).This finding also revealed that decision maker to use family planning was significantly associated with the use of FP [26]; Disabled women whose decision to use family planning was made by their husband were 92% less likely to utilize family planning methods than women who made decisions by themselves [OR: 0.08; 95% CI (0.03, 0.21) P<0.001] with heterogeneity index (I2 = 0%) (Table 4).
Furthermore, the pooled effects of participants who trusted health workers as capable to keep their privacy were significantly associated with the utilization of family planning [27]. Accordingly, participants who trusted health workers as capable to keep their privacy was 5.14 (3.13–8.43) times more likely to utilize family planning methods [OR = 3.73; 95% CI (3.13, 8.43) P<0.001] with heterogeneity index of 100% (Table 4).
4. Discussion
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pooled prevalence and associated factors of FP utilization among Ethiopian women with disabilities. To the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the first of its kind in determining the national prevalence and significant factors of FP utilization among WWDs in Ethiopia, which will be used as input for policymakers, health care providers, and other stakeholders in developing evidence-based strategies to improve FP utilization among WWDs.
The overall pooled prevalence of family planning utilization among women with disabilities in Ethiopia was 29.57% (95% CI: 22.30, 36.83), which is lower than the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) report 2019 [40]. This could be because the EDHS reports family planning utilization among all women, but this review was limited to WWDs. Also, it is lower than a review conducted in Ethiopia [41,42]. The difference might be due to the difference in the study period of primary studies and the study population, since the two studies are conducted among adolescents and postpartum women who are more information about sexual and reproductive health from different sources.
However the result of this review was higher than the minimum rate of family planning utilization among WWDs, according to a review conducted by Horner-Johnson [43] and Beyene GA [18]. The result of this study could be a pooled estimate of different studies, whereas Horner-Johnson and Beyene GA report the minimum and maximum range of family planning utilisation among WWDs by reviewing literature from different settings, and the comparison in this study was based on the minimum rage from the report. In addition, it was higher than a review conducted by Y.F. Geda and T.M. Berhe [44]. The difference could be due to differences in study participants and contraceptive type, as this study was conducted among WWDs for the use of all types of contraceptives, whereas a study by Y.F. Geda and T.M. Berhe was conducted among postpartum women for the use of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD).
Based on the subgroup analysis result, the prevalence of family planning utilization was found to be high in Addis Ababa region studies [32.61, (26.39, 38.82)]. This could be attributed to the city’s urbanization and women’s increased awareness. Because Addis Ababa is the country’s capital, disabled women may have more access to information on family planning. In Addis Ababa, there is also the Ethiopian Women with Disability Association, where many women participate and discuss their health, including family planning.
In addition, this review revealed that there is a high prevalence of family planning utilization among studies conducted after 2015 [32.61, (26.39, 38.82)]. The reason could be that after the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) were completed in 2015; The Ethiopian government developed a new plan called the Costed Implementation Plan for Family Planning, which includes various strategies to increase the contraceptive prevalence rate and decrease total fertility rate by 2020, that may encourage more women to use contraception [45]. Furthermore, various information distribution technologies such as social media are increasingly being used to disseminate information regarding family planning options. This may make it easier for women to learn about the advantages of family planning, where to get it, and how to use it.
In this review, the odds of utilizing FP were 8.6 times higher among women who had been in a marital union than their counterparts. This is in line with a review conducted in sub-Saharan Africa [46], Ethiopia [47] and a report from USAID [48]. This is because family planning can increase partners’ involvement in decisions about whether and when to have children while also assisting them in avoiding unintended pregnancy. It also provides her with enough time and opportunity to love and care for her husband and children. As a result, partner involvement in family planning decisions is critical, and a married woman may be encouraged to use contraception by her partner.
The findings of this study also revealed that women who discussed with their partner were 6 times more likely to use FP than those who did not. This is consistent with the review conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa [46,49]. This may be due to the fact that couples who talk about FP issues are more likely to jointly decide on the type of contraceptive method to use, the number of children to have, and the spacing between the children. As a result, they are more likely to use the service. Also Male participation in contraceptive use increases women’s uptake, according to a report from a review protocol by Anbesu and his colleagues [50]. In addition male involvement plays a role in the use of reproductive and maternal health services, and any factor that influences the partner’s attitude towards these services will have an effect on women’s use, either positively or negatively. So talking with a partner may give them the impression that she values their influence in her life, giving the woman more freedom to make decisions.
This study found that disabled women who had good knowledge were significantly associated with utilization of family planning. This finding was supported by a review finding from Ethiopia [42,44] and around the globe [49]. This might be attributed to an in-depth knowledge of family planning methods, which can improve women’s understanding and awareness of the importance and side effects of various contraceptive methods, allowing them to make an informed decision on the method to be used and, as a result, increase their usage of this service.
In this meta-analysis, economic status of the women was positively associated with FP utilization. Women who had rich economic status were more likely to utilize FP compared to their counterparts. This is consistent with a studies conducted by Mekonnen AG et.al [42]. This could be because women with higher economic status are more likely to be exposed to information on family planning due to their health seeking behavior for various reasons and their use of various information-gathering mass media such as the internet. The information may have influenced their use by helping them comprehend the purpose and importance of family planning methods.
In addition these reviews showed that a woman’s whose decision to use family planning was made by their husband were less likely to utilize family planning methods than women who made decisions by themselves. This finding was consistent with a study finding from different settings [51,52]. This might be due to the fact that decision-making autonomy on contraceptive use influences their utilization. Women’s independent decisions on reproductive health issues like FP are crucial and increase women’s access to health information and utilization. So less autonomy in the decision regarding contraceptive use due to male dominance at the household level may affect their utilization.
Accordingly, this review revealed that participants who trusted health workers as capable to keep their privacy was more likely to utilize family planning which is supported by a review conducted by Brittain et al. [53]. A possible explanation is that maintaining confidentiality and ensuring privacy are crucial for effective, sensitive management of potentially stigmatizing health conditions and improved quality care, including getting sexual and reproductive health services [54,55] So, if the woman believes the health care practitioner will respect her privacy and confidentiality, she is more likely to use the service.
There are limitations to this study. The absence of studies from some Ethiopian regions in this study makes it challenging to extrapolate the results to the national level. Second, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the significant heterogeneity among the studies. Moreover, only observational study articles published in English were considered. Finally, we found it challenging to compare our results because there were few systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted at the national, regional, and international levels.
5. Conclusion
According to the findings of this study, only one-third of disabled women in Ethiopia utilize family planning. Being married and discussing with a partner were significantly associated with family planning utilization among WWDs. Therefore, the discussions with the partner and their engagement in decisions to use family planning are critical to increase its use. It also important to increase access to quality contraceptive care and improve negative clinician attitudes and awareness of disabled women to increase utilization. In addition, it is critical to pay more attention to the reproductive health care needs of women with disabilities to improve health care equity.
Supporting information
S1 Checklist. PRISMA 2009 checklist.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291189.s001
(DOCX)
S1 File. Advanced PubMed search engine.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291189.s002
(TXT)
S2 File. Quality assessment of primary studies.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291189.s003
(PDF)
Citation: Demisse TL, Silesh M, Taye BT, Moltot T, Chekole MS, Ayalew M (2023) Utilization of family planning and associated factors among women with disabilities in ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 18(9): e0291189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291189
About the Authors:
Tesfanesh Lemma Demisse
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: Department of Midwifery, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3038-5821
Mulualem Silesh
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Midwifery, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-041X
Birhan Tsegaw Taye
Roles: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Midwifery, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-3797
Tebabere Moltot
Roles: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Midwifery, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
Moges Sisay Chekole
Roles: Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Midwifery, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-119X
Maritu Ayalew
Roles: Data curation, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Midwifery, Teda Health Science College, Gondar, Ethiopia
1. Disabled World. Disabilities: Definition, Types and Models of Disability—Disabled World [Internet]. 2019. p. 1–3. Available from: https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/types/.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Disability and health [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health.
3. UN WOMEN. MAKING THE SDGS COUNT FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS WITH. 2017.
4. Qaisar M. History of Family Planning and Role of ICFP 2022 _ ICFP. In: interational confrence on family planning. 2022.
5. UNFPA. Family planning. Vol. 55, Indian medical journal. 2021. p. 259–60.
6. World Health Organization (WHO). Family Planning / Contraception Methods Key facts [Internet]. Who.Int. 2020. p. 1–5. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception.
7. United Nations. World Contraception Day 2022: Access to safe and effective family planning methods key to gender equality and improved livelihoods _ United Nations in Timor-Leste. 2022.
8. UNFPA. Women and young people with disabilities_ A needs assessment of sexual and reproductive health and rights, gender-based violence, and access to essential services—Samoa—Samoa _ Relie. 2022.
9. World Health Organization, Johns Hopkins USA for ID. Family Planning A GLOBAL HANDBOOK FOR PROVIDERS? 2018. 327–328 p.
10. WHO, UNFPA. Promoting sexual and reproductive health for persons with disabilities. 2009.
11. Ledingham E, Wright GW, Mitra M. Sexual Violence Against Women With Disabilities: Experiences With Force and Lifetime Risk. Am J Prev Med [Internet]. 2022;62(6):895–902. Available from: pmid:35184946
12. Beaudrap P De, Mouté C, Pasquier E, Tchoumkeu A, Temgoua CD, Zerbo , et al. Burden of and risk factors for sexual violence among women with and without disabilities in two sub-Saharan African countries. Glob Health Action [Internet]. 2022;15(1). Available from: pmid:35775278
13. Report W. Fact Sheet: Violence against Women and Girls with Disabilities. 2013;(February).
14. Horner-johnson W, Klein KA, Campbell J, Guise J. Experiences of Women With Disabilities in Accessing and Receiving Contraceptive Care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs [Internet]. 2021;50(6):732–41. Available from: pmid:34389287
15. MacQuarrie KLD, Julia Fleuret. Patterns of Reproductive Health among Women with Disabilities. In: DHS ANALYTICAL STUDIES. 2022. p. 80.
16. Tesfaye T, Markos EW, Chea N, Wachamo D. Accessing Healthcare Services for People with Physical Disabilities in Hawassa City Administration, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:3993–4002. pmid:34602827
17. Soule O, Sonko D. Examining access to sexual and reproductive health services and information for young women with disabilities in Senegal: a qualitative study Examining access to sexual and reproductive health services and qualitative study. 2022.
18. Beyene GA. Contraceptive Dynamics Among Women with Disabilities in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review Protocol Registration: 2021;1–12.
19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ [Internet]. 2009;339(7716):332–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535.
20. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Vol. 62, Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2009. 1–34 p.
21. Mesfin Yesgat Y, Gebremeskel F, Estifanous W, Gizachew Y, Jemal S, Atnafu N, et al. Utilization of Family Planning Methods and Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women with Disability in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia. Open Access J Contracept. 2020;Volume 11:25–32. pmid:32308510
22. Mekonnen AG, Bayleyegn AD, Aynalem YA, Adane TD, Muluneh MA, Asefa M. Level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of family planning and associated factors among disabled persons, north-shewa zone, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia. Contracept Reprod Med. 2020;5(1):1–7. pmid:32626598
23. Beyene GA, Munea AM, Fekadu GA. Modern contraceptive use and associated factors among women with disabilities in gondar city, amhara region, north west ethiopia: A cross sectional study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2019;23(2):101–9. pmid:31433598
24. Yimer AS, Modiba LM. Modern contraceptive methods knowledge and practice among blind and deaf women in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional survey. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):1–13.
25. Abera S. The Assessment of Determinants of family planning use and unmet need among women of reproductive age group with disabilities in Addis Ababa. 2016;(November).
26. Amsaya T. Modern Contraceptive Utilization and Associated Factors Among Disabled and Non Disabled Reproductive Age Group Women in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia. 2021.
27. Kellali T, Hadush G FH. Modern Contraceptive Methods Utilization and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities. Int J Pharm Biol Sci Fundam [Internet]. 2017;13(01)(01):1–8. Available from: www.ijpbsf.com.
28. Mesfin Y. Disparities in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Utilization and Associated Factors among Adolescents with and without Disability in Southern Ethiopia. Sci World J. 2021;2021.
29. Mesfin Y. Unmet Need for Family Planning and Yibeltal Mesfin * Union Reproductive-Age Women with Disability in Southern Ethiopia: Cross Sectional Study Abstract List of abbreviations: Study design and setting Socio-demographic characteristics of the. Heal Sci J. 2021;15(1):1–4.
30. Tessema AL, Bishaw MA, Bunare TS. Assessment of the Magnitude and Associated Factors of Unmet Need for Family Planning among Women of Reproductive Age Group with Disabilities in Bahir Dar City, Amhara Region, North West Ethiopia. Open J Epidemiol. 2015;05(01):51–8.
31. Diribsa T, Wakjira D, Atomsa G, Mekoya T, Mamo F, Fekecha B, et al. Determinant Factors of Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Utilization among In-School Adolescents with Disability in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Int J Reprod Med. 2022;2022:1–9. pmid:36035448
32. Engdaw A. Modern Contraceptive Utilization and Its Associated Factors Among Women Beggars in Bahir Dar Town, North West Ethiopia. Am J Heal Res. 2020;8(4):49.
33. Modesti PA, Reboldi G, Cappuccio FP, Agyemang C, Remuzzi G, Rapi S, et al. Cross Sectional Study Newcastle—Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016;11(1):1–2. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?type=supplementary&id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0147601.s001.
34. Kassa BG, Ayele AD, Belay HG, Tefera AG, Tiruneh GA, Ayenew NT, et al. Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use and its associated factors in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):1–12.
35. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J. 2003;327(7414):557–60. pmid:12958120
36. Borenstein M, Hedges L V., Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):97–111. pmid:26061376
37. DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):105–14. pmid:16807131
38. Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis. Am Med Assoc. 2006;295(6):1–7.
39. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088. pmid:7786990
40. Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) [Ethiopia], ICF. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019: Key indicators. 2019.
41. Wake GE, Fitie GW, Tizazu MA. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Post-Abortion Contraceptive Utilization and Associated Factors in Ethiopia. Front Public Heal. 2022;10(May). pmid:35669760
42. Mekonnen AG, Odo DB, Nigatu D. Review Article Adolescents ‘ Contraceptive Uptake in Ethiopia: A Meta-Analysis. 2022;2022.
43. Horner-Johnson W, Moe EL, Stoner RC, Klein KA, Edelman AB, Eden KB, et al. Contraceptive knowledge and use among women with intellectual, physical, or sensory disabilities: A systematic review. Disabil Health J [Internet]. 2019;12(2):139–54. Available from: pmid:30473221
44. Geda YF, Berhe TM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of immediate postpartal intrauterine contraceptive device use in Ethiopia. Heliyon [Internet]. 2022;8(11):e11657. Available from: pmid:36406695
45. Federal Ministry of Health. Costed Implementation Plan for Family Planning in Ethiopia, 2015/16–2020, January 2016 https://fp2030.org/sites/default/files/Ethiopia_CIP_Nov2016-with-signature.pdf. 2020;(January 2016).
46. Blackstone SR, Nwaozuru U, Iwelunmor J. Factors Influencing Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. 2017; pmid:28056643
47. Jima GH, Kaso MK, Biesma-Blanco RG, Sendekie TY, Stekelenburg J. Factors associated with modern contraceptives uptake during the first year after birth in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(2 February). pmid:36749759
48. USAID. CONTRACEPTIVE USE, AND UNMET DHS COMPARATIVE. 2017;(July).
49. Souza PD, Bailey J V, Stephenson J, Oliver S, Souza PD, Bailey J V, et al. Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally: a synthesis of systematic reviews. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care [Internet]. 2022;27(5):364–72. Available from: pmid:36047713
50. Anbesu EW, Aychiluhm SB, Kahsay ZH. Male involvement in family planning use and its determinants in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev. 2022;11(1):1–5.
51. Mare KU, Aychiluhm SB, Tadesse AW, Abdu M. Married women’s decision-making autonomy on contraceptive use and its associated factors in Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis of 2016 demographic and health survey. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10.
52. Adde KS, Ameyaw EK, Mottey BE, Akpeke M, Amoah RM, Sulemana N, et al. Health decision-making capacity and modern contraceptive utilization among sexually active women: Evidence from the 2014–2015 Chad Demographic and Health Survey. Contracept Reprod Med. 2022;7(1):1–9.
53. Brittain AW, Williams JR, Zapata LB, Moskosky SB, Weik TS. Confidentiality in Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(2):S85–92. pmid:26190851
54. Corley AG, Sprockett A, Montagu D, Chakraborty NM. Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11). pmid:35682160
55. Agostino H, Toulany A. Considerations for privacy and confidentiality in adolescent health care service delivery. Paediatr Child Health. 2023;28(3):172–7. pmid:37205141
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023 Demisse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
Persons with disabilities have a right to make their own choices about their bodies, health, and lives, especially regarding their sexual and reproductive health. But they may experience more challenges than women without disabilities in having their reproductive health needs met. So there is an urgent need to scale up disability inclusion in all levels of the health system including family planning. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the pooled prevalence of Family Planning Utilization and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Ethiopia.
Methodology
Studies were gathered from Pub Med/MEDLINE (681), Google Scholar (426), African Journal of Online (AJOL) (36), CINAHL (211), HINARI (191), Scopus (86), Science Direct (62), Excerpta Medica database (EMBA, SE) (113), DOAJ (38), Web of Science (26), Google (271), and other organization’s websites (2) using a combination of search terms and Boolean operators. The modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cross-sectional research was used by three authors to independently assess the quality of each study. For statistical analysis, STATATM Version 11 software was employed. For the meta-analysis, the random-effects (Der Simonian and Laird) technique was applied. The heterogeneity test was performed using I-squared (I2) statistics. A one-out sensitivity analysis was performed.
Result
A total of 7 articles with 2787 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of family planning utilization among Women with Disabilities was 29.6% (95% CI: 22.3, 36.8); I2 = 94.6%). Women who were in marital union (p<0.001) and who had a discussion with their husbands (p = 0.007) were factors significantly associated with the utilization of family planning among women with disabilities.
Conclusion
The finding of this study showed that utilization of family planning among women with disability is relatively lower than the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey 2019. Therefore, the discussions with the partner and their engagement in decisions to use family planning are critical to increase its use.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Silesh, Mulualem
; Taye, Birhan Tsegaw
; Moltot, Tebabere; Chekole, Moges Sisay
; Maritu Ayalew