It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Which facets of human spatial navigation do sex and menstrual cycle influence? To answer this question, a cross-sectional online study of reproductive age women and men was conducted in which participants were asked to demonstrate and self-report their spatial navigation skills and strategies. Participants self-reported their sex and current menstrual phase [early follicular (EF), late follicular/periovulatory (PO), and mid/late luteal (ML)], and completed a series of questionnaires and tasks measuring self-reported navigation strategy use, topographical memory, cognitive map formation, face recognition, and path integration. We found that sex influenced self-reported use of cognitive map- and scene-based strategies, face recognition, and path integration. Menstrual phase moderated the influence of sex: compared to men, women had better face recognition and worse path integration, but only during the PO phase; PO women were also better at path integration in the presence of a landmark compared to EF + ML women and men. These findings provide evidence that human spatial navigation varies with the menstrual cycle and suggest that sensitivity of the entorhinal cortex and longitudinal axis of the hippocampus to differential hormonal effects may account for this variation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Toronto, Psychology, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)
2 University of Calgary, Department of Psychology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, and Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Canada (GRID:grid.22072.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7697)
3 University of Toronto, Psychology, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938); Baycrest Health Sciences, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy of Research and Education, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938); Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (GRID:grid.5640.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2162 9922)
4 University of Toronto, Psychology, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938); Baycrest Health Sciences, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy of Research and Education, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)