It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Introduction
Immunization is the most effective strategy for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB); however, parents need to weigh the risk–benefit and financial impact of immunizing their children against MenB in the absence of a national immunization program (NIP). This study aimed to explore societal preferences (of parents and pediatricians) regarding the attributes of a MenB vaccine in Spain.
Methods
A discrete choice experiment (DCE) based on cross-sectional surveys was carried out to determine preferences. A literature review and scientific committee determined the six attributes related to the MenB vaccine included in the DCE: vaccination age, cost, duration, percentage of protection, adverse events probability, and expert/authority recommendation. Data were analyzed using a mixed logit model. Relative importance (RI) of attributes was calculated and compared between parents and pediatricians.
Results
A total of 278 parents [55.8% female, mean age 40.4 (standard deviation, SD 7.3) years] and 200 pediatricians [73.0% female, mean age 45.8 (SD 12.9) years] answered the DCE. For parents, the highest RI was attributed to vaccine cost, expert/authority recommendation, and percentage of protection (26.4%, 26.1%, and 22.9%, respectively), while for pediatricians the highest RI was assigned to percentage of protection, expert/authority recommendation, and vaccination age (27.2%, 23.7%, and 22.6%, respectively). Significant differences between parents and pediatricians were found in the RI assigned to all attributes (p < 0.001), except for vaccine recommendation.
Conclusion
In the decision regarding MenB vaccination, cost was a driver in parental decision-making but had a low RI for pediatricians and, conversely, vaccination age was highly valued by pediatricians but was the attribute with least importance for parents. Despite these differences, expert/authority recommendation and percentage of protection were essential criteria for both groups. These results provide relevant information about MenB vaccination, highlighting the importance of considering societal preferences for NIP inclusion.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
 ; de Miguel, Ángel Gil 2 ; Ruiz-Contreras, Jesús 3 ; Vallejo-Aparicio, Laura A. 4 ; García, Andrea 4 ; Gonzalez-Inchausti, María C. 4 ; de Gomensoro, Eduardo 4 ; Kocaata, Zeki 5 ; Gabás-Rivera, Clara 6 ; Comellas, Marta 6 ; Prades, Miriam 6 ; Lizán, Luis 7
 
; de Miguel, Ángel Gil 2 ; Ruiz-Contreras, Jesús 3 ; Vallejo-Aparicio, Laura A. 4 ; García, Andrea 4 ; Gonzalez-Inchausti, María C. 4 ; de Gomensoro, Eduardo 4 ; Kocaata, Zeki 5 ; Gabás-Rivera, Clara 6 ; Comellas, Marta 6 ; Prades, Miriam 6 ; Lizán, Luis 7 1 Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Department, Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.411048.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8816 6945); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, University of Santiago de Compostela, Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.11794.3a) (ISNI:0000000109410645); Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.413448.e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9314 1427)
2 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.28479.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 2206 5938)
3 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Department of Pediatrics, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.144756.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1945 5329); Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667)
4 GSK, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.419327.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1768 1287)
5 GSK, Wavre, Belgium (GRID:grid.425090.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0468 9597)
6 Outcomes’10, Castellón, Spain (GRID:grid.425090.a)
7 Outcomes’10, Castellón, Spain (GRID:grid.425090.a); Universidad Jaime I, Department of Medicine, Castellón, Spain (GRID:grid.425090.a)





