It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Gait data collection from overweight individuals walking on irregular surfaces is a challenging task that can be addressed using inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. However, it is unclear how many IMUs are needed, particularly when body attachment locations are not standardized. In this study, we analysed data collected from six body locations, including the torso, upper and lower limbs, to determine which locations exhibit significant variation across different real-world irregular surfaces. We then used deep learning method to verify whether the IMU data recorded from the identified body locations could classify walk patterns across the surfaces. Our results revealed two combinations of body locations, including the thigh and shank (i.e., the left and right shank, and the right thigh and right shank), from which IMU data should be collected to accurately classify walking patterns over real-world irregular surfaces (with classification accuracies of 97.24 and 95.87%, respectively). Our findings suggest that the identified numbers and locations of IMUs could potentially reduce the amount of data recorded and processed to develop a fall prevention system for overweight individuals.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); University of Malaysia Pahang, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Pekan, Malaysia (GRID:grid.440438.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1798 1407)
2 Griffith University, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Gold Coast, Australia (GRID:grid.1022.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0437 5432)
3 University of Malaysia Pahang, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Pekan, Malaysia (GRID:grid.440438.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1798 1407)
4 King Saud University, Biomedical Technology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.56302.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1773 5396)
5 University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA (GRID:grid.21925.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9000)