INTRODUCTION
The spread of antibiotic resistance (AR) poses a global threat to the healthcare system, increasing morbidity and mortality associated with infectious diseases (1 - 3). Globally, there were an estimated 4.95 million deaths associated with bacterial AR in 2019, and deaths attributable to AR in European Union have increased ~2.5-fold between 2007 and 2015 (1, 4). Hospitalized patients are especially vulnerable to infections by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) (5 - 9). One model of how hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) occur is that shedding of pathogens by a patient or healthcare worker seeds contamination of common surfaces and equipment, which can in turn seed infection of additional patients (5, 10 - 12). In fact, contaminated hospital surfaces have been clearly linked to specific outbreaks of infections caused by lineages of related MDROs, which colonize plumbing systems and spread on hospital surfaces (13 - 17). However, there are still key gaps in our understanding of the natural history of MDRO colonization dynamics in the hospital built environment. First, much of the prior work in this space has focused on retrospective sampling in the context of outbreaks, which provides an important yet incomplete picture of MDRO colonization dynamics in healthcare systems. Furthermore, although genomic surveillance of nosocomial pathogens is common, the choice of methodology has a large impact on discriminatory index. Specifically, methods that can differentiate between isolates that belong to a common endemic lineage versus those that result from a recent transmission are not commonly used, resulting in a course-grained picture of transmission dynamics (18). To identify recent transmission events, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) tracking is required to discriminate between lineages that may be endemic to a region (19). Additionally, long-term contamination can lead to MDROs transferring genes conferring AR, heightened virulence, and environmental persistence to other species via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (20). Transmission of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) has previously been shown to exacerbate nosocomial outbreaks (21 - 24) and mediate multidrug resistance across large phylogenetic distances (25 - 28). A higher-resolution understanding of the composition and genomic adaptations of the hospital built environment microbiome, and scope of HGT that occurs is needed to reduce the burden of HAIs.
Previously, we found that healthcare surfaces at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan (PAK-ICU) carried a high burden of MDROs that were dominated by closely related lineages, and limited long-read sequencing suggested widespread HGT of the carbapenemase
Fig 1
Study overview. (A) Overview of collection scheme. Created with BioRender.com. (B) Most commonly recovered species from both this study and D’Souza et al., colored by order. (C) Number of isolates recovered per room, per time point. Faceted by environment and colored by country. Due to a local holiday, Month 4 samples were not collected from PAK sites. (D) Number of isolates collected per room, per collection. Faceted by environment and colored by country.
From our 28 months of sampling over these two studies, we show a high burden of common nosocomial pathogens on sink surfaces—including many Pseudomonadales and Enterobacterales—and strains that persist throughout PAK-ICU for as long as 2 years. We found that isolates recovered from ICUs have higher ARG abundance and diversity compared to those collected at HOME and WORK sites, and ARGs that confer resistance to antibiotics of last-resort are found in both common and opportunistic pathogens. Finally, we show cross-species sharing of plasmids that confer clinical resistance to all beta-lactams tested, including carbapenems. Altogether, this presents a concerning scenario where the PAK-ICU water system allows for persistence of MDROs through vertical transmission of related clones and transmission of resistance-conferring MGEs between taxa by HGT. These results demonstrate the importance of methodically characterizing hospital microbiomes in a surface-focused manner, to better understand how MDROs move through and persist in the healthcare environment.
RESULTS
PAK and US sinks and water have a high burden of species of
In this study, we recovered 530 bacterial isolates from 360 samples taken from hospital, office, and home water and sink surfaces in Pakistan and the United States. To improve taxonomic resolution, resolve transmission dynamics, and analyze ARG content, we performed WGS on all isolates. In total, we analyzed 822 recovered isolates, including the 292 isolates from PAK-ICU and US-ICU previously sequenced by D’Souza et al
We hypothesized that PAK-ICU sink surfaces are persistently colonized by closely related isolates. To identify possible transmission events, we first constructed a core genome alignment of the draft genomes for the most common species and grouped genomes into lineages of <500 core genome SNPs. We next aligned reads to assemblies within each group in an all-vs-all manner to select an internal reference and counted whole genome single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) against that reference. To define strain-level groups that were most likely the result of a recent transmission, we used a cutoff of ≥99.9995% average nucleotide identity (ANI) based on SNVs to an in-group reference (see Materials and Methods) (18). We found that many of the frequently recovered isolates were members of closely related strains, some appearing transiently and other persisting for at least 2 years (Fig. 2).
Fig 2
Overview of strains identified in commonly recovered isolates. Rows represent single strains, and diamonds represent a time point where that strain was identified. Lines drawn between collections of the same strain to highlight persistence. The time between both studies, where samples were not collected, is grayed out.
Fig 3
(A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of
Isolates recovered from ICU rooms were enriched in ARG abundance and diversity compared to HOME and WORK rooms
Isolates recovered from ICUs had a higher abundance of ARGs compared to isolates from HOME or WORK rooms, in both PAK and US sites (
Fig 4
Overall ARG content of genomes. (A, B) Scatterplot showing the number of ARGs and number of ARG classes per genome for all isolates (as predicted by AMRFinder), with small amount of jitter added for visibility. *** =
Enterobacterales, Aeromonadales, and Alteromonadales possess a similar repertoire of ARGs
To identify ARGs that were most prevalent across different taxa (and potentially acquired horizontally), we calculated the average frequency of each ARG per genome in each genus (Fig. 4E). We observed that similar ARGs frequently appeared in the genomes of different genera. Concerningly, we found the extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases
Clustering of shared sequences identifies widespread sharing of ARG-encoding regions
To identify potential HGT events, we developed a computational pipeline for identifying horizontally transferred sequences in our entire data set using a BLASTn-based clustering method to identify families of common plasmidic sequences (25, 35). To reduce the likelihood of hits resulting from nearly identical, vertically acquired sequences, we first selected contigs originating from plasmids using Platon on all genomes (34). We then performed an all-vs-all alignment of the selected contigs using BLAST and filtered alignments at ≥99% identity, ≥95% coverage, and ≥5 kb in length (36). We first compared the total amount of shared genomic space between isolates to taxonomy of isolates and found that genomes within the orders Enterobacterales, Aeromonadales, and Alteromonadales appear to engage in extensive cross-species sharing of plasmidic DNA (Fig. 5A). Curiously, Pseudomonadales (
Fig 5
HGT events within the sink environment. (A) Phylogenetic cladogram of all 822 genomes in this study, generated using GTDB-Tk and RAxML. The outer ring is colored by taxonomic order, and the lines connecting each node represent shared genomic space between those two genomes by BLAST alignment (>5 kbp in length, >99% identity, and >95% coverage). Lines are colors blue if the two genomes are the same species, yellow if they are different species, and pink if they are different species and the shared genomic spaces encodes an ESBL or carbapenemase. (B) Network showing the 11 clusters of plasmid sequences identified using nanopore sequencing and sequence alignment. Each node represents a single contig, colored by genus. An edge connecting two nodes represents a significant BLAST alignment between those two contigs (>5 kbp in length, >99% identity, and >95% coverage, <10% difference in contig size, at least one contig is circularized). (C) Balloon plot showing the most commonly shared ARGs different taxonomic levels. For each ARG encoded on a shared genomic space, the number of unique taxa combinations sharing that ARG was counted at different taxonomic levels. For visibility, only the most commonly-shared ARGs are shown. (D) Nucleotide alignment of plasmid Clusters 10, 7, and 2. Gray blocks show BLAST matches of >99% ID and >5 kb, with SNV counts on the left, and the ANI (based on SNVs) noted on the right. ORFs are colored by function (pink = ARG, orange = MGE, teal = other). ANI, average nucleotide identity; ARG, antibiotic resistance gene; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; HGT, horizontal gene transfer; SNV, single-nucleotide variant.
Plasmids harboring diverse and clinically important ARGs are disseminated across multiple genera and detected over 19 months apart
Epidemiological and genomic evidence suggested the possibility that numerous ARGs were shared among spatially linked pathogens species through plasmids. To identify such events, we used an iterative approach, where we clustered the BLAST alignment data using Cytoscape (37) and performed Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) long-read sequencing on representative isolates from each cluster to circularize plasmid sequences. Clusters containing multiple species and isolates annotated with ESBLs and carbapenemases were given preference. After hybrid assembly, the all-vs-all BLAST alignment was repeated, and clusters were re-analyzed. In total, we performed nanopore sequencing on 60 isolates, which we combined with the 10 hybrid assemblies that were previously reported in D’Souza et al. (29). To identify families of shared plasmids, we further filtered the alignment results using the following criteria: (i) at least one aligned contig was circularized and (ii) the aligned contigs differed by no more than 10% in length. Overall, we identified 11 clusters (Table 1 and Fig. 5B) of highly similar plasmid families. To identify plasmid sharing within each family, we employed an SNV-based analysis used for tracking plasmid spread within healthcare-associated bacteria (35). Within each family, a reference sequence was chosen based on the first appearance of that plasmid, and Illumina reads from each sample within that family were aligned to that reference to quantify SNVs. A threshold of 99.985% (<15 SNVs per 100 kbp) was chosen to determine if the shared sequences were likely due to HGT (35).
TABLE 1
Summary of plasmid clusters
| Cluster | Mean length (bp) | Mean GC (%) | Replicon type(s) | Relaxase type | MPF type | ARG(s) | Species in cluster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67,328.2 | 53.3 | IncN | MOBF | MPF_T | aac(6′)-Ib-cr5, aadA16, arr-3, blaNDM-5, blaTEM-1, ble, dfrA27, mph(A), qnrB6, sul1, tet(A) | |
| 2 | 6,141.0 | 52.2 | rep_cluster_1195 | MOBP | – | blaOXA-232 | |
| 3 | 177,388.5 | 54.4 | – | – | – | aadA1, blaNDM-1, blaOXA, blaPER-3, ble, mph(A), sul1 | |
| 4 | 110,792.0 | 54.8 | IncFIB,IncFII,rep_cluster_2272 | MOBF | MPF_F | blaNDM-1, ble, rmtC, sul1 | |
| 5 | 309,511.3 | 48.8 | Col(VCM04) | MOBH | – | aac(3)-IIe, aac(6')-Ib-cr5, aadA1, aadA16, arr-3, blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-1, ble, catA2, dfrA27, sul1, sul2 | |
| 6 | 222,581.3 | 55.1 | rep_cluster_1332 | MOBH | – | aac(3)-IId, aac(6′)-Ib, aac(6′)-Ib-cr5, aadA1, aadA16, ant(3″)-Ij/aac(6′)-Ib, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, arr-3, blaNDM-1, blaOXA, blaOXA-1, blaPER-3, blaTEM-1, ble, catB3, mph(A), sul1, tet(A) | |
| 7 | 85,098.0 | 57.2 | – | – | – | aac(6′)-Ib4, aac(6′)-Il, aadA5, arr-2, blaIMP-1, blaOXA-10, dfrA15, sul1, tmexC3, tmexD3, toprJ1 | |
| 8 | 329,536.5 | 47.1 | IncHI2A,rep_cluster_1088 | MOBH | MPF_F | aac(6′)-Ib-cr5, aadA1, aadA16, arr-3, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-1, ble, catA1, dfrA27, qnrB1, sul1, tet(A) | |
| 9 | 333,080.0 | 47.1 | IncHI2A,rep_cluster_1088 | MOBH | MPF_F | aac(3)-IIe, aac(6′)-Ib-cr5, aadA1, aadA16, arr-3, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1, ble, catA1, dfrA27, mph(A), mph(E), msr(E), qnrB1, sul1, tet(A) | |
| 10 | 331,845.0 | 38.8 | – | MOBP,MOBP | – | aac(6′)-Ib4, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-VIa, aph(6)-Id, arr-3, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-58, ble, dfrA44, mph(E), msr(E), sul1, sul2, tet(X3) | |
| 11 | 302,786.5 | 39.3 | – | MOBP | – | aac(6′)-Ib4, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-VIa, aph(6)-Id, arr-3, blaNDM-1, ble, mph(E), msr(E), sul1, sul2, tet(X3) | |
This analysis identified a pair of nearly identical plasmids (4 SNVs over ~300 kbp) carrying the tetracycline destructase
Persistent plasmids confer a resistance phenotype
To investigate the phenotypic consequences of harboring some of these plasmids, we identified strains with multiple isolates that differed in the presence or absence of an identified plasmid. We performed Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST) using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assays in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (Supplementary Data) (39). When we tested
Discussion
The colonization of hospital sink surfaces by MDROs leading to disease is well documented, but the transmission dynamics that enable these surfaces to act as reservoirs is not well understood (18, 40). Here, we present a multiyear, genomic investigation of bacterial colonization in matched clinical and non-clinical spaces in Pakistan and the USA. This resulted in the recovery of 530 new bacterial isolates, for a total of 822 isolates across both sampling sites. Using comparative genomics, we identified 104 species in total, including 37 genomospecies. Across all sites, we find a similar microbial ecology, dominated by
Recent studies have similarly sought to understand and characterize the ecology of hospital sinks using genomics (14, 18, 42
-
47). These surveys have found similarities between environmental isolates and patient isolates associated with nosocomial outbreaks, particularly in
We found long-term contamination of surfaces, both from common pathogens like
Perhaps the most concerning finding is the maintenance of ARG-harboring plasmids in hospitals by HGT. This work adds to the growing body of literature that establishes specific examples of HGT occurring within hospitals (20, 25, 47) and describes specific cases of HGT allowing for transfer of multiple ARGs—including carbapenemases and ESBLs—across phylogenetic boundaries (25, 47). This presents another mechanism by which ARGs persist in the environment that does not require a strain to establish itself on a surface. This is best illustrated by plasmid Clusters 2, 7, and 10 which demonstrate how high-risk carbapenemases can be preserved in species where we did not observe any strain persistence, or even between hosts of different species. When we typed these plasmid sequences, we identified relaxase and replicon types that are predicted to allow conjugation and are associated with appearance in multiple genera (65). We also identified plasmids in
This study had several limitations. By selective culturing to enrich for MDROs, we did not capture the full microbial ecology of these surfaces. Metagenomic studies, which are becoming increasingly common in these environments, would be better suited to comprehensively profile their respective microbiomes (18, 67). We also cannot conclude an exact mechanism of transmission, as surface-to-surface transmission would appear the same as source-to-multiple-surface in our sampling scheme. Finally, our bioinformatic analysis was designed to detect whole plasmids, and therefore discarded shared sequences that may be the result of transposition and integration in the genome. Further analysis designed to capture the full extent of HGT on these surfaces could better characterize HGT events in non-Enterobacterales isolates.
In conclusion, our investigation of MDRO persistence in hospital sinks provides a high-resolution view of the strain dynamics of differing taxa, the ARG burden in these environments, and the different mechanisms used by these taxa that results in the maintenance of ARGs in these environments. Our work illustrates the utility of genomic-based methods for monitoring surface contamination and emphasizes the role that HGT plays in the persistence of ARGs in the environment. Further work is needed to understand the full dynamics between patients, healthcare workers, and ICU sinks, complemented by efforts to decontaminate sinks and eliminate these MDRO reservoirs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection and culturing
Rooms (ICU, HOME, and WORK) were sampled every month for 5 months (due to a local holiday, the Month 4 samples from PAK were not collected). At each time point, three sink surfaces were sampled in each room: sink faucet opening (swabbing on the aerator for 1 min), sink basin (swabbing entire inside surface for 1 min), and the sink drain (swab inserted directly into the drain and rubbed against the sides of the pipe). Two water samples were then also collected: first collection (the first 14mL sitting in the fixture) and 2 min flow (after letting the water run for 2 min, collect 14mL of water). The ESwab collection and transport system (Copan, Murieta, CA, USA) was used to collect surface samples; swabs were moistened with sterile water prior to sample collection. Two swabs were held together for specimen collection. Specimens collected in Pakistan were shipped to the US site for processing and analysis. One ESwab specimen was vortexed and 90µL of eluate was inoculated to each of the following culture selective medium: VRE chromID (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France), HardyCHROM ESBL (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA), Cetrimide Agar (Hardy, Santa Maria, CA, USA), MacConkey Agar with cefotaxime (Hardy, Santa Maria, CA, USA), and MacConkey Agar with ciprofloxacin (Hardy, Santa Maria, CA, USA). Sheep’s blood agar (Hardy, Santa Maria, CA, USA) was also used as a growth control, but only isolates from selective plates were sequenced. Plates were incubated at 35°C in an air incubator and incubated up to 48h prior to discard if no growth. Up to four colonies of each colony morphotype (as appropriate for the agar type) were subcultured and identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with the VITEK MS system. Water samples were briefly vortexed, and 100µL was inoculated on the same media. All isolates recovered were stored at −80°C in TSB with glycerol.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
After shipment to the US site, antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion, interpreted according to criteria from the M100-S30 (39), on 329 isolates from commonly recovered.
Illumina WGS
Total genomic DNA was obtained from pure cultures using the QIAmp BiOstic Bacteremia DNA kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). DNA was quantified with the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 0.5ng of genomic DNA was used to create sequencing libraries with the Nextera kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using a modified protocol (68). Samples were pooled and sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq platform to obtain 2×150 bp reads. The reads were demultiplexed by barcode and had adapters removed with Trimmomatic v0.38 (69). Processed reads were
ONT WGS
Total genomic DNA was obtained from pure cultures using the QIAmp BiOstic Bacteremia DNA kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) with the following modifications to preserve High Molecular Weight DNA: heating step reduced to 8 min and bead-beating step reduced to 90 s. DNA was quantified with the Qubit BR dsDNA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 1µg of genomic DNA was used to create sequencing libraries with the ONT Ligation Sequencing Kit (SQK-LSK109) and Native Barcodes (EXP-NBD196) (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). Samples were pooled and sequenced on an ONT MinION Flow Cell (R9.4.1 chemistry). Reads were demultiplexed and basecalled with guppy v5.0.11 using the following command: guppy_basecaller -i fast5/ -s fastq/ --config dna_r9.4.1_450bps_sup.cfg gpu_runners_per_device 24 --num_callers 12 --compress_fastq --trim_barcodes --disable_qscore_filtering --barcode_kits EXP-NBD196–-detect_mid_strand_barcodes --min_score_mid_barcodes 60x cuda:0. Long reads were filtered with filtlong v0.2.0 (73) to remove reads <1,000 bp, and the worst 5% of reads. Long reads were combined with trimmed short reads and assembled with Unicycler v0.4.7 (69) using default settings. Assemblies were subjected to the same quality control measures as before.
Genome annotation
The assembly.fasta file from Unicycler was annotated with prokka v1.14.5 (74), and the resulting files were used for all further analyses. ARGs were identified using AMRFinderPlus v3.9.8 (75). For statistical comparisons of ARG counts, only 530 new isolates were considered.
Taxonomic assignment
All isolates were initially identified using the VITEK MS v2.3.3 system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France). Following draft genome assembly, the species assignment was done using an
Core genome alignment
For individual species, the .gff files generated by Prokka were used to construct a core genome alignment with Roary v3.12.0 and PRANK v.170427 (78, 79). The core genome alignment was used to build a maximum likelihood tree using rAxML v8.2.11 and visualized using iToL (80, 81). For the phylogenetic analysis of all isolates, marker genes were identified, extracted, and aligned using GTDB-Tk v1.7.0 (82). A maximum likelihood tree was constructed from the alignment as before using rAxML and iToL (80, 81).
Strain-sharing analysis
For species where at least 10 isolates were found across both studies (with at least one being from this study), pairwise core genome SNP counts between isolates were calculated using snp-dists v0.8.2 and clustered roughly using a cutoff of <500 pairwise SNPs (83). Within each grouping, trimmed Illumina reads and draft genomes were used to call variants in an all-vs-all manner using snippy v4.6.0 (84). Reads from D’Souza et al. were downloaded from SRA using the BioProject accession (PRJNA497126) and processed with Trimmomatic v0.38 (69). SNVs (including SNPs and indels) were counted between each query-reference pairing, with sites showing variation between a genome and its own reads masked from all calculations. Within each grouping, the genome with the highest median number of aligned bases when used as a reference was chosen as the reference assembly for comparisons within that group. ANI was calculated using the formula:
An ANI cutoff of 99.9995% was chosen as a cutoff for determining strain identity based on the cutoff of 99.999% recommended by inStrain’s authors (85) and the observation that it captured the comparisons between the most similar isolates in the multimodal distribution of calculate ANI values (Fig. S6). Given observations that non-hypermutator
Accessory genome analysis of
Core genes were removed from the gene_presence_absence.Rtab generated by Roary. The vegdist function from the Vegan R package to calculate Jaccard distance between genomes, and pcoa function from the ape R package was used to perform principal coordinates decomposition (91). PERMANOVA was performed using the adonis2 function in Vegan (92).
Identification of shared plasmid sequences
Draft genomes were first filtered for contigs predicted to originate from plasmids using platon v1.5 (34), and then aligned against one another in an all-vs-all manner using nucmer v4.0.0b2 (93). Matches were filtered for >5 kbp and 95% identity. Sequences were extracted and merged with bedtools v2.27.1 (94) and aligned against one another by all-vs-all blastn using blast+ v2.6.0 (95). The resulting comparisons were filtered for matches that were ≥99% identity, ≥95% coverage, and ≥5 kbp, and clustered using Cytoscape v3.9.0 (37). To identify plasmid sharing events, the comparisons were further filtered for alignments where at least one contig was circularized, and the two contigs being compared are no more than 10% different in overall length. After clusters were identified with Cytoscape, SNVs were called by aligning Illumina reads to the plasmid contig using snippy v4.6.0 within each cluster (84). The earliest appearance of the plasmid was used as reference, or the lowest percentage of unaligned bases in the case of a tie. Pairwise SNV distances were calculated based on the output of snippy-core, and ANI was calculated using the formula:
Pairwise plasmid alignment and visualization was done using EasyFig v2.2.0.
Plasmid typing
Plasmid replicons, relaxases, and Mate-Pair formation types were identified using MOB-typer function in the MOB-suite v3.1.0 set of tools (96, 97).
Annotation of MGEs on plasmids
An ORF was considered an MGE if the prokka annotation mentioned any of the following terms: “transposase,” “transposon,” “integrase,” “integron,” “conjugative,” “conjugal,” “recombinase,” “recombination,” “mobilization,” “phage,” “plasmid,, “resolvase,” “insertion element,” or “mob.”
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2023 Diorio-Toth et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Contamination of hospital sinks with microbial pathogens presents a serious potential threat to patients, but our understanding of sink colonization dynamics is largely based on infection outbreaks. Here, we investigate the colonization patterns of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care unit sinks and water from two hospitals in the USA and Pakistan collected over 27 months of prospective sampling. Using culture-based methods, we recovered 822 bacterial isolates representing 104 unique species and genomospecies. Genomic analyses revealed long-term colonization by
IMPORTANCE
Hospital sinks are frequently linked to outbreaks of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Here, we used whole-genome sequencing to track the long-term colonization patterns in intensive care unit (ICU) sinks and water from two hospitals in the USA and Pakistan collected over 27 months of prospective sampling. We analyzed 822 bacterial genomes, representing over 100 different species. We identified long-term contamination by opportunistic pathogens, as well as transient appearance of other common pathogens. We found that bacteria recovered from the ICU had more antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in their genomes compared to matched community spaces. We also found that many of these ARGs are harbored on mobilizable plasmids, which were found shared in the genomes of unrelated bacteria. Overall, this study provides an in-depth view of contamination patterns for common nosocomial pathogens and identifies specific targets for surveillance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer




