It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The panicle architecture is a critical determinant of the reproductive success of rice plants and has a direct impact on grain production. In this study, we evaluated the genetic variation of panicle parameters in fifteen rice genotypes and compared them with five commonly grown cultivars in the study area to assess their potential for crop improvement initiatives. The selection of the 15 genotypes was based on specific criteria, including diversity in origin, grain type, and adaptation to local conditions. Significant morphological variations were observed among the rice accessions for panicle parameters, including panicle length, weight, test weight, panicle number, grains/panicle, chaffs/panicle, and flag leaf area. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that the first two axes explained 59.8% of the total variance, indicating substantial variability in panicle features across the genotypes. Panicle length, panicle weight, and flag leaf area were identified as significant variables contributing to phenotypic variation. Multiple correlation analysis indicated that panicle weight was strongly positively correlated with panicle length, flagleaf area, grains/panicle, and test weight but was negatively correlated with panicle number, chaffs/panicle, and panicle angle. Genetic advance as a percentage of the mean (GAM) ranged from 7.226% for panicle number to 70.728% for chaffs/panicle. Traits such as grain/panicle, panicle length, flag leaf area, chaffs/panicle, and test weight exhibited high GAM and heritability, highlighting their significance for selection during crop improvement. Certain rice accessions, namely SVIN123, IR106523-25-34-3-2-13-1-2, Radha-13, and IR15L17315, demonstrated superior panicle weight, larger grains/panicle, and panicle length, making them attractive candidates for future rice breeding projects.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 G. P. Koirala College of Agriculture and Research Center, Purbanchal University, Morang, Gothgaun, Nepal
2 Department of Plant Breeding, G. P. Koirala College of Agriculture and Research Center, Purbanchal University Morang, Gothgaun, Nepal