1. Introduction
The normal physiological cell-surface prion protein (PrPC) is highly expressed in a variety of tissues in mammalian species [1,2]. During the early embryogenesis stage, PrPC plays an important role in neural development and adult neurogenesis as well [3]. Lopes and his colleagues showed that PrPC stimulates polarization in synapse development in embryonic hippocampal neuron cultures [4]. PrPC has been involved in a variety of functions including signal transduction [5], cell adhesion, and antiapoptosis activity [6], neuronal differentiation, neurite outgrowth [7], and proliferation and neuronal differentiation of stem cells (SCs) [8,9]. On the other hand, PrPC also undergoes a conformational conversion into a misfolded β-sheet-rich structure known as PrP scrapie (PrPSc). It has been reviewed that once aggregates of PrPSc deposit within brain tissue, they induce the neuropathological characteristics of prion diseases, or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), including vacuolization (spongiosis), neuronal death, and PrPSc deposits [10].
Scrapie, which affects sheep and goats, was the first prion disease discovered in animals. Later, cattle were diagnosed with prion disease (bovine spongiform encephalopathy; BSE); deer, elk, and moose (chronic wasting disease; CWD), minks (transmissible mink encephalopathy), and felines (feline spongiform encephalopathy) can manifest forms of the disease [11]. In humans, most cases occur sporadically due to the spontaneous misfolding of PrPC into PrPSc. An example of sporadic human prion disease is sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD). Jeong and Kim reviewed the examples of the genetic forms of human prion disease including fatal familial insomnia, Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker disease (GSS), and familial CJD [12]. Due to the potential transmission between other species and humans, the scientific community has placed a particular emphasis on prion diseases.
No potential therapeutic agents or treatments are available for prion diseases, except those available for the inhibition of PrPSc accumulation and to decrease the conversion of PrPC into PrPSc [13,14]. Unfortunately, when delivered at the late stage of the disease, these drugs have not shown in vivo efficacy [15]. Therefore, it is important to develop treatments that target prion propagation and pathogenesis. Moreover, although prion research has greatly progressed over the last few decades, many unanswered concerns remain regarding prion replication processes, cell toxicity, genetic susceptibility variations associated with prion strains, and the nature of prion strains. SCs are self-renewing multilineage differentiated cells that can be isolated from various sources of tissues including bone marrow (BM), adipose tissue, brain, blood, dental pulp, synovial fluids, and other tissues [16,17]. In addition to their significant regenerative and immunomodulatory activities, SCs are also being utilized as essential cell models to understand the mechanism of several diseases. Neural SCs (NSCs) comprise a promising key subset of SCs currently being employed as a potential therapy for prion diseases. Thus, SCs might be a good cell model to understand the mechanism of prion disease and as a promising therapy as well. In this paper, we first discuss the molecular biology of prion disease. In addition, we highlight the proposed roles of SCs as a potential in vitro model for prion diseases and their promising therapeutic application for prion diseases.
2. Molecular Biology and Pathogenesis of Prion Diseases
It has been concluded that prion diseases are deadly, transmissible, and irreversible neurodegenerative disorders triggered by aberrant aggregated prion proteins in a wide variety of hosts (Figure 1) [18,19].
TSE is subdivided into CJD and kuru for humans, scrapie for sheep, and BSE for cattle [18]. Prion disorders can be sporadic, inherited, or acquired and are transmissible within and between mammalian species [20]. There have been numerous cases of variants of CJD resulting from the transmission of BSE to humans [21]. The suffering of millions of animals from BSE causes major food crises worldwide. The cellular-host-encoded prion protein is an alpha-helical neuronal glycoprotein [22]. However, the role of PrPC has not been entirely elucidated. Nevertheless, Westergard et al., 2007 reviewed that PrPC has important physiological functions regarding cellular proliferation, adhesion, differentiation, neural development, and immune response due to its location on the cell membrane [23]. Additionally, PrPC has a multimolecular signaling pathway in the neuronal differentiation process [9,24]. The globular C-terminus, which contains three alpha-helices and two short ß-strands, in addition to the unstructured N-terminus, is one of the two principal domains in PrPC. PrPC is found in different cells such as neurons, glial cells, lymphocytes, and follicular dendritic cells [25,26,27]. PrPC is mostly prevalent in brain tissue, although it is also detected in the heart, skeletal muscle, and kidney, while it is barely detected in the liver [2].
PrPC undergoes a conformational change in prion diseases, resulting in a misfolded, beta-sheet-rich, and aggregation-prone variant (known as PrPSc) (Figure 1), which is a partially protease-resistant isoform [18,19]. A characteristic feature of prion diseases is the formation of the aberrant isoform PrPSc of the host-encoded PrPC in the central nervous system. It has been concluded that PrPSc aggregates deposit and propagate inside the brain, eventually resulting in prion disease pathologies such as neuronal vacuolation, significant apoptosis, neuroinflammation, and neurotoxicity, all of which cause neurodegenerative disorders [28,29,30]. The normal isoform PrPC is protease-sensitive (PrPSen), but the pathological isoform PrPSc is somewhat protease-resistant (also known as PrPres). PrPSc is an infectious agent without nucleic acid and contains only an abnormal conformer of PrPC, known as the ‘protein only hypothesis’, which affects the prion propagation and infectivity [19]. Therefore, detection of the protease-resistant core of PrPSc on immunoblotting assay serves as an accurate molecular marker and aids in the diagnosis of the presence of the infectious agent [31,32]. The immunoblotting procedure is used and validated for the detection of protease-resistant PrPSc [33,34].
PrPSc serves as a conformational template, attracting PrPC for subsequent conversion, and this process is self-replicating. Prions primarily, if not entirely, have a damaging effect on the central nervous system [30,35]. In prion disorders, the conversion response is critical for neurotoxicity [35]. However, the underlying cause of neurotoxicity remains unknown. PrPC is necessary for prion development, as it has been reported that PrPC-deficient animals are resistant to prions [36]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that transplanting neural tissue overexpressing PrPC into the brain of PrP-lacking mice produces excessive levels of PrPSc and induces prion-like disease characteristics [37]. Furthermore, neurotoxicity was reversed when the endogenous neuronal PrPC was depleted in established prion-infected mice [38]. Taken together, these studies suggest that misfolded PrPC elicits neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration. Therefore, strategies aimed at restoring normal function and promoting neuroregeneration should be pursued for therapeutic advancements. Unfortunately, no therapies with confirmed advantages against prion diseases are currently available.
3. Current Therapeutic Strategies for Prion Diseases
Treating prion disorders is an incredibly difficult task. There are currently no treatments available for prion disorders [39]. Since the disease proceeds rapidly and is always deadly, there is an urgent need for medicines that target prion pathogenesis. The finding that misfolded proteins are implicated in other neurodegenerative disorders is favorably influencing the field of prion drug research [40]. Effective treatment for prion diseases should either prevent the formation of misfolded proteins or mitigate the development of neurotoxic effects. In this section, we briefly summarize the advancements that have led to improvements in the drug development process for prion disorders.
3.1. Target PrPC
One approach to combating prion diseases is to target PrPC. Numerous PrPC-targeting therapies have been developed. The utilization of the adult-onset model of PrPC depletion has provided support for the concept of the efficacy of approaches targeting PrPC [38]. This transgene-modulated elimination of neuronal PrPC during developed prion infection allowed the animals to remain without symptoms for an extended period and resulted in the reversal of early spongiform alterations. Anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies, for example, have been shown to block the integration of PrPC into pathogenic spreading prions in prion-infected cultured cells, resulting in PrPSc removal [41]. However, this technique may not be enough for treating patients whose prion disease has already developed to the extent of showing neuropathological effects.
3.2. Inhibit the Conversion of PrPC to PrPSc
Because the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc is essential for prion pathogenesis, drugs that target this pathway are attractive treatment prospects for prion diseases [42]. Many elements of prion conversion might be studied, for example, compounds such as polysulfated polyanionic, polyamine, tetrapyrroles, polyene antibiotics, tetracyclic, tricyclic, and peptides [43]. Nevertheless, these drugs have minimal therapeutic impact on disease progression in vivo, poor bioavailability, and need further clinical trials [43]. Moreover, they have only been demonstrated to slow disease development when given prophylactically around the time of prion inoculation and when the infection is limited to the lymphoreticular system [44]. An effective and sensitive prion infectivity bioassay is needed for clinical diagnostics and to validate the anti-prion substances. Real-time-quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) has recently emerged as a very sensitive technique for detecting PrPSc [45]. RT-QuIC is an in vitro amplification assay that enables the real-time monitoring of the aggregation activity of misfolded prion proteins [45,46]. It serves as a prescreening assay for substances that potentially prevent the aggregation development of the PrPC to PrPSc such as doxycycline, carnosic acid, acridine, dextran sulfate sodium, tannic acid, curcumin, and poly(propylene imine) glycodendrimers [47,48,49,50]. Moreover, the RT-QuIC assay currently provides a validated diagnostic tool for human patients [51]. Different review opinions stated the capability of the small molecule theragnostic to combine imaging and treatment at the same time, presenting great promise to treat and diagnose in vivo prion diseases through its ability to bind with PrPC and consequently prevent prion conversion [52,53,54].
3.3. Clearance of PrPSc
It is commonly known that PrPSc aggregation in the brain induces neuronal cell death. As a result, treatments that either increase PrPSc clearance or inhibit its toxicity might be potentially beneficial [55]. While there is no change in PrPSc levels, therapeutics that suppress the unfolded protein response result in clinical improvements. Quercetin, a flavonoid molecule of the polyphenol group, has been discovered to break down prion fibrils in vitro in the battle against prion fibrils. Quercetin-like molecules bind to prion fibrils and reduce the β-strand content by transforming certain β-strands into loop and helical structures, causing the fibril structure to disaggregate [56]. Our study recently showed that clonidine-treated prion-infected mice displayed a significant clearance of accumulated PrPSc by stimulating the glymphatic system, the brain’s perivascular waste-clearing mechanism [33]. However, clonidine did not completely cure the prion-infected mice.
4. Mesenchymal SCs (MSCs)
Hoang et al., 2022 reviewed that MSCs have unique abilities such as self-renewal, differentiation capability, immunomodulation, and migration to injured tissue, making them excellent candidates for the treatment of musculoskeletal, neurological, eye, oral, and systemic disorders [57]. Embryonic SCs (ESCs), induced pluripotent SCs (iPSCs), and adult MSCs are the three major types of SCs used for treatment purposes (Figure 2).
The pluripotent capacity and ethical concerns (use of germ cells) are a major challenge for ESCs (reviewed by Lo and Parham) [58]. iPSCs do not exist in nature, but they are reprogrammed in culture by the necessary expression of factors essential for managing the crucial properties of ESCs [59]. However, genetic mutations, tumorigenesis, immunogenicity, and epigenetic abnormalities are the major concerns of the iPSC type [60]. The third type of SCs is adult MSCs, which are isolated from numerous types of adult organs and tissues such as BM, adipose tissue, dental pulp, brain, cartilage, synovial fluid, blood, and other sources [61,62]. Friedenstein and his colleagues pioneered the use of MSCs [63]. Since then, significant advances have been made in describing them. MSCs are now a hot topic in cell therapy and bioengineering research. They are found in high numbers in BM, adipose tissues, umbilical cord, peripheral blood, synovial fluid, dental tissues, and placental tissues. MSCs can be grown in various undifferentiated phases to develop into highly specialized cells that produce secretory substances, enhancing tissue regeneration in the body. In recent years, extensive research has been undertaken on the extraction and characterization of MSCs derived from diverse sources. However, it has been concluded that their characterization is still a topic of discussion [64].
Considerable progress has been made in characterizing adult MSCs. According to the International Society for Cellular Therapy, the minimum criteria for identifying MSCs are (1) adhesion to the culture dish, (2) ability to form colony units, (3) trilineage differentiation into adipogenesis, chondrogenesis, and osteogenesis, and (4) positive expression of cell surface markers CD105, CD90, CD73, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and negative expression of CD34, CD45, and MHC II [65]. MSCs do not express MHC II so they are less susceptible to attack by immune cells [66]. Considerable efforts have been made to regulate the microenvironment of SCs in vitro through factors such as seeding density, passage number, coating surfaces, and three-dimensional scaffolds [67]. Furthermore, various approaches, including preconditioning with biological agents and cytokines, genetic alteration, and hypoxia application have been proposed to enhance MSC characteristics [17,68].
Despite the relevance of MSCs in regenerative medicine, their usage is not without complications. Earlier research has reviewed that MSCs are very heterogeneous, comprising cells with various multipotent characteristics [69]. There is still a shortage of understanding of the molecular process involved in the identification and isolation of MSCs. The immune system perceives MSCs as invading cells, leading to immunological rejection in specific types and procedures of MSCs. Additionally, the impact of the inflamed environment on their differentiation potential still needs to be extensively investigated [70]. Nevertheless, SC transplantation is already being used to treat a variety of diseases and disorders.
5. Regenerative Potential of MSCs
Hoogduijn and Dor 2013 concluded that BM and adipose tissue MSCs are the generally well-known adult sources; they are also the most generally used for clinical applications due to the less invasive collection, relative abundance inside the body, and excellent tissue regeneration capabilities [71]. The properties of MSCs vary depending on the tissue from which they are collected. Adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AdMSCs) demonstrate a high proliferative capacity and resistance to the effects of aging [72], while BM-derived- MSCs (BM-MSCs) exhibit high osteogenesis and low proliferation with age [73]. Another important source is NSCs, which are self-renewing multipotent cells in the nervous system that can differentiate into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Maldonado-Soto et al., 2014 reviewed that cultured NSCs have contributed to understanding the mechanisms underlying the formation of neurons and glia [74]. The distinctions among diverse populations and sources of human MSCs have been highlighted, including their biological features, surface marker expression, proliferation and differentiation capacity, immune-modulatory properties, and variances in the extracellular microenvironment [75]. Previously, it was thought that MSCs had therapeutic potential due to their capacity for differentiation. However, new research has concluded that MSCs provide biological and regenerative benefits through the release of paracrine factors [76,77,78] (Figure 3).
These paracrine factors play an important role in cell-to-cell communication, regulating cell proliferation and adhesion, and exhibiting immunomodulatory activities [79]. Due to the interaction between MSCs and immune cells, MSCs play a role for clinical purposes. MSCs exhibit immunomodulatory mechanisms through the secretion of factors such as IDO, prostaglandin E2, transforming growth factor-β, and human leukocyte antigen G5, which interact with immune cells including B and T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages (reviewed by Gao et al., 2016) [80] (Figure 3). MSCs possess immunoregulatory properties derived from their interactions with immune cells in both the innate and adaptive immune systems. They can decrease CD8+ T cell proliferation and cytokine production [81], and increase the percentage of functionally induced CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and IL-10 secretion [82]. Therefore, MSCs are a potential treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis by inhibiting the proliferation and cytotoxicity of Natural Killer cells and increasing the production of regulatory T cells [83]. In addition to their immunomodulatory processes, MSCs release biologically active molecules such as growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and exosomes (Figure 3). These paracrine factors are vital in suppressing cell apoptosis and fibrosis, promoting tissue healing, and stimulating wound remodeling [84]. Zayed and Iohara reviewed the different types of mature MSC release molecules such as TGF, hepatocyte growth factor, IDO, vascular endothelial growth factor, insulin-like growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and cytokines (IL-6, -8, -10) [85].
Recent research has shown that the paracrine factors indicated above are released in MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs serve as essential paracrine regulators of MSCs that exist in cell supernatants and play an important role in cell signaling. EVs are classified into four types based on their diameter: exosomes, microvesicles, apoptotic bodies (formed following cell death), and endosomes [86]. These EVs can encapsulate and transport various bioactive molecules including proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and organelles to contact cells [87]. Exosomes and microvesicles appear to have essential roles as EV mediators in a wide range of physiological processes. The EV-mediated cellular communication between MSCs and a variety of target cells, including macrophages, microglia, chondrocytes, articular chondrocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, pericytes, NSCs, neurons, hepatic stellate cells, and podocytes, demonstrates MSC-EVs’ therapeutic potential in immune modulation and tissue repair [88]. Moreover, while EVs and MSCs have similar therapeutic benefits, EVs have a safety profile superior to that of MSCs due to their lack of cellular content, decreased immunogenicity, and capacity to pass the blood–brain barrier as reviewed by Gowen et al., 2020 [89]. Several clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate MSC-derived EVs for the treatment of lung and kidney fibrosis, spinal cord injuries, skin injuries, osteoarthritis, and type 1 diabetes [86]. Considering all the benefits and activities mentioned above, MSCs are concluded to represent a promising cell-based treatment option for many tissue disorders [16,90,91,92].
6. MSCs as a Cell Model for Prion Diseases
Prion bioassays in murine mice are commonly utilized to study prion diseases [93]. These costly and time-consuming animal trials, however, are impractical for evaluating various substances possibly effective for anti-prion therapy, particularly in humans. It has become obvious, in particular, that anti-prion substances discovered using mouse prions do not display efficacy against human prion strains, since the desired drugs must be capable of crossing the blood–brain barrier [94]. The inadequate recapitulation of other features of human prion disease and the limited lifespan that prevents the development of a phenotype are among the challenges of using animal models [93]. Thus, more models are anticipated to be developed to handle the increasingly complicated concerns of prion biology. As a result, accurate in vitro paradigms for investigating prion propagation are needed to test potential therapies in a high-throughput manner [95]. Cell culture has long been employed as an effective tool for molecular biology research, and it continues to provide vital insights into processes. However, the current cell culture models for human prion disease are not of sufficient quality, leading to limitations in exploring anti-prion drugs for clinical application [13]. Prion strain-specific therapeutic effects, the emergence of drug-resistant prion strains after long-term treatment, and the difficulties of reproducing human prions in cultured cells are all obstacles [96,97,98,99,100]. A more likely explanation of the difficulty of propagating human prions in cultured cells is that human prions have a peculiar feature that makes them difficult to replicate in cultured cells [101,102]. Additionally, chromosomal abnormalities and genomic instability can give rise to cancers driven by aberrant gene expression. Hence, it is important to employ cell lines with consistent cellular phenotypes and chromosomal stability. To better understand the biological characteristics and therapeutic potential of different therapies, neural cell lines were employed as a cellular model for prion disease [103,104]. N2a neuroblastoma cells are the most cultured cell line used for the propagation of prion diseases [105]. GT1 is hypothalamic, and CAD5 catecholaminergic cells have become popular models in prion diseases as well [96]. Prion strains can potentially infect non-neuronal cells such as fibroblast cell lines (NIH-3T3, L929, and skeletal myoblasts cells) [106,107]. The microglial cell line MG20 was employed to investigate the mechanism of the host immune reaction in prion infection [108]. In addition, genetically engineered cells such as N2a#58, RK13, and NpL2 have been utilized to explore prion diseases [99,109,110]. Nevertheless, significant drawbacks of employing mouse cell lines for prion infection have been mentioned, including the cytotoxic effects associated with prion propagation and cell death after active prion propagation in primary neurons [111].
MSCs offer significant benefits over other cell lines as a cellular model for prion diseases. The following are the key benefits of using MSCs as a cell model in studying cellular and molecular biology.
-
Because SCs are derived from healthy tissues, they constantly exhibit normal physiological conditions.
-
The genomes of SCs are devoid of aberrations and can be exceptionally durable [112].
-
SCs can differentiate into a variety of cell types.
-
SCs can produce organoids, which allow cellular processes to be investigated in the context of differentiated tissue.
It has been demonstrated that BM-MSCs express PrPC, which decreases with the subsequent passage [113]. PrPres accumulation in MSCs of experimentally infected mice might lead to prion manifestations in the brain [114]. The presence of PrPres in BM-MSCs collected from CJD patients was discovered in the same study, and it was suggested as an alternate means of diagnosis. Lyahyai and his colleagues demonstrated that MSCs from ovine peripheral blood have been isolated and characterized, expressing SC markers and differentiating into adipogenesis, osteogenesis, chondrogenesis, and neurogenesis [115]. According to the findings, MSCs can express the cellular prion protein gene (PRNP), which is increased during neurogenesis. Taken together, the influence of prion infection in monolayer-cultured ovine BM-MSCs and BM-MSC-derived spheroids was evaluated, demonstrating that MSCs could maintain the infection in neurogenic conditions, making this model potentially useful for prion studies [116]. Moreover, García-Mendívil and his colleagues studied the potential of ovine MSCs to be infected by natural scrapie and replicate PrPSc, showing sustained levels of PrPSc postinoculation [117]. Neurons and astrocytes derived from SCs offer a promising approach to creating a cell culture model of prion infection and replication [118]. Krejciova and his colleagues demonstrated that astrocytes derived from human iPSCs could sustain the propagation of prions isolated from CJD patients’ brain samples [118]. Therefore, MSCs are suitable cell models for establishing in vitro systems to study prion infectivity and propagation.
7. Modulation of Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cell Fate by Prion Disease
We recently reported that BM-conserved hematopoietic cells differentially express PrPC, and the expression of PrPC gradually increases depending on more immature hematopoietic cells [119] (Figure 4).
Hematopoietic SCs (HSCs, phenotypically defined as CD150+CD48-Lineage−Sca-1+c-Kit+ cells) express approximately 65% of PrPC protein, which is higher than the expression in Lin−Sca-1+c-Kit+ (LSK) cells (~48%), Lin−Sca-1−c-Kit+ cells (~18%) and Lin− cells (~17%). PrPC-positive LSK cells and HSCs go through apoptotic cell death in the BM of ME7-infected middle-aged mice via elevating mitochondrial ROS, Annexin V, p-JNK, and Caspase 3 levels in a cell-autonomous mechanism. MSCs express around 48% of PrPC protein in the BM of ME7-infected mice and display cell senescence by upregulating senescence-related markers such as SA-β-gal activity and p16 in a cell-autonomous mechanism. ME7-infection-caused senescence of MSCs renders the BM microenvironment aged. The preferentially aged BM microenvironment by ME7 infection causes both PrPC-positive and negative HSCs to become senescent by upregulating the levels of senescence-related factors such as mitochondrial ROS, p-p38, p16, and SA-β-gal activity through a non-cell-autonomous-manner in infected old-aged mice. The identification of hematological abnormalities in prion disease can aid in the finding of hints to improved survival in prion-infected individuals. Furthermore, the result raises concerns about the therapeutic use of BM cells from early prion-infected persons who do not have prion disease-related symptoms in cancer patients who require BM-conserved HSC transplantation.
8. MSCs as a Potential Therapy for Prion Diseases
The most common neurological disorders include neurodegenerative diseases and injury to the central or peripheral nervous system. Mahar and Cavalli 2018 concluded that after neuronal cells have been damaged, it is difficult for them to regain their functions [120]. MSCs have been reviewed as possible therapeutic agents for neurodegenerative disorders such as stroke [121], Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [122], Parkinson’s disease (PD) [123], sclerosis, and injuries of the spinal cord [124]. Because of the abovementioned potential activities of MSCs, MSC transplantation into brain lesions improves functional impairments and exhibits neuroprotective action. Several registered clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov(accessed 16th August 2023) employ MSCs to treat various neurological issues in individuals with AD, PD, and spinal cord injury [125].
Prion disease is one of the neurological disorders for which MSCs can be a promising cell-based therapy (Table 1).
Song and his colleagues conducted the first investigation of MSCs as a possible therapy for prion diseases in 2009, evaluating the potential effect of immortalized xenogeneic human BM-MSCs (hBM-MSCs) in prion-infected mice. MSCs could spread to brain lesion areas and extend the lifespan of infected mice. In the same study, hBM-MSCs differentiated into neural cells in response to prion infection lesions and produced a variety of trophic factors [126]. The mechanism of migration of MSCs to the brain lesions caused by prion propagation was elucidated, implying the involvement of CCR3, CCR5, CXCR3, and CXCR4 in MSC functions after chemotactic migration [130]. In another investigation, the same group extracted autologous compact bone-derived MSCs (CB-MSCs) from the femur and tibia to treat prion-infected mice. Using an in vitro migration experiment, the CB-MSCs migrated to brain extracts from Chandler-strain-infected animals. Moreover, MSC implantation could reduce body weight loss and increase microglial activation [127].
Hay and his colleagues reported that the exposure of glia and BV2 microglial cell line to prion infection in an in vitro model when co-culturing with AdMSCs resulted in a substantial reduction in inflammatory cytokine mRNA and markers for reactive astrocytes and activated microglia [131]. In a prion-infected mouse model, Hay and his colleagues recently evaluated the utility of intranasally administered adipose-derived MSCs (AdMSCs). When activated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha or prion-infected brain homogenates, AdMSCs promote anti-inflammatory genes and growth factors. Mice given AdMSCs had less vacuolization across the brain, and inflammasome signaling genes were downregulated in the hippocampus. AdMSC therapy altered the quantity and shape of the microglia, and animals had fewer reactive astrocytes [129].
9. NSCs as a Potential Therapy for Prion Diseases
NSCs are self-renewing multipotent cells in the nervous system that create neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. NSCs can be obtained from PSCs, ESCs, or iPSCs [132]. It has been reported that transplanted NSCs are a promising therapy for neurological disorders by several mechanisms, such as releasing neurotrophic factors, inhibiting neuroinflammation, improved neuronal plasticity, and cell repair [133]. As aforementioned, the physiological form of PrP positively regulates the endogenous early stage of neurogenesis or adult neurogenesis [134]. However, increasing the expression of PrPC can lead to increased conversion into PrPSc, resulting in prion propagation in the brain tissue.
As a new cell culture model for prion disease, fetal NSCs, and adult multipotent progenitor cells could be the basis of a cell model for prion diseases as reviewed by Milhavet et al., 2006 [135]. Moreover, Relaño-Ginès and his colleagues demonstrated that PrPSc accumulated and replicated in NSCs isolated from prion-infected mice [136]. Such cells are potentially a cell therapy for prion diseases as well. The use of fetal NSCs (fNSCs) as a potential late-stage therapy for TSEs has been reported, demonstrating that the transplanting of fNSCs derived from prion-resistant knockout (koPrP) induces larger numbers of neurons and prolonged survival rate [137]. Another study showed the impacts of transplanting fNSCs, isolated from wildtype PrP or knockout PrP, into prion-infected animals on the development of the clinical signs. A significant result was indicated by increased incubation (20.1%) and survival times (13.6%). Furthermore, these temporal delays were linked to a decrease in the amount of astrocytes in areas around the NSC injection sites [128].
10. Conclusions
Despite significant advances in research in recent years, a therapy that stops or may delay the first signs of prion diseases or even reduces their course is still unavailable. Due to the several unique pathways that may cause prion diseases, treatment options for the disease are becoming increasingly diverse. Using SCs as a treatment approach is promising due to their capacity to regenerate damaged cells and improve clinical outcomes. SCs generated from BM and other SCs have been utilized as transplants to repair damaged neural cells in the brains of prion-induced mice. While certain outcomes have proved encouraging in terms of boosting mouse life, the timing of disease onset and SC transplantation is critical to achieving successful results. As a result, the usefulness of SCs has not yet been proven in prion diseases; the type of SC and the source employed in research must be considered.
Conceptualization, M.Z. and B.-H.J.; methodology, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z., B.-H.J. and S.-H.K.; writing—review and editing, supervision, B.-H.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Cause and host diversity of prion diseases. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 27 September 2023).
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. An illustration showing the different types of stem cells. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 28 September 2023).
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Strategies enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) include tissue regeneration, release of biologically active molecules, and mediation of immunomodulation including indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), interleukin 10 (IL 10), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), nitric oxide (NO), and interferon-gamma. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 20 July 2023).
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. A simplified schema of the proposed model. At 5 months post-injection, PrPC-positive HSCs in ME7-infected middle-aged mice show cell-autonomous apoptosis. At 7 months post-injection, both PrPC-negative and -positive HSCs in ME7-infected old-aged mice become senescent due to selective deterioration of the BM microenvironment with aged phenotypes of increased adipogenesis and osteoclastogenesis via a non-cell-autonomous mechanism.
Preclinical trials of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) therapy for the management of prion diseases.
| Preclinical Study | Cell Source | Species | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on mice infected with prions. | Immortalized human bone marrow-derived MSCs | Mice infected with Obihiro/Chandler scrapie strain | Prolonged survival time |
[ |
| The therapeutic effect of autologous compact bone-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on prion disease. | Autologous compact bone-derived MSCs | Mice infected with Obihiro/Chandler scrapie strain | Enhanced microglial activation |
[ |
| Stem cell therapy extends incubation and survival time in prion-infected mice in a time window–dependent manner. | Fetal NSCs | RML strains of mouse-adapted prions | Increased incubation (20.1%) and survival times (13.6%) |
[ |
| Intranasally delivered mesenchymal stromal cells decrease glial inflammation early in prion disease. | Adipose-derived MSCs | RML strains of mouse-adapted prions | Decreased vacuolization |
[ |
RML: Rocky Mountain Laboratories.
References
1. Rivera-Milla, E.; Oidtmann, B.; Panagiotidis, C.H.; Baier, M.; Sklaviadis, T.; Hoffmann, R.; Zhou, Y.; Solis, G.P.; Stuermer, C.A.; Málaga-Trillo, E. Disparate evolution of prion protein domains and the distinct origin of Doppel- and prion-related loci revealed by fish-to-mammal comparisons. FASEB J.; 2006; 20, pp. 317-319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.05-4279fje] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16352647]
2. Bendheim, P.E.; Brown, H.R.; Rudelli, R.D.; Scala, L.J.; Goller, N.L.; Wen, G.Y.; Kascsak, R.J.; Cashman, N.R.; Bolton, D.C. Nearly ubiquitous tissue distribution of the scrapie agent precursor protein. Neurology; 1992; 42, pp. 149-156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.42.1.149] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1346470]
3. Steele, A.D.; Emsley, J.G.; Ozdinler, P.H.; Lindquist, S.; Macklis, J.D. Prion protein (PrPc) positively regulates neural precursor proliferation during developmental and adult mammalian neurogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2006; 103, pp. 3416-3421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511290103] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16492732]
4. Lopes, M.H.; Hajj, G.N.; Muras, A.G.; Mancini, G.L.; Castro, R.M.; Ribeiro, K.C.; Brentani, R.R.; Linden, R.; Martins, V.R. Interaction of cellular prion and stress-inducible protein 1 promotes neuritogenesis and neuroprotection by distinct signaling pathways. J. Neurosci.; 2005; 25, pp. 11330-11339. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2313-05.2005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16339028]
5. Linden, R.; Martins, V.R.; Prado, M.A.; Cammarota, M.; Izquierdo, I.; Brentani, R.R. Physiology of the prion protein. Physiol. Rev.; 2008; 88, pp. 673-728. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00007.2007]
6. Aguzzi, A.; Baumann, F.; Bremer, J. The prion’s elusive reason for being. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.; 2008; 31, pp. 439-477. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125620]
7. Hajj, G.N.; Lopes, M.H.; Mercadante, A.F.; Veiga, S.S.; da Silveira, R.B.; Santos, T.G.; Ribeiro, K.C.; Juliano, M.A.; Jacchieri, S.G.; Zanata, S.M. et al. Cellular prion protein interaction with vitronectin supports axonal growth and is compensated by integrins. J. Cell Sci.; 2007; 120, Pt 11, pp. 1915-1926. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03459]
8. Zhang, C.C.; Steele, A.D.; Lindquist, S.; Lodish, H.F. Prion protein is expressed on long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells and is important for their self-renewal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2006; 103, pp. 2184-2189. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510577103]
9. Martellucci, S.; Manganelli, V.; Santacroce, C.; Santilli, F.; Piccoli, L.; Sorice, M.; Mattei, V. Role of Prion protein-EGFR multimolecular complex during neuronal differentiation of human dental pulp-derived stem cells. Prion; 2018; 12, pp. 117-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336896.2018.1463797]
10. Scheckel, C.; Aguzzi, A. Prions, prionoids and protein misfolding disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet.; 2018; 19, pp. 405-418. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0011-4]
11. Watts, J.C.; Balachandran, A.; Westaway, D. The expanding universe of prion diseases. PLoS Pathog.; 2006; 2, e26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020026] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16609731]
12. Jeong, B.H.; Kim, Y.S. Genetic studies in human prion diseases. J. Korean Med. Sci.; 2014; 29, pp. 623-632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.5.623] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24851016]
13. Krance, S.H.; Luke, R.; Shenouda, M.; Israwi, A.R.; Colpitts, S.J.; Darwish, L.; Strauss, M.; Watts, J.C. Cellular models for discovering prion disease therapeutics: Progress and challenges. J. Neurochem.; 2020; 153, pp. 150-172. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14956] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31943194]
14. Jeong, B.H.; Kim, N.H.; Jin, J.K.; Choi, J.K.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, J.I.; Choi, E.K.; Carp, R.I.; Kim, Y.S. Reduction of prion infectivity and levels of scrapie prion protein by lithium aluminum hydride: Implications for RNA in prion diseases. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.; 2009; 68, pp. 870-879. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181aeccfb] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19606066]
15. Barreca, M.L.; Iraci, N.; Biggi, S.; Cecchetti, V.; Biasini, E. Pharmacological Agents Targeting the Cellular Prion Protein. Pathogens; 2018; 7, 27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens7010027]
16. Zakrzewski, W.; Dobrzyński, M.; Szymonowicz, M.; Rybak, Z. Stem cells: Past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res. Ther.; 2019; 10, 68. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5]
17. Zayed, M.; Iohara, K.; Watanabe, H.; Ishikawa, M.; Tominaga, M.; Nakashima, M. Characterization of stable hypoxia-preconditioned dental pulp stem cells compared with mobilized dental pulp stem cells for application for pulp regenerative therapy. Stem Cell Res. Ther.; 2021; 12, 302. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02240-w]
18. Colby, D.W.; Prusiner, S.B. Prions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.; 2011; 3, a006833. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006833]
19. Prusiner, S.B. Molecular biology of prion diseases. Science; 1991; 252, pp. 1515-1522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1675487]
20. Kim, Y.C.; Jeong, B.H. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Incidence, South Korea, 2001–2019. Emerg Infect Dis; 2022; 28, pp. 1863-1866. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2809.212050]
21. Will, R.G.; Ironside, J.W.; Zeidler, M.; Cousens, S.N.; Estibeiro, K.; Alperovitch, A.; Poser, S.; Pocchiari, M.; Hofman, A.; Smith, P.G. A new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the UK. Lancet; 1996; 347, pp. 921-925. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91412-9]
22. Zahn, R.; Liu, A.; Lührs, T.; Riek, R.; von Schroetter, C.; López García, F.; Billeter, M.; Calzolai, L.; Wider, G.; Wüthrich, K. NMR solution structure of the human prion protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2000; 97, pp. 145-150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.1.145]
23. Westergard, L.; Christensen, H.M.; Harris, D.A. The cellular prion protein (PrP(C)): Its physiological function and role in disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta; 2007; 1772, pp. 629-644. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2007.02.011]
24. Martellucci, S.; Santacroce, C.; Santilli, F.; Manganelli, V.; Sorice, M.; Mattei, V. Prion Protein in Stem Cells: A Lipid Raft Component Involved in the Cellular Differentiation Process. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 4168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21114168] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545192]
25. Kretzschmar, H.A.; Prusiner, S.B.; Stowring, L.E.; DeArmond, S.J. Scrapie prion proteins are synthesized in neurons. Am. J. Pathol.; 1986; 122, pp. 1-5.
26. Moser, M.; Colello, R.J.; Pott, U.; Oesch, B. Developmental expression of the prion protein gene in glial cells. Neuron; 1995; 14, pp. 509-517. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(95)90307-0]
27. Aguzzi, A.; Polymenidou, M. Mammalian prion biology: One century of evolving concepts. Cell; 2004; 116, pp. 313-327. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01031-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14744440]
28. Li, B.; Chen, M.; Zhu, C. Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 2196. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042196] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33672129]
29. Soto, C.; Satani, N. The intricate mechanisms of neurodegeneration in prion diseases. Trends Mol. Med.; 2011; 17, pp. 14-24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2010.09.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20889378]
30. Fernandez-Funez, P.; Casas-Tinto, S.; Zhang, Y.; Gómez-Velazquez, M.; Morales-Garza, M.A.; Cepeda-Nieto, A.C.; Castilla, J.; Soto, C.; Rincon-Limas, D.E. In vivo generation of neurotoxic prion protein: Role for hsp70 in accumulation of misfolded isoforms. PLoS Genet.; 2009; 5, e1000507. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000507]
31. Jeong, B.H.; Ju, W.K.; Huh, K.; Lee, E.A.; Choi, I.S.; Im, J.H.; Choi, E.K.; Kim, Y.S. Molecular analysis of prion protein gene (PRNP) in Korean patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J. Korean Med. Sci.; 1998; 13, pp. 234-240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.1998.13.3.234]
32. Kim, Y.C.; Park, K.J.; Hwang, J.Y.; Park, H.C.; Kang, H.E.; Sohn, H.J.; Jeong, B.H. In-depth examination of PrP(Sc) in Holstein cattle carrying the E211K somatic mutation of the bovine prion protein gene (PRNP). Transbound. Emerg. Dis.; 2022; 69, pp. e356-e361. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14309]
33. Kim, Y.C.; Won, S.Y.; Jeong, B.H. Altered expression of glymphatic system-related proteins in prion diseases: Implications for the role of the glymphatic system in prion diseases. Cell Mol. Immunol.; 2021; 18, pp. 2281-2283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41423-021-00747-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34363029]
34. Vanni, I.; Iacobone, F.; D’Agostino, C.; Giovannelli, M.; Pirisinu, L.; Altmeppen, H.C.; Castilla, J.; Torres, J.M.; Agrimi, U.; Nonno, R. An optimized Western blot assay provides a comprehensive assessment of the physiological endoproteolytic processing of the prion protein. J. Biol. Chem.; 2023; 299, 102823. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102823] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36565989]
35. Le, N.T.T.; Wu, B.; Harris, D.A. Prion neurotoxicity. Brain Pathol.; 2019; 29, pp. 263-277. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12694] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30588688]
36. Büeler, H.; Aguzzi, A.; Sailer, A.; Greiner, R.A.; Autenried, P.; Aguet, M.; Weissmann, C. Mice devoid of PrP are resistant to scrapie. Cell; 1993; 73, pp. 1339-1347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90360-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8100741]
37. Brandner, S.; Isenmann, S.; Raeber, A.; Fischer, M.; Sailer, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Marino, S.; Weissmann, C.; Aguzzi, A. Normal host prion protein necessary for scrapie-induced neurotoxicity. Nature; 1996; 379, pp. 339-343. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/379339a0]
38. Mallucci, G.; Dickinson, A.; Linehan, J.; Klöhn, P.C.; Brandner, S.; Collinge, J. Depleting neuronal PrP in prion infection prevents disease and reverses spongiosis. Science; 2003; 302, pp. 871-874. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1090187]
39. Ferreira, N.C.; Marques, I.A.; Conceição, W.A.; Macedo, B.; Machado, C.S.; Mascarello, A.; Chiaradia-Delatorre, L.D.; Yunes, R.A.; Nunes, R.J.; Hughson, A.G. et al. Anti-prion activity of a panel of aromatic chemical compounds: In vitro and in silico approaches. PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e84531. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084531]
40. Sweeney, P.; Park, H.; Baumann, M.; Dunlop, J.; Frydman, J.; Kopito, R.; McCampbell, A.; Leblanc, G.; Venkateswaran, A.; Nurmi, A. et al. Protein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases: Implications and strategies. Transl. Neurodegener.; 2017; 6, 6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0077-5]
41. Raymond, G.J.; Zhao, H.T.; Race, B.; Raymond, L.D.; Williams, K.; Swayze, E.E.; Graffam, S.; Le, J.; Caron, T.; Stathopoulos, J. et al. Antisense oligonucleotides extend survival of prion-infected mice. JCI Insight; 2019; 5, e131175. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.131175]
42. Burke, C.M.; Walsh, D.J.; Steele, A.D.; Agrimi, U.; Di Bari, M.A.; Watts, J.C.; Supattapone, S. Full restoration of specific infectivity and strain properties from pure mammalian prion protein. PLoS Pathog.; 2019; 15, e1007662. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007662]
43. Shim, K.H.; Sharma, N.; An, S.S.A. Prion therapeutics: Lessons from the past. Prion; 2022; 16, pp. 265-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19336896.2022.2153551]
44. Cashman, N.R.; Caughey, B. Prion diseases—close to effective therapy?. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.; 2004; 3, pp. 874-884. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd1525] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15459678]
45. Schmitz, M.; Candelise, N.; Llorens, F.; Zerr, I. Amplification and Detection of Minuscule Amounts of Misfolded Prion Protein by Using the Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion. Methods Mol. Biol.; 2018; 1779, pp. 257-263. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7816-8_16] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29886538]
46. Foutz, A.; Appleby, B.S.; Hamlin, C.; Liu, X.; Yang, S.; Cohen, Y.; Chen, W.; Blevins, J.; Fausett, C.; Wang, H. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of human prion detection in cerebrospinal fluid. Ann. Neurol.; 2017; 81, pp. 79-92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.24833] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893164]
47. Hyeon, J.W.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, S.M.; Lee, J.; An, S.S.A.; Lee, M.K.; Lee, Y.S. Anti-Prion Screening for Acridine, Dextran, and Tannic Acid using Real Time–Quaking Induced Conversion: A Comparison with PrPSc-Infected Cell Screening. PLoS ONE; 2017; 12, e0170266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170266] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095474]
48. Karagianni, K.; Pettas, S.; Kanata, E.; Lioulia, E.; Thune, K.; Schmitz, M.; Tsamesidis, I.; Lymperaki, E.; Xanthopoulos, K.; Sklaviadis, T. et al. Carnosic Acid and Carnosol Display Antioxidant and Anti-Prion Properties in In Vitro and Cell-Free Models of Prion Diseases. Antioxidants; 2022; 11, 726. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox11040726] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35453411]
49. Schmitz, M.; Candelise, N.; Kanata, E.; Llorens, F.; Thüne, K.; Villar-Piqué, A.; da Silva Correia, S.M.; Dafou, D.; Sklaviadis, T.; Appelhans, D. et al. Validation of Poly(Propylene Imine) Glycodendrimers Towards Their Anti-prion Conversion Efficiency. Mol. Neurobiol.; 2020; 57, pp. 1863-1874. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-01837-w]
50. Schmitz, M.; Cramm, M.; Llorens, F.; Candelise, N.; Müller-Cramm, D.; Varges, D.; Schulz-Schaeffer, W.J.; Zafar, S.; Zerr, I. Application of an in vitro-amplification assay as a novel pre-screening test for compounds inhibiting the aggregation of prion protein scrapie. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 28711. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28711]
51. Vascellari, S.; Orrù, C.D.; Caughey, B. Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion Assays for Prion Diseases, Synucleinopathies, and Tauopathies. Front. Aging Neurosci.; 2022; 14, 853050. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.853050] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35360213]
52. Uliassi, E.; Nikolic, L.; Bolognesi, M.L.; Legname, G. Therapeutic strategies for identifying small molecules against prion diseases. Cell Tissue Res.; 2023; 392, pp. 337-347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-021-03573-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989851]
53. Zaccagnini, L.; Rossetti, G.; Tran, T.H.; Salzano, G.; Gandini, A.; Colini Baldeschi, A.; Bolognesi, M.L.; Carloni, P.; Legname, G. In silico/in vitro screening and hit evaluation identified new phenothiazine anti-prion derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem.; 2020; 196, 112295. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112295] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325366]
54. Staderini, M.; Vanni, S.; Baldeschi, A.C.; Giachin, G.; Zattoni, M.; Celauro, L.; Ferracin, C.; Bistaffa, E.; Moda, F.; Pérez, D.I. et al. Bifunctional carbazole derivatives for simultaneous therapy and fluorescence imaging in prion disease murine cell models. Eur. J. Med. Chem.; 2023; 245, 114923. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114923]
55. Moreno, J.A.; Halliday, M.; Molloy, C.; Radford, H.; Verity, N.; Axten, J.M.; Ortori, C.A.; Willis, A.E.; Fischer, P.M.; Barrett, D.A. et al. Oral treatment targeting the unfolded protein response prevents neurodegeneration and clinical disease in prion-infected mice. Sci. Transl. Med.; 2013; 5, 206ra138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3006767] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24107777]
56. Jheng, C.-P.; Lee, C.-I. Combination of structure-based virtual screening, molecular docking and molecular dynamics approaches for the discovery of anti-prion fibril flavonoids. Front. Mol. Biosci.; 2023; 9, 1088733. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.1088733]
57. Hoang, D.M.; Pham, P.T.; Bach, T.Q.; Ngo, A.T.L.; Nguyen, Q.T.; Phan, T.T.K.; Nguyen, G.H.; Le, P.T.T.; Hoang, V.T.; Forsyth, N.R. et al. Stem cell-based therapy for human diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.; 2022; 7, 272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01134-4]
58. Lo, B.; Parham, L. Ethical issues in stem cell research. Endocr. Rev.; 2009; 30, pp. 204-213. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.2008-0031]
59. Al Abbar, A.; Ngai, S.C.; Nograles, N.; Alhaji, S.Y.; Abdullah, S. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Reprogramming Platforms and Applications in Cell Replacement Therapy. Biores Open Access; 2020; 9, pp. 121-136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/biores.2019.0046]
60. Qiao, Y.; Agboola, O.S.; Hu, X.; Wu, Y.; Lei, L. Tumorigenic and Immunogenic Properties of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: A Promising Cancer Vaccine. Stem Cell Rev. Rep.; 2020; 16, pp. 1049-1061. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12015-020-10042-5]
61. Keating, A. Mesenchymal stromal cells. Curr. Opin. Hematol.; 2006; 13, pp. 419-425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.moh.0000245697.54887.6f] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17053453]
62. Zayed, M.; Caniglia, C.; Misk, N.; Dhar, M.S. Donor-Matched Comparison of Chondrogenic Potential of Equine Bone Marrow- and Synovial Fluid-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Implications for Cartilage Tissue Regeneration. Front. Vet. Sci.; 2017; 3, 121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00121] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149840]
63. Friedenstein, A.J.; Chailakhyan, R.K.; Gerasimov, U.V. Bone marrow osteogenic stem cells: In vitro cultivation and transplantation in diffusion chambers. Cell Tissue Kinet.; 1987; 20, pp. 263-272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.1987.tb01309.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3690622]
64. Han, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Han, Y.; Chang, F.; Ding, J. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Regenerative Medicine. Cells; 2019; 8, 886. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8080886]
65. Dominici, M.; Le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.; Krause, D.; Deans, R.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.; Horwitz, E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy; 2006; 8, pp. 315-317. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14653240600855905]
66. Chan, J.L.; Tang, K.C.; Patel, A.P.; Bonilla, L.M.; Pierobon, N.; Ponzio, N.M.; Rameshwar, P. Antigen-presenting property of mesenchymal stem cells occurs during a narrow window at low levels of interferon-gamma. Blood; 2006; 107, pp. 4817-4824. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-01-0057]
67. MacQueen, L.; Sun, Y.; Simmons, C.A. Mesenchymal stem cell mechanobiology and emerging experimental platforms. J. R. Soc. Interface; 2013; 10, 20130179. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0179]
68. Seo, Y.; Shin, T.H.; Kim, H.S. Current Strategies to Enhance Adipose Stem Cell Function: An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 3827. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153827]
69. Mabuchi, Y.; Okawara, C.; Méndez-Ferrer, S.; Akazawa, C. Cellular Heterogeneity of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells in the Bone Marrow. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2021; 9, 689366. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.689366]
70. Zayed, M.N.; Schumacher, J.; Misk, N.; Dhar, M.S. Effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines on chondrogenesis of equine mesenchymal stromal cells derived from bone marrow or synovial fluid. Vet. J.; 2016; 217, pp. 26-32. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.05.014]
71. Hoogduijn, M.J.; Dor, F.J. Mesenchymal stem cells: Are we ready for clinical application in transplantation and tissue regeneration?. Front. Immunol.; 2013; 4, 144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2013.00144] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781219]
72. Dufrane, D. Impact of Age on Human Adipose Stem Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering. Cell Transplant.; 2017; 26, pp. 1496-1504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689717721203] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113460]
73. Zhou, S.; Greenberger, J.S.; Epperly, M.W.; Goff, J.P.; Adler, C.; Leboff, M.S.; Glowacki, J. Age-related intrinsic changes in human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to osteoblasts. Aging Cell; 2008; 7, pp. 335-343. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00377.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18248663]
74. Maldonado-Soto, A.R.; Oakley, D.H.; Wichterle, H.; Stein, J.; Doetsch, F.K.; Henderson, C.E. Stem cells in the nervous system. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.; 2014; 93, (Suppl. S3), pp. S132-S144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000111]
75. Hass, R.; Kasper, C.; Böhm, S.; Jacobs, R. Different populations and sources of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC): A comparison of adult and neonatal tissue-derived MSC. Cell Commun. Signal.; 2011; 9, 12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-9-12]
76. Sagaradze, G.D.; Basalova, N.A.; Efimenko, A.Y.; Tkachuk, V.A. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as Critical Contributors to Tissue Regeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2020; 8, 576176. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.576176]
77. Liang, X.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tse, H.F.; Lian, Q. Paracrine mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy: Current status and perspectives. Cell Transplant.; 2014; 23, pp. 1045-1059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096368913X667709]
78. Keshtkar, S.; Azarpira, N.; Ghahremani, M.H. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: Novel frontiers in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res. Ther.; 2018; 9, 63. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0791-7]
79. Gnecchi, M.; Zhang, Z.; Ni, A.; Dzau, V.J. Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy. Circ. Res.; 2008; 103, pp. 1204-1219. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.176826]
80. Gao, F.; Chiu, S.M.; Motan, D.A.L.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L.; Ji, H.L.; Tse, H.F.; Fu, Q.L.; Lian, Q. Mesenchymal stem cells and immunomodulation: Current status and future prospects. Cell Death Dis.; 2016; 7, e2062. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2015.327]
81. Li, M.; Sun, X.; Kuang, X.; Liao, Y.; Li, H.; Luo, D. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress CD8+ T cell-mediated activation by suppressing natural killer group 2, member D protein receptor expression and secretion of prostaglandin E2, indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase and transforming growth factor-β. Clin. Exp. Immunol.; 2014; 178, pp. 516-524. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cei.12423] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25070361]
82. Luz-Crawford, P.; Kurte, M.; Bravo-Alegría, J.; Contreras, R.; Nova-Lamperti, E.; Tejedor, G.; Noël, D.; Jorgensen, C.; Figueroa, F.; Djouad, F. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells generate a CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell population during the differentiation process of Th1 and Th17 cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther.; 2013; 4, 65. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/scrt216] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734780]
83. Volpe, G.; Bernstock, J.D.; Peruzzotti-Jametti, L.; Pluchino, S. Modulation of host immune responses following non-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Translational implications in progressive multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol.; 2019; 331, pp. 11-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.12.005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28034466]
84. Gnecchi, M.; Danieli, P.; Malpasso, G.; Ciuffreda, M.C. Paracrine Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Tissue Repair. Methods Mol. Biol.; 2016; 1416, pp. 123-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3584-0_7]
85. Zayed, M.; Iohara, K. Immunomodulation and Regeneration Properties of Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Potential Therapy to Treat Coronavirus Disease 2019. Cell Transpl.; 2020; 29, 963689720952089. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689720952089]
86. Kou, M.; Huang, L.; Yang, J.; Chiang, Z.; Chen, S.; Liu, J.; Guo, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, X.; Xu, X. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for immunomodulation and regeneration: A next generation therapeutic tool?. Cell Death Dis.; 2022; 13, 580. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05034-x]
87. Pathan, M.; Fonseka, P.; Chitti, S.V.; Kang, T.; Sanwlani, R.; Van Deun, J.; Hendrix, A.; Mathivanan, S. Vesiclepedia 2019: A compendium of RNA, proteins, lipids and metabolites in extracellular vesicles. Nucleic Acids Res; 2019; 47, pp. D516-D519. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1029]
88. Bazzoni, R.; Takam Kamga, P.; Tanasi, I.; Krampera, M. Extracellular Vesicle-Dependent Communication Between Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Immune Effector Cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2020; 8, 596079. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.596079]
89. Gowen, A.; Shahjin, F.; Chand, S.; Odegaard, K.E.; Yelamanchili, S.V. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Challenges in Clinical Applications. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2020; 8, 149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00149]
90. Zhou, X.; Jin, N.; Wang, F.; Chen, B. Mesenchymal stem cells: A promising way in therapies of graft-versus-host disease. Cancer Cell Int.; 2020; 20, 114. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01193-z]
91. Yao, L.; Hu, X.; Dai, K.; Yuan, M.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, Y. Mesenchymal stromal cells: Promising treatment for liver cirrhosis. Stem Cell Res. Ther.; 2022; 13, 308. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-03001-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35841079]
92. Torres-Torrillas, M.; Rubio, M.; Damia, E.; Cuervo, B.; Del Romero, A.; Peláez, P.; Chicharro, D.; Miguel, L.; Sopena, J.J. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Promising Tool in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 3105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20123105] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242644]
93. Brandner, S.; Jaunmuktane, Z. Prion disease: Experimental models and reality. Acta Neuropathol.; 2017; 133, pp. 197-222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-017-1670-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28084518]
94. Kawasaki, Y.; Kawagoe, K.; Chen, C.J.; Teruya, K.; Sakasegawa, Y.; Doh-ura, K. Orally administered amyloidophilic compound is effective in prolonging the incubation periods of animals cerebrally infected with prion diseases in a prion strain-dependent manner. J. Virol.; 2007; 81, pp. 12889-12898. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01563-07]
95. Vorberg, I.; Chiesa, R. Experimental models to study prion disease pathogenesis and identify potential therapeutic compounds. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.; 2019; 44, pp. 28-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2019.02.002]
96. Berry, D.B.; Lu, D.; Geva, M.; Watts, J.C.; Bhardwaj, S.; Oehler, A.; Renslo, A.R.; DeArmond, S.J.; Prusiner, S.B.; Giles, K. Drug resistance confounding prion therapeutics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2013; 110, pp. E4160-E4169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317164110]
97. Giles, K.; Berry, D.B.; Condello, C.; Dugger, B.N.; Li, Z.; Oehler, A.; Bhardwaj, S.; Elepano, M.; Guan, S.; Silber, B.M. et al. Optimization of Aryl Amides that Extend Survival in Prion-Infected Mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.; 2016; 358, pp. 537-547. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.116.235556]
98. Lu, D.; Giles, K.; Li, Z.; Rao, S.; Dolghih, E.; Gever, J.R.; Geva, M.; Elepano, M.L.; Oehler, A.; Bryant, C. et al. Biaryl amides and hydrazones as therapeutics for prion disease in transgenic mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.; 2013; 347, pp. 325-338. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.113.205799]
99. Lawson, V.A.; Vella, L.J.; Stewart, J.D.; Sharples, R.A.; Klemm, H.; Machalek, D.M.; Masters, C.L.; Cappai, R.; Collins, S.J.; Hill, A.F. Mouse-adapted sporadic human Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions propagate in cell culture. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.; 2008; 40, pp. 2793-2801. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2008.05.024]
100. Giles, K.; Berry, D.B.; Condello, C.; Hawley, R.C.; Gallardo-Godoy, A.; Bryant, C.; Oehler, A.; Elepano, M.; Bhardwaj, S.; Patel, S. et al. Different 2-Aminothiazole Therapeutics Produce Distinct Patterns of Scrapie Prion Neuropathology in Mouse Brains. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.; 2015; 355, pp. 2-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.115.224659]
101. Ghaemmaghami, S.; Phuan, P.W.; Perkins, B.; Ullman, J.; May, B.C.; Cohen, F.E.; Prusiner, S.B. Cell division modulates prion accumulation in cultured cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2007; 104, pp. 17971-17976. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708372104] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17989223]
102. Watts, J.C.; Prusiner, S.B. Mouse models for studying the formation and propagation of prions. J. Biol. Chem.; 2014; 289, pp. 19841-19849. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R114.550707] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860095]
103. Follet, J.; Lemaire-Vieille, C.; Blanquet-Grossard, F.; Podevin-Dimster, V.; Lehmann, S.; Chauvin, J.P.; Decavel, J.P.; Varea, R.; Grassi, J.; Fontès, M. et al. PrP expression and replication by Schwann cells: Implications in prion spreading. J. Virol.; 2002; 76, pp. 2434-2439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jvi.76.5.2434-2439.2002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11836421]
104. Oboznaya, M.B.; Gilch, S.; Titova, M.A.; Koroev, D.O.; Volkova, T.D.; Volpina, O.M.; Schätzl, H.M. Antibodies to a nonconjugated prion protein peptide 95-123 interfere with PrPSc propagation in prion-infected cells. Cell Mol. Neurobiol.; 2007; 27, pp. 271-284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10571-006-9108-y]
105. Uryu, M.; Karino, A.; Kamihara, Y.; Horiuchi, M. Characterization of prion susceptibility in Neuro2a mouse neuroblastoma cell subclones. Microbiol. Immunol.; 2007; 51, pp. 661-669. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1348-0421.2007.tb03954.x]
106. Herbst, A.; Banser, P.; Velasquez, C.D.; Mays, C.E.; Sim, V.L.; Westaway, D.; Aiken, J.M.; McKenzie, D. Infectious prions accumulate to high levels in non proliferative C2C12 myotubes. PLoS Pathog.; 2013; 9, e1003755. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003755]
107. Mahal, S.P.; Baker, C.A.; Demczyk, C.A.; Smith, E.W.; Julius, C.; Weissmann, C. Prion strain discrimination in cell culture: The cell panel assay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2007; 104, pp. 20908-20913. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710054104]
108. Iwamaru, Y.; Takenouchi, T.; Ogihara, K.; Hoshino, M.; Takata, M.; Imamura, M.; Tagawa, Y.; Hayashi-Kato, H.; Ushiki-Kaku, Y.; Shimizu, Y. et al. Microglial cell line established from prion protein-overexpressing mice is susceptible to various murine prion strains. J. Virol.; 2007; 81, pp. 1524-1527. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01379-06]
109. Nishida, N.; Harris, D.A.; Vilette, D.; Laude, H.; Frobert, Y.; Grassi, J.; Casanova, D.; Milhavet, O.; Lehmann, S. Successful transmission of three mouse-adapted scrapie strains to murine neuroblastoma cell lines overexpressing wild-type mouse prion protein. J. Virol.; 2000; 74, pp. 320-325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.1.320-325.2000]
110. Marshall, K.E.; Hughson, A.; Vascellari, S.; Priola, S.A.; Sakudo, A.; Onodera, T.; Baron, G.S. PrP Knockout Cells Expressing Transmembrane PrP Resist Prion Infection. J. Virol.; 2017; 91, e01686-16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01686-16]
111. Milhavet, O.; McMahon, H.E.; Rachidi, W.; Nishida, N.; Katamine, S.; Mangé, A.; Arlotto, M.; Casanova, D.; Riondel, J.; Favier, A. et al. Prion infection impairs the cellular response to oxidative stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2000; 97, pp. 13937-13942. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.250289197] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11095725]
112. Martins-Taylor, K.; Xu, R.H. Concise review: Genomic stability of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells; 2012; 30, pp. 22-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stem.705] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21823210]
113. Mohanty, S.T.; Cairney, C.J.; Chantry, A.D.; Madan, S.; Fernandes, J.A.; Howe, S.J.; Moore, H.D.; Thompson, M.J.; Chen, B.; Thrasher, A. et al. A small molecule modulator of prion protein increases human mesenchymal stem cell lifespan, ex vivo expansion, and engraftment to bone marrow in NOD/SCID mice. Stem Cells; 2012; 30, pp. 1134-1143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stem.1065] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22367629]
114. Takakura, Y.; Yamaguchi, N.; Nakagaki, T.; Satoh, K.; Kira, J.; Nishida, N. Bone marrow stroma cells are susceptible to prion infection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 2008; 377, pp. 957-961. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.099]
115. Lyahyai, J.; Mediano, D.R.; Ranera, B.; Sanz, A.; Remacha, A.R.; Bolea, R.; Zaragoza, P.; Rodellar, C.; Martín-Burriel, I. Isolation and characterization of ovine mesenchymal stem cells derived from peripheral blood. BMC Vet. Res.; 2012; 8, 169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-169]
116. Hernaiz, A.; Cobeta, P.; Marín, B.; Vázquez, F.J.; Badiola, J.J.; Zaragoza, P.; Bolea, R.; Martín-Burriel, I. Susceptibility of Ovine Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Spheroids to Scrapie Prion Infection. Animals; 2023; 13, 1043. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13061043]
117. García-Mendívil, L.; Mediano, D.R.; Hernaiz, A.; Sanz-Rubio, D.; Vázquez, F.J.; Marín, B.; López-Pérez, Ó.; Otero, A.; Badiola, J.J.; Zaragoza, P. et al. Effect of Scrapie Prion Infection in Ovine Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Ovine Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Neurons. Animals; 2021; 11, 1137. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11041137]
118. Krejciova, Z.; Alibhai, J.; Zhao, C.; Krencik, R.; Rzechorzek, N.M.; Ullian, E.M.; Manson, J.; Ironside, J.W.; Head, M.W.; Chandran, S. Human stem cell-derived astrocytes replicate human prions in a PRNP genotype-dependent manner. J. Exp. Med.; 2017; 214, pp. 3481-3495. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20161547]
119. Sim, H.-J.; Kim, Y.-C.; Bhattarai, G.; Won, S.-Y.; Lee, J.-C.; Jeong, B.-H.; Kook, S.-H. Prion infection modulates hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell fate through cell-autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms. Leukemia; 2023; 37, pp. 877-887. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01828-w]
120. Mahar, M.; Cavalli, V. Intrinsic mechanisms of neuronal axon regeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.; 2018; 19, pp. 323-337. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0001-8]
121. Li, Z.; Dong, X.; Tian, M.; Liu, C.; Wang, K.; Li, L.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J. Stem cell-based therapies for ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Stem Cell Res. Ther.; 2020; 11, 252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01762-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32586371]
122. Liu, X.Y.; Yang, L.P.; Zhao, L. Stem cell therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. World J. Stem Cells; 2020; 12, pp. 787-802. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v12.i8.787] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952859]
123. Heris, R.M.; Shirvaliloo, M.; Abbaspour-Aghdam, S.; Hazrati, A.; Shariati, A.; Youshanlouei, H.R.; Niaragh, F.J.; Valizadeh, H.; Ahmadi, M. The potential use of mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes in Parkinson’s disease treatment. Stem Cell Res. Ther.; 2022; 13, 371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-03050-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902981]
124. Shang, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhang, B.; Wang, X.; Wanyan, P. Clinical translation of stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury still premature: Results from a single-arm meta-analysis based on 62 clinical trials. BMC Med.; 2022; 20, 284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02482-2]
125. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (accessed on 16 August 2023).
126. Song, C.H.; Honmou, O.; Ohsawa, N.; Nakamura, K.; Hamada, H.; Furuoka, H.; Hasebe, R.; Horiuchi, M. Effect of transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on mice infected with prions. J. Virol.; 2009; 83, pp. 5918-5927. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00165-09] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19297502]
127. Shan, Z.; Hirai, Y.; Nakayama, M.; Hayashi, R.; Yamasaki, T.; Hasebe, R.; Song, C.H.; Horiuchi, M. Therapeutic effect of autologous compact bone-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on prion disease. J. Gen. Virol.; 2017; 98, pp. 2615-2627. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.000907] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28874230]
128. Relaño-Ginés, A.; Lehmann, S.; Bencsik, A.; Herva, M.E.; Torres, J.M.; Crozet, C.A. Stem Cell Therapy Extends Incubation and Survival Time in Prion-Infected Mice in a Time Window–Dependant Manner. J. Infect. Dis.; 2011; 204, pp. 1038-1045. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir484]
129. Hay, A.J.D.; Latham, A.S.; Mumford, G.; Hines, A.D.; Risen, S.; Gordon, E.; Siebenaler, C.; Gilberto, V.S.; Zabel, M.D.; Moreno, J.A. Intranasally delivered mesenchymal stromal cells decrease glial inflammation early in prion disease. Front. Neurosci.; 2023; 17, 1158408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1158408]
130. Song, C.H.; Honmou, O.; Furuoka, H.; Horiuchi, M. Identification of chemoattractive factors involved in the migration of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to brain lesions caused by prions. J. Virol.; 2011; 85, pp. 11069-11078. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.05318-11]
131. Hay, A.J.D.; Murphy, T.J.; Popichak, K.A.; Zabel, M.D.; Moreno, J.A. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells decrease prion-induced glial inflammation in vitro. Sci. Rep.; 2022; 12, 22567. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26628-7]
132. Galiakberova, A.A.; Dashinimaev, E.B. Neural Stem Cells and Methods for Their Generation From Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in vitro. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2020; 8, 815. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00815] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117792]
133. De Gioia, R.; Biella, F.; Citterio, G.; Rizzo, F.; Abati, E.; Nizzardo, M.; Bresolin, N.; Comi, G.P.; Corti, S. Neural Stem Cell Transplantation for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 3103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093103] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354178]
134. Castle, A.R.; Gill, A.C. Physiological Functions of the Cellular Prion Protein. Front. Mol. Biosci.; 2017; 4, 19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2017.00019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28428956]
135. Milhavet, O.; Casanova, D.; Chevallier, N.; McKay, R.D.; Lehmann, S. Neural stem cell model for prion propagation. Stem Cells; 2006; 24, pp. 2284-2291. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2006-0088] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16741225]
136. Relaño-Ginès, A.; Gabelle, A.; Hamela, C.; Belondrade, M.; Casanova, D.; Mourton-Gilles, C.; Lehmann, S.; Crozet, C. Prion replication occurs in endogenous adult neural stem cells and alters their neuronal fate: Involvement of endogenous neural stem cells in prion diseases. PLoS Pathog.; 2013; 9, e1003485. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003485] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23935493]
137. Brown, K.L.; Brown, J.; Ritchie, D.L.; Sales, J.; Fraser, J.R. Fetal cell grafts provide long-term protection against scrapie induced neuronal loss. Neuroreport; 2001; 12, pp. 77-82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200101220-00023]
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Sung-Ho, Kook 2
; Byung-Hoon Jeong 3
1 Korea Zoonosis Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54531, Republic of Korea;
2 Department of Bioactive Material Sciences, Research Center of Bioactive Materials, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
3 Korea Zoonosis Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54531, Republic of Korea;