Amphibians and Reptiles of the Montagne des Français: An Update of the Distribution and Regional Endemicity

Abstract

Simple Summary

In 2014 and 2020, we conducted research in the Montagne des Français Protected Area. This area is recognized for its remarkable fauna and high rate of endemism. The objective of this study was to prioritize areas and determine the diversity and distribution of herpetofauna species, as well as their conservation status, endemism, and threats. In this study, we compared species richness between two surveys conducted in 2014 and 2020. We found that three species of amphibians and one reptile species had a new distribution. The 2020 survey also discovered Langaha pseudoalluaudi, a snake that has not been observed since 2007. The information gathered from this survey could be of use to site managers in the revision of conservation management plans.

Abstract

The harmonious landscape of Montagne des Français is a protected area in the far north of Madagascar. Our herpetofauna surveys were conducted on the eastern and western slopes according to habitat variations within the massif for 2014 and 2020. Our research updates the herpetofauna species richness, spatial distribution ranges, and ecological guilds within the protected area. We used direct opportunistic observations, systematic refuge examinations, and pitfall traps with drift fences at three sites to sample animals. Nineteen amphibian and fifty reptile species were recorded during this study. Three amphibian species and one reptile species, in addition to the snake Langaha pseudoalluaudi, last recorded in 2007, were discovered at Montagne des Français. Here, we present a database update for the herpetofauna species from Montagne des Français and provide a specific morphological description of the morphospecies considered as a new extension or localized distribution. This new database can help site managers develop new strategic conservation plans in response to habitat modification.

1. Introduction

Madagascar is recognized globally as a biodiversity hotspot [1]. High levels of endemism and diversity are observed due to its isolation [2,3,4]. The creation of protected areas is underway to conserve biodiversity and ecosystem services [5]. The island also has a highly endemic herpetofauna, with 90% of the species found nowhere else [6]. Montagne des Français, which is one of Madagascar’s protected areas, is situated in the northern region. The site is a limestone massif [7] and is home to an exceptional community of herpetofauna [8], including several endemic species [9].

Unfortunately, the biodiversity of the flora and fauna in this protected area has been affected by human activities. These anthropogenic pressures have caused habitat loss and significant alterations to the ecosystem [7,10], resulting in landscape erosion. Currently, dry forests are one of the most threatened ecosystems on the island as they are subjected to frequent fires [11,12]. Among vertebrates, herpetofauna are especially sensitive to habitat alterations and disturbances [13,14]. In addition, numerous studies have shown that species within the herpetofauna category are among the most endangered vertebrates on Earth [15,16,17]. This is typically observed in tropical regions [18]. Although research efforts have been ongoing for decades, the inventory of Madagascar’s herpetofauna remains incomplete [19,20].

Research in Montagne des Français has provided incomplete data on the distribution and status of species [7,20,21]; however, ongoing field studies continue to collect new information. A large body of literature indicates that Montagne des Français is home to many reptile and amphibian species. Among them are Heteroliodon fohy [22] and Thamnosophis martae [23] snakes, along with Brookesia tristis [24]. The gecko Paroedura lohatsara is also present in this locality, along with various frog species, including Stumpffia staffordi [22,25] and Mantella viridis [26,27]. The majority of these species are microendemic or regionally endemic, meaning that they are exceptionally or primarily found in the Montagne des Français and its neighboring regions.

Many of the species under consideration have recently undergone assessments revealing that they are “Critically Endangered” or “Endangered”, highlighting their precarious position regarding extinction. Human activities, such as agriculture and logging, have severely reduced their habitats and caused fragmentation and degradation, all of which pose significant threats to their continued survival. The distribution maps of several species suggest that a biogeographical border exists between Montagne des Français/Orangea and limestone massifs situated to the south, underscoring the importance of safeguarding and managing Montagne des Français as a critical habitat for these reptiles [28]. Furthermore, species inventories have only been conducted in a few areas of Montagne des Français. In this study, we investigated two sites that are much less visited, Ampitiliantsambo and Sahabedara.

This article presents recent findings on the biodiversity, biogeography, and endemicity of herpetofauna residing in Montagne des Français. Field surveys were conducted on both the eastern and western slopes of the mountain in 2014 and 2020, incorporating ecological parameters, such as habitat type, stream flow, and degree of degradation. The database on biodiversity resulting from the two studies of amphibians and reptiles serves not only to prioritize species but also to ease pressure on the protected core area and aid the site manager in executing the new management plan. These new data can also contribute to the implementation of a new conservation strategy, given the many threats that surround this protected area [29,30]. Optimal management of protected areas requires access to scientific data and comprehensive knowledge of biodiversity, which should be incorporated into the design of conservation and management strategies [31]. Biological inventories are highly effective means of acquiring such information [32].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Montagne des Français is a limestone plateau intersected by narrow canyons, located in northern Madagascar, between 12°18 and 12°27′ latitudes south and 49°21 and 49°23′ longitudes east, with a maximum elevation of 425 m asl. The forest massif is very close to the city of Antsiranana, measuring 6049 ha (Figure 1). This site has had a fully protected status as a Category V new protected area since 28 April 2015 (Decree N°. 2015-780) and is managed by the NGO “Service d’Appui pour la Gestion de l’Environment” which is located in the city of Antsiranana.

• Sahabedara is located at an altitude of 159 m between 049°21′41.7″ E and 12°23′05.8″ S. The area consists of a gallery forest with sandy and rocky terrains. The forest is moderately degraded, with an open canopy, and is situated outside the core area of Montagne des Français.

• Ampitiliantsambo lies between 049°23′05.5″ E and 12°23′16.6″ S at an altitude of 204 m. It supports a natural semi-deciduous forest and an open-canopy fragmented forest. This site is situated in the peripheral area of Montagne des Français.

• Andavakoera is located between 049°20′58.1″ E and 12°19′49.6″ S at an altitude of 173 m. It consists of a Sambirano forest or a relict gallery forest with sand and rocks. The site represents the core area of Montagne des Français PA.

Figure 1

Map of the study sites in Montagne des Français.

[Figure omitted. See PDF]

2.2. Data Collection

We conducted a biological inventory at the Andavakoera site from January 13 to 24 in 2014, and from May 3 to 24 in 2020. The first survey focused only on the Andavakoera site and the second on Sahabedara, Ampitiliantsambo, and Andavakoera (Figure 1). The Andavakoera site is situated in the core area, while Sahabedara and Ampitiliantsambo are in the peripheral areas. In 2014, a group of four individuals conducted ten days of fieldwork, whereas in 2020, a group of seven individuals conducted six days of fieldwork per site. We established four transects to ensure that the different habitat types at each site were surveyed. The transect length ranged from 1500 m to 3000 m. We determined each transect based on the type of environment, plant and geological formations, topography (valley bottoms, flanks, canyons, and summits), and degree of degradation. The field guide developed by [8] was used to identify species.

During these expeditions, three standard field techniques were used to sample the herpetofauna community:

(1) Pitfall trapping: We used pitfall traps made up of buckets (275 mm deep, 290 mm top internal diameter, and 220 mm bottom internal diameter). To allow water to drain, we removed the handles and made a few tiny holes at the bottom. We buried the buckets with their upper rims flushed with the earth at intervals of 10 m along a drift fence. We used 100 m long by 0.5 m high black plastic sheeting to create the drift fence. We positioned the fence to cut through the center of each pitfall trap and fastened it vertically to short wooden pegs. To prevent individuals from passing beneath the barrier, we dug the bottom of the plastic approximately 50 mm deep into the ground. Each day, in the early morning and late afternoon, we checked the pitfall traps and removed all the captives. For eight nights, we employed three drift fence pitfall arrays at each location.

(2) Refuge examinations: We conducted active searches both during the day and night in all possible habitats and altitudes. The majority of the searches, which lasted between 30 min and three hours, were concentrated in the interior of the forest near pathways and trails for cryptic reptile species and arboreal frogs, as well as in streams and the related riparian vegetation for amphibians. Examining refuges are suitable for both active daytime and nocturnal resting animals.

(3) Opportunistic searching [33]: This method complemented the refuge examinations and was usually carried out at the same time and along the same transect. This involved creating an inventory of amphibians and reptiles perceived along the transect. The transect was visited once per day to mitigate disturbance to the animals. As certain groups of species are nocturnal, observations were also conducted at night.

2.3. Data Analysis

Population structure was determined by examining several parameters, including the number of species present at each site, their abundance, status, ecological distribution, and habitat frequency. Concerning the habitat description, we used two forest types according to habitat loss, which was also used in [34]. The first one represents a forest with a weak pressure (noted F) where there are more big trees (≥25 m), and the second one has numerous observed anthropogenic activities as well as fewer big trees (noted A). We used a classification system similar to that developed by [35] to categorize species based on their abundance. This system is as follows: abundant (encountered regularly in large numbers throughout the year), common (encountered regularly year-round), infrequent (encountered unpredictably and in small numbers), and rare (rarely encountered). All identifications of the species are only based on morphological analysis. For frogs, we used stable morphological features like mensuration, iris peripheral coloration, and webbing formula; and for Squamata, we used mensuration, characteristics of rostral appendix, and scale and spine features.

3. Results

3.1. Species Richness

We recorded a total of 19 amphibian and 50 reptile species at Montagne des Français during the two surveys of 2014 and 2020, which provided an overall herpetofaunal diversity of 69 species. Some species are presented within the Supplementary Materials. Of these species, 94% are endemic to Madagascar, 10% are locally endemic, and 21% are regionally endemic. From this overall result, in 2014, we identified 10 amphibians of three families and 35 reptiles of six families. In 2020, we found 17 amphibians from two families and 44 reptiles from six families (Table 1). In 2014, we only investigated the Andavakoera site. However, in 2020, we recorded amphibians and reptiles from Sahabedara (14 amphibians/37 reptiles), Ampitiliantsambo (15 amphibians/30 reptiles), and Andavakoera (8 amphibians/24 reptiles) (Figure 2). We noticed that Andavakoera had fewer species recorded in 2020 than in 2014.

3.2. Abundance and Ecological Preference

We found that 9 species (13%) were abundant, 21 species (30%) were common, 17 species (24%) were infrequent, and 22 species (31%) were rare (Table 1). Of the recorded amphibians, Mantella viridis was dominant (34% of the total) in Andavakoera, whereas other sites were dominated by Boophis tephraeomystax, Mantidactylus bellyi, and Mantidactylus ulcerosus. We also observed that 28 species were strictly arboreal (37%), 32 were in terrestrial environments (43%), 10 were semi-aquatic (13%), and 5 were found in rocky environments (7%). Half of the observed species (50%) were found within forested areas, 10% were recorded in anthropogenically disturbed areas, and 40% were in both forested and anthropogenically disturbed areas.

3.3. Newly Recorded Species at Montagne des Français

We identified three frogs (Boophis cf. occidentalis, B. cf. marojezensis, and B. sp.) and one snake (Phisalixella cf. arctifasciata) previously unknown to the area. Additionally, we found Langaha pseudoalluaudi, which previously had not been seen in the area since 2007. Below, we present a description of these observations:

3.3.1. Boophis cf. occidentalis

This is a medium-sized deciduous forest species (SVL = 44.3 mm). The seven individuals observed had a green dorsum and yellow lateral line running between the snout tip and inguinal region. All the ventral surfaces were pink (Figure 2). The webbing formula is 1 (0.25) 2i (0.5) 2e (0.25) 3i (0.25) 3e (0.25) 4i (1) 4e (1) 5 (0). Males have evident tubercles, especially on the dorsum, which are absent in females. We observed this species on a branch overhanging the stream and above the riverbank from 6–9 p.m.

3.3.2. Boophis cf. marojezensis

This is a small forest species (SVL = 23.5 mm) found close to a small stream. One individual had a cream color on the dorsum and a blue peripheral ring on its iris. The fingertips and toe tips were pigmented with a golden color. The webbing formula is 1 (0.5) 2i (0) 2e (0.25) 3i (1) 3e (0.5) 4i (1) 4e (1) 5 (0) and this characteristic shows some differentiation according to the webbing formula by Glaw et Vences (2007). This species was resting on a leaf of a shrub overhanging a small stream at 9:15 p.m.

3.3.3. Boophis sp.

This is a large forest species (SVL = 65.5 mm). This species could belong to the Boophis goudotii group based on the presence of a turquoise-blue outer iris periphery and a large SVL. The webbing formula is 1 (0.25) 2i (0) 2e (0) 3i (0.5) 3e (0.25) 4i (0.75) 4e (0.75) 5 (0). It was resting on a branch of a shrub overhanging a small stream at 10:15 p.m.

3.3.4. Phisalixella cf. arctifasciata

This arboreal snake was found at Montagne des Français during our 2014 and 2020 investigations. It is a large species (TL: 864 mm; SVL: 288 mm) but differs from P. arctifasciatus by the presence of 135 dark transverse bands between the neck and the tail tip. It was active during the night, around 11:00 p.m., on a branch at a height of 3.5 m next to a small stream.

3.3.5. Langaha pseudoalluaudi

This is a large arboreal forest species (TL = 1275 mm for males; 1260 m for females). These male and female individuals were found in the same environment. Both specimens were discovered under identical conditions, on shrubby plants measuring 2 m and 2.5 m at the periphery of the relict forest, situated in an open environment at an altitude of 80 m.

4. Discussion

Our study provides new data on the distribution and endemism of amphibians and reptiles within Montagne des Français PA. The results build on previous studies [7,8,9,36] of the unique herpetofaunal community of Montagne des Français. All these studies have already highlighted the level of endemicity and habitat loss due to various threats, including the proximity of this zone to human settlements and their activities.

4.1. Species Richness

Incredible faunal diversity was found in the extreme northern karst formations of Madagascar. Sixty-nine species were encountered during this study. Of these, we recorded 10 amphibians from three families and 35 reptiles from six families in 2014 in Andavakoera. In addition, the survey we conducted in 2020 allowed us to encounter 16 amphibians from two families and 44 reptiles from six families. The endemicity level was 94%, which is similar to that in [7,9,34]. Despite the relatively short fieldwork, we were able to increase sampling effort by having a large research team composed of eight people. Moreover, we investigated other sites, such as Sahabedara and Ampitiliantsambo, located in the peripheral areas of Montagne des Français PA, in addition to Andavakoera, to further assess the herpetofaunal diversity of the area. Although these additional sites were not frequently surveyed, we found a higher species diversity of amphibians and reptiles than that of Andavakoera during the survey of 2020 (Table 1), including the highly cryptic snake Langaha pseudoalluaudi rediscovered in Sahabedara, which was last recorded by [7] in 2007. Furthermore, most of the newly recorded species were discovered in these sites, namely, Boophis cf. marojezensis, B. cf. occidentalis, B. sp., and the snake Physalixella cf. arctifasciata, which morphologically present a big challenge for classification and Montagne des Francais appears as a new biogeographical distribution for them. Importantly, we emphasize the need for bioacoustic and molecular studies on the newly recorded species we present here, as we cannot confirm their status based on morphology and appearance alone.

Comparing previous research data with those gathered during the current inventory, it can be shown that Zonosaurus aenus, Thamnosophis lateralis, and T. stumpffi were not identified by [7,9,25]. Relatedly, the recent study conducted by [25] did not confirm the occurrence of Dromicodryas bernieri and Langaha pseudoalluaudi, while the previous studies in 2007 [7,9] did. The absence of these animals could be attributed to seasonal factors. If surveys were conducted when they are inactive, it may make observing them challenging or impossible. Additionally, the lack of detection in some years might be due to survey differences between the western slope, Andavakoera, and the eastern slope, Sahabedara and Ampitiliantsambo, or due to the presence of bushfire, charcoal production, or other habitat factors affecting species presence during surveys.

4.2. Importance of Conservation

While the Montagne des Français is located near the urban area of Antsiranana, anthropogenic activities such as charcoal production [7] and timber harvesting provoke threats to species habitat and negatively affect herpetofauna [36]. Moreover, the sites of Sahabedara and Ampitiliantsambo were more disturbed by land use leading to a fragmented and degraded forest. Some species of herpetofauna in tropical dry forests have been shown to be highly resilient [37]. Indeed, certain species are found in forests of varying quality. For example, Langaha pseudoalluaudi, Lycodryas sp., Sanzinia volontany, and Madagascarophis colubrinus may be able to adapt their behavior to disturbed habitats. We observed these species frequently in areas with closed canopies and in more open habitats. At the same time, other species are more sensitive to minor habitat changes; for example, Mantella viridis, Boophis cf majori, B. cf occidentalis, and B. sp., which are typically restricted to intact humid forest. We suggest that the frequent and continued exploitation of forest will drastically reduce the habitat of amphibians and reptiles, meaning that they will be more prone to extinction [7,13,15]. The most threatened species in Montagne des Français are three amphibian species, Mantella viridis (EN), Stumpffia roseifemoralis (EN), and Stumpffia staffordi (VU), and nineteen reptile species, including three critically endangered, five endangered, and eleven vulnerable (cf. Table 1). To ensure the viability of the site, permanent monitoring and conservation planning is needed for all of them [21,38,39,40]. Particularly, we recommend the conservation of species that have a restricted distribution throughout the northern half of Madagascar, namely, Mantella viridis, Paroedura lohatsara, Zonosaurus tsingy, Thamnosophis martae, and Heteroliodon fohy.

5. Conclusions

The fieldwork conducted in 2014 and 2020 contributes to the existing literature regarding the diversity and occurrence of the herpetofaunal community of Montagne des Français, especially in Ampitiliantsambo, where investigation has not been undertaken before. Overall, this study highlighted the occurrence and the update of the distribution of 19 amphibian and 50 reptile species living within the Montagne des Français PA. In the face of a rapidly changing landscape, it is pivotal to consider an effective management and conservation plan for Montagne des Français regarding its proximity to Antsiranana city and frequent land use. Human activity in the boundary of this zone is one of the factors that drives habitat loss and consequently species decline. Intensive long-term monitoring has to be planned to assess herpetofaunal trends in the northern area of Madagascar, informing effective policies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.O.R., B.R. and C.J.R.; methodology, B.R., H.O.R. and C.J.R.; validation, N.H.C.R. and B.R.; investigation, H.O.R., B.R. and C.J.R.; writing—original draft preparation, H.O.R.; writing—review and editing, H.O.R. and N.H.C.R.; supervision, N.H.C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Field surveys were approved by the Direction of Protected Area Systems (permit number: 238/18/MEEF/SG/DGF/DSAP/SCB.Re).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We thank the team from the Sciences Department of the University of Mahajanga for data collections in Montagne des Français surveys.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures and Table

Figure 2. Photographic documentation of the morphospecies found and rediscovered species in the Montagne des Français area. (A): Boophis cf. occidentalis; (B): Boophis sp.; (C): Boophis cf. marojezensis; (D): Phisalixella cf. arctifasciata; (E): Langaha pseudoalluaudi (male); (F): Langaha pseudoalluaudi (female).

Table 1

Species composition of the herpetofaunal community recorded in the NAP Montagne des Français during the years 2014 and 2020. Site: AND: Andavakoera, AMP: Ampitiliantsambo, SAH: Sahabedara. End: endemicity, IUCN: CR = Critically Endangered, EN = Endangered, VU = vulnerable, LC = Least Concern, NE = Not Evaluated. Relative abundance (RA): A = abundant, C = common, I = infrequent, R = rare. Ecological distribution (ED): Ab = arboreal, Tr = terrestrial, S = semiaquatic, Ro = rocky. Habitat: F = forest relatively intact, A= anthropogenically disturbed area. Endemicity (END): E = endemic, RE = regionally endemic, LE = locally endemic, NE = not endemic.

	2014	2020			IUCN	RA	ED	Habitat	END
TAXON	AND	AND	AMP	SAH
AMPHIBIANS
MANTELLIDAE
Aglyptodactylus securifer	+	−	−	−	LC	I	Tr	F	E
Boophis marojezensis	−	−	+	−	NE	R	Ab	F	E
Boophis occidentalis	−	−	+	+	NE	R	Ab	F, A	E
Boophis sp.	−	−	−	+	NE	R	Ab	F, A	E
Boophis tephraeomystax	+	+	+	+	LC	A	Ab, S	F, A	E
Gephyromantis pseudoasper	−	−	+	+	LC	R	S	F	E
Laliostoma labrosum	+	−	+	−	LC	I	Tr	F, A	RE
Mantella viridis	+	+	+	+	EN	A	Tr	F, A	LE
Mantidactylus bellyi	+	+	+	+	LC	A	Tr	F, A	E
Mantidactylus betsileanus	+	−	−	−	LC	I	Tr	F	E
Mantidactylus ulcerosus	+	+	+	+	LC	A	Tr	F, A	E
PTYCHADENIDAE
Ptychadena mascareniensis	+	+	+	+	LC	C	Tr, S	F, A	C
MICROHYLIDAE
Stumpffia analamaina	−	−	+	+	LC	I	S	F	E
Stumpffia angeluci		+	+	+	LC	C	S	F	RE
Stumpffia gimmeli	+	−	−	+	LC	C	S	F	RE
Stumpffia cf. madagascariensis	−	−	+	+	LC	R	S	F	RE
Stumpffia roseifemoralis	−	+	+	+	EN	C	S	F	E
Stumpffia staffordi	−	+	+	+	VU	R	S	F	E
DICROGLOSSIDAE
Hoplobatrachus tigerinus	+	−	−	−	LC		Tr	F, A	NE
REPTILES
BOIDAE
Acrantophis madagascariensis	−	−	+	+	LC	R	Tr	F, A	E
Sanzinia volontany	+	−	−	+	LC	C	Ab	F	E
CHAMAELEONIDAE
Brookesia ebenaui	+	−	−	+	VU	I	Tr	F	E
Brookesia stumpffi	+	+	−	−	VU	C	Tr	F	E
Brookesia tristis	+	−	−	−	NE	R	Tr	F	E
Furcifer oustaleti	+	−	+	−	LC	A	Ab	F, A	E
Furcifer pardalis	+	−	+	−	LC	C	Ab	F, A	RE
Furcifer petteri	+	+	+	+	VU	I	Ab	F, A	E
GEKKONIDAE
Blaesodactylus boivini	+	+	+	+	VU	C	Ab	F, A	RE
Geckolepis maculata	+	−	+	−	NE	C	Ab	F, A	E
Geckolepis typica	+	+	−	−	LC	C	Ab	F, A	E
Hemidactylus frenatus	+	+	−	+	LC	A (	Ab, Ro	A	NE
Hemidactylus mercatorius	+	−	−	−	LC	A	Ab, Ro	A	NE
Lygodactylus heterurus	−	−	+	+	LC	R	Ab	F	RE
Paroedura hordiesi	+	−	−	+	CR	R	Ro	F, A	LE
Paroedura lohatsara	+	+	+	+	CR	R	Ro	F, A	LE
Paroedura stumpffi	+	−	−	+	LC	C	Ro	F, A	RE
Phelsuma abbotti	+	+	+	+	LC	I	Ab	F	E
Phelsuma grandis	+	−	+	−	LC	A	Ab	F	RE
Uroplatus fetsy	−	−	+	+	NE	R	Ab	F	RE
Uroplatus giganteus	−	−	−	+	VU	R	Ab	F	E
Uroplatus henkeli	+	−	+	−	VU	C	Ab	F	E
Uroplatus sameiti	+	+	−	−	LC	C	Ab	F	E
LAMPROPHIDAE
Alluaudina bellyi	−	+	−	−	LC	R	Tr	F	E
Dromicodryas bernieri	−	−	+	+	LC	C	Tr	A	E
Dromicodryas quadrilineatus	+	−	+	+	LC	C	Tr	A	E
Heteroliodon fohy	+	−	−	−	EN	R	Tr	F	LE
Ithycyphus miniatus	+	−	+	+	LC	I	Ab	F	E
Langaha madagascariensis	+	−	−	−	LC	I	Ab	F, A	E
Langaha pseudoalluaudi	−	−	−	+	LC	R	Ab	F, A	E
Leioheterodon modestus	+	−	−	+	LC	C	Tr	F, A	E
Leioheterodon madagascariensis	+	+	+	+	LC	C	Tr	F, A	E
Liophidium therezieni	+	−	−	−	EN	R	Tr	F	LE
Liophidium torquatum	+	−	+	+	LC	I	Tr	F	E
Lycodryas inopinae	+	−	+	+	LC	R	Ab	F, A	RE
Lycodryas granuliceps	−	−	+	−	LC	I	Ab	F, A	E
Lycodryas pseudogranuliceps	−	−	−	+	LC	C	Ab	F, A	E
Madagascarophis colubrinus	+	+	+	+	LC	C	Tr	F, A	E
Madagascarophis fuchsi	+	+	−	−	CR	I	Tr	F	LE
Mimophis occultus	−	+	+	+	LC	C	Tr	F, A	E
Phisalixella cf. arctifasciata	+	−	+	−	NE	R	Ab	F	LE
Phisalixella arctifasciata	+	−	+	+	LC	I	Ab	F	RE
Pseudoxyrhopus quinquelineatus	+	−	−	+	LC	I	Tr	F	RE
Thamnosophis martae	−	+	+	−	EN	I	Tr	F	RE
Thamnosophis stumpffi	−	−	+	−	VU	I	Tr	F	E
SCINCIDAE
Madascincus miafina	−	−	−	+	LC	R	Tr	F	E
Trachylepis elegans	+	+	+	+	LC	A	Tr	A	E
Trachylepis tavaratra	−	−	−	+	VU	C	Tr	A	RE
Voeltzkowia sp.	+	−	−	−		R	Tr	A
TYPHLOPIDAE
Indotyphlops braminus	+	−	+	+	NE	R	Tr	F	E
Total of Amphibians	10	8	14	14
Total of Reptiles	36	24	30	37

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13213361/s1, Figure S1: Photo of amphibians; Figure S2: Photo of reptiles.

References

1. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Da Fonseca, G.A.; Kent, J. Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature; 2000; 403, pp. 853-858. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35002501] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10706275]

2. Raxworthy, C.J.; Pearson, R.G.; Zimkus, B.M.; Reddy, S.; Deo, A.J.; Nussbaum, R.A.; Ingram, C.M. Continental Speciation in the Tropics: Contrasting Biogeographic Patterns of Divergence in the Uroplatus Leaf-tailed Gecko Radiation of Madagascar. J. Zool.; 2008; 275, pp. 423-440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00460.x]

3. Vences, M.; Wollenberg, K.C.; Vieites, D.R.; Lees, D.C. Madagascar as a Model Region of Species Diversification. Trends Ecol. Evol.; 2009; 24, pp. 456-465. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.011]

4. Goodman, S.M. Updated Estimates of Biotic Diversity and Endemism for Madagascar—Revisited after 20 Years. Oryx; 2023; 57, pp. 561-565. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605322001284]

5. Heinen, J. International Trends in Protected Areas Policy and Management. Prot. Area Manag.; 2012; pp. 1-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5772/50061]

6. Goodman, S.M.; Benstead, J.P. Natural History of Madagascar; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2003; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2004)085<0813:BR>2.0.CO;2] ISBN 0-226-30306-3

7. D’Cruze, N.; Sabel, J.; Green, K.; Dawson, J.; Gardner, C.; Robinson, J.; Starkie, G.; Vences, M.; Glaw, F. The First Comprehensive Survey of Amphibians and Reptiles at Montagne Des Français, Madagascar. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol.; 2007; 2, pp. 87-99.

8. Glaw, F.; Vences, M. A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar; 3rd ed. Vences & Glaw: Köln, Germany, 2007; ISBN 978-3-929449-03-7

9. Frontier Madagascar. Montagne des Français Biodiversity and Conservation Evaluation; Frontier-Madagascar Environmental Research Society for Environmental Exploration: London, UK, Institut Halieutique et des Sciences Marines: Antsiranana, Madagascar, 2007; 33.

10. Sabel, J.; Green, K.; Dawson, J.; Robinson, J.; Gardner, C.; Starkie, G.; D’Cruze, N. The Conservation Status of Mammals and Avifauna in the Montagne Des Français Massif, Madagascar. Madag. Conserv. Dev.; 2009; 4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mcd.v4i1.44012]

11. Harper, G.J.; Steininger, M.K.; Tucker, C.J.; Juhn, D.; Hawkins, F. Fifty Years of Deforestation and Forest Fragmentation in Madagascar. Environ. Conserv.; 2007; 34, pp. 325-333. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907004262]

12. Soarimalala, V.; Raherilalao, M. Pression et Menace Dans La Région Forestière Sèche Malgache. For. Sèches Madag. SM Goodman Wilmé Eds Malagasy Nat.; 2008; 1, pp. 1-57.

13. Vallan, D. Effects of Anthropogenic Environmental Changes on Amphibian Diversity in the Rain Forests of Eastern Madagascar. J. Trop. Ecol.; 2002; 18, pp. 725-742. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026646740200247X]

14. Vallan, D.; Vences, M.; Glaw, F. Two New Species of the Boophis Mandraka Complex (Anura, Mantellidae) from the Andasibe Region in Eastern Madagascar. Amphib. Reptil.; 2003; 24, pp. 305-319.

15. Cordier, J.M.; Aguilar, R.; Lescano, J.N.; Leynaud, G.C.; Bonino, A.; Miloch, D.; Loyola, R.; Nori, J. A Global Assessment of Amphibian and Reptile Responses to Land-Use Changes. Biol. Conserv.; 2021; 253, 108863. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108863]

16. Heigl, F.; Horvath, K.; Laaha, G.; Zaller, J.G. Amphibian and Reptile Road-Kills on Tertiary Roads in Relation to Landscape Structure: Using a Citizen Science Approach with Open-Access Land Cover Data. BMC Ecol.; 2017; 17, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-017-0134-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28651557]

17. Clulow, S.; Clulow, J.; Marcec-Greaves, R.; Della Togna, G.; Calatayud, N.E.; Yuan, Y. Common Goals, Different Stages: The State of the ARTs for Reptile and Amphibian Conservation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev.; 2022; 34, pp. i-ix. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RDv34n5_FO] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35275052]

18. Mittermeier, R.A.; Carr, J.L.; Swingland, I.R.; Werner, T.B.; Mast, R.B. Conservation of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetology: Current Research on the Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles; Adler, K. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles: St. Louis, MO, USA, 1992; pp. 59-80.

19. Pabijan, M.; Gehring, P.-S.; Koehler, J.; Glaw, F.; Vences, M. A New Microendemic Frog Species of the Genus Blommersia (Anura: Mantellidae) from the East Coast of Madagascar. Zootaxa; 2011; 2978, pp. 34-50. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2978.1.2]

20. D’Cruze, N.; Henson, D.; Olsson, A.; Emmett, D. The Importance of Herpetological Survey Work in Conserving Malagasy Biodiversity: Are We Doing Enough?. Herpetol. Rev.; 2009; 40, 19.

21. D’Cruze, N. Conserving Amphibian and Reptile Diversity in North Madagascar: Contributions from Baseline Herpetological Survey Work. Ph.D. Thesis; Oxford Brookes University: Oxford, UK, 2011.

22. Megson, S.; Mitchell, P.; D’Cruze, N. Reptilia, Serpentes, Colubridae, Heteroliodon Fohy: Distribution Extension. Check List; 2009; 5, pp. 692-694. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15560/5.3.692]

23. Glaw, F.; Nagy, Z.T.; Köhler, J.; Franzen, M.; Vences, M. Phylogenetic Relationships of a New Species of Pseudoxyrhophiine Snake (Reptilia: Lamprophiidae: Thamnosophis) Suggest a Biogeographical Link between Western and Northern Madagascar. Org. Divers. Evol.; 2009; 9, pp. 13-22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2008.10.004]

24. Glaw, F.; Köhler, J.; Townsend, T.M.; Vences, M. Rivaling the World’s Smallest Reptiles: Discovery of Miniaturized and Microendemic New Species of Leaf Chameleons (Brookesia) from Northern Madagascar. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e31314. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031314]

25. Megson, S.; Mitchell, P.; Köhler, J.; Marsh, C.; Franzen, M.; Glaw, F.; D’Cruze, N. A Comprehensive Survey of Amphibians and Reptiles in the Extreme North of Madagascar. Herpetol. Notes; 2009; 2, pp. 31-44.

26. Mercurio, V.; Andreone, F. New Distribution Data of the Green Mantella, Mantella Viridis, from Northern Madagascar (Anura: Mantellidae). Herpetol. Notes; 2008; 1, pp. 3-7.

27. Pintak, T.; Bohme, W. Mantella viridis sp. n.(Anura: Ranidae: Mantellinae) Aus Nord-Madagaskar. Salamandra; 1988; 24, pp. 119-124.

28. Andriantsimanarilafy, R.R.; Rakotondrina, A.J.; Glaw, F.; München, S.S. A New Locality and New Colour Variant of the Giant Stick Insect Achrioptera Manga from the Northern Tip of Madagascar. SPIXIANA; 2019; 42, pp. 283-284.

29. Vallan, D. Influence of Forest Fragmentation on Amphibian Diversity in the Nature Reserve of Ambohitantely, Highland Madagascar. Biol. Conserv.; 2000; 96, pp. 31-43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00041-0]

30. Andreone, F.; Cadle, J.E.; Cox, N.; Glaw, F.; Nussbaum, R.A.; Raxworthy, C.J.; Stuart, S.N.; Vallan, D.; Vences, M. Species Review of Amphibian Extinction Risks in Madagascar: Conclusions from the Global Amphibian Assessment. Conserv. Biol.; 2005; 19, pp. 1790-1802. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00249.x]

31. Kremen, C.; Razafimahatratra, V.; Guillery, R.P.; Rakotomalala, J.; Weiss, A.; Ratsisompatrarivo, J. Designing the Masoala National Park in Madagascar Based on Biological and Socioeconomic Data. Conserv. Biol.; 1999; 13, pp. 1055-1068. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98374.x]

32. Nussbaum, R.; Raxworthy, C.; Raselimanana, A.; Ramanamanjato, J.-B. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Reserve Naturelle Integrale d’Andohahela, Madagascar. Fieldiana Zool.; 1999; 94, pp. 155-174.

33. Raxworthy, C.J. Reptiles, Rainforest and Conservation in Madagascar. Biol. Conserv.; 1988; 43, pp. 181-211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(88)90113-9]

34. Durkin, L.; Steer, M.; Belle, E. Herpetological Surveys of Forest Fragments between Montagne d’Ambre National Park and Ankarana Special Reserve, Northern Madagascar. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol.; 2011; 6, pp. 114-126.

35. Wilson, L.D.; McCranie, J.R. The Herpetofauna of the Cloud Forests of Honduras. Amphib. Reptile Conserv.; 2004; 3, 34.

36. D’Cruze, N.; Kumar, S. Effects of Anthropogenic Activities on Lizard Communities in Northern Madagascar: Anthropogenic Activities and Lizard Communities in Northern Madagascar. Anim. Conserv.; 2011; 14, pp. 542-552. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2011.00459.x]

37. Suazo-Ortuño, I.; Alvarado-Díaz, J.; Mendoza, E.; López-Toledo, L.; Lara-Uribe, N.; Márquez-Camargo, C.; Gil Paz-Gutiérrez, J.; David Rangel-Orozco, J. High Resilience of Herpetofaunal Communities in a Human-Modified Tropical Dry Forest Landscape in Western Mexico. Trop. Conserv. Sci.; 2015; 8, pp. 396-423. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800208]

38. D Cruze, N.C.; Green, K.E.; Robinson, J.E.; Gardner, C.J. A Rapid Assessment of the Amphibians and Reptiles of an Unprotected Area of Dry Deciduous Forest in North Madagascar. Herpetol. Bull.; 2006; 96, 17.

39. Jenkins, R.K.; Tognelli, M.F.; Bowles, P.; Cox, N.; Brown, J.L.; Chan, L.; Andreone, F.; Andriamazava, A.; Andriantsimanarilafy, R.R.; Anjeriniaina, M. Extinction Risks and the Conservation of Madagascar’s Reptiles. PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e100173. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100173] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25111137]

40. Vences, M.; Andreone, F.; Glaw, F.; Raminosoa, N.; Randrianirina, J.E.; Vieites, D.R. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Ankaratra Massif: Reproductive Diversity, Biogeography and Conservation of a Montane Fauna in Madagascar. Ital. J. Zool.; 2002; 69, pp. 263-284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11250000209356469]