Abstract
Background
Host resilience (HR) to parasites can affect the performance of animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to present a detailed investigation of the genetic mechanisms of HR to ticks (TICK), gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN), and Eimeria spp. (EIM) in Nellore cattle that were raised under natural infestation and a prophylactic parasite control strategy. In our study, HR was defined as the slope coefficient of body weight (BW) when TICK, GIN, and EIM burdens were used as environmental gradients in random regression models. In total, 1712 animals were evaluated at five measurement events (ME) at an average age of 331, 385, 443, 498, and 555 days, which generated 7307 body weight (BW) records. Of the 1712 animals, 1075 genotyped animals were used in genome-wide association studies to identify genomic regions associated with HR.
Results
Posterior means of the heritability estimates for BW ranged from 0.09 to 0.54 across parasites and ME. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-derived heritability for BW at each ME ranged from a low (0.09 at ME.331) to a moderate value (0.23 at ME.555). Those estimates show that genetic progress can be achieved for BW through selection. Both genetic and genomic associations between BW and HR to TICK, GIN, and EIM confirmed that parasite infestation impacted the performance of animals. Selection for BW under an environment with a controlled parasite burden is an alternative to improve both, BW and HR. There was no impact of age of measurement on the estimates of genetic variance for HR. Five quantitative trait loci (QTL) were associated with HR to EIM but none with HR to TICK and to GIN. These QTL contain genes that were previously shown to be associated with the production of antibody modulators and chemokines that are released in the intestinal epithelium.
Conclusions
Selection for BW under natural infestation and controlled parasite burden, via prophylactic parasite control, contributes to the identification of animals that are resilient to nematodes and Eimeria ssp. Although we verified that sufficient genetic variation existed for HR, we did not find any genes associated with mechanisms that could justify the expression of HR to TICK and GIN.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola de Veterinária, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (GRID:grid.8430.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4888)
2 The University of Queensland, School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
3 Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1016.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 2719); Hendrix Genetics, Swine Business Unit, Boxmeer, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.482400.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0624 5121)
4 Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1016.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 2719)
5 Mundo Novo Farm, Uberaba, Brazil (GRID:grid.8430.f)
6 Embrapa Gado de Leite, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Juiz de Fora, Brazil (GRID:grid.460200.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0541 873X)





