It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Increased pulmonary
Methods
Three methodologies for determining the optimal kernel to smooth the CT are compared with noiseless simulations and non-TOF MLEM reconstructions of a patient-realistic digital phantom: (i) the point source insertion-and-subtraction method,
Results
The simulations demonstrated that at
Conclusions
Simulations for non-TOF PET indicated that around 200i were needed to approach image resolution stability in the lung. In addition, at this iteration number, a single global kernel, determined from several VOIs, for AFC, performed well over the whole lung. The
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.52996.31) (ISNI:0000 0000 8937 2257); National Physical Laboratory, Nuclear Medicine Metrology, Teddington, UK (GRID:grid.410351.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8991 6349)
2 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.52996.31) (ISNI:0000 0000 8937 2257)
3 National Physical Laboratory, Nuclear Medicine Metrology, Teddington, UK (GRID:grid.410351.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8991 6349); The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.412917.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0430 9259); University of Manchester, Schuster Laboratory, School of Physics and Astronomy, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.5379.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 2407)
4 University College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201)
5 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, UCL Respiratory, University College London and Interstitial Lung Disease Service, London, UK (GRID:grid.52996.31) (ISNI:0000 0000 8937 2257)
6 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.52996.31) (ISNI:0000 0000 8937 2257); University College London, Centre for Medical Image Computing, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201)