BIM to BEM for Building Energy Analysis: A Review of Interoperability Strategies

Abstract

The main objective of this review is to summarize and thoroughly investigate the most popular and promising BIM (building information modeling) and BEM (building energy modeling) interoperability strategies employed in the last years (2004–2023), highlighting pros and cons of each strategy and trying to understand the reason for the still limited BIM–BEM interaction. This review summarizes the main countries, areas, modeling tools, and interoperability strategies, with the advantages and disadvantages of each one. The methodology is based on the PRISMA protocol, and two databases were used for the research: Scopus and Google Scholar. A total of 532 publications were selected and 100 papers were deemed useful for the purposes of this review. The main findings led to the identification of four different interoperability strategies between BIM and BEM tools: (1) real-time connection; (2) standardized exchange formats and middleware corrective tools; (3) adherence to model view definitions; (4) proprietary tool-chain. These strategies were found to be characterized by different degrees of complexity, time required for information exchange, proprietary or opensource software, ability to reduce information loss, and detailed energy results. The results of this study showed that, to date, there is no better interoperability strategy, and that further efforts are needed so that interoperability between the two tools can become commonplace.

1. Introduction

In March 2023, the European Parliament approved the “Green Homes Directive”, which, among other provisions, stipulates that all new buildings must be carbon neutral starting from 2028 [1]. Consequently, the way buildings are currently designed needs to be reviewed, not only by testing the application of new ecological building materials [2,3] but also by providing for the use of innovative technologies capable of including the energy efficiency issue as early as the project’s preliminary phase. The challenge of designing a high energy performance building requires the creation of a shared working environment where the architectural and energy spheres can communicate easily and exchange information expeditiously. In the past two decades, building information modeling (BIM) has established itself as a tool with the potential to revolutionize the construction industry [4]. In fact, due to the growing complexity of buildings, managing construction projects is becoming increasingly challenging [5]. In this context, BIM, as a multifunctional method, can assist the entire building design process, contributing to the realization of green buildings [6]. The potential of BIM lies in its faithful and detailed digital reproduction of the architectural features of a building.

However, BIM only allows for preliminary qualitative assessments, not allowing for in-depth analysis for building energy design. To date, BIM can be employed for qualitative solar studies [7]. In fact, the software contains a detailed solar path analysis module that assists designers in optimizing the building’s orientation during the early stages of a project [7]. However, the functionality of BIM in the energy field is still very limited. Although BIM may dynamically contain thermal and physical information of the various building components, it is not able to perform an in-depth analysis of the building’s energy performance and outline optimization scenarios. Consequentially, the capabilities of BIM should be implemented by those offered by BEM software, developed specifically for conducting energy simulations.

For this reason, increasing efforts to research techniques for integrating BIM and BEM into a single simulation tool are needed, to find a comprehensive software capable of calculating the thermal loads and energy consumption of buildings [8]. The BIM–BEM combination, integrating the architectural and energy aspects of a building, could effectively enhance design choices, leading to the creation of energy-efficient and environmentally friendly structures [9]. Furthermore, the collaborative use of BIM could help to reduce design errors and increase the productivity of the construction industry [10]. Despite extensive research efforts and existing strategies to convert BIM data into analytical models readable in the BEM environment, the transformation process still tends to be prone to errors [11].

To date, BIM interoperability is a major research and development topic for the architectural engineering and construction (AEC) industry [12]. In the last decade, several review studies have been conducted on BIM and BEM, generically treating the topic of interoperability. In fact, in some cases, it does not represent the focus of the article, but is treated as one of the various functions of BIM and BEM. In other cases, although it represents the main theme of the study, it is not addressed in detail in all its facets, which also include the in-depth examination of the different export strategies [9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].

Two of the aforementioned studies [9,14] mentioned the various interoperability strategies currently used by simply offering a list of them. Most of the works analyzed [13,15,16,18,21,22,23,24] provided an overview of the BIM–BEM process, discussing, in some cases [13,15,18,21,23,24], one of the various interoperability strategies in depth. In particular, the review conducted by Andriamamonjy et al. [9] was mainly scientometric. It classified the various articles into clusters, each of which dealt with an aspect of BIM. The BIM–BEPS interoperability problem was not the main topic of the review. In Alsharif’s study [14], interoperability was addressed as one of the various features of BIM, not representing the focus of the article. Farzaneh et al. [13] and Di Biccari et al. [24] conducted a bibliometric evaluation of the works considered, classifying them according to the interoperability strategy, and examining the strategy based on adherence to model view definitions in depth. The works of Bahar et al. [15], Gao et al. [21], and Gerrish et al. [23] discussed, in detail, model export methodologies based on IFC and gbXML formats. Similarly, Fernald et al. [18] reviewed the various tools used for BIM-to-BEM translation in the context of the strategy based on standardized exchange formats. The review by Pezeshki et al. [16] mainly talked about the potential of energy modeling. In the study by Senave et al. [22], attention focused more on the software used for the transition of the model from BIM to BEM rather than on the process itself. The study of Maskil-Leitan et al. [19] focused on the management of BIM–BEM communication by stakeholders, examining information exchange problems between participants in the process, rather than between the two. In the studies by Lesniak et al. [17] and Khodeir et al. [20], the authors mainly dealt with the status of the application of both BIM and BEM in their country.

Therefore, no study has adequately examined the issue of BIM–BEM interoperability summarizing and thoroughly investigating the strategies used for exporting BIM models to the BEM environment.

The main purpose of this work is to offer a review of the different BIM–BEM interoperability strategies from 2004 to 2023, highlighting their advantages, disadvantages, and future developments, through a detailed examination of case studies. For each of the interoperability strategies, the potential and limitations are discussed, showing the reasons why effective interoperability between the two modeling tools has not yet been found.

Starting with an explanation of the methodology employed, a systematic review of the selected papers is provided. In the second part of this paper, an overview of BIM and BEM applications is provided, with particular attention to the study of energy issues. Interoperability techniques between the two modeling approaches are then described in detail in Section 4. Finally, the results obtained are discussed (Section 5), comparing interoperability strategies and highlighting advantages, disadvantages, and potential future developments.

2. Research Methods and Materials

In this section, the significance of this study and the methodology employed are presented and discussed.

2.1. Significance of this Study

The significance of the proposed review study lies in the importance of facilitating the exchange of information between architectural and energy software.

Although the potential of BIM and BEM is known, the current difficulties that arise during the model export process do not allow for efficient software communication and, consequently, widespread use of the BIM-to-BEM method. Offering an in-depth analysis of the various interoperability strategies present today could help highlight the limitations of each of them and, at the same time, offer research insights for their optimization.

2.2. Methodology

The literature research was conducted following the guidelines provided by the PRISMA checklist [25], to carry out systematic, transparent, and replicable research. In detail, Table A1 of Appendix A lists all the checklist items addressed in this review.

The main research questions that this study attempted to answer are listed below:

• RQ1: What is meant by BIM–BEM interoperability?

• RQ2: How can BIM–BEM interoperability facilitate energy analyses of buildings?

• RQ3: What are the currently existing strategies for BIM–BEM interoperability?

• RQ4: What are the advantages and disadvantages of BIM–BEM interoperability strategies?

The main databases used for research are Scopus and Google Scholar, which are among the world’s leading sources for scientific research, providing researchers with access to millions of documents from journals, books, series, protocols, reference works, and proceedings.

A primary article search was conducted using search strings, based on the chosen keywords, as shown in Table 1. The Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” were employed to refine the search process. From this initial search, 532 articles were identified.

Subsequently, an initial screening was performed through the reading of titles and abstracts, based on well-defined criteria, shown in Table 2. This screening resulted in the exclusion of 438 papers, of which 10 were published in non-English language, 178 were duplicated, 183 were unavailable, and 67 were irrelevant.

The qualitative assessment of the remaining articles was performed through an in-depth reading of the full-text content. Based on this second screening, 23 other works were excluded from the analysis, as they were deemed irrelevant to the purpose of this review. Finally, an additional 29 papers deriving from a citation search were added to the 71 articles selected after various screenings.

As a result, a total of 100 publications were selected, of which 61 were from Scopus, 10 were from Google Scholar, and 29 from the citation, including original research papers, conference papers, reviews, and book chapters.

The method used for the literature search and screening process is shown in Figure 1, in order to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of this review’s findings.

Following PRISMA’s suggestion [25], tabulation was chosen to summarize the results of this study. In detail, each work was recorded, reporting the main information such as authors and their country of origin, year of publication of the paper, publisher, database used for research, keywords reported in the article, type of article, the object of the research, and main contents. The main information is summarized in Table A2 of Appendix A.

Analyzing the trend of selected publications, it is clear that, despite fluctuations over the years, the trend is growing, showing that the topic of interoperability between BIM and BEM has increasing interest in the scientific community.

The selected papers highlighted that the topic is quite widespread, with the U.S. leading the most prolific countries with 29 published papers (Figure 2).

Figure 3 shows the most used keywords in the collected articles, among which “BIM” and “Building information modeling” hold the record, followed by “BEM”, “Interoperability” and “Building Energy Modeling”. In particular, “BIM” was found in 56% of the articles, “Building Information Modeling” in 35%, “BEM” in 26%, “Interoperability” in 19%, and “Building Energy Modeling” in 10%.

3. BIM and BEM Applications: An Overview

3.1. BIM-Based Analyses for the Design of Green Buildings

According to the National Building Information Model Standard Project Committee in the United States, “BIM is a digital representation of physical and functional characteristics of a facility. A BIM is a shared knowledge resource for information about a facility forming a reliable basis for decisions during its life-cycle; defined as existing from earliest conception to demolition” [26]. Through detailed three-dimensional modeling, it can offer an extremely precise representation of the building components, allowing the various users to fully understand all the characteristics of the project [27].

In a context in which the construction industry represents one of the sectors most responsible for global carbon emissions [28], learning how to design sustainable buildings is essential [29,30]. BIM could be the key to revolutionizing the entire construction industry, leading to a substantial reduction in its environmental impact [31,32]. In fact, this technology is able to support the designer in managing the characteristics of a building during the entire design and construction process, facilitating, for example, the prediction of the exact quantity of materials needed during the construction phase, the management of waste during the demolition phase, and the choice of energy-efficient design solutions during the design phase. Since the adoption of BIM, various efforts have been made to understand how this tool can contribute to the design of green buildings [4,33,34].

Antòn et al. [35] demonstrate that the integration and exchange of data between BIM software and lifecycle assessment (LCA) applications can bring a significant benefit in improving the environmental performance of buildings during their entire lifecycle. On the one hand, BIM is an excellent support in the design phase, helping to better manage information and data; on the other hand, the LCA is used to evaluate all the environmental impacts of the project [36]. Moreover, BIM-based models could represent the main source of information needed to conduct a comprehensive lifecycle assessment of buildings, avoiding the burden of manual data reentry [37].

In general, building lifecycle analysis requires the intervention of various professional figures, each with a specific skill. This leads to a multidisciplinary work environment that is potentially difficult to manage, with the risk of losing information by committing design errors [38]. Building information modeling, thanks to its collaborative logic, makes dialogue with other software possible, allowing professionals from various disciplines to share data and information and efficiently integrate all design aspects.

BIM is a useful support during the entire lifecycle of a building, starting from the design phase, up to the demolition/renovation phase [4,39,40], as shown in Figure 4.

The design stage of a building is crucial for making informed and environmentally sound decisions [41,42,43,44,45]. The BIM-based model enables construction stakeholders to work collaboratively for efficient project delivery, ensuring that sustainability measures are easily and effectively integrated into the entire design process [4,41,46]. The ability of BIM to exchange data and information with other software allows different professionals to work on the same project, dealing with different aspects, establishing a harmonious and multidisciplinary dialogue. The potential interoperability of BIM makes it possible to already insert energy aspects in the conceptual phase of the project, allowing for the evaluation of design alternatives that can benefit the building during its operational phase in terms of indoor comfort and energy saving [47,48]. An accurate prediction of buildings’ energy efficiency is important to minimize as much as possible their environmental impact [49,50,51,52,53,54].

Furthermore, the three-dimensional model created in the design phase is also useful for predicting the exact amount of materials to be used for construction [55], helping to reduce waste [56].

As for the operational phase, BIM could be a useful tool for controlling the indoor thermal comfort of an environment. In this context, Marzouk et al. [57] developed a wireless sensor network (WSN) integrated with a BIM model to monitor the thermal comfort of a subway. In their work, the WSN was used to measure the temperature and humidity of the air inside the subway, while the BIM model was used to visualize the recorded data.

Finally, the BIM tool can help in waste management during demolition and renovation processes. For example, Cheng et al. [58] developed a system that can extract material and volume data from the BIM environment for detailed waste estimation and planning.

3.2. BIM for Energy Analyses

The design phase is essential to ensure that the building provides high energy performance [59]. Thanks to BIM, some energy aspects can be evaluated, such as solar radiation [59,60].

In fact, BIM is equipped with a module for simulating the sun path [7], thanks to which the impact of building orientation and shading strategies, which strongly influence the energy behavior of a building [61], can be assessed during the entire year, at any time [62].

Ciccozzi et al. [63] explored the potential of Revit in the preliminary design of a photovoltaic system, analyzing shading (Figure 5) and incident solar radiation on a sample building for academic use. The purpose of the study was to identify the most suitable surfaces for installing the modules.

However, despite the enormous potential of BIM, its use for energy performance analyses is still quite limited. In fact, although BIM may contain thermal and physical information about building components, it is not able to carry out complex energy analyses. Consequently, to fill this gap, BIM-based models need to be further analyzed through specialized software, i.e., building energy modeling (BEM).

3.3. BEM for Energy Analyses

Over the last 50 years, a wide range of energy simulation programs have been developed for the analysis and prediction of buildings’ energy performance [64]. Usually, these software use simulation engines based on mathematical equations capable of representing building behavior and calculating its energy requirements [65]. Crawley et al. [64] compared the characteristics of twenty energy simulation programs in order to highlight their applicability. Among these, the authors mentioned EnergyPlus and DOE-2. EnergyPlus is a free, opensource whole-building energy simulation tool able to determine energy consumption and water use [66,67]. Since EnergyPlus is a console-based program that reads input and writes output to text files [66], it is often used with graphical interfaces, including DesignBuilder [68], Insight 360 [69] and OpenStudio [70], of which the last two can also be installed as plugins on Autodesk Revit and Sketchup [71,72], respectively. DesignBuilder is extremely intuitive, and it is widely used to carry out dynamic energy simulations on various types of buildings [73,74,75]. As for DOE-2 [76], it was developed in collaboration with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) [77]. This software is able to predict energy consumption and costs for all types of buildings. DOE-2 also uses graphical interfaces, such as Green Building Studio (GBS) [78] and Insight 360 [69], to simplify the energy analysis process. Green Building Studio is the most appropriate software for quick output and easy comparison of multiple solutions [79].

An in-depth review analysis conducted by Pereira et al. [80] showed that the most used BEM software turned out to be EnergyPlus.

To automate the lengthy energy modeling processes, simulations based on BIM models have become increasingly frequent [81]. By using BIM-based models, modeling times are minimized [82] and, at the same time, the energy aspects of the project are perfectly integrated with the architectural features. The transfer of data from one software to another, i.e., from BIM to BEM, falls under the question of so-called interoperability, which still requires great effort for efficient strategies to be developed.

4. Results

Interoperability refers to the ability to exchange information between different software [9]. Efficient communication between modeling tools is fundamental to establishing a collaborative design environment [9]. In recent years, the interoperability between BIM and BEM tools has attracted increasing interest. The BIM-based BEM methodology uses architectural design information as input for the creation of the energy model, enabling efficient design decisions to be made after evaluating various design alternatives [21]. The purpose of this methodology is to create the energy model of the building in question starting from the architectural model, saving time in terms of modeling and better integrating energy aspects with architectural ones. However, often, the potential of BIM cannot be fully exploited due to a loss of information (both geometric and thermal data) that occurs during the export of the model [80,83]. In some cases, this data loss consists of an incorrect transfer of geometric surfaces [84], and in others, a lack of information related to the thermal properties of the walls or the HVAC system [85].

This lack of data could lead to inaccuracies in the simulation results [81]. Currently, due to the unresolved problems encountered in the process of data transfer, the interoperability between BIM and BEM is not much exploited by professionals [86]. In fact, unless the building under study is simple, substantial manual corrections are required after exporting the model from one software to another. This could make the BIM-to-BEM process excessively cumbersome and, consequently, not applicable when project delivery times are tight. However, this topic has found a lot of interest among researchers, who aim at the development of new methodologies capable of improving integration between the two software [9]. The importance of research in this field derives from the need to best integrate energy aspects with architectural ones in order to obtain efficient interaction between passive (e.g., envelope) and active (e.g., HVAC system) components of a building. In this context, it is essential to seek tools capable of managing the various aspects of a project, ensuring a dynamic response to the different variations that emerge during the design phase. To date, there are four main BIM–BEM interoperability strategies [9,14]:

• Real-time connection.

• Standardized exchange formats and middleware corrective tools.

• Adherence to Model View Definitions (MVDs).

• Proprietary tool-chain.

Below, a review of the various BIM–BEM interoperability strategies is provided, highlighting all the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

4.1. Strategy 1—Real-Time Connection

In the most recent versions of BIM software, it is possible to install plugins for energy simulation, which allow for the generation of an energy analytical model directly from the architectural model [14]. In this way, the process of exporting/importing data from one software to another would not be necessary and many errors in the model would be avoided [14]. Also, any changes made to the design would have an immediate impact on the energy analysis results [14]. This interoperability strategy allowed Maglad et al. [59] to evaluate the energy performance of a building immediately after the creation of its architectural model, obtaining significant savings in terms of modeling time. This allowed the authors to consider different design strategies in order to arrive at a more informed and efficient choice.

From a literature search, Autodesk Insight 360, which can be installed as a plugin on Revit, resulted as the most used tool for energy analyses based on the “Real-time connection” interoperability strategy [49,50,59,61,87,88,89].

In this context, in the work of Maglad et al. [59], mentioned previously, Insight 360 was used for energy optimization of a building case study, i.e., A-Block COMSATS Abbottabad (Pakistan). After detailed modeling on Autodesk Revit, the building was geolocated, taking the closest weather station to the place indicated as a reference. Based on the location, meteorological, and thermal data assigned to the various building components in the modeling phase, the energy model was generated in the form of base color codes for different components in order to be simulated using Insight (Figure 6). Basically, the software required three steps to perform the energy analysis: (1) energy model creation; (2) design options generation; (3) energy optimization results. The analysis provided energy needs and consumption of the building and various intervention strategies for its energy optimization, concerning the orientation, the window-to-wall ratio, and the lighting. More information about Autodesk Insight 360 functionalities is available on its official website [69].

Insight 360 was also used by Yarramsetty et al. [61] to analyze the impact of the building’s orientation on its energy consumption.

In a study by Boloorchi [87], a single-family home in Georgia was modeled in Revit to conduct a thorough fenestration analysis. In detail, the dimensions, position, material, and shading of the windows were studied with Insight 360 to identify the best solutions for building energy savings.

Gonzalez et al. [88], using Insight 360, ran five simulations of a hypothetical two-story single-family home, selecting five different locations. The aim was to study the energy response of the building based on the climatic conditions to which it was subjected.

Insight 360 was also used to analyze the lighting of two classrooms in a school building located in Brazil [89]. In this case, the study conducted in Revit supported the actual energy analysis of the building carried out in DesignBuilder.

To date, these BIM plugins can only provide a rough energy analysis concerning the entire building, but cannot yet provide guidance on individual thermal zones or building components. Therefore, the BIM plugins can be employed for preliminary rather than detailed energy analyses. Among other things, many operations that can be performed with the aforementioned applications are limited and cannot be customized [87].

4.2. Strategy 2—Standardized Exchange Formats and Middleware Corrective Tools

Currently, the Industry Foundation Class (IFC) and Green Building XML (gbXML) are the two most widely used standardized exchange formats for importing and exporting data from one software to another [90].

The gbXML format was tested in the work of Gourlis et al. [91] for the export of the models of two industrial plants, a partially historical plant (Case B) and a new one (Case M). On the one hand, the model of Case B was created to be exported to energy simulation software, with all the necessary geometric simplifications. On the other hand, for Case M, an existing architectural model was used for the study. In both cases, the architectural models were made in Revit and exported to OpenStudio (Sketchup plugin). The results showed that geometric errors were minimized in Case B, while substantial manual corrections in the modeling were required in Case M.

Delgado et al. [92] created the BIM-based model of a residential building in northern Portugal using a point cloud obtained with software based on structure-from-motion (SfM) algorithms starting from photogrammetry. The export to gbXML on DesignBuilder was successful and allowed for comparison between the numerical data derived from the simulation and the experimental ones obtained with monitoring.

In the work of Ham et al. [93], an automated method for assigning thermal properties to BIM building components in gbXML format was proposed. In detail, the thermal resistances of the BIM elements were updated based on the results of a thermographic survey. In this way, it was possible to conduct an energy analysis as accurately as possible.

In a study by Chen et al. [85], BIM–BEM interoperability was tested by exporting a residential building model to four different energy software (Ecotect, EQUEST, DesignBuilder, and IES-VE). The data exchange took place via the gbXML format. The results showed an inconsistency in the geometric information and an incorrectness in the HVAC parameters.

Steel et al. [94] presented their experiences in the field of software interoperability using mostly the industry standard IFC data modelling format. In most cases, models made in one IFC-compatible software are viewable in another without any difficulty. However, when the model size is too large, its display probably will not be easily supported in energy software.

In general, various studies have examined the differences between IFC and gbXML formats, the technical challenges, and the approaches used for their application [46,53,84,90,95,96].

In particular, Dong et al. [90] analyzed the differences between the two standardized exchange formats in terms of data representations, data structures, and applications. First, IFC can represent any geometric shape, while gbXML can only represent rectangular ones [97]. However, gbXML is able to transfer the environmental data and the thermal zones created on the BIM, unlike IFC [90,98].

A comparison of the two formats was also performed by Porsani et al. [84] through the modeling of two sample buildings, namely, a residence and an industrial warehouse. After creating the architectural models in Revit, the gbXML files were imported into DesignBuilder and OpenStudio, and the IFC files into CYPETHERM HE. DesignBuilder is allowed to edit the geometries, the spaces, and materials, while OpenStudio only the materials and thermal zones. The authors found that exporting the gbXML file was easier than the IFC format, even though the transfer of the industrial warehouse model was unsuccessful due to a loss of geometry data. Therefore, according to the authors, exporting models with complex geometry presents problems, such as the correct geometric surface transfer, that make energy simulation not accurate. Regarding the residential building, the simulations of the models in the two formats led to different results, which should be investigated in order to understand the motivation behind them. Figure 7 shows a comparison between the models exported in the two formats.

One of the major gaps currently present in the exchange process using standardized formats, both with IFC and gbXML formats, is the data loss that occurs once the model is imported into the analytical software [99].

With middleware tools, IFC and gbXML files can be enriched by implementing much missing information [9,14]. A literature search revealed several studies on the development of middleware corrective tools to improve communication between BIM and BEM, as summarized in Table 3 [100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123].

As said, IFC schema can mainly export geometry information. For this reason, in various papers, such as that of Cemesova et al. [100], extensions to this format have been proposed, to complete the model by also inserting energy data, such as the properties of the materials, the characteristics of the plant system, or the thermal zones.

For example, the information contained in the IFC files, mainly related to the geometry of the building, is not sufficient to carry out the BEM-based energy performance simulation of photovoltaic systems. Therefore, Gupta et al. [101] proposed to link the BIM-based model to external archives containing meteorological data and technical specifications of the system components (PV module, inverter).

The IFC format is geometrically very detailed and contains a lot of potentially redundant information for energy simulation. This excess of data could lead to export errors. Examining several case studies, Maile et al. [124] listed the geometry problems encountered with the use of the IFC format. Among these, duplicate objects, incorrect space volumes, missing spaces, missing space boundaries, missing exterior walls, misalignment of space geometry, building element geometry, and column dislocation have been detected. BSPro COM-Server is one of the tools currently used by several researchers to simplify the geometric representation of IFC to the more restrictive three or four vertex planar surfaces [103].

Differently, the gbXML format has a geometric data structure designed to be in line with energy software requirements [104]. In the work of Yang et al. [104], a workflow to optimize the geometric data contained in a gbXML file was proposed. This workflow aims to construct the building model by extruding the room boundaries. The presented method was tested on two sample buildings, showing that the model obtained through the use of the developed workflow has cleaner geometry than that of models deriving from standard gbXML files (Figure 8).

One of the barriers to BIM–BEM integration is the large number of input parameters needed to perform energy analysis. The metamodel could be the solution to this problem as it consists of a simplified model able to correlate the inputs to the results deriving from more complex mathematical models (for example energy modeling tools). Bracht et al. [105] developed an integration tool to link models made with different BIM software to the metamodel obtained in gbXML format. The study, however, was carried out on a building with a simple geometry. Consequently, it would be advisable to test the method on more complex building geometry to verify its applicability.

In the work of Chiaia et al. [106], “Space Boundary Tool” (SBT) middleware was used as an “interoperable bridge” between Revit and EnergyPlus to better exchange information between the two software without data loss. The experimentation led to good results. The format used for the exchange was the IFC.

Wang et al. [107] presented a framework for an automated HVAC system design tool. This procedure was tested in an office building located in Shanghai. However, full automation of the exchange process has not been reached. In fact, the authors manually simplified the BIM model before exporting it to the BEM software through the gbXML format (Figure 9).

To minimize the loss of information and optimize modeling times on EnergyPlus, some works [111,113,114] developed an interface to convert geometric information from IFC to IDF (Input Data Files), the input format of the energy software.

Likewise, Barone et al. [118] presented a workflow capable of converting BIM into an input file readable using energy simulation software. The tool was tested on a sample building located in Naples, Italy. Thanks to the developed workflow, various design strategies were considered for the energy improvement of the building. These included the introduction of an air-to-water heat pump, photovoltaic glass, and the replacement of shading systems with photovoltaic shelters. Particular attention was devoted to studying the optimal level of detail of the modeling required for a reliable energy assessment of the building. Before exporting to gbXML, the model was duly simplified where necessary.

Through an in-depth analysis of three case studies, Kamel et al. [121] found that the gbXML format does not correctly export all the data required for energy analysis. As a result, the authors proposed a tool capable of modifying a gbXML file before its export, in order to solve problems related to the building envelope.

Although middleware corrective tools constitute the most widely used interoperability strategy today, their flaw is the dependence on another data source, different from the BIM, which could lead to errors in the model as the possible presence of duplicates. In addition, the middleware tool is limited, as it is meant for a specific simulation software and situation; therefore, it is not applicable to every case study [9].

4.3. Strategy 3—Adherence to Model View Definitions (MVD)

There are many workflows in the IFC format that are far from the purpose for which energy simulation tools were created. In fact, BEMs do not need all the information contained in the IFC. Model View Definitions were created to solve this problem. MVDs are a subset of the IFC schema [125]. They define which datasets are usable for export to BEM software [125] using the Information Delivery Manual (IDM) methodology. This strategy is very flexible as it is not based on a proprietary tool [9].

An example of the application of this approach is represented by the work of Pinheiro et al. [126]. Indeed, in their study, an MVD was developed after identifying the necessary exchange requirements needed for exporting to EnergyPlus and Modelica, based on a collection of use cases. The use cases varied in levels of complexity from a single room to a large commercial building resulting in a total of eight use cases, each featuring a different HVAC system. The methodology used was IDM/MVD (Figure 10) and it focused on the latest release of the IFC schema, i.e., IFC4, which is currently the most used version of IFC.

Andriamamonjy et al. [127] created an MVD intended to improve the exchange of information between the IFC file and Modelica, defining the requirements for energy simulation.

On the other hand, a Simulation Domain Model (SimModel), created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in collaboration with Digital Alchemy Pro represents an approach to integrate Modelica into the BIM environment. SimModel could form the basis for a new IFC Model View Definition, which could allow for the exchange of information between HVAC design applications and BEMs [128]. Wimmer et al. [129] extended the research on using SimModel by connecting it to different Modelica libraries, taking into consideration several complex use cases.

Although the interoperability strategy based on MVDs is promising, it still has limitations due to the incomplete compatibility of BIM with IFC4 and customized MVDs [9].

4.4. Strategy 4—Proprietary Tool-Chain

This interoperability strategy involves using proprietary software (usually the BIM Application Programming Interface—API) to transfer information between BIM and BEM. By adopting this method, data loss is minimized, as the software API is fully BIM compatible.

Rahmani Asl et al. [130] created a BIM-based performance optimization framework (BPOpt) capable of transforming BIM models into input files for energy software. The development of the software was based on the interaction between Revit and Dynamo, an application capable of expanding the parametric capabilities of Revit. The developed framework used the Revit API to transform the information contained in the BIM into the data necessary for the creation of the energy model. The energy simulation was performed on Green Building Studio (GBS) through the creation of an automatic connection between BIM and BEM software.

Gao et al. [44] utilized Revit API to extract project information for energy simulation and generate reports within Revit User Interface through Visual C#.

Through the use of the API, Yan et al. [131] created two prototypes, Revit2Modelica and Revit2Radiance, able to optimize the communication between the tools.

Object-oriented modeling (OOM) is considered by several researchers a very good method to perform multidomain energy simulations [132]. Modelica is an example of software that uses the object-oriented physical modeling (OOPM) language to model the dynamic behavior of buildings. Creating Modelica simulations is time-consuming due to the complexity of providing the necessary parameters (such as the components of an HVAC system or the thermal properties of materials) for a complete solution. In this context, the use of a BIM-based model to automatically transfer these parameters can eliminate a large part of the manual task [133]. Many efforts have been made to improve the export from BIM to Modelica [133]. For example, Kim et al. [134] have developed a Modelica library to translate BIM elements into OOPM-based energy models using the API.

According to Jeong et al. [135], using Revit API instead of standardized IFC and gbXML formats, allows to “(1) preserve object relationships established by parametric modeling, (2) define a model view of Revit to support bidirectional data exchange with the object-oriented simulation solver— LBNL Modelica Buildings Library”. This approach was tested in their work [136] for the development of an algorithm capable of transforming the object-oriented architectural model of the building into an energy model.

Continuing the work already undertaken with the development of the SimModel framework [129], Remmen et al. [137] studied the linking of the SimXML file with the mapping rules of the various Modelica libraries. The procedure was made possible thanks to a Python tool which, through a generic API, accessed the mapped data to create the model on Modelica.

A Python framework is also used by Thorade et al. [138] to improve communication between BIM and Modelica. Applying the framework to a simple case study proved efficient. The authors intend to test the methodology on more complex case studies in the future.

In the work of Utkucu et al. [139], Dynamo was used to set the parametric relationships of the facade of a sample building for its energy optimization, through Revit API.

Parametric modeling has great potential for energy analyses, since it is possible to have a rapid comparison between the architectural project and the energy performance associated with it. This approach allows the designer to evaluate different alternatives to make effective decisions. This concept was demonstrated in a study by Rahmani Asl et al. [140], where the authors exploited the Revit API to parametrically model a sample building and the Green Building Studio API to simulate it energetically.

Furthermore, in some cases, through the use of specific tools, it is possible to have a real-time connection between the architectural model and the energy model. An example of these tools is Design Performance Viewer (DPV) [141,142,143], which can be used in order to integrate energy calculations directly into the BIM editor using the API. With this system, the designer can switch between displaying the model and the resulting energy performance at any time.

In summary, the proprietary tool-chain strategy demonstrates many advantages, including reduced data loss in the transition from the architectural model to the energy model, immediacy in reading energy results, and the possibility of evaluating different strategies during the design process. The main downside to this approach is that proprietary software is generally only compatible with the vendor’s tools, not allowing for large-scale application.

5. Discussion

The four interoperability strategies employed to enable a connection between BIM and BEM software showed advantages and disadvantages, but none proved to be significantly better than the others. Figure 11 shows a synoptic overview of the steps required to move from BIM to BEM with the four interoperability strategies analyzed.

The present literature review revealed that the most used interoperability strategy is that of standardized exchange formats and middleware corrective tools, with 60% of publications, followed by the proprietary tool-chain (23%), and real-time connection (11%). The least common strategy was found to be adherence to MVD (6%), as shown in Figure 12.

Based on the literature review, it is worth noting that all the interoperability strategies are capable of correctly exporting data from the BIM-based to the BEM-based model, except for the standardized exchange formats and middleware corrective tools (strategy 3) which, although resulting in being the most widely used, showed limited ability to export data correctly. Moreover, not all strategies enable direct BIM–BEM interoperability, but in some cases (strategies 2 and 3) intermediate steps are needed, as shown in Figure 12.

Although strategy 1 (real-time connection) allows for energy simulations to be carried out very quickly, a detailed energy analysis cannot be performed due to the performance limitations of the software. Differently, the other three interoperability strategies showed the ability to perform even complex dynamic energy analysis. Clearly, this ability results in a greater time burden for model creation. In particular, except for strategy 1, any changes in the BIM model are not directly translated to the BEM model, leading to a software interaction process that is not always efficient and liable to information losses.

Unlike the first three strategies, which showed considerable adaptability to the different cases analyzed, strategy 2 was less flexible to be applied to all case studies, as middleware tools are almost always designed for specific simulation software.

Moreover, it is interesting to observe that all interoperability strategies showed a good ability to customize software operations, except for strategy 1, which limits the design choices to a restricted number of parameters. For instance, very important variables, such as the power of the heat generator, and the type of emission devices, cannot be customized. Finally, the only strategy that depends on proprietary software is strategy 4.

In Figure 13, the main advantages and disadvantages of each interoperability strategy are summarized, based on the articles examined in this study.

Therefore, it was possible to appreciate the potential and limitations of each of the interoperability strategies employed to date. The results obtained showed that there is no strategy that is clearly better than the others and that each strategy still has limitations that preclude its widespread use. At the moment, it is up to the designer to choose the one best suited to their needs. Thus, research must continue to search for flexible, opensource, accurate interoperability solutions that can enable massive deployment of BIM and BEM tools, making building energy design affordable for everyone.

The main advantages and disadvantages of each strategy are briefly listed in Figure 14.

Remark 1. 

For further information regarding the individual works, refer to Table A2 of Appendix A.

6. Conclusions

This work presented an in-depth BIM–BEM interoperability analysis. The research highlighted that the interest in architectural and energy modeling has grown significantly in the last few years, and BIM–BEM integration is one of the main research goals.

It was found that interoperability strategies are usually analyzed individually, but there are no articles that summarize and compare them in-depth.

In detail, the main findings of the literature review revealed that:

• (1). The most adopted strategy is standardized exchange formats and middleware corrective tools. To date, perfect integration of the two programs is still far away. In most cases, the transition from the architectural to the energy model requires manual changes before carrying out the energy simulation, especially when the case study is complex. This is mainly due to the loss of information, the presence of geometric errors, and lack of thermal and physical data. Middleware tools try to overcome this problem by integrating the information lost. However, their dependence on another data source limits their use.

• (2). The real-time connection strategy, not requiring the model export process, avoids all the problems related to this phase. On the other hand, the review showed that this strategy leads to an excessive generality of the results.

• (3). The proprietary tool-chain strategy has great potential, as it preserves object relationships established by parametric modeling, reducing incompatibility errors. However, the dependence on proprietary software limits the widespread application of this method.

• (4). Adherence to Model View Definitions (MVDs), designed to optimize the model exchange in IFC format, is independent from proprietary software. Its main limitations currently lie in the insufficient compatibility of the different BIM software applications with IFC4 and customized MVDs.

In conclusion, BIM–BEM interoperability is very broad and leaves space for various insights, since every strategy, which has shown advantages and disadvantages, requires deepening and refining. The results obtained are encouraging and pave the way for many research branches, as none of the interoperability strategies has proven clearly better than the others.

Future developments of the work will focus on testing and comparing different interoperability strategies trying to improve communication between software. The idea is to find solutions capable of solving some of the problems that currently arise in the transition phase of the model as much as possible, to make the BIM to BEM method more accessible and widespread.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C. and T.d.R.; methodology, A.C., T.d.R. and D.A.; resources, A.C. and T.d.R.; data curation, A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C. and T.d.R.; writing—review and editing, T.d.R., D.P. and D.A.; supervision, T.d.R., D.P. and D.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1. Flowchart of the methodology used for article screening and review [25].

Figure 2. Geographic distribution of the publications.

Figure 3. Most used keywords in the collected articles.

Figure 4. BIM support during the various phases of the construction process.

Figure 5. An example of solar analysis with Revit. Adapted from [63].

Figure 6. Creating the energy model using Autodesk Insight 360. Adapted from [59].

Figure 7. Comparison between the standardized exchange formats. In red are the models exported in gbXML; in yellow are the models exported in IFC. (a) Residence (simple geometry well recognized). (b) Industrial warehouse (complex geometry, with information loss). Adapted from [84].

Figure 8. Comparison of three different gbXML exports. (a) Using the workflow developed in the work [104]. (b) Using “Room Volumes” in Revit. (c) Using “Energy Model” in Revit. Adapted from [104].

Figure 9. Process of simplifying the BIM model. Adapted from [107].

Figure 10. The methodology used for the development of the MVD, extracting the information necessary for the BEM software from eight use cases. Adapted from [126].

Figure 11. Comparison of different BIM–BEM interoperability strategies.

Figure 12. Percentage spread of interoperability strategies in the papers analyzed in this review.

Figure 13. Comparison between interoperability strategies pros and cons.

Figure 14. Summary of the main advantages and disadvantages of each interoperability strategy.

Table 1

Keywords used for the literature research.

Main Keywords				Other Keywords
BIM-BEM			AND	Interoperability	OR	Integration
BIM-BEM			AND	Model export	OR	Model translation
BIM	AND	BEM	AND	Interoperability	OR	Integration
BEM			AND	BIM-based analysis
BIM			AND	BEPS
BIM			AND	Thermal simulation	AND	Interoperability
BIM			AND	Dynamic simulation	AND	Building retrofit

Table 2

Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria used for the second screening.

Criteria
Inclusionary	Exclusionary
Scientific articles	Not scientific articles
International articles published in English	Articles published in other languages
-	Duplicated papers
Paper available (papers that provide the online version of full-text content)	Papers not available (papers that cannot provide the online version of full-text content)
Articles pertinent to the topic under study	Articles not pertinent to the topic under study

Table 3

Case studies on the use of middleware tools.

References	Middleware Tool	Tool Functionality	Case Study
Cemesova et al. [100]	PassivBIM Java (for IFC)	Insertion of material properties and characteristics of the plant system	Energy analysis of single-family and terraced buildings
Gupta et al. [101]	RENEWBIM (for IFC)	Introduction of climate data and PV module and inverter specifications	Analysis of a photovoltaic system for domestic use
Carvalho et al. [102]	IFC Builder (for IFC)	Correction of geometric errors	Energy analysis of an existing building and a new building project
Karola et al. [103]	BSPro COM-Server (for IFC)	Geometric simplification of the model	Building energy analysis
Yang et al. [104]	gbXML corrective tool (for gbXML)	Correction of geometric errors	Importing models of a technical school and an academic building to BEM
Bracht et al. [105]	gbXML corrective tool (for gbXML)	Insertion of the thermal properties of the materials and information related to the operation of the windows, such as the opening factor for ventilation	Thermal load prediction of a single-family residential building
Chiaia et al. [106]	Space Boundary Tool (SBT) (for IFC)	Correction of the geometric errors and insertion of the material properties	Energy analysis of a sample building
Wang et al. [107]	Automated HVAC design tool (for gbXML)	Geometric simplification of the model and HVAC system topology generation	HVAC system analysis of an eight-stories office building
Chen et al. [108]	AutoBPS-BIM (for IFC)	Introduction of the HVAC system information	Load calculation and chiller design optimization of an office building
Kamel et al. [109]	Automated Building Energy Modeling and Assessment Tool (ABEMAT) (for gbXML)	Correction of the geometric errors	Energy analysis of a one-story building
Kim et al. [110]	IFC corrective tool (for IFC)	Automatic mapping of building materials	Energy analysis of an office building
Ahn et al. [111]	IFC–IDF interface (for IFC)	Automated conversion of geometric information	Energy analysis of a library building
Spiridigliozzi et al. [112]	SIMPLEBIM (for IFC)	Correction of the geometric errors	Energy analysis of a single dwelling of two floors
Kim et al. [113]	IDF converter (for IFC)	Insertion of the material properties	Energy analysis of a five-story building
Choi et al. [114]	IFC-IDF converter (for IFC)	Definition of internal loads, equipment systems and weather data	Energy analysis of sample building
Heffernan et al. [115]	Solibri Model Checker (for gbXML/IFC)	Geometric error identification	Energy analysis of a residential building
Benjanac [116]	Geometry Simplification Tool (GST)	Geometric simplification of the model	Building energy analysis
Benjanac et al. [117]	IFC HVAC interface to EnergyPlus	Defining HVAC equipment and system data	Building energy analysis
Barone et al. [118]	gbXML corrective tool (for gbXML)	Inclusion of custom simulation settings and collection of specific outputs	Energy analysis of a maritime passenger station
Guzmán Garcia et al. [119]	gbXML corrective tool (for gbXML)	Correction of the geometric, material and/or location mismatches	Energy analysis of sample buildings
Ramaji et al. [120]	BIMserver serializer	Correction of the geometric errors	Energy analysis of an office building
Kamel et al. [121]	gbXML corrective tool (for gbXML)	Correction of the geometric errors and insertion of the material properties	Energy analysis of sample buildings
Welle et al. [122]	ThermalSim (for IFC)	Correction of the geometric errors	Thermal simulation of two industrial case studies
O’Donnell et al. [123]	Solibri Model Checker (for gbXML/IFC)	Geometric error identification	Energy analysis of NASA Ames Sustainability Base

Appendix A

Table A1

PRISMA 2020 checklist. Adapted from [25].

Section and Topic	Item #	Checklist Item	Location Where Item Is Reported
TITLE
Title	1	Identify the report as a systematic review.
ABSTRACT
Abstract	2	See the PRISMA 2020 for abstracts checklist.
INTRODUCTION
Rationale	3	Describe the rationale for the review in the context of existing knowledge.
Objectives	4	Provide an explicit statement of the objective(s) or question(s) the review addresses.
METHOD
Eligibility criteria	5	Specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review and how studies were grouped for the syntheses.
Information sources	6	Specify all databases, registers, websites, organizations, reference lists, and other sources searched or consulted to identify studies. Specify the date when each source was last searched or consulted.
Search strategy	7	Present the full search strategies for all databases, registers, and websites, including any filters and limits used.
Selection process	8	Specify the methods used to decide whether a study met the inclusion criteria of the review.
Data collection process	9	Specify the methods used to collect data from reports.
Data items	10a	List and define all outcomes for which data were sought. Specify whether all results that were compatible with each outcome domain in each study were sought (e.g., for all measures, time points, analyses), and if not, the methods used to decide which results to collect.
Synthesis methods	13a	Describe the processes used to decide which studies were eligible for each synthesis (e.g., tabulating the study intervention characteristics and comparing against the planned groups for each synthesis (item #5)).
	13b	Describe any methods required to prepare the data for presentation or synthesis, such as handling of missing summary statistics, or data conversions.
	13c	Describe any methods used to tabulate or visually display results of individual studies and syntheses.
	13d	Describe any methods used to synthesize results and provide a rationale for the choice(s).
RESULTS
Study selection	16a	Describe the results of the search and selection process, from the number of records identified in the search to the number of studies included in the review, ideally using a flow diagram.
Study characteristics	17	Cite each included study and present its characteristics.
DISCUSSION
Discussion	23a	Provide a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence.
	23b	Discuss any limitations of the evidence included in the review.
	23d	Discuss implications of the results for practice, policy, and future research.
OTHER INFORMATION
Registration and protocol	24a	Provide registration information for the review, including register name and registration number, or state that the review was not registered.
	24b	Indicate where the review protocol can be accessed, or state that a protocol was not prepared.
	24c	Describe and explain any amendments to information provided at registration or in the protocol.
Support	25	Describe sources of financial or nonfinancial support for the review, and the role of the funders or sponsors in the review.
Competing interests	26	Declare any competing interests of review authors.
Availability of data, code, and other materials	27	Report which of the following are publicly available and where they can be found: template data collection forms; data extracted from included studies; data used for all analyses; analytic code; any other materials used in the review.

Table A2

Summary of the analyzed works.

References	Year	Country	Publisher	Database	Keywords	Type of Article	Research Object	Main Research Contents
Andriamamonjy et al. [9]	2019	Belgium	Elsevier	Scopus	building information model (BIM); building energy performance simulation (BEPS);scientometric analysis	Review article	BIM functionalities; BIM–BEPS interoperability; interoperability strategies	Review of the integration of BIM and building energy performance simulation (BEPS) and of the different strategies to improve their interoperability.
Li et al. [11]	2023	USA	Elsevier	Scopus	BIM interoperability; BEM; object mapping; invariant signatures; building design; IFC	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)	Development of mapping algorithms capable of interfacing BIM and analytical models by automatically mapping objects based on their invariant signatures.
Farzaneh et al. [13]	2019	Canada	Elsevier	Scopus	BIM; BEM; design process; technology; research gap; literature review	Review article	BIM–BEM interoperability, discussion about Model View Definition (MVD)	Overview of the BIM–BEM processand recent technological developments and proposal of a framework to improve BIM–BEM interoperability.
Alsharif [14]	2019	Australia	Swinburne University of Technology	Google Scholar		Review article	BIM and BEM applications; BIM–BEM interoperability; interoperability strategies	Review of thecurrent applications of BIM-based BEM process and of the different strategies to improve their interoperability. Presentation of a case study of the application of BIM-based BEM between two commonsoftware tools “Revit and IES VE”.
Bahar et al. [15]	2013	France	MDPI	Scopus	thermal simulation; BIM; interoperability; integration review	Review article	BIM and BEM functionalities; BIM–BEM interoperability	Description of the BIM and BEM functionalities, review of the current trends in thermal simulation, discussion on the interoperability between BIM and BEM.
Pezeshki et al. [16]	2019	Iran	Elsevier	Scopus	BEM; building energy; BIM; optimization; new methods	Review article	BEM application; BIM–BEM interoperability	Reviews of building energy modeling (BEM) development and review of BIM–BEM interoperability.
Lesniak et al. [17]	2021	Poland	MDPI	Scopus	building information modeling (BIM); building energy model (BEM); architecture, engineering,and construction (AEC) projects; barriers; Ishikawa diagram	Review article	BIM advantages; BIM–BEM interoperability	Discussion on the importance of BIM during the life cycle of a building and analysis of BIM–BEM interoperability. Focus on the use of BIM in Poland.
Fernald et al. [18]	2018	Canada	Conference	Google Scholar	eSim; building performance simulation; model translation; energy modelling; BIM to BEM; interoperability	Review article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Analysis on BIM to BEM translation workflows and their challenges and limitations. Focus on the optimization of BIM–BEM interoperability.
Maskil-Leitan et al. [19]	2018	Israel	Springer	Scopus	building information modeling (BIM); building energy modeling (BEM); corporate social responsibility (CSR); sustainability; social network analysis (SNA)	Review article	Relevance of BIM’s social capabilities to the BEM process	Analysis of the integration of BIM socio-technical system intothe BEM process, with the possibility of improving the process through stakeholder management.
Khodeir et al. [20]	2017	Egypt	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modelling (BIM); building energy models (BEM); architectural firmsEgypt	Review article	BIM and BEM applications in Egypt; BIM–BEM interoperability	Analysis of the state of the art of BIM and BEM application in Egypt and focus on BIM–BEM interoperability.
Gao et al. [21]	2019	UK,Germany	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modelling (BIM); building energy modelling (BEM); IFC; gbXML	Review article	Application of BIM and BEM in the design process; BIM–BEM interoperability	Review on the building design process, and applications of building information modelling and building energy modelling in the design process. Review on the development of building information modelling-based building energy modelling methods and the development of prevalent informational infrastructures.
Senave et al. [22]	2015	Belgium	WITPRESS	Google Scholar	BIM, building energy performance (BEP); energy simulation (software); interoperability; information query; data transfer; design stages	Review article	Relation between BIMand energy simulation in the different stages of design	Review of the relation between BIMand energy simulation in the different stages of design, with an emphasis on the conceptual stage.
Gerrish et al. [23]	2016	UK	Emerald Publishing Limited	Scopus	design and development; stakeholders; information exchange; building energy modelling;building information modelling; level of development	Review article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Presentation of a process map for exchanging information between buildingdesigners and BEM practitioners highlighting the extents of information required at key stagesthroughout the construction design process.
Di Biccari et al. [24]	2022	Italy	Elsevier	Google scholar		Review article	BIM–BEM interoperability; interoperability strategies	Analysis of the state of the art of the interoperability between BIM and BEM and illustration of the different existing strategies to improve it.
Hu [31]	2018	USA	MDPI	Scopus	renovation; education buildings; building information model; building environmental model; building performance model; nearly zero energy	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Presentation of a framework to test the interoperability among different digital tools and platforms. The framework has been used for the energy renovation of existing education buildings.
Rathnasiri et al. [32]	2020	China,Sri Lanka, UK	International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics	Scopus	green building information modeling; existing green buildings; energy simulation	Original research article	BIM for energy analyses	Test on the possibility of using Green BIM techniques to conduct energy analyses.
Visschers et al. [33]	2016	The Netherlands	Eindhoven University of Technology	Google Scholar		Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability optimization	Development of a tool capable of converting IFC files into gbXML files for optimizing BIM–BEM interoperability.
Fonseca Arenas et al. [34]	2023	UK	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modelling; life cycle assessment; sustainability; buildings	Review article	BIM for energy analyses	Analysis of different methodologies such asbuilding information modeling (BIM), lifecycle assessment (LCA), and building energy modeling (BEM) through a systematic literature review.
Cormier et al. [38]	2011	France	Conference	Scopus		Original research article	BIM–BEPS interoperability	Overview of the services provided by theplatform for the BIM management in a multi-userenvironment; BIM-BEPS interoperability.
Bonomolo et al. [40]	2021	Italy	MDPI	Scopus	BIM; BEM; simulation modelling; dynamic simulation	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Analysis of the interaction between BIM and energy simulation, through a review of the mainexisting commercial tools. The analysis has been conducted on a case study.
Cho et al. [43]	2011	USA, Korea	Conference	Scopus	building information modeling; LEED; energy efficiency; high-performance building; scope definition; PDRI; whole-building design	Original Research Article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Comparison of EnergyPlus and IES < Virtual Environment > as BIM-based energy simulation tools. The analysis was conducted on a case study.
Gao et al. [44]	2019	UK, Germany	Conference	Scopus	early design stage; BIM-based building energy simulation; design optimization; Revit	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Presentation of a BIM-based real time building energy simulation and optimization tool
Stegnar et al. [45]	2019	Slovenia	Elsevier	Scopus	progressive BIM;project information management; renovation; energy performance; sustainability	Original research article	BIM for energy analyses	Test on the use of BIM for energy analyses
Lin et al. [46]	2019	China	MDPI	Scopus	green BIM; thermal comfort; energy consumption; tradition market; PMV; IES VE	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Use of green BIM model to explore the energy efficiency performance and comfort level of a case study.
Paneru et al. [48]	2021	USA	MDPI	Scopus	energy; sustainability; environment; building information model; energy	Original research article	BIM for energy analyses	Develop of a comprehensive framework for the integration of energy analysis withexisting Building Information Modeling tools.
Carrasco et al. [49]	2023	Spain	MDPI	Scopus	BIM; thermal loads; simulation; cost-effectiveness	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Calculation of the thermal loads of a sample building through a BIM-based energy model.
Montiel-Santiago et al. [50]	2020	Spain	MDPI	Scopus	Building information modeling; BIM-6D; energy eefficiency; green buildings; hospitals;emissions; sustainability; energy simulation; energetic certification; decarbonization	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Creation of the energy model of a building using the BIM methodology.
Forastiere et al. [51]	2023	Italy	MDPI	Scopus	energy efficiency; building information modeling; building energy modeling; dynamicmulti-parameter analysis; energy retrofit; thermal comfort; carbon footprint; economic assessment;dynamic simulation; thermal bath building	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Integration of dynamic multi-data and parameter analysis with advanced building information modeling (BIM) techniques to evaluate the energy performance of existing buildings and determine the most effective retrofit strategies.
Amoruso et al. [52]	2019	Korea, Germany	MDPI	Scopus	daylight analysis; visual comfort; BIM-parametric refurbishment workflow	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Analysis of the improvement in visual comfort for the renovation of an exemplary apartment unit in Seoulusing building information modeling (BIM) and parametric environmental analysis tools.
Elnabawi [53]	2020	Bahrain, Egypt	Frontiers in Built Environment	Scopus	interoperability; building information modeling (BIM); building energy modeling (BEM); building and sustaining a research program; energy consumption (EC)	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Test on the interoperability between Autodesk’s Revit (BIM) and DesignBuilder and IES-ve (BEM).
Sultanguzin et al. [54]	2019	Russia	Conference	Scopus		Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Presentation of the concept and the process of integrated design and construction of energy-efficient house during the lifecycle based on the use of BIM (building information modeling), BEM (building energy modeling) and CFD (computational fluid dynamics) technologies.
Maglad et al. [59]	2023	Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Kuwait	Elsevier	Scopus	BIM; MEP; BIM adoption; energy consumption; green buildings	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—real-time connection	Orientation analysis using Autodesk Insight 360 and Green Building Studio.
Sanhudo et al. [60]	2018	Portugal	Elsevier	Scopus	energy retrofit; building information modeling; data acquisition methods; authoring and energy analysis software; interoperability	Review article	BIM for energy retrofitting	BIM for energy efficiency; exploration of data acquisition solutions such as laser scanning and infrared thermography.
Yarramsetty et al. [61]	2019	India	Springer	Scopus	building information modelling (BIM); energy simulations; multi-family residential house; building orientation; sustainability	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—real-time connection	Use of BIM for orientation analysis on a building case study.
Ciccozzi et al. [63]	2023	Italy	Conference	Google Scholar	building information modelling (BIM); energy efficiency; sustainable building; incident solar radiation; energy simulation	Original research article	BIM for energy studies	Use of BIM for the analysis of shading and incident solar radiation on a sample building.
Reeves et al. [79]	2015	USA	MDPI	Scopus	building information modeling (BIM); building energy modeling (BEM); simulation; energy consumption; daylighting; natural ventilation	Original research article	Evaluation of BEM tools	Evaluation of twelve BEM tools using four criteria: interoperability, usability, available inputs and available outputs. Application of the first three BEM tools on a case study.
Pereira et al. [80]	2021	Portugal, USA	Elsevier	Google scholar	architecture; construction; design; energy performance; building performance; engineering; environment; operations; sustainability	Review article	BIM and BEM review	Identification of areas where BIM can improve building efficiency. Review of the BIM and BEM software currently present and identification of the most used ones.
Kim et al. [81]	2011	USA	Conference			Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Identification of the differences in energy simulation results between detailed simulation method (DOE 2.2 simulation engine) and BIM-based simulation method.
Trani et al. [82]	2021	Italy	Conference	Scopus	BIM cross information; IFC Model View Definition; BIM interoperability; fromBIM to BEM	Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Creation of a tool able to collect and import information in the BIM model in order to be exported using the IFC standard and read using energy analysis software.
Kenley et al. [83]	2016	Australia, New Zealand	Conference	Scopus		Original research article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Presentation of two interoperability issues for construction of rail infrastructure.
Porsani et al. [84]	2021	Spain	MDPI	Scopus	building information modelling (BIM); building energy model (BEM); Green Building extensible markup language (gbXML); Industry Foundation Classes (IFC); interoperability; digital twin; sustainable construction; intelligent buildings assessment; sustainability performance; simulation tools for building	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Comparison between ogbXML and IFC exchange formats through the modeling of two sample buildings, namely, a residence and an industrial warehouse.
Chen et al. [85]	2018	Singapore, UK	Conference		building information modelling (BIM); building energy simulation (BES); interoperability; sustainable design; Green Building XML schema (gbXML)	Original research article	Interoperability between building Information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Test on BIM–BEM interoperability by exporting a residential building model to four different energy software (Ecotect, EQUEST, Design Builder and IES-VE) using gbXML format.
Osello et al. [86]	2011	Italy	Conference			Review article	BIM–BEM interoperability	Definition of a preliminary set ofpossible standards for general architectural data (e.g.,orientation, surfaces, volumes, dimensions) and detailed material data (e.g., texture, thickness, stratigraphy, reflection and roughness) targeted to optimize the interoperability among architectural andenergetic software in a BIM process.
Boloorchi [87]	2023	Iran	Sciendo	Google Scholar	window size; window material, window shadings, window position, BIM, The Autodesk Insight 360	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—real-time connection	Using Insight 360 for energy analysis of a sample building: potential and limitations. Dimensions, position, material and shading of the windows were studied with Insight 360 to identify the best solutions for energy savings in the building.
Gonzàlez et al. [88]	2021	Brazil	MDPI	Google Scholar	energy efficiency; experimental design; building appliances; energy performance; BIMand BEM	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—real-time connection	Energy simulation of a hypothetical two-story single-family home selecting five different locations, using Insight 360.
de Lima Montenegro Duarte et al. [89]	2021	Brazil	Elsevier	Scopus	energy efficiency; thermal comfort; visual comfort; daylight; building information modeling	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—real-time connection	Using Autodesk Insight 360 for a school lighting study in Brazil.
Dong et al. [90]	2007	USA	Conference		IFC; gbXML; common data exchange; lighting simulation	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Detailed investigation andcomparative study of the differences between IFCand gbXML in terms of their data representations,data structures and applications.
Gourlis et al. [91]	2017	Austria	Elsevier	Scopus	BIM; BEM; industrial construction; thermal simulation	Original research article	Interoperability between building Information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Test on the gbXML format through the export to OpenStudio of the models of two industrial plants.
Delgado et al. [92]	2023	Portugal, Brazil	Elsevier	Scopus	BIM; BEM; photogrammetric survey; sustainable construction; energy simulation; UAS;UAV; drones	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Creation of the BIM model of a residential building using a point cloud obtained on the Sfm software starting from photogrammetry. Exporting the model to Design Builder via gbXML format and performing energy analysis. Comparison between numerical results and experimental results deriving from monitoring.
Ham et al. [93]	2015	USA	Elsevier		building information models (BIM); Green Building XML (gbXML); building energy performance modeling; thermography; image-based 3D reconstruction; thermal resistances; building retrofits	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Presentation of an automated method for assigning thermal properties to BIM building components in gbXML format through a thermographic survey.
Steel et al. [94]	2012	Australia	Springer		building information modelling; interoperability	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Presentation of various experiences in the field of software interoperability using mostly the industry standard IFC data modelling format.
Noack et al. [95]	2016	Germany, Portugal, UK	Conference	Google Scholar		Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Analysis of the differences between gbXML and IFC formats.
Moon et al. [96]	2011	Korea	Conference			Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Analysis of the differences between gbXML and IFC formats. Evaluation of BIM–BEM interoperability through export of models in gbXML to EnergyPlus, eQUEST, Ecotectand IES/VE.
Elagiry et al. [97]	2020	Italy, France	Conference			Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Presentation of a systematic workflow based on the IFC to handle the BIM toBuilding Energy Performance Simulation (BEPS) process and review the commonly adopted tools and approaches for each of its stages, i.e., from the generation of the BIM model, its geometry check, its data enrichment until its exploitation by a BEPS tools.
Cheng et al. [98]	2014	China	Conference		green buildings; gbXML; energy analysis; automated code checking; web services	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Presentation of a modular web service based framework which integrates the information necessary for green building design, automates the building design evaluation processes and facilitates simple updates on the building model on a common but distributed platform.
Hijazi et al. [99]	2015	USA	MDPI		building information modeling, (BIM), building energy modeling, (BEM), interoperability,Gbxml	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Exporting a model to gbXML to verify that the efficiency of the standardized exchange format.
Cemesova et al. [100]	2015	France, UK	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modelling;Industry Foundation Classes;Passivhaus standard	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Proposal to extend the IFC format with energy information.
Gupta et al. [101]	2013	UK	Elsevier		renewable energy; PV simulation; Open-BIM; IFC; interoperability; prototype	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Presentation of a conceptual framework for developing IFC-compliant renewable energy simulation tools using a multi-model concept in which the IFC data model provides partial input data required to run simulation models.
Carvalho et al. [102]	2021	Portugal	MDPI	Scopus	building information modelling (BIM); building energy modelling (BEM); energy efficiency;building sustainability assessment (BSA); sustainability	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Presentation of a framework capable of implementing the information contained in the BIM model with the aim to carry out energy analyses on renewable sources.
Karola et al. [103]	2022	Finland, Canada, USA	Elsevier	Scopus	IFC-compliant software; BSPro COM-Server; IAI	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Using BSPro COM-Server to simplify the complex geometric representation of IFC.
Yang et al. [104]	2022	China	MDPI	Scopus	building information modeling; building energy modeling; gbXML; plugin development; model simplification; interoperability	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of an automatic workflow to reconstruct the building geometric model based on the extrusion of room boundaries, use of the format gbXML for exporting the model.
Bracht et al. [105]	2021	Brazil	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modeling; gbXML; thermal load prediction; BIM–BEM integration; performance prediction metamodel; interoperability	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of an integration tool to link models made with different BIM software to the metamodel through the gbXML format.
Chiaia et al. [106]	2015	Italy, Iran	Conference	Scopus		Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Using “Space Boundary Tool” (SBT) as middleware tool to improve the interoperability between Revit and EnergyPlus.
Wang et al. [107]	2022	China	Springer	Scopus	BIM; BEM; HVAC system; automated design	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Presentation of a framework for an automated HVAC system design tool.
Chen et al. [108]	2023	China, Singapore	Springer	Scopus	BIM; building energy model; EnergyPlus; chiller design optimization; AutoBPS-BIM	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of a rapid building modeling tool, AutoBPS-BIM, to transfer the building information model (BIM) to the building energy model (BEM) for load calculation and chiller design optimization.
Kamel et al. [109]	2018	USA	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modeling (BIM); building energy modeling (BEM); smart homes; gbXML; OpenStudio; EnergyPlus	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of a tool, ABEMAT, that contributes in automation of building energy simulation and providing fine-grained outputs by using building information modeling (BIM) and modified source code of energy simulation tools such as EnergyPlus and OpenStudio. This tool receives gbXML file and provides userswith the amount of heat transfer through every single building envelope component such as windows,doors, and walls through an automated process.
Kim et al. [110]	2016	Korea, USA	Elsevier		IFC; building information modeling (BIM); energy modeling; energy simulation; design improvement	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Optimization of BIM-based energy modeling by developing an object based approach in which the energy modeler may change and expand various properties in building materials.
Ahn et al. [111]	2014	Korea	Elsevier		building information modeling; industry foundation classes; EnergyPlus; interface; sensitivity analysis	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of an interface to convert geometric information from IFC to IDF in order to minimize the loss of information and optimize modeling times on EnergyPlus.
Spiridigliozzi et al. [112]	2019	Italy	Conference	Scopus		Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of a workflow to reduce file transfer errors from BIM to BEM.
Kim et al. [113]	2012	Korea	Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering		building information modeling (BIM); energy performance assessments; Industry Foundation Classes (IFC); Input Data File (IDF)	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of an interface to convert geometric information from IFC to IDF in order to minimize the loss of information and optimize modeling times on EnergyPlus.
Choi et al. [114]	2016	Korea	Elsevier		building information modeling (BIM); data interoperability; energy performance assessment (EPA); energy property information; Industry Foundation Classes (IFC); IFC-IDF converting system	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Develop of an environment thatcontains a process, a materials library, and an energy performance assessments support system that connects BIM and energy modeling in order to improve their interoperability.
Heffernan et al. [115]	2017	Australia	Conference		information; modelling; BEM; building; energy; BIM; modelling; collaborative; approach	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Presentation of a workflow based upon the information delivery manuals (IDMs) from buildingSMART using nonproprietary Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) format.
Benjanac [116]	2008	USA	Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory		simulation; simulation input; IFC-based BIM; interoperable software; data transformation; rules; methodology; semi-automated process	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Illustration of a methodology to semi-automate building energy performance (BEP) simulation preparation and executionmakes this process much more effective.
Benjanac et al. [117]	2004	USA, Germany	Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory			Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of an interface capable of importing information relating to HVAC systems, generated by other IFC compatible software tools.
Barone et al. [118]	2021	Italy	MDPI	Scopus	BIM to BEM; energy efficiency; nearly zero energy building; nearly zero energy infrastructures;dynamic simulation	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development a workflow capable of converting BIM into an input file readable by energy software. Study of the optimal level of detail of the modeling required for a reliable energy assessment of the building.
Guzmán Garcia et al. [119]	2015	Canada	Elsevier		building information modeling; Building energy modeling; data analysis; interoperability	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Illustration of an automated solution through the design of a novel Extensible Style Sheet Language Transformation (XSLT), which includes a series of instructions to facilitate the information exchange between building design and energy modeling fields.
Ramaji et al. [120]	2020	USA, Iceland	Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering	Scopus	building information modeling (BIM); building energy modeling (BEM); model transformation; Model View Definition (MVD); Industry Foundation Classes (IFC).	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of an extension for OpenStudio that transforms building information models represented in IndustryFoundation Classes (IFC) files into building energy analysis models in the OpenStudio data format.
Kamel et al. [121]	2019	USA	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modeling; BIM; gbXML; building energy simulation; Revit; OpenStudio; Green Building Studio; GBS; EnergyPlus	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Identification of the various issues related to BIM–BEM interoperability through the in-depth analysis of three case studies. Development of a tool capable of modifying a gbXML file before its export, in order to solve problems related to building envelope.
Welle et al. [122]	2011	USA	Springer	Scopus	multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO); conceptual building design; energy simulation; daylighting simulation; interoperability; process integration; design automation	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Development of the ThermalOpt methodology to automate the BIM-based thermal simulation process for use in multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) environments.
O’Donnell et al. [123]	2013	USA	Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory			Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—middleware corrective tool	Developed of a semiautomated process that enables reproducible conversions of building information model (BIM) representations of building geometry into a format required by building energy modeling (BEM) tools.
Maile et al. [124]	2013	USA, Ireland	Conference			Review article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—standardized exchange formats	Examination of various case studies and discussion of geometry problems encountered with the use of the IFC format.
Akbarieh [125]	2017	Italy	University of Engineering and Architecture of Bologna			Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)	Investigation of interoperability issues between BIM and BEM.
Pinheiro et al. [126]	2018	Ireland, Germany, USA	Elsevier	Scopus	BIM; IFC; BEPS; HVAC; MVD; information exchange	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—adherence to Model View Definitions (MVD)	Development of an MVD after identifying the necessary exchange requirements needed for exporting to EnergyPlus and Modelica, based on a collection of eight case studies.
Andriamamonjy et al. [127]	2018	Belgium	Elsevier	Scopus	BIM; IFC4; energy efficiency; building performance simulation; building life cycle	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—adherence to Model View Definitions (MVD)	Development of an MVD intended to improve the exchange of information between the IFC file and Modelica, defining the necessary requirements for energy simulation.
O’Donnell et al. [128]	2011	USA	Conference			Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—adherence to Model View Definitions (MVDs)	Development of a Simulation Domain Model (SimModel) that will form the basis for a new IFC Model View Definition, capable of allowing the exchange of information between HVAC design applications and BEMs.
Wimmer et al. [129]	2015	Germany, Ireland	Conference			Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—adherence to Model View Definitions (MVD)	Improved connection between SimModel and Modelica through the implementation of mapping rules.
Rahamani Asl et al. [130]	2015	USA	Elsevier		building information modeling (BIM); performance-based design; building performance optimization; multi-objective optimization; parametric modeling; visual programming	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Creation of an optimization framework for performance optimization (BPOpt) capable of transforming BIM models into input files for energy software, using the application programming interfaces (e.g., Revit API and GBS-API).
Yan et al. [131]	2013	USA, South Korea	Conference	Scopus		Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Explore the benefits of using application programming interface (API) instead of interchangeable BIM data format—Industry FoundationClasses (IFC).
Jeong et al. [132]	2016	South Korea	MDPI	Scopus	building information modeling (BIM); object-oriented physical modeling (OOPM);building energy modeling (BEM); model translation	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Adoption of OOPM into buildingperformance simulations with BIM to facilitate model translations between BIM and BEM (building energy modeling).
Seidenschnur et al. [133]	2022	Denmark, the Netherlands	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modeling; HVAC; object models; common data environment; BIM level 3		BIM–BEM interoperability	Introduction of a common data environments (CDEs) to facilitate the connection between BIM and BEM.
Kim et al. [134]	2015	USA, South Korea	Elsevier	Scopus	building information modeling (BIM); building energy modeling (BEM); object-oriented physical modeling (OOPM); interoperability	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Development of a Modelica library for building information modeling (BIM) to perform a semiautomatic translation from the building models in BIM to building energy modeling (BEM) using a BIM’s authoring tool’s application programming interface (API).
Jeong et al. [135]	2014	USA, South Korea	Hindawi Publishing Corporation	Scopus		Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Use of the BIMauthoring tool Autodesk Revit and its application programming interface (API) and the LBNL Modelica BuildingsLibrary for the BIM2BEM development.
Jeon et al. [136]	2016	South Korea	MDPI		building information modeling; object-oriented physical modeling; building energy modeling; building topology	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Development of an algorithm to translate building topology in an object-orientedarchitectural building model (building information modeling, BIM) into an object-oriented physical-based energy performance simulation by using an object-oriented programming approach.
Remmen et al. [137]	2015	Germany, Ireland	Conference	Scopus		Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Overview of an opensource framework to connect BIM-based architecture and engineering software with building energy performance simulation in Modelica.
Thorade et al. [138]	2015	Germany	Conference		building information modelling; Modelicacode generation; building performance simulation	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Presentation of Modelica code generation for buildingperformance simulation based on building information models and focus on an opensource Python framework to connect BIM with Modelica.
Utkucu et al. [139]	2020	Turkey	Elsevier	Scopus	BIM; CFD; energy modeling; interoperability; data exchange	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Use of Dynamo to set the parametric relationships of the facade of a sample building for its energy optimization.
Rahmani Asl et al. [140]	2013	USA	Conference			Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Use of parametric modeling to improve interoperability between BIM and BEM.
Schlueter et al. [141]	2009	Switzerland	Elsevier		building information model; building performance; energy analysis; exergy analysis; design support; parametric design	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Use of Design Performance Viewer (DPV) tool in order to integrate energy calculations directly into the BIM editor using the application programming interface (API).
Miller et al. [142]	2014	Singapore, Switzerland, USA	Conference	Scopus		Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Presentation of a novel process of informationextraction from building information model (BIM) tobuilding energy model (BEM) using the Design Performance Viewer (DPV) and the Revit Python Shell(RPS).
Schlueter et al. [143]	2018	Switzerland, Belgium	Elsevier	Scopus	design of experiments (DoE); building information modeling (BIM); dynamic simulation; distributed simulation; building retrofit; retrofit design strategies	Original research article	Interoperability between building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM)—proprietary tool-chain	Introduction of design of experiments (DoE) in an integrated design workflow using the Design Performance Viewer (DPV) toolset, combining building information modeling (BIM), distributed dynamic simulation, and statistical analysis of the extensive simulation results.

References

1. MEPs Back Plans for a Climate Neutral Building Sector by 2050. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20230310IPR77228/meps-back-plans-for-a-climate-neutral-building-sector-by-2050 (accessed on 12 May 2023).

2. Wang, C.; Xiao, J.; Liu, W.; Ma, Z. Unloading and reloading stress-strain relationship of recycled aggregate concrete reinforced with steel/polypropylene fibers under uniaxial low-cycle loadings. Cem. Concr. Compos.; 2022; 131, 104597. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104597]

3. Wang, C.; Wu, H.; Li, C. Hysteresis and damping properties of steel and polypropylene fiber reinforced recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial low-cycle loadings. Constr. Build. Mater.; 2022; 319, 126191. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126191]

4. Zhao, X. A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization. Autom. Constr.; 2017; 80, pp. 37-47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002]

5. Bryde, D.; Broquetas, M.; Volm, J.M. The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). Int. J. Proj. Manag.; 2013; 31, pp. 971-980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001]

6. Cao, Y.; Kamaruzzaman, S.N.; Aziz, N.M. Green Building Construction: A Systematic Review of BIM Utilization. Buildings; 2022; 12, 1205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081205]

7. Lu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chang, R.; Li, Y. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions. Autom. Constr.; 2017; 83, pp. 134-148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.024]

8. Ryan, E.M.; Sanquist, F.T. Validation of building energy modeling tools under idealized and realistic conditions. Energy Build.; 2012; 47, pp. 375-382. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.020]

9. Andriamamonjy, A.; Saelens, D.; Klein, R. A combined scientometric and conventional literature review to grasp the entire BIM knowledge and its integration with energy simulation. J. Build. Eng.; 2019; 22, pp. 513-527. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.021]

10. Miettinen, R.; Paavola, S. Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Autom. Constr.; 2014; 43, pp. 84-91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.009]

11. Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Chang, S.; Sparkling, A. BIM-based object mapping using invariant signatures of AEC objects. Autom. Constr.; 2023; 145, 104616. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104616]

12. Pezeshki, Z.; Ivari, S.A.S. Applications of BIM: A Brief Review and Future Outline. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.; 2018; 25, pp. 273-312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9204-1]

13. Farzaneh, A.; Monfet, D.; Forgues, D. Review of using Building Information Modeling during the design process. J. Build. Eng.; 2019; 23, pp. 127-135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.029]

14. Alsharif, R. A Review on the Challenges of BIM-Based BEM Automated Application in AEC Industry; Swinburne University of Technology: Melbourne, Australia, 2019.

15. Bahar, Y.N.; Pere, C.; Landrieu, J.; Nicolle, C. A Thermal Simulation Tool for Building and Its Interoperability throught the Building Information Modeling (BIM) Platform. Buildings; 2013; 3, pp. 380-398. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings3020380]

16. Pezeshki, Z.; Soleimani, A.; Darabi, A. Application of BEM and using BIM database for BEM: A review. J. Build. Eng.; 2019; 23, pp. 1-17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.021]

17. Lesniak, A.; Górka, M.; Skrzypczak, I. Barriers to Implementation in Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Projects-The Polish Study. Energies; 2021; 14, 2090. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14082090]

18. Fernald, H.; Hong, S.; Bucking, S.; O’Brien, W. BIM to BEM translation workflows and their challenges: A case study using a detailed BIM model. Proceedings of the eSim 2018 «BUILDING SIMULATION TO SUPPORT BUILDING SUSTAINABILITY»; Montréal, QC, Canada, 9–10 May 2018.

19. Maskil-Leitan, R.; Reychav, I. BIM’s social role in building energy modeling. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy; 2019; 21, pp. 307-338. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1637-9]

20. Khodeir, L.M.; Nessim, A.A. BIM2BEM integrated approach: Examining status of the adoption of building information modelling and building energy models in Egyptian architectural firms. Ain Shams Eng. J.; 2018; 9, pp. 1781-1790. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2017.01.004]

21. Gao, H.; Koch, C.; Wu, Y. Building information modelling based building energy modelling: A review. Appl. Energy; 2019; 238, pp. 320-343. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.032]

22. Senave, M.; Boeykens, S. Link between BIM and energy simulation. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment; WIT Press: Southampton, UK, 2015; Volume 149, pp. 341-352.

23. Gerrish, T.; Ruikar, K.; Cook, M. Using BIM capabilities to improve existing building energy modelling practices. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag.; 2017; 24, pp. 190-208. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2015-0181]

24. Di Biccari, C.; Calcerano, F.; D’Uffizi, F.; Esposito, A.; Campari, M.; Grigliarelli, E. Building information modeling and building performance simulation interoperability: State-of-the-art and trends in current literature. Adv. Eng. Inform.; 2022; 54, 101753. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101753]

25. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E. et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Syst. Rev.; 2021; 10, 89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781348]

26. ISO 29481-1:2016 Building Information Models—Information Delivery Manual—Part 1: Methodology and Format; Interna-tional Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.

27. Begic, H.; Galic, M. A Systematic Review of Construction 4.0 in the Context of the BIM 4.0 Premise. Buildings; 2021; 11, 337. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings11080337]

28. European Commission. Clean Energy for All Europeans Package; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019.

29. Inyim, P.; Rivera, J.; Zhu, Y. Integration of Building Information Modeling and Economic and Environmental Impact Analysis to Support Sustainable Building Design. J. Manag. Eng.; 2015; 31, A4014002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000308]

30. Shen, Z.; Jensen, W.; Wentz, T.; Fischer, B. Teaching Sustainable Design Using BIM and Project-Based Energy Simulations. Educ. Sci.; 2012; 2, pp. 136-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci2030136]

31. Hu, M. Optimal Renovation Strategies for Education Buildings—A Novel BIM–BPM–BEM Framework. Sustainability; 2018; 10, 3287. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10093287]

32. Rathnasiri, P.; Jayasena, S.; Siriwardena, M. Assessing the Applicability of Green Building Information Modelling for Existing Green Buildings. Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodyn.; 2020; 15, pp. 763-776. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.150601]

33. Visschers, M.G. Building Information Modeling (BIM) Based Whole-Building Energy Analysis towards an Improved Interoperability. Master’s Thesis; Construction Management and Engineering, University of Technology: Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2016.

34. Arenas, N.F.; Shafique, M. Recent progress on BIM-based sustainable buildings: State of the art review. DIBE; 2023; 15, 100176.

35. Antòn, L.A.; Dìaz, J. Integration of life cycle assessment in a BIM enviroment. Procedia Eng.; 2014; 85, pp. 26-32. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.525]

36. Najjar, M.; Figueiredo, K.; Palumbo, M.; Haddad, A. Integration of BIM and LCA: Evaluating the enviromental impacts of building materials at an early stage of designing a typical office building. J. Build. Eng.; 2017; 14, pp. 115-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.10.005]

37. Soust-Verdaguer, B.; Llatas, C.; Garcìa-Martìnez, A. Critical review of bim-based LCA method to buildings. Energy Build.; 2017; 136, pp. 110-120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.009]

38. Cormier, A.; Robert, S.; Roger, P.; Stephan, L.; Wurtz, E. Towards a BIM-based service oriented platform: Application to building energy performance simulation. Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Sydney, Australia, 14–16 November 2011.

39. Chong, H.Y.; Lee, C.Y.; Wang, X. A mixed review of the adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod.; 2017; 142, pp. 4114-4126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.222]

40. Bonomolo, M.; Di Lisi, S.; Leone, G. Building Information Modelling and Energy Simulation for Architecture Design. Appl. Sci.; 2021; 11, 2252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11052252]

41. Wong, J.K.W.; Zlhou, J. Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM: A review. Autom. Constr.; 2015; 57, pp. 156-165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.06.003]

42. Oti, A.H.; Tizani, W. BIM extension for the sustainability appraisal of conceptual steel design. Adv. Eng. Inform.; 2015; 29, pp. 28-46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2014.09.001]

43. Cho, C.S.; Chen, D.; Woo, S. Building information modeling (BIM)-based design of energy efficient buildings. Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction; Seoul, Republic of Korea, 29 June–2 July 2011.

44. Gao, H.; Zhang, L.; Koch, C.; Wu, Y. BIM-based real time building energy simulation and optimization in early design stage. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; Kazimierz Dolny, Poland, 21–23 November 2019.

45. Stegnar, G.; Cerovsek, T. Information needs for progressive BIM methodology supporting the holistic energy renovation of office buildings. Energy; 2019; 173, pp. 317-331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.087]

46. Lin, P.H.; Chang, C.C.; Lin, Y.H.; Lin, W.L. Green BIM Assessment Applying for Energy Consumption and Comfort in the Traditional Public Market: A Case Study. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 4636. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11174636]

47. Jalaei, F.; Jrade, A.; Nassiri, M. Integrating Decision Support System (DSS) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) to Optimize the Selection of Sustainable Building Components. ITcon; 2015; 20, pp. 399-420.

48. Paneru, S.; Jahromi, F.F.; Hatami, M.; Roudebush, W.; Jeelani, I. Integration of Emergy Analysis with Building Information Modeling. Sustainability; 2021; 13, 7990. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13147990]

49. Carrasco, C.A.; Lombillo, I.; Balbás, F.J.; Aranda, J.R.; Villalta, K. Building Information Modeling (BIM 6D) and Its Application to Thermal Loads Calculation in Retrofitting. Buildings; 2023; 13, 1901. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings13081901]

50. Montiel-Santiago, F.J.; Hermoso-Orzáez, M.J.; Terrados-Cepeda, J. Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: BIM 6D. Study of the BIM Methodology Applied to Hospital Buildings. Value of Interior Lighting and Daylight in Energy Simulation. Sustainability; 2020; 12, 5731. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12145731]

51. Forastiere, S.; Piselli, C.; Pioppi, B.; Balocco, C.; Sciurpi, F.; Pisello, A.L. Towards Achieving Zero Carbon Targets in Building Retrofits: A Multi-Parameter Building Information Modeling (BIM) Approach Applied to a Case Study of a Thermal Bath. Energies; 2023; 16, 4757. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en16124757]

52. Amoruso, F.M.; Dietrich, U.; Schuetze, T. Integrated BIM-ParametricWorkflow-Based Analysis of Daylight Improvement for Sustainable Renovation of an Exemplary Apartment in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability; 2019; 11, 2699. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11092699]

53. Elnabawi, M.H. Building Information Modeling-Based Building Energy Modeling: Investigation of Interoperability and Simulation Results. Front. Built Environ.; 2020; 6, 573971. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.573971]

54. Sultanguzin, I.A.; Kruglikov, D.A.; Yatsyuk, T.V.; Kalyakin, I.D.; Yavorovsky, Y.V.; Govorin, A.V. Using of BIM, BEM and CFD technologies for design and construction of energy-efficient houses. E3S Web Conf.; 2019; 124, 03014. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912403014]

55. Ahankoob, A.; Khoshnava, S.M.; Rostami, R.; Preece, C. Bim Perspectives on Construction Waste Reduction. Proceedings of the Management in Construction Research Association (MiCRA) Postgraduate Conference; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5–6 December 2012.

56. Liu, Z.; Osmani, M.; Demian, P.; Baldwin, A.N. The potential use of BIM to aid construction waste minimalisation. Proceedings of the CIB W78-W102; Sophia Antipolis, France, 26–28 October 2011.

57. Marzouk, M.; Abdelaty, A. Monitoring thermal comfort in subways using building information modeling. Energy Build.; 2014; 84, pp. 252-257. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.006]

58. Cheng, J.C.P.; Ma, L.Y.H. A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste estimation and planning. Waste Manag.; 2013; 33, pp. 1539-1551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23490358]

59. Maglad, A.M.; Houda, M.; Alrowais, R.; Khan, A.M.; Jameel, M.; Rehman, S.K.U.; Khan, H.; Javed, M.F.; Rehman, M.F. Bim-based energy analysis and optimization using insight 360 (a case study). Case Stud. Constr. Mater.; 2023; 18, e01755. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01755]

60. Sanhudo, L.; Ramos, N.M.M.; Martins, J.P.; Almeida, R.M.S.F.; Barreira, E.; Simões, M.L.; Cardoso, V. Building information modeling for energy retrofitting—A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.; 2018; 89, pp. 249-260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.064]

61. Yarramsetty, S.; Rohullah, M.S.; Sivakumar, M.V.N.; Raj, P.A. An investigation on energy consumption in residential building with different orientation a BIM approach. Asian J. Civ. Eng.; 2020; 21, pp. 253-266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00189-z]

62. AUTODESK Revit 2024-About Solar Studies. Available online: https://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2024/ENU/?guid=GUID-346146C7-CE92-4A85-945A-5E634271D1E0 (accessed on 21 May 2023).

63. Ciccozzi, A.; de Rubeis, T.; Pasqualoni, G.; Paoletti, D.; Ambrosini, A. Approach to energy analysis using Building Information Modeling (BIM) software. Proceedings of the XXIII CIRIAF National Congress-Sustainable Development, Protection of the Environment and Human Health; Perugia, Italy, 13–14 April 2023.

64. Crawley, D.B.; Hand, J.W.; Kummert, M.; Griffith, B.T. Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Build. Environ.; 2008; 43, pp. 661-673. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.027]

65. Li, X.; Wen, J. Review of building energy modeling for control and operation. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.; 2014; 37, pp. 517-537. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.056]

66. EnergyPlus. Available online: https://energyplus.net/ (accessed on 23 May 2023).

67. Crawley, D.B.; Lawrie, L.K.; Winkelmann, F.C.; Buhl, W.F.; Huang, Y.J.; Pedersen, C.O.; Strand, R.K.; Liesen, R.J.; Fisher, D.E.; Witte, M.J. et al. EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy Build.; 2001; 33, pp. 319-331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00114-6]

68. DesignBuilder. Available online: https://designbuilder.co.uk/ (accessed on 23 May 2023).

69. Insight 360. Available online: https://insight360.autodesk.com/oneenergy (accessed on 23 May 2023).

70. OpenStudio. Available online: https://openstudio.net/ (accessed on 23 May 2023).

71. Al-Zubaydi, A.Y.T. Building Models Design and Energy Simulation With Google Sketchup And Openstudio. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Res.; 2013; 3, pp. 318-333.

72. Wittkopf, S.K.; Kambadkone, A.; Quanhui, H.; Khai, N.P. Development of a Solar Radiation and BIPV Design Tool as Energyplus Plugin for Google Sketchup. Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2009: Eleventh International IBPSA Conference; Glasgow, Scotland, 27–30 July 2009.

73. de Rubeis, T.; Nardi, L.; Ambrosini, D.; Paoletti, D. Is a self-sufficient building energy efficient? Lesson learned from a case study in Mediterranean climate. Appl. Energy; 2018; 218, pp. 131-145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.166]

74. de Rubeis, T.; Nardi, I.; Muttillo, M.; Paoletti, D. The restoration of severely damaged churches—Implications and opportunities on cultural heritage conservation, thermal comfort and energy efficiency. J. Cult. Herit.; 2020; 43, pp. 186-203. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.008]

75. de Rubeis, T.; Falasca, S.; Curci, G.; Paoletti, D.; Ambrosini, D. Sensitivity of heating performance of an energy self-sufficient building to climate zone, climate change and HVAC system solutions. Sustain. Cities Soc.; 2020; 61, 102300. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102300]

76. DOE-2. Available online: https://www.doe2.com/ (accessed on 23 May 2023).

77. Berkeley Lab. Available online: https://www.lbl.gov/ (accessed on 23 May 2023).

78. Green Building Studio. Available online: https://gbs.autodesk.com/gbs (accessed on 23 May 2023).

79. Reeves, T.; Olbina, S.; Issa, R.R.A. Guidelines for Using Building Information Modeling for Energy Analysis of Buildings. Buildings; 2015; 5, pp. 1361-1388. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings5041361]

80. Pereira, V.; Santos, J.; Leite, F.; Escórcio, P. Using BIM to improve building energy efficiency—A scientometric and systematic review. Energy Build.; 2021; 250, 111292. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111292]

81. Kim, S.; Woo, J.H. Analysis of the differences in energy simulation results between building information modeling (BIM)-based simulation method and the detailed simulation method. Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference; Phoenix, AZ, USA, 11–14 December 2011.

82. Trani, M.L.; Ruschi, M.; Ripamonti, F. Cross information and BIM interoperability tools for energy retrofit analysis. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; Bolzano-Bozen, Italy, 14–16 April 2021.

83. Kenley, R.; Harfield, T.; Behnam, A. BIM Interoperability Limitations: Australian and Malaysian Rail Projects. MATEC Web Conf.; 2016; 66, 00102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600102]

84. Porsani, G.B.; de Lersundi, K.D.V.; Gutierrez, A.S.O.; Bandera, C.F. Interoperability between Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Building Energy Model (BEM). Appl. Sci.; 2021; 11, 2167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11052167]

85. Chen, S.; Jin, R.; Alam, M. Investigation of interoperability between building information modelling (BIM) and building energy simulation (BES). Int. Rev. Appl. Sci. Eng.; 2018; 9, pp. 137-144. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1848.2018.9.2.9]

86. Osello, A.; Cangialosi, G.; Dalmasso, D.; Di Paolo, A.; Lo Turco, M.; Piumatti, P.; Vozzola, M. Architecture data and energy efficiency simulations: BIM and interoperability standards. Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Sydney, Australia, 14–16 November 2011.

87. Boloorchi, F. Analyzing the energy analysis tool (The Autodesk Insight 360) of BIM during the early stages of the design process in terms of window factors in a single-family house. Logistics, Supply Chain. Sustain. Glob. Chall.; 2022; 13, pp. 50-60. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jlst-2023-0004]

88. Gonzàlez, J.; Soares, C.A.P.; Najjar, M.; Haddad, A.N. BIM and BEM Methodologies Integration in Energy-Efficient Buildings Using Experimental Design. Buildings; 2021; 11, 491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100491]

89. de Lima Montenegro Duarte, J.G.C.; Zemero, B.R.; de Souza, A.C.D.B.; de Lima Tostes, M.E.; Bezerra, U.H. Building Information Modeling approach to optimize energy efficiency in educational buildings. J. Build. Eng.; 2021; 43, 102587. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102587]

90. Dong, B.; Lam, K.P.; Huang, Y.C.; Dobbs, G.M. A comparative study of the IFC and gbXML informational infrastructures for data exchange in computational design support environments. Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Sydney, Australia, 14–16 November 2011.

91. Gourlis, G.; Kovacic, I. Building Information Modelling for analysis of energy efficient industrial buildings—A case study. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.; 2017; 68, pp. 953-963. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.009]

92. Delgado, J.M.P.Q.; Guimarães, A.S.; Martins, J.P.; Parracho, D.F.R.; Freitas, S.S.; Lima, A.G.B.; Rodrigues, L. BIM and BEM Interoperability-Evaluation of a Case Study in Modular Wooden Housing. Energies; 2023; 16, 1579. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en16041579]

93. Ham, Y.; Golparvar-Fard, M. Mapping actual thermal properties to building elements in gbXML-based BIM for reliable building energy performance modeling. Autom. Constr.; 2015; 49, pp. 214-224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.07.009]

94. Steel, J.; Drogemuller, R.; Toth, B. Model interoperability in building information modelling. Softw. Syst. Model; 2012; 11, pp. 99-109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-010-0178-4]

95. Noack, F.; Katranuschkov, P.; Scherer, R.; Dimitriou, V.; Firth, S.K.; Hassan, T.M.; Ramos, N.; Pereira, P.; Malò, P.; Fernando, T. Technical challenges and approaches to transfer building information models to building energy. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling, (ECPPM 2016); Limassol, Cyprus, 7–9 September 2016.

96. Moon, H.J.; Choi, M.S.; Kim, S.K.; Ryu, S.H. Case studies for the evaluation of interoperability between a BIM based architectural model and building performance analysis programs. Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Sydney, Australia, 14–16 November 2011.

97. Elagiry, M.; Bourreau, P.; Charbel, N.; De Angelis, E. IFC to Building Energy Performance Simulation: A systematic review of the main adopted tools and approaches. Proceedings of the BauSIM 2020 Online Conference; 23–25 September 2020.

98. Cheng, J.C.P.; Das, M. A BIM-based web service framework for green building energy simulation and code checking. J. Inf. Technol. Constr.; 2014; 19, pp. 150-168.

99. Hijazi, M.; Kensek, K.; Konis, K. Bridging the gap: Supporting data transparency from BIM to BEM. Proceedings of the ARCC 2015 Conference: The Future of Architectural Research; Chicago, IL, USA, 6–9 April 2015.

100. Cemesova, A.; Hopfe, C.J.; McLeod, R.S. PassivBIM: Enhancing interoperability between BIM and low energy design software. Autom. Constr.; 2015; 57, pp. 17-32. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.04.014]

101. Gupta, A.; Cemesova, A.; Hopfe, C.J.; Rezgui, Y.; Sweet, T. A conceptual framework to support solar PV simulation using an open-BIM data exchange standard. Autom. Constr.; 2014; 37, pp. 166-181. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.005]

102. Carvalho, J.P.; Almeida, M.; Bragança, L.; Mateus, R. BIM-Based Energy Analysis and Sustainability Assessment-Application to Portuguese Buildings. Buildings; 2021; 11, 246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060246]

103. Karola, A.; Lahtela, H.; Hanninen, R.; Hitchcock, R.; Chen, Q.; Dajka, S.; Hangstrom, K. BSPro COM-Server-interoperability between software tools using industrial foundation classes. Energy Build.; 2002; 34, pp. 901-907. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00066-X]

104. Yang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Zeng, F.; Lin, Z.; Li, C. A gbXML Reconstruction Workflow and Tool Development to Improve the Geometric Interoperability between BIM and BEM. Buildings; 2022; 12, 221. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020221]

105. Bracht, M.K.; Melo, A.P.; Lamberts, R. A metamodel for building information modeling-building energy modeling integration in early design stage. Autom. Constr.; 2021; 121, 103422. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103422]

106. Chiaia, B.; Davardoust, S.; Osello, A.; Aste, N.; Mazzon, M. BIM and interoperability for energy simulations. Proceedings of the Building Simulation Applications 2015; Bozen, Italy, 4–6 February 2015.

107. Wang, H.; Xu, P.; Sha, H.; Gu, J.; Xiao, T.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, D. BIM-based automated design for HVAC system of office buildings—An experimental study. Build. Simul.; 2022; 15, pp. 1177-1192. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0883-7]

108. Chen, Z.; Deng, Z.; Chong, A.; Chen, Y. AutoBPS-BIM: A toolkit to transfer BIM to BEM for load calculation and chiller design optimization. Building Simulation; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2023.

109. Kamel, E.; Memari, A.M. Automated Building Energy Modeling and Assessment Tool (ABEMAT). Energy; 2018; 147, pp. 15-24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.023]

110. Kim, H.; Shen, Z.; Kim, I.; Kim, K.; Stumpf, A.; Yu, J. BIM IFC information mapping to building energy analysis (BEA) model with manually extended material information. Autom. Constr.; 2016; 68, pp. 183-193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.002]

111. Ahn, K.U.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, C.S.; Kim, I.; Lee, K. BIM interface for full vs. semi-automated building energy simulation. Energy Build.; 2014; 68, pp. 671-678. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.063]

112. Spiridigliozzi, G.; Pompei, L.; Cornaro, C.; De Santoli, L.; Bisegna, F. BIM-BEM support tools for early stages of zero-energy building design. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 609, 072075.

113. Kim, I.; Kim, J.; Seo, J. Development of an IFC-based IDF Converter for Supporting Energy Performance Assessment in the Early Design Phase. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng.; 2012; 11, pp. 313-320. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.11.313]

114. Choi, J.; Shin, J.; Kim, M.; Kim, I. Development of openBIM-based energy analysis software to improve the interoperability of energy performance assessment. Autom. Constr.; 2016; 72, pp. 52-64. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.07.004]

115. Heffernan, E.E.; Sohel, M.I.; Beazley, S.F. From BIM (Building Information Modelling) to BEM (Building Energy Modelling): A collaborative approach. Proceedings of the Australasian Building Simulation 2017 Conference; Melbourne, Australia, 15–16 November 2017.

116. Benjanac, V. IFC BIM-Based Methodology for Semi-Automated Building Energy Performance Simulation; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2008.

117. Benjanac, V.; Tobias, M. IFC HVAC interface to EnergyPlus—A case of expanded interoperability for energy simulation. Proceedings of the SIMBUILD2004 Conference Boulder; Boulder, CO, USA, 4–6 August 2004.

118. Barone, G.; Buonomano, A.; Forzano, C.; Giuzio, G.F.; Palombo, A. Improving the Efficiency of Maritime Infrastructures through a BIM-Based Building Energy Modelling Approach: A Case Study in Naples, Italy. Energies; 2021; 14, 4854. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14164854]

119. Guzmán Garcia, E.; Zhu, Z. Interoperability from building design to building energy modeling. J. Build. Eng.; 2015; 1, pp. 33-41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.03.001]

120. Ramaji, I.J.; Messner, J.I.; Mostavi, E. IFC-Based BIM-to-BEM Model Transformation. J. Comput. Civ. Eng.; 2020; 34, 04020005. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000880]

121. Kamel, E.; Memari, A.M. Review of BIM’s application in energy simulation: Tools, issues, and solutions. Autom. Constr.; 2019; 97, pp. 164-180. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.008]

122. Welle, B.; Haymaker, J.; Rogers, Z. ThermalOpt: A methodology for automated BIM-based multidisciplinary thermal simulation for use in optimization enviroments. Build. Simul.; 2011; 4, pp. 293-313. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12273-011-0052-5]

123. O’Donnell, J.T.; Maile, T.; Rose, C.; Mrazović, N.; Morrissey, E.; Regnier, C.; Parrish, K.; Bazjanac, V. Transforming BIM to BEM: Generation of Building Geometry for the NASA Ames Sustainability Base BIM; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Foshan, China, 2013.

124. Maile, T.; O’Donnell, J.; Bazjanac, V.; Rose, C. BIM-Geometry modelling guidelines for building energy performance simulation. Proceedings of the BS2013: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Chambéry, France, 26–28 August 2013.

125. Akbarieh, A. Systematic Investigation of Interoperability Issues between Building Information Modelling and Building Energy Modelling. Master’s Thesis; University of Engineering and Architecture of Bologna: Bologna, Italy, 2017.

126. Pinheiro, S.; Wimmer, R.; O’Donnell, J.; Muhic, S.; Bazjanac, V.; Maile, T.; Frisch, J.; van Treeck, C. MVD based information exchange between BIM and building energy performance simulation. Autom. Constr.; 2018; 90, pp. 91-103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.009]

127. Andriamamonjy, A.; Saelens, D.; Klein, R. An automated IFC-based workflow for building energy performance simulation with Modelica. Autom. Constr.; 2018; 91, pp. 166-181. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.019]

128. O’Donnell, J.; See, R.; Rose, C.; Maile, T.; Bazjanac, V.; Haves, P. Simmodel: A domain data model for whole building energy simulation. Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Sydney, Australia, 14–16 November 2011.

129. Wimmer, R.; Cao, J.; Remmen, P.; Maile, T.; O’Donnel, J.; Frisch, J.; Streblow, R.; Müller, D.; van Treeck, C. Implementation of advanced BIM-based mapping rules for automated conversions to Modelica. Proceedings of the BS2015: 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Hyderabad, India, 7–9 December 2015.

130. Rahmani Asl, M.; Zarrinmehr, S.; Bergin, M.; Yan, W. BPOpt: A framework for BIM-based performance optimization. Energy Build.; 2015; 108, pp. 401-412. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.011]

131. Yan, W.; Haberl, J.S.; Clayton, M.J.; Jeong, W. Interfacing BIM with Building Thermal and Daylighting Modeling. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA); Chambery, France, 25–28 August 2013.

132. Jeong, W.S.; Kim, K.H. A Performance Evaluation of the BIM-Based Object-Oriented Physical Modeling Technique for Building Thermal Simulations: A Comparative Case Study. Sustainability; 2016; 8, 648. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su8070648]

133. Seidenschnur, M.; Kücükavci, A.; Fjerbæk, E.V.; Smith, K.M.; Pauwels, P.; Hviid, C.A. A common data environment for HVAC design and engineering. Autom. Constr.; 2022; 142, 104500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104500]

134. Kim, J.B.; Jeong, W.S.; Clayton, M.J.; Haberl, J.S.; Yan, W. Developing a physical BIM library for building thermal energy simulation. Autom. Constr.; 2015; 50, pp. 16-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.011]

135. Jeong, W.S.; Kim, J.B.; Clayton, M.J.; Haberl, J.S.; Yan, W. Translating Building Information Modeling to Building Energy Modeling Using Model View Definition. Sci. World J.; 2014; 638276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/638276] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25309954]

136. Jeong, W.S.; Son, J.W. An Algorithm to Trasnslate Building Topology in Building Information Modeling into Object-Oriented Physical Modeling-Based Building Energy Modeling. Energies; 2016; 9, 50. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en9010050]

137. Remmen, P.; Cao, J.; Ebertshäuser, S.; Frisch, J.; Lauster, M.; Maile, T.; O’Donnell, J.; Pinheiro, S.; Rädler, J.; Streblow, R. et al. An open framework for integrated BIM-based Building Performance Simulation using Modelica. Proceedings of the BS2015: 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association; Hyderabad, India, 7–9 December 2015.

138. Thorade, M.; Rädler, J.; Remmen, P.; Maile, T.; Wimmer, R.; Cao, J.; Lauster, M.; Nytsch-Geusen, C.; Müller, D.; van Treeck, C. An open toolchain for generating Modelica code from Building Information Models. Proceedings of the 11th International Modelica Conference; Versailles, France, 21–23 September 2015.

139. Utkucu, D.; Sözer, H. Interoperability and data exchange within BIM platform to evaluate building energy performance and indoor comfort. Autom. Constr.; 2020; 116, 103225. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103225]

140. Rahmani Asl, M.; Zarrinmehr, S.; Yan, W. Towards BIM-based Parametric Building Energy Performance Optimization. Proceedings of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA); Cambridge, ON, Canada, 24–27 October 2013.

141. Schlueter, A.; Thesseling, F. Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages. Autom. Constr.; 2009; 18, pp. 153-163. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.07.003]

142. Miller, C.; Thomas, D.; Irigoyen, S.D.; Hersberger, C.; Nagy, Z.; Rossi, D.; Schlueter, A. BIM-extracted EnergyPlus model calibration for retrofit analysis of a historically listed building in Switzerland. Proceedings of the Building Simulation Conference; Atlanta, GA, USA, 10–12 September 2014.

143. Schlueter, A.; Geyer, P. Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance. Autom. Constr.; 2018; 86, pp. 33-43. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.021]