It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Introduction: Urban green spaces, including urban trails, have demonstrated health benefits to those who utilize these spaces. However, access and use of these spaces are impacted by many different individual and community-level factors. This dissertation examined barriers and facilitators to urban trail use within two neighborhoods along the Schuylkill Banks in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Methods: In each of the two neighborhoods, disorder audits were conducted. Freelisting was also conducted with those actively using the trail and among those encountered in the neighborhood. Finally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) were used to create composite maps using secondary data representing terms identified during freelisting, providing a visualization of areas with varying facilitators to trail use.
Results: Neighborhood audits demonstrated substantially higher disorder in the blocks around one access point as compared to the other. Freelisting responses from 233 participants revealed the primary factors that facilitated trail use to be convenience and access. Infrequent users highlighted factors such as available transportation and parking, while frequent users emphasized the importance of access related issues, such as having a ramp at the access point entrance. Composite maps created with GIS showed that, areas closer to the trail points indicated greater ease of trail use, however, this ease of use was not consistent along the entire trail. Maps representing freelisting terms reported by infrequent users showed that areas with more facilitators were scattered, with each high facilitator segment covering a small geographical area.
Conclusion: Organizational stakeholders can use results from this dissertation to begin community discussions about trail use and access, especially in communities around the access points. Additionally, maps derived from this dissertation can be used for identification and prioritization of communities with limited facilitators to trail use. Ultimately, this methodology has the potential to impact practice and policy, locally in Philadelphia and more broadly, and improve the planning and implementation of future urban trails.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer