It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Transparency, inclusion, and stakeholder participation have become buzzwords that are regularly related to in the literature relating to contemporary planning in major public infrastructure procurement. However, the concept can be defined and administered differently by different governing authorities in different countries. The term will be defined differently depending on the government authorities or academic writers' unique and distinct fundamental philosophical positions. One of the heralded principles of government authorities reasoning in using Public– Private Partnerships in infrastructure procurement is that it is claimed that the PPP model of delivery offers a more open, transparent, inclusive, and accountable delivery process than that of the traditional model. This study outlines the differences in the application of the internal governance structures of two different first-world neo-liberal governments and their chosen models of PPP in Infrastructure procurement in the province of British Columbia, Canada, and the state of Oregon in the USA. The study rigorously investigated the approach adopted to transparency, stakeholder inclusion, and participation in the procurement and delivery processes of major public road infrastructure projects and how transparency was addressed in infrastructure over three case study projects in the two governing authorities. It researches each of the governing authority's approaches to transparency, stakeholder inclusion and consultation, the role of communities as stakeholders, and the differing role and position of that of First Nation communities in the consultation and delivery of infrastructure projects that impact their traditional lands.
This study argues that greater transparency and stakeholder inclusion is essential throughout the procurement and delivery project cycle to ensure that the interests of the public are protected in the decision-making process of the procurement and delivery of public infrastructure. In-depth, the approach to transparency, the inclusion of the community as stakeholders in the procurement process and the recognition of First Nation communities as integral stakeholders in projects is explored in terms of its application in the projects beyond their stated positions in government literature, outlining the barriers to them.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





