Abstract
Objectives
Despite evidence of breast cancer screening efficacy, the screening rate has remained less than 50% in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an environmental approach offering on-site mammography in workplaces.
Methods
Supermarket stores were randomly assigned into two groups, the intervention group (leaflet and mammography) and the control group (leaflet). From May to July 2018, participants in the intervention group were given a leaflet informing them of the subsidies for breast cancer screening and offered the opportunity to have mammography in their workplaces. Participants in the control group were given the same leaflet, but had to arrange their own screening outside the workplace. The primary outcome was the breast cancer screening rate in 2018. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for having screening in the intervention group compared with the control group were estimated using multilevel logistic regression.
Results
We analyzed data from 1624 participants (mean age 53 years) from 25 supermarket stores (intervention: 8 stores, control: 17 stores). Among participants who had not attended screening in the previous year, the screening rate was 7% in the control group and 53% in the intervention group, with an adjusted OR (95% CI) of 14.22 (8.97–22.54). The effect was greater in those who had never attended screening before.
Conclusion
In a worksite-based cluster randomized controlled trial in Japanese supermarket stores, an environmental approach offering mammography in workplaces substantially increased the breast cancer screening rate within 1 year (UMIN000030465).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Tanaka, Hideo 2 ; Okamura, Tomonori 3 ; Nishikawa, Tomofumi 4 ; Morino, Ayumi 1 ; Godai, Kayo 5 ; Tatsumi, Yukako 6 ; Kawahara, Mizuki 7 ; Kiyohara, Maiko 7 ; Kawatsu, Yuichiro 8 ; Kimura, Takashi 9 ; Miyamatsu, Naomi 7 1 Department of Clinical Nursing, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan; Occupational Health Care Office, Heiwado Co., Shiga, Japan
2 Public Health Center of Neyagawa City, Osaka, Japan
3 Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
4 Department of Health and Nutrition, Kyoto Koka Women's University, Kyoto, Japan
5 Department of Health Promotion Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
6 Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
7 Department of Clinical Nursing, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan
8 Occupational Health Care Office, Heiwado Co., Shiga, Japan
9 General Incorporated Foundation Kinki Health Administration Center, Shiga, Japan





