Introduction
Recent advances in producing ultrathin freestanding single-crystalline membranes have enabled heterogenous integration of dissimilar crystalline materials in a single electrical or photonic device, opening a path towards creation of devices with enhanced performance and functionalities1,2. The focus of recent studies was mainly on the membrane generation method and a rough demonstration of a prototype device fabricated via heterogeneous integration3–5. However, to advance this field to the next stage, it is pivotal to demonstrate the possibility of creating a device with state-of-the-art performance. Many aspects of heterogeneous integration of dissimilar materials are unknown, but perhaps the most important is the interface quality between the transferred single-crystalline membrane and the host heterostructure. To verify this, we have fabricated gallium nitride (GaN)-based high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMT) with a heterogeneously integrated SrTiO3 gate oxide layer and characterized its performance. We find that with careful fabrication and transfer of the gate oxide membrane, the device performance in regard to the oxide/HEMT interface show excellent quality, matching or exceeding that of conventionally deposited amorphous gate oxides as well as in-situ grown SiN oxides6–8.
GaN-based HEMT is one of the most promising structure for high-power and RF applications owing to its superior properties, such as high electron mobility and high breakdown field9–11. To further improve the performance and reliability beyond conventional GaN HEMTs with Schottky metal gate, metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS)-HEMTs structures have been proposed to suppress gate leakage and passivated the GaN surface from ambient. In this regard, MOS-GaN HEMTs with various dielectric materials such as Al2O3 and HfO2 have been demonstrated12–14. In MOS-HEMT, the crystallization and interfacial quality of the gate dielectric material play a crucial role in determining the performance15.
Among various dielectric materials, complex-oxide materials have attracted considerable interest due to their diverse functional properties such as high dielectric constant (high-κ), ferroelectricity, magnetism, and superconducting properties making complex-oxides an attractive material system for developing next-generation devices16,17. However, epitaxial limitations in monolithic growth of dissimilar materials make it difficult to integrate single-crystalline complex-oxide materials with other material platforms such as GaN. The epitaxy of complex-oxides on substrates with different lattice constants and thermal expansion coefficients results in growth of polycrystalline films with inferior material properties. In other words, epitaxial limitations make it difficult to integrate complex-oxide materials onto conventional semiconductors while maintaining its excellent functional properties18.
To address this challenge, recent advances in fabricating single-crystalline freestanding complex-oxide membrane techniques have paved the way to seamlessly integrate complex-oxides with any arbitrary semiconductor platforms19–21. In this work, we demonstrate state-of-the-art GaN HEMTs utilizing heterogeneously integrated single-crystalline strontium titanium oxide (SrTiO3, abbreviated as STO) gate dielectric films. Epitaxial lift-off and direct stacking of freestanding membrane enables integration of crystalline complex-oxide materials on GaN HEMT platforms. STO, a representative perovskite material, exhibits ultrahigh dielectric constant (κ ~ 300 at room temperature) and comparable breakdown field with conventional dielectric materials22,23. This material was recently utilized to demonstrate 2D-FETs successfully24. The fabricated devices show excellent electrical characteristics such as negligible hysteresis (ΔV), low subthreshold swing (SS) close to the Boltzmann limit, and low dynamic on-resistance. We conclude that the pristine interface between the transferred complex-oxide membrane and GaN is attributed to the superior performance of the devices.
Results
Structure of the STO/GaN HEMTs
Figure 1a–c shows a 3D schematic illustration, photograph, and optical microscope image of the fabricated STO/GaN HEMT device. Centimeter-scale freestanding STO membrane with a thickness of ~25 nm was transferred onto the AlGaN/GaN HEMT heterostructure as the gate insulator. The channel width, channel length, and gate length are 60 µm, 30 µm, and 4 µm, respectively. Figure 1d shows the energy band diagram of the fabricated device (the characterization and fabrication procedure are shown in Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, respectively). With an estimated valence band offset of ~0.5 eV and conduction band offset of ~0.1 eV, the STO gate insulator forms a type-I straddling band alignment with AlGaN25–31. Typically, the type-I negative band alignment of gate dielectric and AlGaN can potentially lead to injection of electrons from the gate toward the interface of the gate insulator and AlGaN due to the low energy barrier to electrons of negative band offset32. Furthermore, the injected electrons may be readily captured by trap states near the interface (interface and border traps) that originate from the poor interface quality and defects in the gate insulator. These electron trapping processes may negatively impact the performance of the HEMT device by causing reliability issues, such as decrease in current level and an increase in dynamic on-resistance as a result of decreasing electron density in the 2DEG at the subsequent on-state after the off-state bias stress33. However, a clean interface quality and high crystallinity of the gate insulator results in low trap states near the interface, which can compensate for the adverse effects of the type-I negative band alignment and enable highly reliable operation of the devices even with type-I negative band alignment.
Fig. 1 [Images not available. See PDF.]
Structure of the STO/GaN HEMTs.
a Schematic illustration, b photograph, c optical microscopy image and d energy band diagram of fabricated AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMT) with SrTiO3 (STO) gate dielectric.
Electrical characteristics
Figure 2 shows the electrical characterizations of the fabricated device. Figure 2a shows the bidirectional transfer characteristics (IDS-VGS) normalized with channel width for a drain voltage (VDS) of 0.1, 1 and 5 V. The inset shows a zoomed in subthreshold region of the transfer curve, showing negligible drain induced barrier lowering (DIBL) for increasing VDS. Figure 2b shows an identical curve in linear scale, confirming stable device operation with negligible hysteresis, which imply very low defects at the oxide/HEMT interface. To confirm the output characteristics, we measured the output curve (IDS-VDS) normalized to the channel width for a VGS range from −4 to 1 V, as shown in Fig. 2c. Regarding the pulse operation of digital circuit systems, a large hysteresis during the on-and off switching of the transistor critically degrades the stability and power efficiency of the circuit. Therefore, demonstrating a device with negligible hysteresis is crucial for ensuring stability and increasing power efficiency in digital circuits.
Fig. 2 [Images not available. See PDF.]
Electrical characteristics.
a Normalized bidirectional transfer curves of the device at drain-source voltage (VDS) = 0.1, 1 V, 5 V, respectively in log scale and b in linear scale. c Normalized output curves in gate-source voltage (VGS) range of – 4 to 1 V. d Normalized bidirectional transfer curves at VDS = 5 V. The inset shows hysteresis (ΔV) at IDS = 1 µA mm−1. e The subthreshold swing (SS) versus IDS curve for forward and reverse direction sweep. f Benchmark of minimum SS (SSmin) and ΔV of the SrTiO3 (STO)/GaN high electron mobility transistors (HEMT) compared to previously reported works of metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS)-HEMTs.
As shown in the Fig. 2d, the device exhibits the ON/OFF ratio ( ~ 2.6 × 107) at VDS = 5 V and the hysteresis (ΔV) of the device is nearly zero ( ~ 0.04 mA) at 1 µA mm−1. Since the hysteresis behavior in MOS-HEMT structures is typically caused by the trapping and detrapping mechanism due to border traps in the gate dielectric34, negligible hysteresis of the STO/GaN MOS-HEMT implies that the STO/GaN HEMT is free from border traps owing to the single-crystalline nature of the STO membrane and a clean STO/GaN interface. Furthermore, Fig. 2e shows the subthreshold swing (SS) extracted from the bidirectional transfer characteristics, showing an ideally low minimum SS (SSmin) value of approximately 62 mV dec−1 in both forward and reverse direction, which is close to the Boltzmann limit at room temperature (60 mV dec−1). By utilizing the following equation, the interface trap density (Dit) can be estimated from the SS value:
1
where k is Boltzmann constant, T is temperature and CSTO is the capacitance of STO23,24. The estimated Dit at room temperature is approximately 6.33 × 1011 eV−1 cm−2, which is even lower than MOS-HEMTs with conventional amorphous-based gate dielectric materials13,35. Thus, the steep SS of our device, which originates from the clean interface of the STO/GaN HEMT, indicates excellent gate controllability, and shows that it’s an advantageous structure for low power consumption applications. Consequently, owing to the pristine interface of the STO/GaN and the high crystallinity of STO, the STO/GaN HEMT exhibits outstanding characteristics in terms of hysteresis and SSmin compared to the other works, as shown in Fig. 2f36–51.The STO/GaN HEMT shows the high off-state breakdown voltage (VBR) of 414 V as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. The breakdown field (EBR) of device is calculated to be ~2 MV cm−1. Supplementary Fig. 4 shows the gate leakage characteristics of the STO/GaN HEMT. It should be noted that the gate leakage in forward bias is considerably affected by the band alignment and barrier height. As shown in Fig. 1d, STO gate insulator forms a type-I straddling band alignment with AlGaN, resulting in higher gate leakage in forward bias region due to the low energy barrier to electrons by negative band offset.
Dynamic on-resistance degradation
To further investigate the interface quality of our STO/GaN HEMT device, we measured the dynamic on-resistance (Ron,D) by varying the quasi-drain voltage (VDSQ,), which indicate the reliability of HEMTs under high quasi-bias stress. Figure 3a, b illustrates the trap states near the interface (interface and border traps) and the mechanism of the dynamic on-resistance effect, respectively. The Ron,D indicates the ratio of Ron before and after applying a stress voltage, VDSQ, at the off state. Due to the trapping of electrons at the interface between the GaN and gate dielectric layer (interface and border traps) during the bias stress, the current degrades after the bias stress, thereby increasing the Ron52. While applying a high VDSQ at the off state (VGS < VTH), the potential differences between the gate and drain electrode generate the electric field in the vertical direction, inducing electrons injection from the gate toward the interface of the gate insulator and AlGaN as shown in Fig. 3b (left). The injected electrons from the gate may be readily captured by trap states near the interface of the GaN and gate dielectric layer that originate from the poor interface quality and defects in the gate insulator, collapsing the current level due to the decreasing electron density in the 2DEG during the on state (VGS > VTH) as shown in Fig. 3b (right). Accordingly, this allows us to investigate the interface quality of the STO/GaN by analyzing the degradation of on-state current level and Ron,D36,53. The periodic drain voltage for high quiescent (VDSQ, VGSQ) and ON state was applied using a pulsed I-V system. The pulse width of VDSQ, VGSQ, and ON state are 3 ms and 2 ms, respectively. The VGSQ was kept at −6 V, while VDSQ was varied from 0 to 40 V, and the ON state drain voltage swept from 0 to 10 V as shown in Fig. 3c. Figure 3d exhibits the output characteristics for various VDSQ and VGSQ combinations, showing only 5 % degradation of the on-state current level compared to the initial state (VGSQ = VDSQ = 0 V) during the bias stress. As the amplitude of VDSQ increases, the electric field generated by the potential drops between the gate and drain electrodes is enhanced, leading to the increases of the electron trapping into the interface trap at the GaN/dielectric layer.
Fig. 3 [Images not available. See PDF.]
Dynamic on-resistance degradation.
a Schematic illustration of trap states near the interface. b Schematic illustration of physical mechanism of the dynamic on-resistance (Ron,D), as a result of decreased electron density in the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) at the subsequent on-state after the off-state bias stress. c Synchronous pulse signal of gate-source voltage (VGS) and drain-source voltage (VDS) scheme for Ron,D measurement. d Normalized output curve measured with pulsed I-V system for the quiescent drain-source voltage (VDSQ) range of 0 to 40 V, under the quiescent gate-source voltage (VGSQ) of – 6 V. The inset shows only 5% degradation of the on-state current level compared to the initial state during the bias stress. eRon, D/Ron ratio as a function of VDSQ.
To evaluate the influence of Ron,D as a function of the quiescent bias (VDSQ), we calculated the Ron,D by increasing the VDSQ from 0 V to 40 V with 5 V steps as shown in Fig. 3e. Owing to the high crystalline quality of STO and the clean interface of the STO/GaN, the maximum Ron,D only increases up to 7 %, which is much lower compared to conventional GaN MOS-HEMTs utilizing deposited amorphous oxides54.
TEM characterization of STO/GaN interface
Finally, to directly investigate the interface of the STO/GaN HEMT, a cross-sectional TEM measurement was conducted. Figure 4a shows the top view SEM image of the fabricated STO/GaN HEMT device and the investigated area of the TEM sample. The TEM was performed at the AlGaN/STO interface, (including a GaN capping layer) as illustrated in the left image of Fig. 4b. Figure 4b (right image) shows the TEM image of at the STO/GaN/AlGaN interface, which showed no defects, airgaps, unexpected interfacial layers or residues at the STO/GaN interface. We suspect that the dangling bonds of the transferred STO membrane may form atomic bonding with the underlying substrate (in our case, GaN HEMT heterostructure) by the thermal annealing process, which consistent with the previous works55–59 (the mechanism of the interface bonds formation is schematically illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 5). Moreover, the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (inset) of the STO region, verified the crystalline nature of the transferred STO membrane. We believe these results, along with the electrical analysis of the gate oxide interface, strongly support that the reliable operation and excellent performance of the fabricated STO gate oxide HEMT is a result of a pristine interface between highly crystalline STO gate oxide and GaN.
Fig. 4 [Images not available. See PDF.]
TEM characterization of STO/GaN interface.
a Plan-view scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of HEMT device, black box represents region of focused ion beam (FIB) milling for transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis. b Cross-sectional TEM image of SrTiO3 (STO)/GaN interface. The inset shows selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the transferred STO.
Conclusions
In summary, we heterogeneously integrated crystalline complex-oxide material on AlGaN/GaN HEMT as a gate dielectric by epitaxial layer transfer approach. Using STO with ultrahigh-κ properties as the gate oxide, we fabricated a MOS-HEMT device. The fabricated devices exhibited a negligible hysteresis (ΔV) at a drain current of 1 µA/mm, and a minimum SS value of 62 mV dec−1. We attribute these results to an extremely clean interface between the STO and GaN, free from interface and border traps. The dynamic on resistance measurements were performed for further interface quality analysis, in which our device only showed a maximum resistance increase of 7%.
Finally, we confirmed through TEM that no unwanted interfacial layer, residues, or airgaps between STO/GaN exists, and that the transferred STO maintains its crystalline nature. Our results demonstrate the potential of heterogeneous integration of complex-oxide materials with mature semiconductor technologies, substantially expanding the possibility of creating high performance electrical and photonic devices with novel functionalities.
Methods
Material preparation and device fabrication
A GaN HEMT, consisting of GaN capping layer (3 nm), Al0.26Ga0.74N barrier (25 nm), AlN interlayer (1 nm), GaN channel layer (2 μm) and GaN buffer layer (1 μm), was grown via metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) on a Si (111) substrate. The electron mobility and sheet carrier concentrations of the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) formed between the AlGaN/GaN interface were >1300 cm2 V−1 s−1 and ~1013 cm−2 at T = 300 K.
The integration of STO with AlGaN/GaN HEMT structure begins with the successive epitaxial growth of a water-soluble strontium aluminum oxide (Sr3Al2O6, abbreviated as SAO) sacrificial layer, followed by the growth of STO gate oxide on a single-crystalline STO (001) substrate by pulsed-laser deposition (PLD). It has been reported that the epitaxial growth of oxide film on the SAO template allows the transfer of single-crystalline STO membranes without fundamental thickness limitation60. The single-crystallinity of the epitaxially grown STO film on SAO/STO substrate is confirmed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) map, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1a–c. After deposition of a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) supporting layer on the as-grown STO/SAO/STO substrate via spin-coating, the stack was immersed in deionized (DI) water for ~24 hours to completely dissolve the SAO sacrificial layer61. The freestanding STO membrane with a thickness of ~25 nm was then transferred onto the AlGaN/GaN HEMT structure followed by removal of the supporting layer by acetone and rinsed by isopropyl alcohol (the complex-oxide membrane transfer procedure schematically illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 2).
The transferred membrane was patterned through standard photolithography and etched using a combination of ion milling and etching in diluted hydrofluoric acid (HF) solution. We believe that the HF etch removes most of the defects caused by the ion milling in the gate oxide membrane, leading to excellent characteristics. Mesa isolation was conducted by inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) using a mixture of BCl3/Cl2 gas. A Ti/Al/Ti/W (20/120/20/30 nm) stack was deposited for the source/drain electrode via e-beam evaporation, followed by rapid thermal annealing at 500 °C for 2 min in N2 environment. Finally, a Ni film ( ~ 500 nm) was deposited as the gate electrode via plasma sputtering (the low magnification cross-sectional image of the fabricated device is shown in Supplementary Fig. 6).
Electrical and material characterizations
The electrical properties of the fabricated devices were measured using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (Keithley−4200A-SCS) with a 4255-RPM module to apply pulsed signals. The structural and interfacial analysis was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), focused ion beam (FIB), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). SEM measurements were performed using JEOL high-resolution SEM (IT-500HR), ZEISS SEM with an EBSD detector. The cross-sectional TEM specimens of the fabricated devices were prepared using a Ga-focused ion beam milling (ZEISS crossbeam 540) technique. TEM measurements were performed using a JEOL ARM 200 F (NEOARM).
Acknowledgements
H.S.K. acknowledge support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (grant no. RS-2023-00252720 and grant no. RS-2023-00222070) and the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering at Yonsei University (2022-22-0311). G.Y. acknowledge support from the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2021R1A4A1033155) and Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy of Korea (RS-2022-00154729). J.K. acknowledge support from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), via [2021-210900005].
Author contributions
H.S.K., G.Y., J.K., and J.J. conceived this work and designed the experiments. H.S.K. directed the team. J.J., J.Y.Y., S.K., S.-H. Bae, J-H.A., S.K., G.Y. and H.S.K. prepared the manuscript. J.J., J.Y.Y., S.L., S.K., M.J.Y., G.L., and H.S. performed the device fabrication and characterization. J.J. H.S., and S.L. carried out the complex-oxide film growth and transfer fabrication. J.Y.Y., S.K., M.J.Y., and G.L. carried out GaN HEMT device fabrication and measurements. S.K. carried out the TEM measurements. All the authors contributed to the discussion and analysis of the results.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Engineering thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Liwen Sang, Anastasiia Vasylchenkova and Ros Daw.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-024-00161-z.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
1. Ji, J; Park, S; Do, H; Kum, HS. A review on recent advances in fabricating freestanding single-crystalline complex-oxide membranes and its applications. Phys. Scr.; 2023; 98, 052002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/acccb4]
2. Ji, J et al. Understanding the 2D-material and substrate interaction during epitaxial growth towards successful remote epitaxy: a review. Nano Converg.; 2023; 10, 19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40580-023-00368-4]
3. Chiabrera, FM et al. Freestanding perovskite oxide films: Synthesis, challenges, and properties. Ann. Phys.; 2022; 534, 2200084. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.202200084]
4. Bouaziz, J; Cancellieri, C; Rheingans, B; Jeurgens, LPH; La Mattina, F. Advanced epitaxial lift-off and transfer procedure for the fabrication of high-quality functional oxide membranes. Adv. Mater. Interfaces; 2023; 10, 2200084.
5. Puebla, S et al. Combining freestanding ferroelectric perovskite oxides with two-dimensional semiconductors for high performance transistors. Nano Lett.; 2022; 22, pp. 7457-7466. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02395]
6. Jiang, H et al. Investigation of in situ SiN as gate dielectric and surface passivation for GaN MISHEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2017; 64, pp. 832-839. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2016.2638855]
7. He, J et al. Normally-OFF AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with Low RON and Vth hysteresis by functioning in-situ SiNx in regrowth process. IEEE Electron Device Lett.; 2022; 43, pp. 529-532. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LED.2022.3149943]
8. Zhang, H et al. Effect of in-situ SiNx grown with different carrier gas on structural and electrical properties of GaN-based MISHEMTs. Appl. Phys. Lett.; 2023; 122, 173501. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0146447]
9. Hoo Teo, K et al. Emerging GaN technologies for power, RF, digital, and quantum computing applications: Recent advances and prospects. J. Appl. Phys.; 2021; 130, 160902. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0061555]
10. Amano, H et al. The 2018 GaN power electronics roadmap. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.; 2018; 51, 163001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf9d]
11. Millan, J; Godignon, P; Perpina, X; Perez-Tomas, A; Rebollo, J. A survey of wide bandgap power semiconductor devices. IEEE Trans. Power Electron.; 2014; 29, pp. 2155-2163. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2013.2268900]
12. Ando, Y; Kaneki, S; Hashizume, T. Improved operation stability of Al2O3/AlGaN/GaN MOS high-electron-mobility transistors grown on GaN substrates. Appl. Phys. Express; 2019; 12, 024002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7567/1882-0786/aafded]
13. Yeom, MJ et al. Low subthreshold slope AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT with spike-annealed HfO2 gate dielectric. Micromachines; 2021; 12, 1441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12121441]
14. Zhao, YP et al. Comparative study on characteristics of Si-based AlGaN/GaN recessed MIS-HEMTs with HfO2 and Al2O3 gate insulators. Chinese Phys. B; 2020; 29, 087304. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ab8daa]
15. Hashizume, T; Nishiguchi, K; Kaneki, S; Kuzmik, J; Yatabe, Z. State of the art on gate insulation and surface passivation for GaN-based power HEMTs. Mater. Sci. Semicond.; 2018; 78, pp. 85-95. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.09.028]
16. Kum, HS et al. Heterogeneous integration of single-crystalline complex-oxide membranes. Nature; 2020; 578, pp. 75-81. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1939-z]
17. Disa, AS et al. Photo-induced high-temperature ferromagnetism in YTiO3. Nature; 2023; 617, pp. 73-78. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05853-8]
18. Bae, SH et al. Integration of bulk materials with two-dimensional materials for physical coupling and applications. Nat. Mater.; 2019; 18, pp. 550-560. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0335-2]
19. Han, S et al. Freestanding membranes for unique functionality in electronics. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.; 2023; 5, pp. 690-704. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c01411]
20. Kum, H et al. Epitaxial growth and layer-transfer techniques for heterogeneous integration of materials for electronic and photonic devices. Nat. Electron.; 2019; 2, pp. 439-450. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0314-2]
21. Bakaul, SR et al. Single crystal functional oxides on silicon. Nat. Commun.; 2016; 7, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10547]
22. Neville, RC; Hoeneisen, B; Mead, CA. Permittivity of strontium titanate. J. Appl. Phys.; 1972; 43, pp. 2124-2131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1661463]
23. Huang, JK et al. High-κ perovskite membranes as insulators for two-dimensional transistors. Nature; 2022; 605, pp. 262-267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04588-2]
24. Yang, AJ et al. Van der Waals integration of high-κ perovskite oxides and two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Electron.; 2022; 5, pp. 233-240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41928-022-00753-7]
25. Maruska, HP; Tietjen, JJ. The preparation and properties of vapor-deposited single-crystal-line GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett.; 1969; 15, pp. 327-329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1652845]
26. Yim, WM et al. Epitaxially grown AlN and its optical band gap. J. Appl. Phys.; 1973; 44, pp. 292-296. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1661876]
27. Koide, Y et al. Energy band-gap bowing parameter in an AlxGa1-xN alloy. J. Appl. Phys.; 1987; 61, pp. 4540-4543. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.338387]
28. Jung, BK et al. GaN schottky barrier MOSFET using transparent source/drain electrodes for UV-optoelectronic integration. Solid-State Electron.; 2012; 73, pp. 78-80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2011.12.007]
29. Four, I; Kameche, M. Optimization of DC and AC performances for Al0.26Ga0.74N/GaN/4H-SiC HEMT with 30nm T-gate. Int. J. Nanoelectron. Mater.; 2020; 13, pp. 361-372.
30. Robertson, J; Falabretti, B. Band offsets of high K gate oxides on III-V semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys.; 2006; 100, 014111. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2213170]
31. Michaelson, HB. The work function of the elements and its periodicity. J. Appl. Phys.; 1977; 48, pp. 4729-4733. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.323539]
32. Jha, J; Meer, M; Ganguly, S; Saha, D. Off-state degradation and recovery in Oxide/AlGaN/GaN heterointerfaces: importance of band offset, electron, and hole trapping. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.; 2020; 2, pp. 2071-2077. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.0c00322]
33. Meneghini, M et al. Trapping in GaN-based metal-insulator-semiconductor transistors: Role of high drain bias and hot electrons. Appl. Phys. Lett.; 2014; 104, 143505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4869680]
34. Yang, JY; Ma, J; Lee, CH; Yoo, G. Polycrystalline/Amorphous HfO2 bilayer structure as a gate dielectric for β-Ga2O3 MOS capacitors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2021; 68, pp. 1011-1015. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2021.3053189]
35. Kanamura, M. et al. Suppression of threshold voltage shift for normally-Off GaN MIS-HEMT without post deposition annealing. Proc. Int. Symp. Power Semicond. Devices ICs 411–414 (2013).
36. Kang, HY et al. Epitaxial κ-Ga2O3/GaN heterostructure for high electron-mobility transistors. Mater. Today Phys.; 2023; 31, 101002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101002]
37. Wang, HC et al. High-Performance LPCVD-SiNx/InAlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with 850-V 0.98-mΩ·cm2 for power device applications. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc.; 2018; 6, pp. 1136-1141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2018.2869776]
38. Wang, HC et al. AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with high quality ALD-Al2O3 gate dielectric using water and remote oxygen plasma as oxidants. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc.; 2017; 6, pp. 110-115. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2017.2779172]
39. Cai, Y et al. Low ON-state resistance normally-OFF AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with partially recessed gate and ZrO charge trapping layer. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2021; 68, pp. 4310-4316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2021.3100002]
40. He, J; Hua, M; Zhang, Z; Chen, KJ. Performance and VTH stability in E-Mode GaN fully recessed MIS-FETs and partially recessed MIS-HEMTs with LPCVD-SiNx/PECVD-SiNx gate dielectric stack. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2018; 65, pp. 3185-3191. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2018.2850042]
41. Jiang, H; Tang, CW; Lau, KM. Enhancement-Mode GaN MOS-HEMTs with recess-free barrier engineering and High-k ZrO2 gate dielectric. IEEE Electron Device Lett.; 2018; 39, pp. 405-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LED.2018.2792839]
42. Chandrasekar, H et al. Demonstration of wide bandgap AlGaN/GaN negative-capacitance high-electron-mobility transistors (NC-HEMTs) using barium titanate ferroelectric gates. Adv. Electron. Mater.; 2020; 6, 2000074. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202000074]
43. Yang, S et al. High-quality interface in Al2O3/GaN/GaN/AlGaN/GaN MIS structures with in situ pre-gate plasma nitridation. IEEE Electron Device Lett.; 2013; 34, pp. 1497-1499. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LED.2013.2286090]
44. Dutta Gupta, S et al. Positive threshold voltage shift in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs and E-Mode operation by AlxTi1-xO based gate stack engineering. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2019; 66, pp. 2544-2550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2019.2908960]
45. Zhang, H. et al. Room-temperature organic passivation for GaN-on-Si HEMTs with improved device stability. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1–5 (2023)
46. Wang, T; Zong, Y; Nela, L; Matioli, E. Enhancement-mode multi-channel AlGaN/GaN transistors with LiNiO junction Tri-gate. IEEE Electron Device Lett.; 2022; 43, pp. 1523-1526. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LED.2022.3189635]
47. Wang, T., Nikoo, M. S., Nela, L. & Matioli, E. LiNiO gate dielectric with tri-gate structure for high performance E-mode GaN transistors. Proc. Int. Symp. Power Semicond. Devices ICs 135–138 (2021).
48. Wu, N et al. Enhanced performance of low-leakage-current normally off p-GaN Gate HEMTs using NH3 plasma pretreatment. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2023; 70, pp. 4560-4564. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2023.3294894]
49. Cheng, W-C et al. Low trap density of oxygen-rich HfO2/GaN interface for GaN MIS-HEMT applications. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B; 2022; 40, 022212. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1116/6.0001654]
50. He, J et al. Distinguishing various influences on the electrical properties of thin-barrier AlGaN/GaN heterojunctions with in-situ SiNx caps. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process.; 2021; 132, 105907. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.105907]
51. Lee, HP; Bayram, C. Improving current ON/OFF ratio and subthreshold swing of Schottky- Gate AlGaN/GaN HEMTs by postmetallization annealing. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2020; 67, pp. 2760-2764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.2992014]
52. Jin, D; Del Alamo, JA. Methodology for the study of dynamic ON-resistance in high-voltage GaN field-effect transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2013; 60, pp. 3190-3196. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2013.2274477]
53. Meneghini, M et al. Trapping phenomena and degradation mechanisms in GaN-based power HEMTs. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process.; 2018; 78, pp. 118-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.10.009]
54. Zhu, JJ et al. Improved interface and transport properties of AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with PEALD-grown AlN gate dielectric. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 2015; 62, pp. 512-518. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2014.2377781]
55. Yong, GJ et al. Thermal stability of SrTiO3/SiO2/Si interfaces at intermediate oxygen pressures. J. Appl. Phys.; 2010; 108, 033502. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3460098]
56. Lee, M et al. Self-sealing complex oxide resonators. Nano Lett.; 2022; 22, pp. 1475-1482. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03498]
57. Yoon, H et al. Freestanding epitaxial SrTiO3 nanomembranes via remote epitaxy using hybrid molecular beam epitaxy. Sci. Adv.; 2022; 8, eadd5328. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add5328]
58. Li, Y et al. Stacking and twisting of freestanding complex oxide thin films. Adv. Mater.; 2022; 34, 2203187. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.202203187]
59. Hashizume, T et al. Effects of postmetallization annealing on interface properties of Al2O3/GaN structures. Appl. Phys. Expr.; 2018; 11, 124102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7567/APEX.11.124102]
60. Ji, D et al. Freestanding crystalline oxide perovskites down to the monolayer limit. Nature; 2019; 570, pp. 87-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1255-7]
61. Lu, D et al. Synthesis of freestanding single-crystal perovskite films and heterostructures by etching of sacrificial water-soluble layers. Nat. Mater.; 2016; 15, pp. 1255-1260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat4749]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Heterogeneous integration of dissimilar crystalline materials has recently attracted considerable attention due to its potential for high-performance multifunctional electronic and photonic devices. The conventional method for fabricating heterostructures is by heteroepitaxy, in which epitaxy is performed on crystallographically different materials. However, epitaxial limitations in monolithic growth of dissimilar materials prevent implementation of high quality heterostructures, such as complex-oxides on conventional semiconductor platforms (Si, III-V and III-N). In this work, we demonstrate gallium nitride (GaN) high-electron-mobility transistors with crystalline complex-oxide material enabled by heterogeneous integration through epitaxial lift-off and direct stacking. We successfully integrate high-κ complex-oxide SrTiO3 in freestanding membrane form with GaN heterostructure via a simple transfer process as the gate oxide. The fabricated device shows steep subthreshold swing close to the Boltzmann limit, along with negligible hysteresis and low dynamic on-resistance, indicating very low defect density between the SrTiO3 gate oxide and GaN heterostructure. Our results show that heterogeneous integration through direct material stacking is a promising route towards fabricating functional heterostructures not possible by conventional epitaxy.
Hyun Kum and colleagues report on the heterogeneous integration of high-k single-crystalline strontium titanium oxide within gallium nitride high-electron-mobility transistors. As the dielectric material is epitaxially grown and transferred, they achieve low defect density between the gate oxide and transistor heterostructures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Yonsei University, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Seoul, South Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)
2 Soongsil University, Department of Electronic Engineering, Seoul, South Korea (GRID:grid.263765.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0533 3568)
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)
4 Sejong University, Department of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Engineering, Seoul, South Korea (GRID:grid.263333.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0727 6358)
5 Soongsil University, Department of Electronic Engineering, Seoul, South Korea (GRID:grid.263765.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0533 3568); Soongsil University, Department of Intelligent Semiconductors, Seoul, South Korea (GRID:grid.263765.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0533 3568)
6 Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002); Washington University in St Louis, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, St Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
7 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786); Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)