It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mutations within the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the spike (S) protein are critical for the emergence of successful SARS-CoV-2 viral lineages. The NTD has been repeatedly impacted by deletions, often exhibiting complex and dynamic patterns, such as the recurrent emergence and disappearance of deletions in dominant variants. This study investigates the influence of repair of NTD lineage-defining deletions found in the BA.1 lineage (Omicron variant) on viral success. We performed comparative genomic analyses of more than 10 million SARS-CoV-2 genomes from GISAID to decipher the transmission success of viruses lacking S:ΔH69/V70, S:ΔV143/Y145, or both. These findings were contrasted against a screening of publicly available raw sequencing data, revealing substantial discrepancies between data repositories, suggesting that spurious deletion repair observations in GISAID may result from systematic artifacts. Specifically, deletion repair events were approximately an order of magnitude less frequent in the read-run survey. Our results suggest that deletion repair events are rare, isolated events with limited direct influence on SARS-CoV-2 evolution or transmission. Nevertheless, such events could facilitate the emergence of fitness-enhancing mutations. To explore potential drivers of NTD deletion repair patterns, we characterized the viral phenotype of such markers in a surrogate in vitro system. Repair of the S:ΔH69/V70 deletion reduced viral infectivity, while simultaneous repair with S:ΔV143/Y145 led to lower fusogenicity. In contrast, individual S:ΔV143/Y145 repair enhanced both fusogenicity and susceptibility to neutralization by sera from vaccinated individuals. This work underscores the complex genotype-phenotype landscape of the spike NTD in SARS-CoV-2, which impacts viral biology, transmission efficiency, and immune escape potential, offering insights with direct relevance to public health, viral surveillance, and the adaptive mechanisms driving emerging variants.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
* We contrast the original GISAID survey of deletion repair in BA.1 with an analysis of raw reads, which replace some of the previous haplotype surveys. Figures 1 and 3, Tables 1 and 2 have been updated; Figures 2 and 4 revised aesthetically. Supplemental files and repository accessions have been updated.
* https://doi.org/10.55876/gis8.230801ex
* https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/17032
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer