It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In pediatric dentistry, the enduring success of root-end filling materials employed for the establishment of apical plugs in immature teeth undergoing endodontic intervention is contingent upon their possessing a robust osteoinductive capacity. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to histologically assess the osteoinductive potential of four distinct dental materials, specifically recommended for retrograde filling applications, utilizing an animal hard tissue model. Within the designed experimental model, two bone defects measuring 2 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth were created in both femurs of a cohort comprising 21 male Wistar albino rats. The first defect in the right femur was left blank as the control group, and Neo MTA Plus was placed in the second defect. The EndoSequence BCRRM Fast Set Putty was placed in the first of the defects on the left femur, and Endo Repair was placed in the second defect. Subjects were sacrificed after 7, 14, and 28 days of follow-up, and sections were examined to assess the degree of inflammation, connective tissue formation, and new bone formation. The data were statistically evaluated with Kruskal‒Wallis and post hoc Dunn's tests using SPSS 12 software. The bone healing levels of the Neo MTA Plus group were significantly higher than those of the other groups in all periods (p < 0.05). Bone organization in all groups decreased over time, and fibrous tissue was enriched. The results of this study demonstrate that NeoMta Plus has superior osteoinductive properties compared to other materials but that EndoSequence and Endo Repair have the potential to be developed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Mersin University, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin, Turkey (GRID:grid.411691.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0694 8546)
2 Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey (GRID:grid.466101.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0471 9784)
3 Mersin University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin, Turkey (GRID:grid.411691.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0694 8546)
4 Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Department of Hıstology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Hatay, Turkey (GRID:grid.14352.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0680 7823)
5 Mersin University, Department of Hıstology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey (GRID:grid.411691.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0694 8546)