It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Purpose
Prostate MRI is established for the investigation of patients presenting with suspected early prostate cancer. Outcomes are dependent on both image quality and interpretation. This study assessed the impact of an educational intervention on participants’ theoretical knowledge of the technique.
Methods
Eighty-one clinicians from two centers with varying experience in prostate MRI participated. Baseline knowledge was assessed with 10 written and image-based multiple-choice questions (MCQs) prior to a course including didactic lectures and hands-on interactive workshops on prostate MRI interpretation. Post-course, participants completed a second 10-question MCQ test, matched by format, themes, and difficulty, to assess for any improvement in knowledge and performance. Results were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data.
Results
Thirty-nine participants, including 25/49 (51.0%) and 14/32 (43.8%) at each center completed both assessments, with their results used for subsequent evaluation. Overall, there was a significant improvement from pre- (4.92 ± 2.41) to post-course scores (6.77 ± 1.46), p < 0.001 and at both Copenhagen (5.92 ± 2.25 to 7.36 ± 1.25) and Toronto (3.14 ± 1.51 to 5.71 ± 1.20); p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively. Participants with no prostate MRI experience showed the greatest improvement (3.77 ± 1.97 to 6.18 ± 1.5, p < 0.001), followed by intermediate level (< 500 MRIs reported) experience (6.18 ± 1.99 to 7.46 ± 1.13, p = 0.058), then advanced (> 500 MRIs reported) experience (6.83 ± 2.48 to 7.67 ± 0.82, p = 0.339).
Conclusions
A dedicated prostate MRI teaching course combining didactic lectures and hands-on workshops significantly improved short-term theoretical knowledge of the technique for clinicians with differing levels of experience.
Critical relevance statement
A dedicated teaching course significantly improved theoretical knowledge of the technique particularly for clinicians with less reporting experience and a lower baseline knowledge. The multiple-choice questions format mapped improved performance and may be considered as part of future MRI certification initiatives.
Key points
• Prostate MRI knowledge is important for image interpretation and optimizing acquisition sequences.
• A dedicated teaching course significantly improved theoretical knowledge of the technique.
• Improved performance was more apparent in clinicians with less reporting experience and a lower baseline knowledge.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Department of Radiology, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.120073.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0622 5016)
2 Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Department of Radiology, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.120073.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0622 5016); Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.278247.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0604 5314); National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.260539.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2059 7017)
3 Collective Minds Radiology AB, Danderyd, Sweden (GRID:grid.260539.b)
4 Herlev Gentofte University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Herlev, Denmark (GRID:grid.411646.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0646 7402)
5 University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)