It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Quantum communication networks rely on quantum cryptographic protocols including quantum key distribution (QKD) based on single photons. A critical element regarding the security of QKD protocols is the photon number coherence (PNC), i.e., the phase relation between the vacuum and one-photon Fock state. To obtain single photons with the desired properties for QKD protocols, optimal excitation schemes for quantum emitters need to be selected. As emitters, we consider semiconductor quantum dots, that are known to generate on-demand single photons with high purity and indistinguishability. Exploiting two-photon excitation of a quantum dot combined with a stimulation pulse, we demonstrate the generation of high-quality single photons with a controllable degree of PNC. The main tuning knob is the pulse area giving full control from minimal to maximal PNC, while without the stimulating pulse the PNC is negligible in our setup for all pulse areas. Our approach provides a viable route toward secure communication in quantum networks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details












1 Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Experimentalphysik, Innsbruck, Austria (GRID:grid.5771.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 8122)
2 Technische Universität Berlin, Institute of Solid State Physics, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6734.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 8254)
3 Universität Bayreuth, Theoretische Physik III, Bayreuth, Germany (GRID:grid.7384.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 6972)
4 University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ), Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.499369.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 7671 3509); University of Vienna, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Photonic Quantum Computer, Faculty of Physics, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.10420.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2286 1424)
5 TU Dortmund, Condensed Matter Theory, Department of Physics, Dortmund, Germany (GRID:grid.5675.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0416 9637); Universität Münster, Institut für Festkörpertheorie, Münster, Germany (GRID:grid.5949.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 9288)
6 Johannes Kepler University Linz, Institute of Semiconductor and Solid State Physics, Linz, Austria (GRID:grid.9970.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 1941 5140)
7 TU Dortmund, Condensed Matter Theory, Department of Physics, Dortmund, Germany (GRID:grid.5675.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0416 9637)