It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Using data from the 2017 China Migrants Dynamics Survey, this study employs generalized structural equation modeling to examine the effects of migrants' places of origin and socioeconomic status on their destination choice and access to homeownership in the destination city. The analyses reveal significant disparities in access to homeownership among migrants from different places of origin. Furthermore, the position of the destination city in the urban hierarchy not only has a direct impact on migrants' access to homeownership but also plays an important mediating role. This study highlights the spatial foundations of housing inequality and builds an analytical framework that links spatial mobility with social mobility. Our findings have significant implications for housing policies and practices aimed at improving the housing conditions of new-generation migrants.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 South China Normal University, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Guangzhou, China (GRID:grid.263785.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 7397); East China Normal University, Research Center for China Administrative Division and School of Geographic Sciences, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.22069.3f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0369 6365)
2 East China Normal University, Research Center for China Administrative Division and School of Geographic Sciences, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.22069.3f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0369 6365)
3 University of Amsterdam, Centre for Urban Studies, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 8499 2262)